Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carbon emissions performance trend across Chinese cities: evidence from efficiency and convergence evaluation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving carbon emissions performance in Chinese cities is a crucial way to promote China’s sustainable development. Employing the super-efficiency SBM model, we first estimate the carbon emissions efficiency (CEE) of 262 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2016. Then we study and explain the club convergence of CEE combining Markov and spatial Markov models and Moran’s I test method. The results show that CEE has improved, especially for the western and northeastern cities. The efficiency of the northwest cities is low, while those of the central and coastal cities are relatively high. Club convergence exists in China’s urban CEE. Cities with high- and low-level efficiency have much higher convergence levels. There are significant spatial agglomeration and spillover effects in China’s urban CEE, contributing to the club convergence. Our analysis suggests that “cross-border” cooperation and communication between cities in different clubs should be highly promoted. Cities in high-level efficiency clubs are encouraged to play its role in radiating the lower-level cities. And the Chinese government is encouraged to strengthen carbon emissions mitigation in low-level areas through combining the green “Belt and Road” construction with the establishment of a national carbon market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1Some cities are not included in the dataset due to data availability and abnormal value issue. In total, there are 293 prefecture-level cities in China in 2016.

  2. 2The classification criterion of this article is that the number of cities in each level is as even as possible. So the cities are divided into four categories according to the critical values that are 95, 100, and 105% of the average CEE of 262 cities in each year, namely, low, medium-low, medium-high, and high-level.

  3. 3If the change in carbon emissions efficiency in each city has completely equal probability, the value is 0.25. If the probability of maintaining the status is greater than changing it (i.e., transferring to any other status), the value is 0.5. Therefore, this article says that if the diagonal element is greater than 0.5, the club members of the level are more inclined to maintain the status and there is a convergence of the club.

References

  • Acaravci A, Erdogan S (2016) The convergence behavior of CO2 emissions in seven regions under multiple structural breaks. Int J Energy Econ Policy 6(3):575–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldy JE (2006) Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: convergence or divergence? Environ Resour Econ 33(4):533–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Christou C (2016) Energy productivity convergence: new evidence from club converging. Appl Econ Lett 23(2):142–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai C, Du K, Yu Y, Feng C (2019) Understanding the trend of total factor carbon productivity in the world: insights from convergence analysis. Energy Econ 81:698–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Barassi MR, Cole MA, Elliott RJ (2011) The stochastic convergence of CO2 emissions: a long memory approach. Environ Resour Econ 49(3):367–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X, Blanchard OJ, Hall RE (1991) Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 107

  • Battisti M, Delgado MS, Parmeter CF (2015) Evolution of the global distribution of carbon dioxide: a finite mixture analysis. Resour Energy Econ 42:31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1986) Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. Am Econ Rev 76(5):1072–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard AB, Durlauf SN (1995) Convergence in international output. J Appl Econ 10(2):97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • BP (2019) Statistic Review of World Energy. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2020

  • Cai B, Guo H, Ma Z, Wang Z, Dhakal S, Cao L (2019) Benchmarking carbon emissions efficiency in Chinese cities: a comparative study based on high-resolution gridded data. Appl Energy 242:994–1009

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarero M, Castillo J, Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Tamarit C (2013) Eco-efficiency and convergence in OECD countries. Environ Resour Econ 55(1):87–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlino GA, Mills LO (1993) Are US regional incomes converging? A time series analysis. J Monet Econ 32(2):335–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlino GA, Mills L (1996) Testing neoclassical convergence in regional incomes and earnings. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(6):565–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Caselli F, Esquivel G, Lefort F (1996) Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics. J Econ Growth 1(3):363–389

  • Chang MC (2020) A study on emissions efficiency, emissions technology gap ratio, room for improvement in emissions intensity, and pluralized relationships. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:14492–14502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07935-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Xu JT (2019) An assessment of energy efficiency based on environmental constraints and its influencing factors in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(17):16887–16900

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Xu C, Managi S, Song M (2019) Energy-carbon performance and its changing trend: an example from China’s construction industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 145:379–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng A, Zhao F (2018) Quantitative measure on inter-regional industry transfer and pollution transfer based on the idea of shift share analysis. Chinese J Popul Resour Environ 28(5):49–57

  • Ding Q, Cheng G, Wang Y, Zhuang D (2017) Effects of natural factors on the spatial distribution of heavy metals in soils surrounding mining regions. Sci Total Environ 578:577–585

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong F, Li X, Long R, Liu X (2013) Regional carbon emission performance in China according to a stochastic frontier model. Renew Sust Energ Rev 28:525–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Q, Wu M, Xu Y, Lu X, Bai L, Yu M (2018) Club convergence and spatial distribution dynamics of carbon intensity in China’s construction industry. Nat Hazards 94(2):519–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf SN, Johnson PA (1995) Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behaviour. J Appl Econ 10(4):365–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Egilmez G, Gumus S, Kucukvar M, Tatari O (2016) A fuzzy data envelopment analysis framework for dealing with uncertainty impacts of input–output life cycle assessment models on eco-efficiency assessment. J Clean Prod 129:622–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan JL, Da YB, Wan SL, Zhang M, Cao Z, Wang Y, Zhang X (2019) Determinants of carbon emissions in ‘Belt and Road initiative’ countries: a production technology perspective. Appl Energy 239:268–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1992) Do old fallacies ever die? J Econ Lit 30:2129–2132

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton TM Jr, Walke AG (2019) Empirical evidence regarding electricity consumption and urban economic growth. Appl Econ 51(18):1977–1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider S, Akram V (2019) Club convergence of per capita carbon emission: global insight from disaggregated level data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):11074–11086

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han F, Xie R, Fang J, Liu Y (2018) The effects of urban agglomeration economies on carbon emissions: evidence from Chinese cities. J Clean Prod 172:1096–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart PE (1995) Galtonian regression across countries and the convergence of productivity. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 57(3):287–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrerias MJ (2012) World energy intensity convergence revisited: a weighted distribution dynamics approach. Energy Policy 49:383–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang G, Ouyang X, Yao X (2015) Dynamics of China’s regional carbon emissions under gradient economic development mode. Ecol Indic 51:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2019) World Economic Outlook Database. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/01/weodata/index.aspx. Accessed 26 Oct 2019

  • Iram R, Zhang J, Erdogan S, Abbas Q, Mohsin M (2020) Economics of energy and environmental efficiency: evidence from OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(4):3858–3870

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam N (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q J Econ 110(4):1127–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Folmer H, Ji M, Zhou P (2018) Revisiting cross-province energy intensity convergence in China: a spatial panel analysis. Energy Policy 121:252–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang YQ, Xie BC, Wang J, Wang YN (2018) Environmental assessment and investment strategy for China’s manufacturing industry: a non-radial DEA based analysis. J Clean Prod 175:501–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya E, Alataş S, Yılmaz B (2019) Replication of Strazicich and List (2003): Are CO2 emission levels converging among industrial countries? Energy Econ 82:135–138

  • Le Gallo J (2004) Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: a Markov chains approach. Int Reg Sci Rev 27(2):138–163

  • Lean HH, Mishra V, Smyth R (2016) Conditional convergence in US disaggregated petroleum consumption at the sector level. Appl Econ 48(32):3049–3061

    Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Sun W, Li G, Cui P, Wu W, Jin B (2017) Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of carbon intensity in China’s construction industry. Resour Conserv Recycl 126:162–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Dai H, Song J, Sun L, Geng Y, Lu K, Hanaoka T (2019) Assessment of the carbon emissions reduction potential of China’s iron and steel industry based on a simulation analysis. Energy 183:279–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Du K (2015) Modeling the dynamics of carbon emission performance in China: a parametric Malmquist index approach. Energy Econ 49:550–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Wang M (2019) Dynamic analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in China’s petroleum refining and coking industry. Sci Total Environ 671:937–947

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Zhou D, Zhou P, Wang Q (2017) Dynamic carbon emission performance of Chinese airlines: a global Malmquist index analysis. J Air Transp Manag 65:99–109

  • Liu C, Hong T, Li H, Wang L (2018) From club convergence of per capita industrial pollutant emissions to industrial transfer effects: An empirical study across 285 cities in China. Energy Policy 121:300–313

  • Liu H, Nie J, Cai B, Cao L, Wu P, Pang L, Wang X (2019) CO2 emissions patterns of 26 cities in the Yangtze River Delta in 2015: Evidence and implications. Environ Pollut 252:1678–1686

  • López-Bazo E, Vayá E, Mora AJ, Suriñach J (1999) Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. Ann Reg Sci 33(3):343–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu IJ, Lin SJ, Lewis C (2007) Decomposition and decoupling effects of carbon dioxide emission from highway transportation in Taiwan, Germany, Japan and South Korea. Energy Policy 35(6):3226–3235

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Long H, Chen K, Tu S, Zhang Y, Liao L (2019) Green growth efficiency of Chinese cities and its spatio-temporal pattern. Resour Conserv Recycl 146:441–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437

  • Markandya A, Pedroso-Galinato S, Streimikiene D (2006) Energy intensity in transition economies: Is there convergence towards the EU average? Energy Econo 28(1):121–145

  • Masanjala WH, Papageorgiou C (2004) The Solow model with CES technology: Nonlinearities and parameter heterogeneity. J Appl Econ 19(2):171–201

  • Mirza FM, Kanwal A (2017) Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Pakistan: dynamic causality analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1233–1240

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China (2013-2017) China’s urban statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan X, Liu Q, Peng X (2015) Spatial club convergence of regional energy efficiency in China. Ecol Indic 51:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang RZ, Deng ZQ, Chiu YH (2015) Pareto improvement through a reallocation of carbon emission quotas. Renew Sust Energ Rev 50:419–430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Sul D (2007) Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica 75(6):1771–1855

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1993) Galton’s fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. Scand J Econ 95:427–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1996) Twin peaks: growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics. Economic Journal 106:1045–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1997) Empirics for growth and distribution: stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs. J Econ Growth 2(1): 27–59

  • Rey SJ (2001) Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geogr Anal 33(3):195–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey SJ, Montouri BD (1999) US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective. Reg Stud 33(2):143–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1):65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • State Council (2019) China sets 2019 GDP growth target at 6–6.5%. http://english.gov.cn/premier/news/2019/03/05/content_281476549639196.htm. Accessed 26 June 2019

  • Strazicich and List (2003) Are CO2 emission levels converging among industrial countries? Environ Resour Econ 24(3):263–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang K, Hailu A (2020) Smallholder farms’ adaptation to the impacts of climate change: Evidence from China’s Loess Plateau. Land Use Policy 91:104353

  • Tang K, Hailu A, Kragt M, Ma C (2016a) Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions: broadacre farming in the Great Southern Region of Western Australia. Aust J Agric Resour Econo 60(3):459–475

  • Tang K, Yang L, Zhang J (2016b) Estimating the regional total factor efficiency and pollutants’ marginal abatement costs in China: A parametric approach. Appl Energy 184:230–240

  • Tang K, Hailu A, Kragt ME, Ma C (2018) The response of broadacre mixed crop-livestock farmers to agricultural greenhouse gas abatement incentives. Agric Syst 160:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang K, He C, Ma C, Wang D (2019) Does carbon farming provide a cost-effective option to mitigate GHG emissions? Evidence from China. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 63(3):575–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang K, Hailu A, Yang Y (2020a) Agricultural chemical oxygen demand mitigation under various policies in China: A scenario analysis. J Clean Prod 250:119513

  • Tang K, Qiu Y, Zhou D (2020b) Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China’s industrial enterprises. Sci Total Environ 712:136362

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Zhou W (2019) How do CO2 emissions and efficiencies vary in Chinese cities? Spatial variation and driving factors in 2007. Sci Total Environ 675:439–452

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2002) A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 143(1):32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran TH, Mao Y, Nathanail P, Siebers PO, Robinson D (2019) Integrating slacks-based measure of efficiency and super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Omega 85:156–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang QW, Zhou P, Shen N, Wang SS (2013) Measuring carbon dioxide emission performance in Chinese provinces: A parametric approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21:324–330

  • Wang Y, Zhang P, Huang D, Cai C (2014) Convergence behavior of carbon dioxide emissions in China. Econ Model 43:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Su Y, Zhao Y (2018) Regional inequality, spatial spillover effects and influencing factors of China’s city-level energy-related carbon emissions. Acta Geographica Sinica 73(3):414–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Long R, Chen H, Li W, Yang J (2019a) A review of studies on urban energy performance evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(4):3243–3261

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Wang W, Du S, Li C, He Z (2019b) Causal relationships between carbon dioxide emissions and economic factors: Evidence from China. Sustain Dev 28:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1966

  • Wang S, Shi C, Fang C, Feng K (2019c) Examining the spatial variations of determinants of energy-related CO2 emissions in China at the city level using geographically weighted regression model. Appl Energy 235:95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Ma C, Tang K (2019) The static and dynamic heterogeneity and determinants of marginal abatement cost of CO2 emissions in Chinese cities. Energy 178:685–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaji K, Matsuhashi R, Nagata Y, Kaya Y (1993) A study on economic measures for CO2 reduction in Japan. Energy Policy 21(2):123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Tang K, Wang Z, An H, Fang W (2017) Regional eco-efficiency and pollutants’ marginal abatement costs in China: A parametric approach. J Clean Prod 167:619–629

  • Yang L, Yang Y, Zhang X, Tang K (2018) Whether China’s industrial sectors make efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from production? A decomposed decoupling analysis. Energy 160:796–809

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilanci V, Pata UK (2020) Convergence of per capita ecological footprint among the ASEAN-5 countries: Evidence from a non-linear panel unit root test. Ecol Indic 113:106178

  • Yu S, Hu X, Fan JL, Cheng J (2018) Convergence of carbon emissions intensity across Chinese industrial sectors. J Clean Prod 194:179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Shen L, Shuai C, Tan Y, Ren Y, Wu Y (2019) Is the low-carbon economy efficient in terms of sustainable development? A global perspective. Sustain Dev 27(1):130–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou D, Zhou F, Zhong S (2018) Club convergence of per capita water resource distribution in China: Based on extended Markov chain model. Arid Land Geography 41(4):867–873

  • Zhou Y, Xu Y, Liu C, Fang Z, Guo J (2019) Spatial Effects of Technological Progress and Financial Support on China’s Provincial Carbon Emissions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16 (10):1743

  • Zhou D, Liang X, Zhou Y, Tang K (2020a) Does emission trading boost carbon productivity? Evidence from China’s pilot emission trading scheme. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(15):5522

  • Zhou Y, Kong Y, Zhang T (2020b) The spatial and temporal evolution of provincial eco-efficiency in China based on SBM modified three-stage data envelopment analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:8557–8569

  • Zhu J, Lin B (2020) Convergence analysis of city-level energy intensity in China. Energy Policy 139:111357

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China (20YJCZH144, 20YJC790191), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2019A1515010884), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030310025, 2018A030310044), and Pearl River Talents Plan of Guangdong Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Di Zhou.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, K., Xiong, C., Wang, Y. et al. Carbon emissions performance trend across Chinese cities: evidence from efficiency and convergence evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 1533–1544 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10518-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10518-4

Keywords

Navigation