Abstract
As a global environmental pollutant, mercury (Hg) threatens our water resources and presents a substantial risk to human health. The rate and extent of immobilization of Hg2+ (hereafter, Hg) on engineered sorbents (Thiol-SAMMS®, pine biochar, SediMite™, Organoclay™ PM-199, and quartz sand as a control) was evaluated using flow-through column experiments. The effectiveness of the sorbents was based on (1) the percentage of Hg removed in relation to the total amount of Hg passing the sorbent column, and (2) the rate of Hg uptake compared to the nonreactive tracer bromide (Br−). All sorbents removed Hg to a certain extent, but none of the sorbents removed all the Hg introduced to the columns. Thiol-SAMMS showed the highest mean percentage of Hg removed (87% ± 2.9%), followed by Organoclay PM-199 (71% ± 0.4%), pine biochar (57% ± 22.3%), SediMite (61% ± 0.8%), and the control quartz sand (11% ± 5.6%). Thiol-SAMMS was the only sorbent to exhibit retardation of Hg in comparison to the conservative tracer Br−. For the remaining sorbents, Br− along with low concentrations of Hg were eluted within the first 3 pore volumes, indicating limited retardation of Hg. Overall, removal of Hg by sorbents was substantial, suggesting that sorbents might be suitable for deployment in contaminated environments. High concentrations of DOM leaching from the soil columns likely influenced the speciation of Hg and inhibited sorption to the sorbents. Incomplete removal of Hg by any sorbent suggests that additional optimization is needed to increase efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Mercury (Hg) is a global pollutant that threatens our water resources and poses a significant risk to human health. Anthropogenic activities, including mining, industrial use, and fossil fuel combustion, have increased Hg flux into the atmosphere (Streets et al. 2011, 2017) and unintentionally increased Hg input to watersheds, lakes, and oceans. Mercury is converted in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems between various forms, which include elemental Hg0, inorganic mercuric Hg2+ (dissolved and particulate), and organomercurials (e.g., methylmercury). Monomethylmercury (MeHg) is not typically released into the environment; it is formed through the conversion of inorganic Hg2+ to MeHg by anaerobic bacteria and archaea (Gilmour et al. 2013a; Parks et al. 2013; Podar et al. 2015). The conversion of Hg0 and Hg2+ to highly toxic MeHg in combination with bioaccumulation and biomagnification in aquatic environments leads to significant risks to environmental and human health (Clarkson 1998; Morel et al. 1998).
Engineered sorbents are used for the removal of heavy metals from industrial waste streams and in situ stabilization in contaminated subsurface environments. While remediation strategies using in situ sorbent amendments have been successfully demonstrated for many organic contaminants (Ghosh et al. 2011), large-scale applications of sorbents to remediate Hg remain limited. Studies have aimed to reduce the bioavailability of Hg for methylation and the bioaccumulation of MeHg (Gilmour et al. 2013b). Sorbents investigated include functionalized mesoporous silica (Fryxell et al. 1999), organocation-modified clay, brass (Wenke et al. 2016), and carbon-based materials such as activated carbon and biochar (Gilmour et al. 2013b; Gomez-Eyles et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2016, 2017; Paulson et al. 2018). Mineral or polymer scaffolds with high surface areas and functionalized with reactive ligands may effectively capture dissolved phase metals from solution (Chen et al. 1999; Crockett et al. 2016; Say et al. 2008).
Amending soils with activated carbon and biochar has been successful in field studies (Asasian et al. 2012; Beesley et al. 2010; Ghosh et al. 2011; Gilmour et al. 2013b, 2018; Gomez-Eyles et al. 2013). A year-long in situ amendment of SediMite in a salt marsh reduced MeHg concentrations, and to a lesser extent total Hg, in pore waters (Gilmour et al. 2018). Activated carbon and biochar materials produced from renewable, low-cost biomass feedstocks show low inherent toxicity (Janssen and Beckingham 2013; Jonkers et al. 2010) and effectively reduce the diffusive flux of contaminants into the water column, which also reduces bioavailability to organisms (Gilmour et al. 2013a). However, natural organic matter and sulfide species may compete with sorbents for the binding of Hg, including MeHg, which can reduce the effectiveness of a sorbent treatment. Natural organic matter is ubiquitous in aquatic environments and consists of a complex, heterogeneous continuum of particulates and high- to low-molecular weight species with different solubilities and variable reactivities towards Hg species (Aiken et al. 2011; Dong et al. 2011; Haitzer et al. 2003).
The impact of dissolved organic matter (DOM) on the effectiveness of sorbent materials considered for Hg remediation in soils and sediments is significant (Johs et al. 2019). Carbon-based materials (pine biochar, SediMite) and engineered materials such as functionalized clays (Organoclay PM-199 and Organoclay MRM) and mesoporous silica (Thiol-SAMMS) were evaluated using sorption isotherms, but the presence of DOM dramatically impeded Hg2+ sorption onto all sorbents (Johs et al. 2019). Differences in effectiveness between sorbents were also observed, e.g., the thiol-based Thiol-SAMMS under these conditions exhibited approximately twice the capacity of SediMite, which is an activated carbon-based sorbent. Organoclays and SediMite also released variable amounts of anions, specifically sulfate, which can enhance Hg2+ methylation by sulfate-reducing bacteria (Gilmour et al. 1992). Taking into consideration sorption efficiency, anion release, potential ecotoxicity, and cost considerations, carbon-based sorbents are promising candidates for the remediation of mercury-contaminated aquatic systems (Gilmour et al. 2013b; Johs et al. 2019).
Hardwood biochar was used to control the release of Hg2+ from sediments and floodplain soils in the South River watershed in Virginia (Paulson 2014). The sorption of Hg and MeHg was evaluated in laboratory experiments by connecting two columns in series (Paulson 2014). The “source column” contained Hg-bearing sediment and the second “treatment column” contained Cowboy Charcoal produced from pyrolysis. The treatment column was loaded with Hg, disconnected, and then subjected to clean influent solutions, and the extent of Hg release was measured. A decline in the dissolved Hg concentrations from the treatment column was observed over time, indicating strong efficacy of the sorbent for retaining Hg (Paulson 2014).
Engineered sorbents can reduce aqueous Hg concentrations and limit the formation of MeHg from aqueous systems. In this study, Hg-contaminated soil was leached to provide a source of aqueous labile Hg that retained properties of complexed Hg present in the environment. The leachate was then introduced into sorbent columns containing either Thiol-SAMMS, pine biochar, SediMite, Organoclay PM-199, or quartz sand as a control. The column method enables evaluation of both the rate and the extent of Hg sorption for each sorbent, and to our knowledge, no similar studies exist involving more than one sorbent. A nonreactive tracer was used to approximate the rate of Hg elution from the columns, and mass balance was used to calculate the extent of sorption. Mercury released in the soil column leachate was hypothesized to be captured effectively until the sorbent reached its maximum capacity.
Materials and methods
Mercury source
Mercury-contaminated soils (~ 22 kg) were collected from the creekbank of East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC) in Oak Ridge, TN, USA, at a location 18.49 km (36° 00′ 24″ N, 84° 16′ 51″ W) upstream from the mouth of the creek (Brooks and Southworth 2011; Dickson et al. 2019; Southworth et al. 2013). The soil samples were mixed, homogenized, and stored at 4 °C until use. The total Hg concentration in the homogenized soil sample (determined by acid digestion as described below) was 1158 ± 534 mg Hg kg−1 dry weight (mean ± standard deviation, n = 2).
Sorbents
Thiol-SAMMS consists of mesoporous silica support that is covalently modified with a self-assembled monolayer of thiol-functionalized organosilanes resulting in high surface area and high sorption capacity for rapid adsorption of Hg and other soft metal ions (Chen et al. 1999; Fryxell et al. 1999; Liu et al. 1998) (Table 1). Organoclay PM-199 (CETCO, Hoffman Estates, IL, USA) is a phyllosilicate clay modified with organocations and is commonly used for the remediation of hydrophobic organics. Biochar is produced by slow pyrolysis of Colorado pine softwood at 650 °C (BiocharNow, LLC, Loveland, CO, USA). SediMite (Sediment Solutions, LLC, Ellicott City, MD, USA) is a blend of 50% activated carbon along with bentonite clay, starch binders, and quartz sand pressed into pellets.
Column experiments
Laboratory-scale soil columns were used to mobilize Hg in leachate from the contaminated creekbank soils. The soils were packed into acrylic flow columns (Soil Measurement Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) having an inner diameter of 7.5 cm and a length of 26.7 cm. A small amount of clean, acid-washed quartz sand (IOTA, Unimin Corp., New Canaan, CT, USA) was applied at the bottom (~ 45 g) to ensure even distribution of influent and the columns were packed with ~ 2-cm-thick layers of field-moist soil and gently compressed. Finally, a layer of quartz sand was added to the top (~ 45 g) of the column to prevent any soil from mobilizing with the column effluent.
After assembly, the soil columns were purged with CO2 from the bottom to displace the air inside the column and inhibit the formation of gas bubbles that can cause preferential flow (Xue et al. 1997). An artificial creek water (ACW) solution was designed to mimic the water chemistry of EFPC (Table 2). Soil column influent solutions were connected to a Deltec 3000 (Smiths Medical MD, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) modular infusion pump to introduce the ACW to the bottom of the column at a flow rate of 5 mL h−1 in order to saturate the column. After saturation, the flow rate was changed to 20 mL h−1 for the entire duration of the experiment.
Eight sorbents and two quartz sand (IOTA, Unimin Corp., New Canaan, CT, USA) columns were constructed with a similar design as the soil columns, only having an inner diameter of 2 cm and a length of 9 cm. The sorbent and sand columns were packed by slowly adding each sorbent or sand while tapping the columns to minimize the formation of void spaces. SediMite pellets are designed to disintegrate into fine powder over time when in contact with a liquid. Therefore, clogging was minimized by packing the SediMite columns with a 2-cm layer of quartz sand at the bottom, followed by a 4-cm layer of SediMite, mixed with sand to eliminate any void spaces, and then adding another 2-cm layer of sand. The top 1 cm of the column remained empty to allow the sorbent to expand. The sorbent and sand columns were saturated with ACW following the same procedure used for the soil columns.
After column assembly, packing with sorbents, saturation with ACW, and nonreactive tracer tests (see below), either sorbent or sand columns were attached to the effluent end of the soil columns, so that the Hg-contaminated effluent served as the source of Hg to the bottom of the sorbent or sand columns (Fig. 1). Flow direction was bottom to top in all columns in order to minimize entrapment of air and flow bypassing the media. After the experiments were completed, the columns were disassembled for the measurement of dry bulk density (ρb) and porosity (ϕ). The soil, sand, and sorbents were dried in an oven at 70 °C for 2 days and the volume inside the column was measured to determine the ρb of each soil column. Porosity was calculated as follows:
The density of the particles (ρP) was assumed to be 2.65 g cm−3 for the soil columns. Since the ρP for the sorbent materials was not known, the following equation was used to determine porosity:
The water volume (VW) was determined by weighing the column packed with the dry and saturated sorbent. The total volume of the column (VT) was calculated from the inner diameter and column height.
Effluent sample collection
Three-way valves were placed at the effluent ends of both soil and the sorbent columns to facilitate sample collection. Samples were collected by diverting the flow into sample collection tubes of 7 or 50 mL, respectively. The 7-mL samples were collected daily for total Hg analysis. The 50-mL samples were collected approximately every 2 days for analyses of pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), specific ultraviolet absorbance at a wavelength of 254 nm (SUVA254), anions, and metals. The 50-mL samples were split into three aliquots: a 5-mL aliquot for pH and anions, a second 5-mL aliquot that was preserved with 0.2 mL of 12 M HCl for DOC and SUVA254 analyses, and a third 5-mL aliquot that was preserved with 0.015 mL of 16 M HNO3 for metals analyses. All samples were stored at 4 °C until analysis.
Nonreactive tracer experiments
Nonreactive tracer experiments were conducted in the sorbent and sand columns using bromide (Br−) to quantify the basic hydraulic properties of the columns and to ensure that bypass flow along the walls of the columns was minimal (Mayes et al. 2003). Bromide was applied only to the sorbent columns and not to the soil columns because only the transport properties of the sorbent columns were needed (i.e., the sole purpose of the soil columns was to serve as a source of aqueous Hg). Bromide application was completed before the soil and sorbent columns were connected. The Br− data are presented in relative pore volumes, which represents the volume of solution eluted compared to the total pore volume of the saturated pores in the columns; thus, one pore volume means that the amount of solution displaced is equivalent to the volume of water inside the sorbent column (Table 3). A three-way valve at the lower sorbent column boundary was used to make an instantaneous switch from the flowing ACW to a flowing solution of ACW with 10 mg L−1 Br− added as KBr, using two different pumps each set to a flow of 20 mL h−1. Bromide was passed through each sand and sorbent column for 2 h, and effluent samples of 2 mL each were collected using a Spectra/Chrom CF-2 fraction collector (Spectrum Chromatography, Houston, TX, USA). After 2 h, the valve was switched back to the ACW to allow all of the applied Br− to elute, while still collecting samples with the fraction collector. After the Br− experiments were completed, the sorbent columns were attached to the outlet of the soil columns to allow Hg-containing soil column leachate to enter the sorbent columns. The initial breakthrough of both Hg and Br− is presented as relative pore volumes so that their rates of elution can be directly compared to each other. The Br− tracer is represented as relative concentration, i.e., the concentration of the tracer in the effluent over the initial concentration (CEff/CIn). We present the initial breakthrough of Hg and Br− on the same figure to qualitatively compare the rates of Br− and Hg breakthrough to each other.
Convective-dispersive transport equation
The convective-dispersive (CDE) equation (Parker and Van Genuchten 1984) was used to determine the hydraulic and geochemical transport parameters using the CXTFIT Excel code (Tang et al. 2010). The CDE transport model is defined (Parker and Van Genuchten 1984) as:
where C refers to resident concentrations in the pore water [M L−3], R is the retardation factor [−], D is the dispersion coefficient [L2 T−1], v is the average pore velocity [L T−1], μ is the first-order decay coefficient [T−1], X is the distance from the column inlet [L], and T is the time.
The transport equation can be reconfigured to represent non-equilibrium processes, such as diffusive exchange between mobile and immobile sites (MIM) or slow and fast reaction sites (2-site model). The MIM and the 2-site model are mathematically equivalent (Toride et al. 1999) in the formulation below:
The aqueous concentrations in the mobile and immobile pores where the fluid is transported or retained (Geiser 2015) sites are Cm and Cim, respectively. The mobile water fraction and the dimensionless mass transfer coefficient are represented by β and ω respectively, and P is the Peclet number [−] (Toride et al. 1999). The Peclet number (Eq. 6) is defined as:
where v [L T-1] is the mean pore water velocity and L is the column length [L]. The known parameters (inputs) for the CDE (Eqs. 7 and 8) are v and the pulse volume T0 [−] of the Br− influent (Tang et al. 2010) (Table 2). They are calculated from the effective porosity θ [−] (Eq. 2), Darcy velocity q [L T-1], pulse duration to [T], and L.
CXTFIT Excel estimates equilibrium and non-equilibrium parameters using a nonlinear least squares method (Tang et al. 2010). As a result of model fitting (Eqs. 9–12), we obtained dispersivity λ [L], R, β, and ω:
Using the outputs of the MIM, we calculated the fraction of mobile water (F), the linear partition coefficient Kd [M T−1] which represents partitioning to the solid phase, and the mass transfer coefficient (α) [T−1] which represents the rate of exchange between the mobile and immobile fractions (Table 3).
Solution analyses
The pH of the samples was measured using a benchtop pH meter Orion Dual Star (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was measured using a total organic carbon analyzer TOC-L CPH (Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). The baseline-corrected UV absorbance at a wavelength of 254 nm (A254) was measured using a Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the specific UV absorbance (SUVA254) was calculated from the ratio of A254 and DOC concentration (Weishaar et al. 2003). Concentrations of anions were measured using a reagent-free ion chromatography system Dionex ICS-2100 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Dissolved metal concentrations (Al, Fe, Mn, and Si) were measured using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer ELAN 6100 (PerkinElmer Sciex Instrument LLC, Norwalk, CT, USA).
Total mercury in samples was analyzed following EPA Method 1631 (USEPA 2002). Briefly, 200 μL of 2 M BrCl was added to 5 mL of sample and left to react overnight to quantitatively oxidize all mercury in the sample to the Hg(II) oxidation state. An aliquot was then added to 5 mL of 0.8% (w/v) stannous chloride in 0.5% HCl and purged with ultra-high purity N2. The emerging Hg0 was quantified by a cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CV-AAS) Zeeman effect Hg analyzer (RA-915+, Ohio Lumex Company, Inc., Twinsburg, OH, USA), which was calibrated with a set of Hg(NO3)2 standards (Brooks Rand Instruments, Seattle, WA, USA). The detection limit was 10 ng L−1. All samples were analyzed in duplicate.
Bromide concentrations were determined using a colorimetric assay adapted from Lepore and Barak (2009). Two stock solutions were prepared; 2.45 mM chloramine trihydrate and 1.63 mM phenol red (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). A buffer stock was prepared consisting of 0.5 M of sodium acetate, 0.5 M of glacial acetic acid, and 12.3 mM of ammonium acetate and adjusted to pH 4.6. The buffer stock and phenol red stock solutions were mixed immediately at a 1:1 (v/v) ratio before use. In a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube, 870 μL of the Br− standard or sample was added to 65 μL of the phenol red-buffer mixture, followed by the addition of 65 μL of chloramine trihydrate. The mixture was allowed to react for 30 min. The solution was then transferred to a 1-mL cuvette and the absorbance at 590 nm was recorded using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer.
Statistical analyses were performed using the data analysis tools as implemented in Microsoft Excel. Two-sample t tests were conducted with a significance level of p = 0.05.
Results
Rate of Hg transport
From modeling the Br− breakthrough curves with the MIM, all dispersivity (λ) values were < 1 cm, and all retardation factors (R) were < 2.0. Quartz sand and pine biochar had a mobile water fraction (F) of 0.94 and 0.97, respectively, and a relatively fast mass transfer coefficient α (> 20 h−1) (Table 3). ThiolSAMMS had an F of 0.47 and SediMite had an F of 0.56, and each had correspondingly low α (< 1 h−1).
In the quartz sand, SediMite, and pine biochar columns, Br− and Hg breakthroughs are nearly simultaneous (Fig. 2a–c). Significant retardation of Hg was observed in the Thiol-SAMMS columns, with breakthrough occurring at 7 and 70 pore volumes in the two duplicate columns, neither of which are visible in Fig. 2d. Unexpectedly, Organoclay PM-199 was highly reactive to Br− such that Br− did not elute from the columns. The breakthrough of Hg occurred at 3 and 7 pore volumes in the Organoclay PM-199 sorbent (Fig. 2e).
Extent of Hg removal
Mercury concentrations in all the effluents eventually reached an approximate steady state, but the steady-state concentrations in the sorbent effluents were less than the effluent concentrations from the soils (Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7). The soil effluent curves represent the total Hg concentration that entered the sorbent columns over time. The sorbent (or sand) curves indicate the total Hg concentrations in the effluent of the sorbent (or sand) columns. The total mass of Hg sorbed by each sorbent (or sand) column is, therefore, the difference between the mass eluting from the soil column and the mass eluting from the sorbent (or sand) column (Table 4). For the sand columns, we observed only small differences between the Hg concentrations in the soil versus the sand column effluents (Fig. 3). The percentage of Hg sorbed to the two sand columns was generally low, only 15% and 7.5% respectively, which was in line with the expected low capacity of sand for retaining Hg (Table 4). This result is consistent with the similar timing of breakthrough of Hg and Br− (Fig. 2a), whereas the breakthrough of Hg was rapid and occurred within the first two pore volumes for each of the sand columns.
Among all sorbent columns, Thiol-SAMMS (Fig. 4) removed the highest percentage of Hg, 85% and 89%, respectively (Table 4), which was consistent with the observed strong retardation of Hg (Fig. 2d). For the pine biochar columns, there was a difference in the effluent Hg concentrations between the two soil columns (Fig. 5). The average concentrations of Hg entering the pine biochar columns were 815 pg mL−1 and 467 pg mL−1, respectively, corresponding to a maximum concentration of 1996 pg mL−1 for column A and 961 pg mL−1 for column B (Fig. 5). The average percentage of Hg retained in the pine biochar columns was 73% and 41%, respectively (Table 4), where the column that removed 73% of the Hg was exposed to a higher Hg concentration. The percentage of Hg retained in the SediMite columns was 61% for both columns (Fig. 6) and 71% for Organoclay PM-199 (Fig. 7, Table 4).
Chemistry of effluent solutions
The differences in DOC, pH, reactive metal, and anion concentrations between the soil and sorbent effluents were evaluated to gain insights into factors controlling Hg sorption in the sorbent columns. DOC concentrations were averaged over the entire experiment for each soil and sorbent column effluent pair (Fig. 8a). Small but statistically significant differences between the DOC concentrations in the effluents of the soil and sorbent columns were only observed for pine biochar and Organoclay PM199 columns (Table 5).
The SUVA254 reflects the degree of aromaticity of DOC (Weishaar et al. 2003). Thus, it is an indicator of organic carbon quality and has been used to characterize Hg mobilization into surface waters from source areas (Burns et al. 2013). The mean concentration and standard deviation of SUVA254 in the soil and sorbent column effluents were measured and then averaged for each soil and sorbent column effluent pair (Fig. 8b). Pine biochar was the only sorbent that showed a small but statistically significant difference between soil and sorbent column effluents (Table 5). Overall, we observed a small increase in the SUVA254 values in the sorbent column effluents and a decrease in DOC concentrations over time, indicating increasing aromaticity with time. This increase suggests a small amount of preferential sorption of the non-aromatic DOM fraction in comparison to the aromatic fraction. The concentrations of other metals (Al, Fe, Mn, and Si), pH, and anions (Cl−, SO42−, and NO3−) in the sorbent column effluents did not change in comparison to effluent from the soil columns (Goñez-Rodríguez 2018) (Table 6).
Discussion
Transport modeling and the rate of Hg transport
Bromide eluent curves were fit with the MIM to determine the hydraulic and geochemical parameters λ, R, F, and α (Levy and Chambers 1987). Dispersivity is a measurement of the rate of flow distribution through a system per unit length (Payne et al. 2008), and informs the extent of preferential flow, e.g., flow along the walls of the columns or bypassing of the sorbent media (Mayes et al. 2003). The values of λ were all < 1 cm (Table 3), which is substantially less than the column length of 9 cm, indicating minimal bypass flow. In soils, Br− is usually a true conservative tracer, but engineered sorbents designed to retain solutes all exhibited some reactivity towards Br−. The retardation factor R, therefore, represented the reduction in the velocity of the mass of Br− due to the reaction with the sorbent material. Thiol-SAMMS and SediMite showed the lowest and highest retardation factors, 1.40 and 1.70, respectively (Table 3). Thus, while Br− was not entirely nonreactive (i.e., R = 1), its retardation with most sorbents was low. Only Organoclay PM-199 retained a substantial fraction of the added Br−, preventing determination of the hydraulic properties of the columns with this sorbent.
The fraction of mobile water F and the mass transfer coefficient α represent the proportion of “mobile” or “fast” reaction sites, and the exchange between these sites, respectively, in the MIM model (Tang et al. 2010). The model does not distinguish between the physical processes of mobile and immobile flow regions, and chemical processes of slow and fast reaction sites (Toride et al. 1999). Biochar and sand both had F~1 and a fast α, suggesting that the rate of transfer between the mobile and immobile fractions was very quick, indicating an approximate equilibrium (Tang et al. 2010). Thiol-SAMMS and SediMite both had F values near 0.50 and a slower α (Table 3), suggesting that there were two interacting regions having substantially different flow rates or reaction rates inside the columns and that the rate of exchange between the two regions was kinetically-limited (Mayes et al. 2003). For Thiol-SAMMS, this finding likely reflects the intraporosity of the functionalized monolayer emplaced on a mesoporous silica support bed, i.e., the design of the material involves both faster and slower reaction sites. SediMite was sandwiched in between two layers of quartz sand to minimize the clogging of the columns because the sorbent is designed to disarticulate in the presence of water. Therefore, finding relatively mobile and immobile regions in these two materials is consistent with the chemical and physical properties of the materials and the column design. In contrast, neither pine biochar nor sand has any properties that would be expected to result in multi-region flow or reactions, and no multi-region flow was observed. The results of the transport modeling suggest that the Br− is a meaningful indicator of the sorption and transport characteristics of the sorbents, and therefore the Br− breakthrough curves are a useful indicator of flow and transport in the columns for comparison to Hg.
In many cases, including pine biochar, SediMite, and sand, Hg breakthrough approximately coincided with Br−, indicating very limited retention of Hg. Unfortunately, much greater sample volumes were required for analysis of breakthrough curves for Hg compared to the Br− tracer and the experiments did not result in a sufficient number of samples to use the MIM to calculate the retardation of Hg. Thus, our determination of the retardation of Hg is qualitative. However, for pine biochar and SediMite sorbents, Hg breakthrough occurred slightly before the Br− breakthrough (Fig. 2b, c). The almost immediate elution of Hg from the sorbent columns illustrates that the sorbent could not retain all of the Hg to which it was exposed. Based on the modeled λ values, it is unlikely that the limited retardation of Hg is a result of bypass flow. Hg breakthrough for Thiol-SAMMS occurred after 7 and 70 pore volumes in the two duplicate columns (Fig. 4b), respectively. The results demonstrate that the sorbents tested in this study, with the notable exception of Thiol-SAMMS, did not effectively slow the rate of transport of Hg.
Extent of Hg removal
The mass balance of eluted and sorbed Hg (Table 4) demonstrated substantial removal of Hg. None of the sorbents, however, were able to remove 100% of the applied Hg. Thiol-SAMMS showed the highest percentage removed, 85% and 89%. A higher variability between duplicates was observed for pine biochar, with 73% and 41% removed. This difference is likely due to heterogeneities in the soil columns which served as a source of Hg. The pine biochar column that removed a higher percentage of Hg was also exposed to a higher Hg concentration. Similar behavior was observed in another column study (Desrochers 2013), where the capacity of the sorbent for Hg uptake was also a function of the initial Hg concentration to which it was exposed. The columns containing quartz sand removed 15% and 7.5%, respectively, demonstrating that the sorbent columns were much more effective than the controls.
A column experiment using Hg-contaminated sediment from South River, Virginia, (USA) determined the potential of Cowboy Charcoal as a sorbent, and a much higher percentage of Hg was removed (> 98%) compared to the current study (Paulson 2014). The column size and geometry were similar to the present study, and the low λ values observed here do not suggest preferential transport. The higher flow rate in the present study could have imparted kinetic limitations on Hg reactions with the surface, but kinetic reaction rates on these sorbents are not yet available. The efficacy of sorbents is, however, influenced by particle size. In this case, the particle size of the pine biochar ranged from 0.65 to 3 mm, while the particle size of Cowboy charcoal was < 2 mm (Paulson 2014). The Cowboy charcoal most likely removed a higher percentage of Hg because the material had a smaller particle size representing a larger surface area for Hg retention, hence the difference in the effectiveness of the materials. In addition, differences in the Hg speciation between soil leachates from South River and EFPC bank soils could have influenced removal efficiencies, but the accurate determination of Hg speciation in soil leachates is very challenging and was not completed for either study.
Solid-solution partitioning
The linear equilibrium partition coefficient (Kd) is a commonly used parameter describing the effectiveness of sorbents and can be used to compare the amount of contaminant that can be removed under specific system conditions. While for many inorganic solutes partitioning reactions are controlled by changes in concentration and pH, the solid-liquid partitioning of trace level contaminants, such as Hg, is controlled by chemical speciation and the presence of competing ligands. The formation of strong complexes between Hg and DOM dominates Hg speciation in low sulfide environments and is a result of strong complexation of Hg with reduced sulfur (thiol) functional groups in DOM (Haitzer et al. 2002; Skyllberg 2008; Aiken et al. 2011; Dong et al. 2011). Thus, DOM can be considered a competing ligand, which influences Hg partitioning between solution and sorbents. High levels of DOM present in soil effluents may facilitate the mobilization of Hg and also limit the sorption of Hg species by sorbent materials. The role of mercury speciation and matrix effects on Hg removal efficiency was evaluated in a previous study (Johs et al. 2019). In a series of batch experiments, Kd values for the removal of Hg for the same sorbents used in the present study were determined by comparing the sorption of aqueous Hg(II) species to a well-defined Hg-DOM complex. This Hg-DOM complex was prepared by equilibrating Hg(II) with Suwannee River aquatic natural organic matter with known chemical composition and is representative of natural organic matter found across a wide range of environments (Green et al. 2015). This comparison of Kd values for Hg-DOM complexes with DOM-free aqueous Hg(II) species demonstrates that DOM limits the partitioning of Hg between solution and sorbents. Overall, Kd values for the Hg-DOM complex were up to two orders of magnitude lower compared to Kd values for aqueous Hg (II) species (Johs et al. 2019). The results from the column experiments in the present study are consistent with previous findings in batch experiments. For example, Thiol-SAMMS had the highest percentage of Hg removed from the sorbent columns (Table 4) and also exhibited the highest Kd in batch experiments (Johs et al. 2019). However, there are distinct differences between Kd and the total amount of Hg retained in column experiments. Based on the results from batch experiments with Hg-DOM, the Kd values for the sorbents can be ranked in the order of Thiol-SAMMS > SediMite > pine biochar > Organoclay PM-199 (Johs et al. 2019). In the present column study, the Hg retained by sorbents can be ranked in the order of Thiol-SAMMS > pine biochar ≈ Organoclay PM-199 > SediMite > > quartz sand. These results suggest that while the partitioning coefficient is an excellent indicator for the affinity of the sorbent for Hg, it is not a good indicator for the Hg sorption capacity of a sorbent.
Mechanism of Hg removal
We evaluated differences in the chemical composition of soil and sorbent column effluents to examine potential mechanisms controlling Hg sorption. In comparing the soil and sorbent effluents, there were no significant changes in pH or the concentrations of major anions or cations, demonstrating that the sorbents did not alter the composition of the mobile phase by preferentially sorbing certain ions (Table 6). On average, most of the sorbent effluents showed a small decrease in the DOC concentration compared to the sorbent influents, but the difference was statistically significant only for pine biochar and Organoclay PM-199 (Table 5, Fig. 8a). The small decrease in DOC concentrations suggests very limited sorption of DOM. A general increase in the SUVA254 with a decrease in DOC in the sorbent column effluents of the pine biochar columns over time (Fig. 8b) suggests that pine biochar selectively removed some non-aromatic compounds from the DOM. The increasing SUVA254 values also correlate with increasing Hg concentrations in the effluent of the pine biochar columns, which might suggest that the sorption of Hg associated with the aromatic DOM fraction occurred to a lesser extent compared to the non-aromatic fraction. However, these differences were very small. We previously investigated the partitioning of DOM to the sorbents in batch experiments (Johs et al. 2019) and found that partition coefficients for DOC are generally one to two orders of magnitude lower compared to Hg partition coefficients. Therefore, Hg sorption in the soil effluents does not appear to be controlled by the direct sorption of DOM. The results for both the batch and column experiments consistently show that DOM limits Hg partitioning to the sorbents, but does not prevent it. Considering the large excess of DOM over Hg in solution and minimal observed changes in solution chemistry (anions, cations, DOC or SUVA254), we hypothesize two potential sorption mechanisms: (1) Selective sorption of Hg species, where the sorbent materials may sorb a subset of Hg species present in the soil effluents, or (2) a ligand exchange mechanism, where functional groups on the sorbent compete with existing Hg ligands in DOM for the binding of Hg. Future studies to identify Hg speciation and relevant functional groups on sorbent samples could help unravel Hg sorption mechanisms on a molecular level.
Conclusions
The goal of this study was to evaluate the immobilization of Hg by engineered sorbents to reduce ambient concentrations in water leaching from contaminated soils. All the sorbents tested removed Hg to a certain extent (> 60%) from soil leachates, but none removed all of the Hg to which they were exposed. Few changes were observed in pH, DOC, SUVA254, or the concentrations of anions and cations in response to Hg sorption. While Thiol-SAMMS was the most effective sorbent of those tested, the present data suggest that a small fraction of the total Hg in the soil effluents remains in solution indicating that Hg speciation and DOM are important factors controlling removal efficiency. However, more research is needed to determine the molecular basis of Hg sorption mechanisms. Because of site-specific variabilities and our limited understanding of specific sorption mechanisms, additional optimization and in situ experiments should be performed to enable the use of sorbents to remove Hg from natural waters.
Data availability
Samples of the soils and the sorbents are available by request to the corresponding author. The data from this experiment will be made publicly available through a DOI at ORNL upon publication.
References
Aiken GR, Hsu-Kim H, Ryan JN (2011) Influence of dissolved organic matter on the environmental fate of metals, nanoparticles, and colloids. Environ Sci Technol 45(8):3196–3201
Asasian N, Kaghazchi T, Soleimani M (2012) Elimination of mercury by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from the biomass material. J Ind Eng Chem 18(1):283–289
Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Gomez-Eyles JL (2010) Effects of biochar and greenwaste compost amendments on mobility, bioavailability and toxicity of inorganic and organic contaminants in a multi-element polluted soil. Environ Pollut 158(6):2282–2287
Brooks SC, Southworth GR (2011) History of mercury use and environmental contamination at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant. Environ Pollut 159(1):219–228
Burns DA, Aiken GR, Bradley PM, Journey CA, Schelker J (2013) Specific ultra-violet absorbance as an indicator of mercury sources in an Adirondack River basin. Biogeochemistry 113(1–3):451–466
Chen XB, Feng XD, Liu J, Fryxell GE, Gong ML (1999) Mercury separation and immobilization using self-assembled monolayers on mesoporous supports (SAMMS). Sep Sci Technol 34(6–7):1121–1132
Clarkson TW (1998) Human toxicology of mercury. J Trace Elem Exp Med 11(2–3):303–317
Crockett MP, Evans AM, Worthington MJH, Albuquerque IS, Slattery AD, Gibson CT, Campbell JA, Lewis DA, Bernardes GJL, Chalker JM (2016) Sulfur-limonene polysulfide: a material synthesized entirely from industrial by-products and its use in removing toxic metals from water and soil. Angew Chem Int Edit 55(5):1714–1718
Desrochers K (2013) Characterization and assessment of stabilization mechanisms for mercury-contaminated riverbank sediments from the South River,Virginia (USA). University of Waterloo, Ontario
Dickson JO, Mayes MA, Brooks SC, Mehlhorn TL, Lowe KA, Earles JK, Gonez-Rodriguez L, Watson DB, Peterson MJ (2019) Source relationships between streambank soils and streambed sediments in a mercury-contaminated stream. J Soils Sediments 19(4):2007–2019
Dong WM, Bian YR, Liang LY, Gu BH (2011) Binding constants of mercury and dissolved organic matter determined by a modified ion exchange technique. Environ Sci Technol 45(8):3576–3583
Fryxell GE, Liu J, Mattigod S (1999) Self-assembled monolayers on mesoporous supports (SAMMS)—an innovative environmental sorbent. Mater Technol 14(4):188–191
Geiser J (2015) Modelling approach for mobile and immobile transport problems with multiple time-scales. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(1):635–639
Ghosh U, Luthy RG, Cornelissen G, Werner D, Menzie CA (2011) In-situ sorbent amendments: a new direction in contaminated sediment management. Environ Sci Technol 45(4):1163–1168
Gilmour C, Bell T, Soren A, Riedel G, Riedel G, Kopec D, Bodaly D, Ghosh U (2018) Activated carbon thin-layer placement as an in situ mercury remediation tool in a Penobscot River salt marsh. Sci Total Environ 621:839–848
Gilmour CC, Henry EA, Mitchell R (1992) Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in fresh-water sediments. Environ Sci Technol 26(11):2281–2287
Gilmour CC, Podar M, Bullock AL, Graham AM, Brown SD, Somenahally AC, Johs A, Hurt RA, Bailey KL, Elias DA (2013a) Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments. Environ Sci Technol 47(20):11810–11820
Gilmour CC, Riedel GS, Riedel G, Kwon S, Landis R, Brown SS, Menzie CA, Ghosh U (2013b) Activated carbon mitigates mercury and methylmercury bioavailability in contaminated sediments. Environ Sci Technol 47(22):13001–13010
Gomez-Eyles JL, Yupanqui C, Beckingham B, Riedel G, Gilmour C, Ghosh U (2013) Evaluation of biochars and activated carbons for in situ remediation of sediments impacted with organics, mercury, and methylmercury. Environ Sci Technol 47(23):13721–13729
Goñez-Rodríguez L (2018) Mercury mobilization from contaminated creek bank soils and stabilization using engineered sorbents. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Green NW, McInnis D, Hertkorn N, Maurice PA, Perdue EM (2015) Suwannee River natural organic matter: isolation of the 2R101N reference sample by reverse osmosis. Environ Eng Sci 32(1):38–44
Haitzer M, Aiken GR, Ryan JN (2002) Binding of mercury(II) to dissolved organic matter: the role of the mercury-to-DOM concentration ratio. Environ Sci Technol 36(16):3564–3570
Haitzer M, Aiken GR, Ryan JN (2003) Binding of mercury(II) to aquatic humic substances: influence of pH and source of humic substances. Environ Sci Technol 37(11):2436–2441
Janssen EML, Beckingham BA (2013) Biological responses to activated carbon amendments in sediment remediation. Environ Sci Technol 47(14):7595–7607
Johs A, Eller VA, Mehlhorn TL, Brooks SC, Harper DP, Mayes MA, Pierce EM, Peterson MJ (2019) Dissolved organic matter reduces the effectiveness of sorbents for mercury removal. Sci Total Environ 690:410–416
Jonkers HM, Thijssen A, Muyzer G, Copuroglu O, Schlangen E (2010) Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol Eng 36(2):230–235
Lepore BJ, Barak P (2009) A colorimetric microwell method for determining bromide concentrations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73(4):1130–1136
Levy BS, Chambers RM (1987) Bromide as a conservative tracer for soil-water studies. Hydrol Process 1(4):385–389
Liu J, Feng XD, Fryxell GE, Wang LQ, Kim AY, Gong ML (1998) Hybrid mesoporous materials with functionalized monolayers. Adv Mater 10(2):161-+
Liu P, Ptacek CJ, Blowes DW, Finfrock YZ, Gordon RA (2017) Stabilization of mercury in sediment by using biochars under reducing conditions. J Hazard Mater 325:120–128
Liu P, Ptacek CJ, Blowes DW, Landis R (2016) Stabilization of mercury in sediment by using biochars under reducing conditions. J Hazard Mater 308:233–242
Mayes MA, Jardine PM, Mehlhorn TL, Bjornstad BN, Ladd T, Zachara JM (2003) Transport of multiple tracers in variably saturated humid region structured soils and semi-arid region laminated sediments. J Hydrol 275(3–4):141–161
Morel FMM, Kraepiel AML, Amyot M (1998) The chemical cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:543–566
Parker JC, van Genuchten MT (1984) Determining transport parameters from laboratory and field tracer experiments. Va Agr Exp Stat B 84–3:1–96
Parks JM, Johs A, Podar M, Bridou R, Hurt RA, Smith SD, Tomanicek SJ, Qian Y, Brown SD, Brandt CC, Palumbo AV, Smith JC, Wall JD, Elias DA, Liang LY (2013) The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science 339(6125):1332–1335
Paulson KMA (2014) Methylmercury production in riverbank sediments of the South River, Virginia (USA) and assessment of biochar as a mercury treatment option. University of Waterloo, Ontario
Paulson KMA, Ptacek CJ, Blowes DW, Gould WD, Ma J, Landis RC, Dyer JA (2018) Role of organic carbon sources and sulfate in controlling net methylmercury production in riverbank sediments of the south river, VA (USA). Geomicrobiol J 35(1):1–14
Payne FC, Quinnan JA, Potter ST (2008) Remediation hydraulics. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006841 432 pp
Podar M, Gilmour CC, Brandt CC, Soren A, Brown SD, Crable BR, Palumbo AV, Somenahally AC, Elias DA (2015) Global prevalence and distribution of genes and microorganisms involved in mercury methylation. Sci Adv 1(9):e1500675
Say R, Birlik E, Erdemgil Z, Denizli A, Ersoz A (2008) Removal of mercury species with dithiocarbamate-anchored polymer/organosmectite composites. J Hazard Mater 150(3):560–564
Skyllberg U (2008) Competition among thiols and inorganic sulfides and polysulfides for Hg and MeHg in wetland soils and sediments under suboxic conditions: illumination of controversies and implications for MeHg net production. J Geophys Res-Biogeo 113, Issue G2. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000745
Southworth G, Mathews T, Greeley M, Peterson M, Brooks S, Ketelle D (2013) Sources of mercury in a contaminated stream-implications for the timescale of recovery. Environ Toxicol Chem 32(4):764–772
Streets DG, Devane MK, Lu ZF, Bond TC, Sunderland EM, Jacob DJ (2011) All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human activities. Environ Sci Technol 45(24):10485–10491
Streets DG, Horowitz HM, Jacob D, Lu ZF, Levin L, ter Schure AFH, Sunderland EM (2017) Total mercury released to the environment by human activities. Environ Sci Technol 51(11):5969–5977
Tang GP, Mayes MA, Parker JC, Jardine PM (2010) CXTFIT/Excel-A modular adaptable code for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty analysis for laboratory or field tracer experiments. Comput Geosci-Uk 36(9):1200–1209
Toride N, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MTh (1999) The CXTFIT code for estimating transport parameter from laboratory or field tracer experiments. Research Report No. 137, U.S. Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA, p 119
USEPA (2002) Method 1631 Revision E: mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. EPA-821-R-02-019. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, August 2002, 38 p
Weishaar JL, Aiken GR, Bergamaschi BA, Fram MS, Fujii R, Mopper K (2003) Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Technol 37(20):4702–4708
Wenke A, Bollen A, Richard JH, Biester H (2016) Potential of brass to remove inorganic hg(II) from aqueous solution through amalgamation. Water Environ Res 88(6):531–539
Xue SK, Chen SL, Selim HM (1997) Modeling alachlor transport in saturated soils from no-till and conventional tillage systems. J Environ Qual 26(5):1300–1307
Funding
This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management (ORO-EM) and URS | CH2M Oak Ridge LLC (UCOR) and is a product of ORNL’s Mercury Remediation Technology Development Program. ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle, LLC, for the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LGR performed the experiments and statistical analysis at Oak Ridge National Laboratory during the pursuit of a Master of Science (MS) degree from the University of Tennessee (UT). FEL was the head of the MS committee at UT, with AJ, KEC, and MAM serving as committee members. MAM, AJ, KAL, and LGR are participants in the ORNL project that sponsored the research, and MAM designed the experiment with input from all authors. KAL provided technical assistance in sample collection, and in experimental design and analyses. LGR wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to subsequent revisions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Kitae Baek
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Goñez-Rodríguez, L., Johs, A., Lowe, K.A. et al. Evaluation of engineered sorbents for the sorption of mercury from contaminated bank soils: a column study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 22651–22663 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12073-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12073-4