Abstract
Problems of ecological environment and resources have become an important factor restricting the high-quality development of China’s economy. How to better integrate into the sustainable development model has become an important goal of macro-policy regulation in the transition period. Mining industry is a fundamental industry in China. Strengthening the incentive role of mining innovation is of great importance for ensuring China’s energy security, reducing emissions and promoting economic growth. However, whether environmental regulation can induce technological innovation ability, that is, the existence of Porter effect, is still controversial. It is helpful to study the influence of the Porter hypothesis on mining enterprises for their sustainable development. Based on the data of listed companies in China from 2003 to 2018, and against the background of the SO2 emission trading pilot policy implemented in 2007, this paper studies the incentive effect of the market-incentive environmental regulation on the technological innovation ability of mineral resource enterprises, tests the existence of Porter effect, and discusses the heterogeneity. The results show that the market-incentive environmental regulation has a significant incentive effect on the innovation of mining enterprises, and there is significant Porter effect on mining enterprises. The robustness test confirms the correctness of this conclusion. At the same time, this paper also discusses the variation of the characteristics of heterogeneous enterprises, and finds that enterprises with utility model patents, no low-carbon behavior, and non-provincial cities and regions with high environmental regulation are more sensitive to the SO2 emission trading pilot policy. This paper verifies the incentive effect of the market-incentive environmental regulation on the innovation ability of mining enterprises, and provides a reference for the formulation of innovation incentive policies for mining enterprises in China.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrizio S, Kozluk T, Zipperer V (2017) Environmental policies and productivity growth: evidence across industries and firms. J Environ Econ Manag 81:209–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.06.002
Berman, Eli, Bui, Linda TM (2001) Environmental regulations and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. The Review of Economics Statistics 83:498–510. https://doi.org/10.1162/00346530152480144
Chen H, Yu H, Li J, Song X (2018) The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: theory and empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 195:200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.206
Chen Y, Dou S, Xu D (2021) The effectiveness of eco-compensation in environmental protection-a hybrid of the government and market. J Environ Manag 280:111840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111840
Costantini V, Crespi F, Martini C, Pennacchio L (2015) Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: the case of the biofuels sector. Res Policy 44:577–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.011
Dong Z, Wang H (2019) Local-neighborhood effect of green technology of environmental regulation China Industrial Economics:100–118. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.01.006 (in Chinese)
Du L, Zhao Y, Tao K, Lin W (2019) Compound effects of environmental regulation and governance transformation in enhancing green competitiveness. Econ Res J 54:106–120 (in Chinese)
Fabrizi A, Guarini G, Meliciani V (2018) Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Res Policy 47:1018–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005
Fang K, Wang T, He J, Wang T, Xie X, Tang Y, Shen Y, Xu A (2020) The distribution and drivers of PM2. 5 in a rapidly urbanizing region: the Belt and Road Initiative in focus. Sci Total Environ 716:137010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137010
Fu J, Si X, Cao X (2018) Research on the influence of emission trading mechanism on green development China. Popul Resour Environ 28:12–21. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZGRZ.0.2018-08-002 (in Chinese)
Gao M, Guo S, Xia L (2016) Analysis on the formation and stability of cooperation management alliance of air pollution control among local governments: based on the evolutionary game Chinese. Journal of Management Science 24:62–70. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.08.008 (in Chinese)
Gao Y, Li M, Xue J, Liu Y (2020) Evaluation of effectiveness of China’s carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation. Energy Econ 90:104872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104872
He J (2010) What is the role of openness for China’s aggregate industrial SO2 emission?: A structural analysis based on the Divisia decomposition method. Ecol Econ 69:868–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.10.012
Hille E, Möbius P (2019) Environmental policy, innovation, and productivity growth: controlling the effects of regulation and endogeneity. Environ Resour Econ 73:1315–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0300-6
Hui W, Zhao G (2017) Environmental regulation and pollution haven: an empirical analysis based on panel threshold regression of Chinese provincial data Economic Theory and Business Management:23–33. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJLL.0.2017-02-003 (in Chinese)
Jin G, Shen K (2018) Polluting thy neighbor or benefiting thy neighbor: enforcement interaction of environmental regulation and productivity growth of chinese cities. Manag World 34:43–55. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2018.0032 (in Chinese)
Kang P, Ru S (2020) Bilateral effects of environmental regulation on green innovation China. Popul Resour Environ 30:93–104. https://doi.org/10.12062/cpre.20200415 (in Chinese)
Li Y, Shen K (2008) Effectives of pollution control policies in China: an empirical analysis based on provincial industrial pollution data. Manag World, pp 7–17. https://doi.org/10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2008.07.002 (in Chinese)
Li B, Wu S (2016) Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 153:342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.042
Li Q, Xiao Z (2020) Heterogeneous environmental regulation tools and green innovation incentives: evidence from green patents of listed companies. Econ Res J 55:192–208 (in Chinese)
Li S, Chu S, Shen C (2014) Local government competition, environmental regulation and regional ecological efficiency. The Journal of World Economy 37:88–110. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:SJJJ.0.2014-04-006 (in Chinese)
Ma X, Wang H, Wei W (2019) The role of emissions trading mechanisms and technological progress in achieving China’s regional clean air target: a CGE analysis. Appl Econ 51:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1494807
Montgomery WD (1972) Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J Econ Theory 5:395–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-X
Palmer K, Portney OPR (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9:119–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.119
Porter ME, Linde CVD (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Qi S, Zhang Q, Wang B (2017) Market-oriented incentives to the innovation of new energy companies: evidence from venture capital and companies' patents China. Ind Econ:95–112. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.20171214.009 (in Chinese)
Qi S, Lin S, Cui J (2018) Do environmental rights trading schemes induce green innovation?: Evidence from listed firms in China. Econ Res J 53:129–143 (in Chinese)
Ranocchia C, Lambertini L (2021) Porter hypothesis vs pollution haven hypothesis: can there be environmental policies getting two eggs in one basket? Environ Resour Econ, pp 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00533-x
Ren Y, Fu J (2019) Research on the effect of carbon emissions trading on emission reduction and green development China. Popul Resour Environ 29:11–20. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZGRZ.0.2019-05-002 (in Chinese)
Ren S, Zheng J, Liu D, Chen X (2019) Does emissions trading system improve firm’s total factor productivity: evidence from chinese listed companies China Ind Econ, pp 5–23. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.05.001 (in Chinese)
Shen K, Jin G, Fang X (2017) Does environmental regulation cause pollution to transfer nearby? Econ Res J 52:44–59 https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJYJ.0.2017-05-012 (in Chinese)
Shen C, Li S, Wang X, Liao Z (2020a) The effect of environmental policy tools on regional green innovation: evidence from China. J Clean Prod 254:120122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120122
Shen N, Hu Y, PEeng H (2020b) Can environmental regulation stimulate green innovation? China Popul Resour Environ 30:75–84. https://doi.org/10.12062/cpre.20191117 (in Chinese)
Shi D, Li S (2020) Emissions trading system and energy use efficiency: measurements and empirical evidence for cities at and above the prefecture level China Ind Econ, pp 5–23. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2020.09.001 (in Chinese)
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Musah I (2017) Ozturk I. Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation Energy 124:706–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.089
Stoever J, Weche JP (2017) Environmental regulation and sustainable competitiveness: evaluating the role of firm level green investments in the context of the porter hypothesis. Environ Resour Econ 70:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0128-5
Tan Z, Zhang Y (2015) An empirical research on the relation between fiscal decentralization and environmental pollution. China Popul Resour Environ 25:110–117. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.04.014 (in Chinese)
Tu Z, Chen R (2015) Can emissions trading scheme achieve the Porter effect in China? Econ Res J 50:160–173. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJYJ.0.2015-07-013 (in Chinese)
Wang H, Liu H (2019) Foreign direct investment, environmental regulation, and environmental pollution: an empirical study based on threshold effects for different Chinese regions. Environ Sci Pollut R 26:5394–5409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3969-8
Wang H, Zhang Y (2020) Trade structure upgrading, environmental regulation and green technology innovation in different regions of China China S Sci:174–181. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZGRK.0.2020-02-016 (in Chinese)
Wang X, Ge J, Li J, Han A (2017) Market impacts of environmental regulations on the production of rare earths: a computable general equilibrium analysis for China. J Clean Prod 154:614–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.200
Wang W, Xie P, Li C, Luo Z, Zhao D (2018) The key elements analysis from the mitigation effectiveness assessment of Chinese pilots carbon emission trading system China. Popul Resour Environ 28:26–34. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZGRZ.0.2018-04-004 (in Chinese)
Wang H, Chen Z, Wu X, Nie X (2019a) Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis?: Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method. Energ Policy 129:930–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.007
Wang Y, Sun X, Guo X (2019b) Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors. Energ Policy 132:611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.016
Xiong H, Jing Z, Zhan J (2020) Impact of different environmental regulatory tools on technological innovation of Chinese industrial enterprises above designated size. Resour Sci 42:1348–1360. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:ZRZY.0.2020-07-011 (in Chinese)
Yu DJ, Li J (2021) Evaluating the employment effect of China’s carbon emission trading policy: based on the perspective of spatial spillover. J Clean Prod, pp 126052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126052
Zeng C, Stringer LC, Lv T (2021) The spatial spillover effect of fossil fuel energy trade on CO2 emissions. Energy 223:120038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120038
Zhang H (2016) Strategic interaction of regional environmental regulation: an explanation on the universality of incomplete enforcement of environmental regulation China Industrial Economics:74–90. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2016.07.006 (in Chinese)
Zhang G, Zhang Z, Gao Y, Chen Z, Li B, Du Y (2018) Environmental regulation policy and public health: mediating effect test based on environmental pollution. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice 38:361–373. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:XTLL.0.2018-02-008 (in Chinese)
Zhang K, Xu D, Li S, Zhou N, Xiong J (2019) has china's pilot emissions trading scheme influenced the carbon intensity of output? Int J Env Res Pub He 16:1854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101854
Zhao X, Jiang G, Nie D, Chen H (2016) How to improve the market efficiency of carbon trading: a perspective of China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 59:1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.052
Zheng X, Wang Y, Zhang L (2019) Coordination between government departments and the a llocation of public resources: theory and empirical evidence. Econ Res J, pp 24–40 (in Chinese)
Zhu P, Zhang Z, Jiang G (2011) Empirical study of the relationship between FDI and environmental regulation:an intergovernmental competition perspective. Econ Res J 46:133–145. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:JJYJ.0.2011-06-013 (in Chinese)
Availability of data and materials
The data that support the findings of this study are available from CNIPA, CNRDS, and CSMAR.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72074197, No. 71991482, No. 71991480), the Open Fund Project of Hubei Provincial Research Base for Regional Innovation Capacity Monitoring and Analysis Soft Science (No. HBQY2020z10), and the Major Research Projects of Guangxi Department of Natural Resources in 2019 (Sub-bid C) (No. GXZC2019-G3-25122-GXGL-C).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yi Wei: visualization, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation. Deyi Xu: conceptualization, project administration, supervision, writing—review and editing. Kangkang Zhang: methodology, software, data curation. Jinhua Cheng: resources, validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, Y., Xu, D., Zhang, K. et al. Research on the innovation incentive effect and heterogeneity of the market-incentive environmental regulation on mineral resource enterprises. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 58456–58469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14788-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14788-4