Abstract
With the increase of carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere, the living environment of human beings is seriously affected. As a high carbon emission industry in China, thermal power enterprises are the key areas of carbon emission reduction in China. This paper first uses Super-SBM model to measure the performance of China’s 18 major thermal power enterprises in 2009–2018 from a static point of view. After considering the carbon emission constraints, it analyzes the degree of change in enterprise performance, and finds that the impact of carbon emission constraints on enterprise performance is not absolute. After that, with the help of Malmquist index model, this paper discusses the dynamic changes of thermal power enterprises’ performance under carbon emission constraint in recent 10 yrs. The results show that the overall performance of carbon emission constraint is in a weak regression stage and summarizes the disadvantages of different enterprises. On the basis of the research conclusion, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions to further improve the performance of Chinese thermal power enterprises under the carbon emission constraints in the future, which is conducive to different enterprises to optimize their own disadvantages.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bi GB, Song W, Zhou P, Liang L (2014) Dose environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China's thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy 66:537–546
Busch T, Hoffmann VH (2011) How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Bus Soc 50:233–265
Chapple L, Clarkson M, Gold DL (2013) The cost of carbon: capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). J Account Financ Bus Stud 49:1–33
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Lewin A, Seiford L (1978) Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA
Chatzistamoulou N, Diagourtas G, Kounetas K (2017) Do pollution abatement expenditures lead to higher productivity growth? Evidence from Greek manufacturing industries. Environ Econ Policy Stud 19:15–34
Chen L (2016) Local institutions, audit quality, and corporate scandals of US-listed foreign firms. J Bus Ethics 133:351–373
Choi Y, Zhang N, Zhou P (2012) Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Appl Energy 98:198–208
Clemens B (2006) Economic incentives and small firms: does it pay to be green? J Bus Res 59:492–500
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: reply. Am Econ Rev 84(5):1040–1044
Feng K, Divis SJ, Sun L, Li X, Guan D, Liu W, Liu Z, Hubacek K (2013) Outsourcing CO2 within China. PNAS 110:11654–11659
Fisher-Vanden K, Thorburn KS (2011) Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth. J Environ Econ Manag 62:430–445
Fogler HR, Nutt F (1975) A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Acad Manag J 18:155–160
Gregg JS, Andres RJ, Marland G(2008) China: emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production. Geophys Res Lett 35
Hart SL, Ahuja G (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus Strateg Environ 5:30–37
Li L, Wang J (2015) The effects of coal switching and improvements in electricity production efficiency and consumption on CO2 mitigation goals in China. Sustainability 7:9540–9559
Liu Z, Davis SJ, Feng K, Hubacek K, Liang S, Anadon LD, Chen B, Liu J, Yan J, Guan D (2015) Targeted opportunities to address the climate–trade dilemma in China. Nat Clim Chang 6:201–206
Matsumura EM, Prakash R, Vera-Munoz SC (2014) Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Account Rev 89:695–724
O’Neill JW, Hanson B, Mattila AS (2008) The relationship of sales and marketing expenses to hotel performance in the United States. Cornell Hosp Q 49:355–363
Palmer K, Oates WE, Portney PR (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9:119–132
Porter ME (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci Am 264:193–246
Rexhäuser S, Rammer C (2014) Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the Porter hypothesis. Environ Resour Econ 57:145–167
Segura S, Ferruz L, Gargallo P, Salvador M (2014) EU ETS CO2 emissions constraints and business performance: a quantile regression approach. Appl Econ Lett 2:129–134
Song W, Bi G, Wu J, Yang F (2017) What are the effects of different tax policies on China's coal-fired power generation industry? An empirical research from a network slacks-based measure perspective. J Clean Prod 142:2816–2827
Song XH, Jiang X, Zhang X, Liu J (2018) Analysis, evaluation and optimization strategy of China thermal power enterprises’ business performance considering environmental costs under the background of carbon trading. Sustainability 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062006
Spicer BH (1978) Investors‘ corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. Account Rev 53:94–111
Sueyoshi T, Goto M, Ueno T (2010) Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies. Energy Policy 38:1675–1688
Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509
Tseng ML, Ming L, Wu KJ, Zhou L, Bui DTD (2017) A novel approach for enhancing green supply chain management using converged interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers-grey relation analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 3450:1–12
Walley N, Whitehead B (1994) It's not easy being green. Harv Bus Rev 72:46–52
Wang YH, Yao X, Yuan P (2015) Strategic adjustment of China’s power generation capacity structure under the constraint of carbon emission. Comput.Econ. 46:421–435
Yang SM, Zhang XT (2017) Study on the U-shaped relationship of carbon constraint on the large thermal power plants’ profitability. Nat Hazards 89:1421–1435
Zhai H, Ou Y, Rubin ES (2015) Opportunities for decarbonizing existing U.S. coal-fired power plants via CO2 capture, utilization and storage. Environ Sci Technol 49:7571–7579
Zhang X, Cheng X, Yuan J, Gao X (2011) Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy 39:644–650
Zhang LL, Long RY, Chen H, Huang XR (2018) Performance changes analysis of industrial enterprises under energy constraints. Resour Conserv Recycl 136:248–256
Zhao XL, Cai Q, Ma C, Hud Y, Luo K, Li W (2017) Economic evaluation of environmental externalities in China’s coal-fired power generation. Energy Policy 102:307–317
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, L., Wang, M. Study on the influence of carbon emission constraints on the performance of thermal power enterprises. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 30875–30884 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09604-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09604-4