Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Examining the asymmetric socioeconomic determinants of CO2 emissions in China: challenges and policy implications

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A better socioeconomic development is necessary for environmental sustainability. The current study scrutinizes the asymmetric socioeconomic factors of CO2 emissions in China by using the nonlinear ARDL approach. This study is based on annual data covering the period from 1980 to 2019. Results show that positive change in economic growth is the leading driver of CO2 growth, while a negative change in economic growth is offsetting CO2 emissions in China. Concurrently, positive and negative changes in energy consumption have adverse impacts on CO2 emissions in the long term, while negative shock has a small influence on CO2 emissions compared to the positive shock of energy. Positive years of schooling, shocks are found to be beneficial for fighting against CO2 emissions in China in the long run. The CO2 emissions are asymmetrically affected by the social and economic structure of China. Based on these empirical findings, thereby China should improve its socioeconomic development and standards of CO2 emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AhAtil A., Bouheni, FB, Lahiani, A, & Shahbaz M (2019). Factors influencing CO2 emission in China: a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lags investigation.

  • Ahmad M, Khattak SI (2020) Is aggregate domestic consumption spending (ADCS) per capita determining CO2 emissions in South Africa? A New Perspective. Enviro Resour Econ 75(3):529–552

  • Ahmad M, Işık C, Jabeen G, Ali T, Ozturk I, Atchike DW (2021a) Heterogeneous links among urban concentration, non-renewable energy use intensity, economic development, and environmental emissions across regional development levels. Sci Total Environ 765:144527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Khan Z, Anser MK, Jabeen G (2021b) Do rural-urban migration and industrial agglomeration mitigate the environmental degradation across China’s regional development levels? Sustain Produc Consum 27:679–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Muslija A, Satrovic E (2021c) Does economic prosperity lead to environmental sustainability in developing economies. Environmental Kuznets Curve Theory Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Al-mulali U, Lee JY, Mohammed AH, Sheau-Ting L (2013) Examining the link between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emission, and economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean. Renew Sust Energ Rev 26:42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2010a) The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: evidence from the commonwealth of independent states. Energy Policy 38(1):650–655

  • Apergis N, Payne JE (2010b) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy 38(1):656–660

  • Arminen H, Menegaki AN (2019) Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus. Energy Econ 80:621–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam B, Hu J, Majeed MT, Andlib Z, Ullah S (2021) Asymmetric macroeconomic determinants of CO 2 emission in China and policy approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Azam M, Khan AQ, Zafeiriou E, Arabatzis G (2016) Socio-economic determinants of energy consumption: An empirical survey for Greece. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Rev 57:1556–1567

  • Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S (2018) How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 113:356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bano S, Zhao Y, Ahmad A, Wang S, Liu Y (2018) Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan. J Clean Prod 183:1082–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 106(2):407–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Lee JW (2013) A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. J Dev Econ 104:184–198

  • Chandran VGR, Tang CF (2013) The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2 emissions in ASEAN-5 economies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 24:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16(1):147–168

  • Desha C, Robinson D, Sproul A (2015) Working in partnership to develop engineering capability in energy efficiency. J Clean Prod 106:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer I, Rosen MA (1998) A worldwide perspective on energy, environment and sustainable development. Int J Energy Res 22(15):1305–1321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO 2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazli P, Abbasi E (2018) Analysis of the validity of Kuznets curve of energy intensity among D-8 countries: panel-ARDL approach. Int Lett Soc Humanist Sci:81

  • Godoy R, Groff S, O'Neill K (1998) The role of education in neotropical deforestation: household evidence from Amerindians in Honduras. Hum Ecol 26(4):649–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokmenoglu KK, Sadeghieh M (2019) Financial development, CO2 emissions, fossil fuel consumption and economic growth: the case of Turkey. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment 38(4):7-28

  • Gradus R, Smulders S (1993) The trade-off between environmental care and long-term growth—pollution in three prototype growth models. J Econ 58(1):25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of economic research.

  • Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: a panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SAR, Sharif A, Golpîra H, Kumar A (2019) A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development. Sustain Dev 27(6):1063–1075

  • Kwon DB (2009). Human capital and its measurement. In The 3rd OECD World Forum on “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy” Charting Progress, Building Visions, Improving Life 27–30

  • Lan J, Kakinaka M, Huang X (2012) Foreign direct investment, human capital and environmental pollution in China. Environ Resour Econ 51(2):255–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lleras-Muney A (2005) The relationship between education and adult mortality in the United States. Rev Econ Stud 72(1):189–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Gao J, Wang Y, Hu J, Cui P (2018) Ionic liquid-based CO2 capture in power plants for low carbon emissions. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 75:134–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Machin S, Marie O, Vujić S (2011) The crime reducing effect of education. Econ J 121(552):463–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood N, Wang Z, Hassan ST (2019) Renewable energy, economic growth, human capital, and CO 2 emission: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(20):20619–20630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikayilov JI, Galeotti M, Hasanov FJ (2018) The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. J Clean Prod 197:1558–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi B, Lopez NSA, Biona JBM, Chiu AS, Blesl M (2017) Driving forces of Iran's CO2 emissions from energy consumption: an LMDI decomposition approach. Appl Energy 206:804–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mujtaba A, Jena PK (2021) Analyzing asymmetric impact of economic growth, energy use, FDI inflows, and oil prices on CO 2 emissions through NARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–14

  • Munir K, & Ameer A (2018). Effect of economic growth, trade openness, urbanization, and technology on environment of Asian emerging economies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

  • Musibau HO, Shittu WO, & Ogunlan FO (2020). The relationship between environmental degradation, energy use and economic growth in Nigeria: new evidence from non-linear ARDL. International Journal of Energy Sector Management.

  • Musolesi A, Mazzanti M, Zoboli R (2010) A panel data heterogeneous Bayesian estimation of environmental Kuznets curves for CO2 emissions. Appl Econ 42(18):2275–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oryani B, Koo Y, Rezania S, Shafiee A (2021) Investigating the asymmetric impact of energy consumption on reshaping future energy policy and economic growth in Iran using extended Cobb-Douglas production function. Energy 216:119187

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2016) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, and foreign trade relationship in Cyprus and Malta. Energy Sources Part B Econ Planning Policy 11(4):321–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pablo-Romero MDP, Sánchez-Braza A (2015) Productive energy use and economic growth: energy, physical and human capital relationships. Energy Econ 49:420–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raggad B (2020) Economic development, energy consumption, financial development, and carbon dioxide emissions in Saudi Arabia: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(17):21872–21891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman A, Ma H, Chishti MZ, Ozturk I, Irfan M, Ahmad M (2021) Asymmetric investigation to track the effect of urbanization, energy utilization, fossil fuel energy and CO 2 emission on economic efficiency in China: another outlook. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(14):17319–17330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rist G. (2008). The history of development.

  • Salahuddin M, Gow J (2014) Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Energy 73:44–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salim R, Yao Y, Chen GS (2017) Does human capital matter for energy consumption in China? Energy Econ 67:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebri M, Ben-Salha O (2014) On the causal dynamics between economic growth, renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and trade openness: fresh evidence from BRICS countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 39:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manag 27(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Sharma R, Sinha A, Jiao Z (2021) Analyzing nonlinear impact of economic growth drivers on CO2 emissions: designing an SDG framework for India. Energy Policy 148:111965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shao S, Liu J, Geng Y, Miao Z, Yang Y (2016) Uncovering driving factors of carbon emissions from China’s mining sector. Appl Energy 166:220–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, pp 281–314

  • Shittu WO, Musibau H, Hassan S (2018) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia: the interactive roles of deforestation and urbanisation. Int J Green Econ 12(3-4):272–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah S, Apergis N, Usman A, Chishti MZ (2020a) Asymmetric effects of inflation instability and GDP growth volatility on environmental quality in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–13

  • Ullah S, Ozturk I, Usman A, Majeed MT, Akhtar P (2020b) On the asymmetric effects of premature deindustrialization on CO2 emissions: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res:1–11

  • Usman A, Ullah S, Ozturk I, Chishti MZ, Zafar SM (2020) Analysis of asymmetries in the nexus among clean energy and environmental quality in Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(17):20736–20747

  • Wang Q, Han X (2021) Is decoupling embodied carbon emissions from economic output in Sino-US trade possible? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 169:120805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Jiang R (2019) Is China’s economic growth decoupled from carbon emissions? J Clean Prod 225:1194–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang K, Wei YM (2014) China’s regional industrial energy efficiency and carbon emissions abatement costs. Appl Energy 130:617–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Zhang F (2021) The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth–evidence from 182 countries. J Clean Prod 279:123838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Yin F, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2012) An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: evidence from Beijing city, China. Appl Energy 100:277–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Su M, Li R (2018a) Toward to economic growth without emission growth: the role of urbanization and industrialization in China and India. J Clean Prod 205:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Zhao M, Li R, Su M (2018b) Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions from economic growth: a comparative study of China and the United States. J Clean Prod 197:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Wood J, Wang Y, Geng X, Long X (2020) CO2 emission in transportation sector across 51 countries along the Belt and Road from 2000 to 2014. J Clean Prod 266:122000

  • Xu SC, Zhang L, Liu YT, Zhang WW, He ZX, Long RY, Chen H (2017) Determination of the factors that influence increments in CO2 emissions in Jiangsu, China using the SDA method. J Clean Prod 142:3061–3074

  • Yan Q, Wang Y, Li Z, Baležentis T, Streimikiene D (2019) Coordinated development of thermal power generation in Beijing-Tianjin- Hebei region: Evidence from decomposition and scenario analysis for carbon dioxide emission. J Clean Prod 232:1402–1417

  • Yang L, Wang J, Shi J (2017) Can China meet its 2020 economic growth and carbon emissions reduction targets? J Clean Prod 142:993–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Ivanovski K, Inekwe J, Smyth R (2019) Human capital and energy consumption: evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ 84:104534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamula I, Kireitseva A (2013) Environmental liabilities arising from the transactions with atmospheric air as an accounting object. Econ Soc 6(2):190–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhidong L (2010) Quantitative analysis of sustainable energy strategies in China. Energy Policy 38(5):2149–2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Fu J, Kong Y, Wu R (2018) How foreign direct investment influences carbon emissions, based on the empirical analysis of Chinese urban data. Sustainability 10(7):2163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, China

    Yexing Yin

  2. Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, 610066, Sichuan, China

    Xinruo Xiong

  3. Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Sana Ullah

  4. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Islamabad, Pakistan

    Sidra Sohail

Authors
  1. Yexing Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xinruo Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sana Ullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sidra Sohail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This idea was given by Yexing Yin. Xinruo Xiong, Yexing Yin, Sidra Sohail, and Sana Ullah analyzed the data and wrote the complete paper, while Yexing Yin and Sana Ullah read and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yexing Yin or Sidra Sohail.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, Y., Xiong, X., Ullah, S. et al. Examining the asymmetric socioeconomic determinants of CO2 emissions in China: challenges and policy implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 57115–57125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14608-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14608-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation