Abstract
Nowadays, paying attention to globalization and the consumption of renewable energy on the ecological footprint is one of the most important issues in the world. In the age of globalization, all countries are trying to prevent the spread of ecological degradation by enacting laws and regulations at the national level and regulating international agreements. This study investigates the effect of explanatory variables of globalization, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural production on the ecological footprint in emerging countries using fixed-effect panel quantile regression of 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th in the period 2002 to 2016. The results showed that the consumption of renewable energy at all levels except the 25th quantile has a positive and significant effect on the ecological footprint; this effect is more in higher quantiles. Globalization in all quantiles has a negative and significant impact on the ecological footprint and has had the most excellent effect among other explanatory variables. Agricultural production variable at the 25th and 50th quantile levels had the most significant and positive effect on the ecological footprint. Therefore, it can be concluded that the increase in agricultural production, income, renewable energy consumption, population, and trade openness can lead to increased environmental degradation. However, the effects of globalization have had the most negligible negative impact on the ecological footprint.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abid M (2016) Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy 41:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.009
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2015) The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy 84:382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004
Andrews DW, Phillips PC (1987) Best median-unbiased estimation in linear regression with bounded asymmetric loss functions. J Am Stat Assoc 82:886–893 http://cowles.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/pub/d07/d0786
Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? Am Econ Rev 91:877–908. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.877
Apergis N, Payne JE (2009) CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 37:3282–3286 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(09)00221-3
Asongu SA, Odhiambo NM (2019a) Environmental degradation and inclusive human development in sub-Saharan Africa. Sustain Dev 27:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1858
Asongu SA, Odhiambo NM (2019b) Basic formal education quality, information technology, and inclusive human development in sub-Saharan Africa. Sustain Dev 27:419–428. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3278442
Balducci F, Impedovo D, Pirlo G (2018) Machine learning applications on agricultural datasets for smart farm enhancement. Machines 6:38. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines6030038
Balogh JM, Jámbor A (2020) The environmental impacts of agricultural trade: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 12:1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031152
Beyer RM, Manica A, Rademacher TT (2018) Relocating agriculture could drastically reduce humanity’s ecological footprint. BioRxiv 488841. https://doi.org/10.1101/488841
Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
Bouhajeb M, Mefteh H, Ben Ammar R (2018) Higher education and economic growth: the importance of innovation. Atlantic RevEconomics (ARoEc) 1
Chen S-T, Chang H-T (2016) Factors that affect the ecological footprint depending on the different income levels. AIMS Energy 4:557–573. https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2016.4.557
Clancy JS (2008) Urban ecological footprints in Africa. Afr J Ecol 46:463–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.01041.x
Cole MA (2006) Does trade liberalization increase national energy use? Econ Lett 92:108–112
Curutchet G, Grinberg S, Gutiérrez RA (2012) Degradación ambiental y periferia urbana: un estudio transdiciplinario sobre la contaminación en la región metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Ambiente & sociedade 15:173–194. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2012000200010
Daigle C, Vasseur L (2019) Is it time to shift our environmental thinking? A perspective on barriers and opportunities to change. Sustainability 11:5010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185010
Danish (2019) Moving toward sustainable development: the relationship between water productivity, natural resource rent, international trade, and carbon dioxide emissions. Sustain Dev 28:540–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2007
Dedeoğlu D, Kaya H (2013) Energy use, exports, imports and GDP: new evidence from the OECD countries. Energy Policy 57:469–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.016
Destek MA, Ozsoy FN (2015) Relationships between economic growth, energy consumption, globalization, urbanization and environmental degradation in Turkey. International Journal of Energy and Statistics 3:1550017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2335680415500179
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1074–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.006
Dollar D, Kraay A (2004) Trade, growth, and poverty. Econ J 114:F22–F49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x
Dreher A, Gaston N, Martens P (2008): Measuring globalisation. Gauging its consequences Springer, New York.
Enfedaque ND, Martínez JMD (2014) El impacto económico de los desastres naturales. eXtoikos:99–101
Etokakpan MU, Adedoyin F, Vedat Y, Bekun FV (2020) Does globalization in Turkey induce increased energy consumption: insights into its environmental pros and cons. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:26125–26140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08714-3
Galli A, Lin D, Wackernagel M, Gressot M, Winkler S (2015): Humanity’s growing ecological footprint: sustainable development implications. Global Footprint Network.
Ge X, Zhou Z, Zhou Y, Ye X, Liu S (2018) A spatial panel data analysis of economic growth, urbanization, and NOx emissions in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040725
Hasanov FJ, Khan Z, Hussain M, Tufail M (2021) Theoretical framework for the carbon emissions effects of technological progress and renewable energy consumption. Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2175
Herrmann IT, Hauschild MZ (2009) Effects of globalisation on carbon footprints of products. CIRP Ann 58:13–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.078
Hussain HI, Haseeb M, Tvaronavičienė M, Mihardjo LW, Jermsittiparsert K (2020) The causal connection of natural resources and globalization with energy consumption in top Asian countries: evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantile approach. Energies 13:2273. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092273
Hynes W, Wang S (2012) Green growth and developing countries: a summary for policymakers. Document DCD/DAC 2012:27
Ibrahiem DM, Hanafy SA (2020) Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy consumption and globalization: an empirical analysis. Management of Environmental Quality: An Int J 31:1549–1568. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2020-0029
Ike GN, Usman O, Alola AA, Sarkodie SA (2020) Environmental quality effects of income, energy prices and trade: the role of renewable energy consumption in G-7 countries. Sci Total Environ 137813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137813
Irfan ZB, Faisal AS (2021) A cross-national analysis of the factors impacting the coastal ecological footprint. Water Productivity Journal 1:51–64
Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of econometrics 90:1–44
Kattumuri R (2018) Sustaining natural resources in a changing environment: evidence, policy and impact. Taylor & Francis 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017.1418903
Kirikkaleli D, Adebayo TS, Khan Z, Ali S (2020) Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11654-7
Klein LR, Marquez JR (1985): Economic theory and econometrics. Univ of Pennsylvania Pr
Koenker R, Bassett G Jr (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica: J Econometric Soc 46:33–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643
Koenker R, Hallock KF (2001) Quantile regression. J Econ Perspect 15:143–156 https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.143
Koenker R, Xiao Z (2002) Inference on the quantile regression process. Econometrica 70:1583–1612. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00342
Kozlova M, Collan M, Luukka P (2015) Renewable energy in emerging economies: shortly analyzing the Russian incentive mechanisms for renewable energy investments. Proceed Int Res Conference GSOM Emerging Markets Conference: Business and Government Perspectives 2016:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7836784
Leal PH, Marques AC, Shahbaz M (2020) The role of globalisation, de jure and de facto, on environmental performance: evidence from developing and developed countries. Environ Dev Sustain:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00923-7
Levine S, Kendall K (2006) Energy efficiency and conservation: opportunities, obstacles, and experiences. Vt J Envtl L 8:101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
Li J-X, Chen Y-N, Xu C-C, Li Z (2019) Evaluation and analysis of ecological security in arid areas of Central Asia based on the emergy ecological footprint (EEF) model. J Clean Prod 235:664–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.005
Lopes GP Jr (2015) The Sino-Brazilian principles in a Latin American and BRICS context: the case for comparative public budgeting legal research. Wis Int l LJ 33:1
Lustigová L, Kuskova P (2006) Ecological footprint in the organic farming system. ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA-PRAHA 52:503
Ma Y, Chen Z, Shinwari R, Khan Z (2021) Financialization, globalization, and Dutch disease: is Dutch disease exist for resources rich countries? Res Policy 72:102048
Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:631–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631
Majeed MT (2018) Information and communication technology (ICT) and environmental sustainability in developed and developing countries. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 12:758–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09704-1
Marasinghe D (2014): Quantile regression for climate data.
Martínez E, Sanz F, Pellegrini S, Jiménez E, Blanco J (2009) Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine. Renew Energy 34:667–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.020
Meraya AM, Dwibedi N, Tan X, Innes K, Mitra S, Sambamoorthi U (2018) The dynamic relationships between economic status and health measures among working-age adults in the United States. Health Econ 27:1160–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3664
Mesino Rivero L (2009) La globalización económica y sus implicaciones socio-culturales en América Latina. Revista de ciencias sociales 15:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782011000200006
Mostafa MM (2010) A Bayesian approach to analyzing the ecological footprint of 140 nations. Ecol Indic 10:808–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.01.002
Musibau HO, Nepal R, Vespignani J, Yanotti M (2020): The moderating role of green energy and energy-innovation in environmental Kuznets: insights from quantile-quantile analysis. Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper. 10.24149/gwp385
Nathaniel SP (2020): Ecological footprint, energy use, trade, and urbanization linkage in Indonesia. GeoJournal, 1-14. 1007/s10708-020-10175-7
Owusu PA, Asumadu-Sarkodie S (2016) A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng 3:1167990
Paltasingh KR, Goyari P (2018) Statistical modeling of crop-weather relationship in India: a survey on evolutionary trend of methodologies. Asian J Agric Dev 15:43–60. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.275688
Pao H-T, Tsai C-M (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38:7850–7860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045
Pehnt M (2006) Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renew Energy 31:55–71
Ren H, Zhou W, Ki N, Gao W, Wu Q (2010) Multi-objective optimization for the operation of distributed energy systems considering economic and environmental aspects. Appl Energy 87:3642–3651
Robert J, Castañeda K (2014): Las ciencias sociales frente a las problemáticas medio-ambientales: apuntes de un primer encuentro. Lima, 12 de noviembre de 2014. Bulletin de l'Institut français d'études andines, 668-674. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2002.000929, 17, 23
Rosen MA (2002) Energy efficiency and sustainable development. Int J Global Energy Issues 17:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2002.000929
Sabir S, Gorus MS (2019) The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:33387–-33398
Saleem N, Shujah-ur-Rahman JZ (2019) The impact of human capital and biocapacity on environment: environmental quality measure-through ecological footprint and greenhouse gases. J Pollut Eff Cont 7(237):10.35248/2375–4397.19.7.237
Sarkodie SA, Adams S (2018) Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Sci Total Environ 643:1590–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.320
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2019) Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 646:862–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.365
Saud S, Chen S, Haseeb A (2020) The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. J Clean Prod 250:119518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119518
Shahbaz M, Sbia R, Hamdi H, Ozturk I (2014) Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecol Indic 45:622–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.022
Shahbaz M, Mallick H, Mahalik MK, Loganathan N (2015) Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecol Indic 52:379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.025
Shaw TM, Cooper AF, Chin GT (2009) Emerging powers and Africa: implications for/from global governance? Politikon 36:27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340903155385
Steers RJ, Funk JL, Allen EB (2011) Can resource-use traits predict native vs. exotic plant success in carbon amended soils? Ecol Appl 21:1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2345.1
Stern DI (2007) The effect of NAFTA on energy and environmental efficiency in Mexico. Policy Stud J 35:291–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00221.x
Usman O, Akadiri SS, Adeshola I (2020a) Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:30681–30693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09170-9
Usman O, Akadiri SS, Adeshola I (2020b) Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09170-9
Victoria Flores M (2016) Globalization as a political, economic and social phenomenon. ORBIS 12:26–41
Wang S, Fang C, Wang Y, Huang Y, Ma H (2015) Quantifying the relationship between urban development intensity and carbon dioxide emissions using a panel data analysis. Ecol Indic 49:121–131. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103416
Wang Z, Rasool Y, Asghar MM, Wang B (2019) Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: empirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:36248–36263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06556-2
WTO (2018) World Trade Statistical Rev:2017
Xu B, Lin B (2018) What cause large regional differences in PM2.5 pollutions in China? Evidence from quantile regression model. J Clean Prod 174:447–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.008
Xu R, Xu L, Xu B (2017) Assessing CO2 emissions in China's iron and steel industry: evidence from quantile regression approach. J Clean Prod 152:259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.009
Yilanci V, Gorus MS (2020) Does economic globalization have predictive power for ecological footprint in MENA counties? A panel causality test with a Fourier function. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:40552–40562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10092-9
York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. Am Sociol Rev 68:279–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519769
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR, Mirza FM, Hou F, Kirmani SAA (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Res Policy 63:101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428
Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.003
Availability of data and materials
No availability of data
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.E.S., A.R., and E.K. drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to participate
This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent for publication
The authors affirm the informed consent for publication of the article.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salari, T.E., Roumiani, A. & Kazemzadeh, E. Globalization, renewable energy consumption, and agricultural production impacts on ecological footprint in emerging countries: using quantile regression approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 49627–49641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14204-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14204-x