Abstract
Environmental pollution caused by carbon emissions is an emerging issue to study among researchers. The nexus between environmental pollution and carbon emissions has motivated researchers to evaluate the impact of cleaner energy on carbon emissions. This study further contributes to the research by examining the above relationship by studying the asymmetric influence of nuclear energy (NE), industrial productivity (IP), and economic growth rate (GDP) on carbon emissions (CO2) in India from 1975 to 2018 using the asymmetric autoregressive distribution lag approach. The results of the bound test and the Wald test show that in the long run, there is an asymmetric relationship between CO2, NE, GDP, and IP, and in the short run, there is a symmetric relationship between CO2, GDP, and IP. The result implies that increased usage of nuclear energy over fossil fuels and improvement in industrial productivity, in the long run, reduces CO2 emission in India. Furthermore, the study concludes that the government should consider the asymmetric relationship between the variables and devise appropriate policies to increased nuclear energy and industrial productivity in India for environmental sustainability.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-021-14365-9/MediaObjects/11356_2021_14365_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-021-14365-9/MediaObjects/11356_2021_14365_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-021-14365-9/MediaObjects/11356_2021_14365_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11356-021-14365-9/MediaObjects/11356_2021_14365_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Alam A (2013) Nuclear energy, CO2 emissions and economic growth: the case of developing and developed countries. J Econ Stud 40: 822–834
Aijaz Syed A (2021) The asymmetric relationship between military expenditure, economic growth and industrial productivity: an empirical analysis of India, China and Pakistan Via the NARDL approach. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica 13(1). https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v13.n1.2021.4
Apergis N, Payne JE (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Econ 34(3):733–738
Baek J (2016) Do nuclear and renewable energy improve the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Ecol Indic 66:352–356
Bölük G, Mert M (2015) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:587–595
BP, BP Statistical Review of World Energy (2018) https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp- stats-review-2018-full-report.pdf
Broock WA, Scheinkman JA, Dechert WD, LeBaron B (1996) A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econom Rev 15(3):197–235
Chen S, Santos-Paulino AU (2013) Energy consumption restricted productivity re-estimates and industrial sustainability analysis in post-reform China. Energy Policy 57:52–60
Danish, Wang Z (2019) Investigation of the ecological footprint’s driving factors: what we learn from the experience of emerging economies. Sustain Cities Soc 49
Danish B, Zhang B, Wang ZW (2017) Role of renewable energy and non- renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 156:855e864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203
Destek MA (2016) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth in newly industrialized countries: evidence from asymmetric causality test. Renew Energy 95:478–484
Dong K, Sun R, Jiang H, Zeng X (2018) CO2 emissions, economic growth, and the environmental Kuznets curve in China: what roles can nuclear energy and renewable energy play? J Clean Prod 196:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.271
EIA (2016) International Energy Outlook 2016. Independent Statistics & Analysis, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Granger CW, Yoon G (2002) Hidden cointegration. U of California, Economics Working Paper, (2002–02)
Hassan ST, Salah-Ud-Din khan Danish, Awais Baloch M, Tarar ZH (2020) Is nuclear energy a better alternative for mitigating CO2 emissions in BRICS countries? An empirical analysis. Nucl Eng Technol 52:2969–2974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.05.016
IAEA (2016) Nuclear power and the Paris Agreement. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna
IAEA (2019a) International atomic energy agency | atoms for peace and development. https://www.iaea.org/. Accessed 12 Feb 2019
IAEA, Climate change and nuclear power (2018). https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/CCNAP-2018_web.pdf 2019b. Accessed 8 February 2019
IEA. Energy Technology Perspectives; OECD/IEA: Paris, France, 2015.
Ishida H (2018) Can nuclear energy contribute to the transition toward a low-carbon economy? $ the Japanese case.
Iwata H, Okada K, Samreth S (2012) Empirical study on the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from OECD countries. Appl Econ 44(27):3513–3519
Jaforullah M, King A (2015) Does the use of renewable energy sources mitigate CO2 emissions? A reassessment of the US evidence. Energy Econ 49:711–717
Jin T, Kim J (2018) What is better for mitigating carbon emissions–renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 91:464–471
Khan SUD, Ahmad A (2021) Testing the pollution haven hypothesis on the pathway of sustainable development: Accounting the role of nuclear energy consumption. Nucl Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.02.008
Khan MWA, Panigrahi SK, Almuniri KSN, Soomro MI, Mirjat NH, Alqaydi ES (2019) Investigating the dynamic impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on renewable energy production: evidence from FMOLS and DOLS tests. Processes 7(8):496
Lau LS, Choong CK, Ng CF, Liew FM, Ching SL (2019) Is nuclear energy clean? Revisit of environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in OECD countries. Econ Model 77:12–20
Lee S, Kim M, Lee J (2017) Analyzing the impact of nuclear power on CO2 emissions. Sustainability 9(8):1428
Mahmood N, Danish WZ, Zhang B (2020) The role of nuclear energy in the correction of environmental pollution: evidence from Pakistan. Nucl Eng Technol 52(6):1327–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.11.027
McKie RE (2020) An environmental harm perspective to examine our understanding of UK nuclear energy expansion. Extractive Ind Soc 7(2):556–564
Meo MS, Khan VJ, Ibrahim TO, Khan S, Ali S, Noor K (2018) Asymmetric impact of inflation and unemployment on poverty in Pakistan: new evidence from asymmetric ARDL cointegration. Asia Pac J Soc Work Dev 28(4):295–310
Narayan PK (2005) The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 37(17):1979–1990
Nathaniel, SP, Bekun FV (2020) Environmental management amidst energy use, urbanization, trade openness, and deforestation: The Nigerian experience. J Public Aff 20(2):e2037
Nathaniel S, Khan S (2020) Public health financing, environmental quality, and the quality of life in Nigeria. J Public Aff 20(3):e2103
Ozcan B, Ulucak R (2020) An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emission in India: Bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses. Nucl Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.12.008
Ozturk I (2017) Measuring the impact of alternative and nuclear energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and oil rents on specific growth factors in the panel of Latin American countries. Prog Nucl Energy 100:71–81
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16(3):289–326
Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346
Salim RA, Hassan K, Shafiei S (2014) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic activities: further evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ 44:350–360
Sarkodie SA, Adams S (2018) Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Sci Total Environ 643:1590–1601
Shin Y, Yu B, Greenwood-Nimmo M (2014) Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer, New York, pp 281–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
Stock JH, Watson MW (2012) Introduction to econometrics (Vol. 3). New York: Pearson
Sun C, Ding D, Yang M (2017) Estimating the complete CO2 emissions and the carbon intensity in India: from the carbon transfer perspective. Energy Policy 109:418–427
Tiwari AK (2011) A structural VAR analysis of renewable energy consumption, real GDP and CO2 emissions: evidence from India. Econ Bull Access Econ 31(2):1793–1806
Ullah A, Zhao X, Abdul Kamal M, Zheng, J (2020) Environmental regulations and inward FDI in China: Fresh evidence from the asymmetric autoregressive distributed lag approach. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2218
Ullah A, Zhao X, Kamal MA, Zheng J (2020b) Modeling the relationship between military spending and stock market development (a) symmetrically in China: an empirical analysis via the NARDL approach. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 554:124106
Waheed R, Sarwar S, Wei C (2019) The survey of economic growth, energy consumption and carbon emission. Energy Rep 5:1103–1115
WNA (2018) Nuclear power in India. World Nuclear Association (WNA). http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/india.aspx. Accessed 31 march 2021
Xu Y, Kang J, Yuan J (2018) The prospective of nuclear power in China. Sustainability 10(6):2086
Yeh JC, Liao CH (2017) Impact of population and economic growth on carbon emissions in Taiwan using an analytic tool STIRPAT. Sustain Environ Res 27(1):41–48
Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):251–270
Data Source
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge all the anonymous referees and participants for contributing to the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Aamir Aijaz Syed (A.S.S), Muhammad Abdul Kamal (M.A.K), Ravindra Tripathi (R.T). Conceptualization, A.S.S; methodology, A.S.S and M.A.K; validation, A.S.S, M.A.K, and R.T; writing original draft preparation, A.S.S, M.A.K, and R.T; writing review and editing, A.S.S, M.A.K, and R.T. Finally all authors have contributed equally to the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to participate
Not Applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Syed, A.A., Kamal, M.A. & Tripathi, R. An empirical investigation of nuclear energy and environmental pollution nexus in India: fresh evidence using NARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 54744–54755 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14365-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14365-9