Abstract
This study used principal component analysis (PCA) to develop composite indexes for economic growth, environmental degradation, and social well-being. The mutual relationship between these indexes was empirically tested using a panel vector autoregressive model based on a generalized method of moment approach (PVAR-GMM), and robustness was determined with Driscoll and Kraay regression. To this end, we gathered the data for 36 Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries over the period 1995–2016. Using a multivariate framework, the empirical results showed that environmental degradation and social well-being have a significant positive impact on the economic growth index. The social well-being index and economic growth are contributors to environmental degradation. Similarly, economic growth, in the long run, improves social well-being. The results confirm bidirectional causality between economic growth and environmental degradation. Another bidirectional causal relationship was found between economic growth and social well-being. Further, causality exists from social well-being to environmental degradation, but not vice versa. The analysis of the impulse response function exhibited the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve phenomenon in BRI countries. Moreover, the results of variance decomposition suggested that a shock in one index spills over to other indexes simultaneously. The study suggests that policymakers should consider social well-being and environmental degradation in economic activity to achieve sustainable development goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Abou-Ali H, Abdelfattah YM (2013) Integrated paradigm for sustainable development: a panel data study. Econ Model 30:334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.016
Abrigo MRM, Love I (2016) Estimation of panel vector autoregression in Stata. Stata J 16:778–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1601600314
Acheampong AO (2018) Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: what causes what and where? Energy Econ 74:677–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.022
Ahmed K, Long W (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve and Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Procedia Econ Financ 1:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00003-2
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Solarin SA (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: the role of renewable energy. Ecol Indic 67:267–282
Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026
Apergis N, Christou C, Gupta R (2017) Are there environmental Kuznets curves for US state-level CO2 emissions? Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.11.219
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Arminen H (2018) Simultaneous equations Modeling in the energy-growth Nexus. Econ Econom Energy-Growth Nexus 307–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812746-9.00010-9
Arminen H, Menegaki AN (2019) Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus. Energy Econ 80:621–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2019.02.009
Arouri MEH, Ben Youssef A, M’henni H, Rault C (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and north African countries. Energy Policy 45:342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2012.02.042
Aye GC, Edoja PE (2017) Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Econ Financ 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1379239
Baek J (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: the case of Arctic countries. Energy Econ 50:13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2015.04.010
Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:6199–6208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9
Bhuiyan MA, Jabeen M, Zaman K et al (2018) The impact of climate change and energy resources on biodiversity loss: evidence from a panel of selected Asian countries. Renew Energy 117:324–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2017.10.054
Blundell, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom 87:115–143
Boggia A, Cortina C (2010) Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: a case study. J Environ Manag 91:2301–2306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.009
Chaabouni S, Saidi K (2017) The dynamic links between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, health spending and GDP growth: a case study for 51 countries. Environ Res 158:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.041
Costantini V, Monni S (2008) Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecol Econ 64:867–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2007.05.011
Danish BMA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.05.028
Destek MA (2019) Investigation on the role of economic, social, and political globalization on environment: evidence from CEECs. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04698-x
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017
Dogan E, Aslan A (2017) Exploring the relationship among CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption and tourism in the EU and candidate countries: evidence from panel models robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence. Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.03.111
Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2020) The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07878-2
Dogan E, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) Determinants of ecological footprint in MINT countries. Energy Environ 30:1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X19834279
Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8
Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
Du J, Zhang Y (2018) Does one belt one road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment? China Econ Rev 47:189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.05.010
ELC (2019) Environment & Society by The Environmental Lireracy Council (ELC). https://enviroliteracy.org/environment-society/. Accessed 30 Oct 2019
Fan JL, Da Bin Y, Wan SL et al (2019) Determinants of carbon emissions in ‘belt and road initiative’ countries: a production technology perspective. Appl Energy 239:268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.201
Fan JL, Zhang YJ, Wang B (2017) The impact of urbanization on residential energy consumption in China: an aggregated and disaggregated analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 75:220–233
Global Footprint Network (2018) 2017. National footprint accounts, ecological footprint. http://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/. Accessed 21 Jan 2019
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
Han T, Zhang C, Sun Y, Hu X (2017) Study on environment-economy-society relationship model of Liaohe River basin based on multi-agent simulation. Ecol Model 359:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.02.016
Hao Y, Chen H, Zhang Q (2016) Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Ecol Indic 67:533–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.025
Harris R, Tzavalis E (1999) Inference for Unit Roots in Dynamic Panels Where the Time Dimension is Fixed. North-Holland
Hotelling H (1933) Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol 24:417–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071325
Howarth R (2012) Sustainability, Well-Being, and Economic Growth | Center for Humans & Nature. Minding Nat 5:
Hussain J, Khan A, Zhou K (2020a) The impact of natural resource depletion on energy use and CO2 emission in belt &. Road Initiative countries: A cross-country analysis Energy 117409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117409
Hussain J, Zhou K, Guo S, Khan A (2020b) Investment risk and natural resource potential in “belt & road initiative” countries: a multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sci Total Environ 137981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137981
Kaidi N, Mensi S (2019) Financial development, income inequality, and poverty reduction: democratic versus autocratic countries. J Knowl Econ 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-00606-3
Khan A, Chenggang Y, Hussain J, Bano S (2019a) Does energy consumption, financial development, and investment contribute to ecological footprints in BRI regions? Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06772-w
Khan A, Hussain J, Bano S, Chenggang Y (2019b) The repercussions of foreign direct investment, renewable energy and health expenditure on environmental decay? An econometric analysis of B&RI countries J Environ Plan Manag 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1692796
Khan TM, Gang B, Fareed Z, Yasmeen R (2020a) The impact of CEO tenure on corporate social and environmental performance: an emerging country’s analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08468-y
Khan ZU, Ahmad M, Khan A (2020b) On the remittances-environment led hypothesis: Empirical evidence from BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07999-8
Khattak SI, Ahmad M, Khan ZU, Khan A (2020) Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4
Liu Y, Hao Y (2018) The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic development in the countries along “the belt and road”. Sci Total Environ 645:674–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.062
López R, Mitra S (2000) Corruption, pollution, and the Kuznets environment curve. J Environ Econ Manage 40:137–150. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1999.1107
Love I, Zicchino L (2006) Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: evidence from panel VAR. Q Rev Econ Financ 46:190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007
Maccagnan A, Wren-Lewis S, Brown H, Taylor T (2019) Wellbeing and society: towards quantification of the co-benefits of wellbeing. Soc Indic Res 141:217–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1826-7
Mamipour S, Yahoo M, Jalalvandi S (2019) An empirical analysis of the relationship between the environment, economy, and society: results of a PCA-VAR model for Iran. Ecol Indic 102:760–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2019.03.039
Ahmad M, Khattak SI, Anwar Khan ZUR (2020) Innovation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the energy-pollution-growth nexus in the OECD economies: a simultaneous equation modeling approach. Environ Ecol Stat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00442-8
Masferrer-Dodas E, Rico-Garcia L, Huanca T, Reyes-García V (2012) Consumption of market goods and wellbeing in small-scale societies: an empirical test among the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon. Ecol Econ 84:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.009
Meyer AG (2015) Is unemployment good for the environment? SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586248
Minkin D, Reyes-García V (2017) Income and wellbeing in a society on the verge to market integration: the case of the Tsimane’ in the Bolivian Amazon. J Happiness Stud 18:993–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9756-7
Moutinho V, Madaleno M, Inglesi-Lotz R, Dogan E (2018) Factors affecting CO2 emissions in top countries on renewable energies: a LMDI decomposition application. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:605–622
Naz S, Sultan R, Zaman K et al (2019) Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from robust least square estimator. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:2806–2819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3837-6
Omri A (2018) Entrepreneurship, sectoral outputs and environmental improvement: international evidence. Technol Forecast Soc Change 128:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.016
Omri A, Euchi J, Hasaballah AH, Al-Tit A (2019) Determinants of environmental sustainability: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Sci Total Environ 657:1592–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.111
Ota T (2017) Economic growth, income inequality and environment: assessing the applicability of the Kuznets hypotheses to Asia. Palgrave Commun 3:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.69
Pal D, Mitra SK (2017) The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide in India and China: growth and pollution at crossroad. J Policy Model 39:371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.03.005
Kwakwa PA, Alhassan H, Adu G (2018) Effect of natural resources extraction on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission in Ghana
Pearson K (1901) On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space. 559–572
Pesaran M (2004) ‘General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels.’ Cambridge Work Pap Econ
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T (2008) A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econom J 11:105–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00227.x
PWT (2019) PWT 9.1 | Penn World Table | Productivity | University of Groningen. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/. Accessed 19 Mar 2020
Rehman MU, Rashid M (2017) Energy consumption to environmental degradation, the growth appetite in SAARC nations. Renew Energy 111:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.100
Riediker M, Koren HS (2004) The importance of environmental exposures to physical, mental and social well-being. Int J Hyg Environ Health 207:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00284
Rodríguez-Rosa M, Gallego-Álvarez I, Vicente-Galindo MP, Galindo-Villardón MP (2017) Are social, economic and environmental well-being equally important in all countries around the world? A study by income levels. Soc Indic Res 131:543–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1257-x
Samargandi N (2017) Sector value addition, technology and CO 2 emissions in Saudi Arabia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78:868–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.056
Sapkota P, Bastola U (2017) Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: panel data analysis of Latin America. Energy Econ 64:206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.001
Shah WUH, Yasmeen R, Padda IUH (2019) An analysis between financial development, institutions, and the environment: a global view. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:21437–21449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05450-1
Shahbaz M, Hye QMA, Tiwari AK, Leitão NC (2013) Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO 2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 25:109–121
Shlens J (2014) A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis
Storper M (2005) Society, community, and economic development. Stud Comp Int Dev 39:30–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686164
Sun C, Zhang F, Xu M (2017) Investigation of pollution haven hypothesis for China: an ARDL approach with breakpoint unit root tests. J Clean Prod 161:153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.119
Tan F, Lu Z (2015) Study on the interaction and relation of society, economy and environment based on PCA–VAR model: as a case study of the Bohai rim region, China. Ecol Indic 48:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2014.07.036
Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
Ur Rahman Z, Iqbal Khattak S, Ahmad M, Khan A (2020) A disaggregated-level analysis of the relationship among energy production, energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from China. Energy 116836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116836
World Bank (2018) World Development Indicators (WDI) | Data Catalog. In: World Bank. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
Yasmeen R, Li Y, Hafeez M, Ahmad H (2018) The trade-environment nexus in light of governance: a global potential. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:34360–34379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3390-3
Zafar MW, Zaidi SAH, Khan NR et al (2019) The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: the case of the United States. Resour Policy 63:101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428
Zaman K, Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Raza SA (2016) Tourism development, energy consumption and environmental Kuznets curve: Trivariate analysis in the panel of developed and developing countries. Tour Manag 54:275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOURMAN.2015.12.001
Zoundi Z (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the environmental Kuznets curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.018
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, A., Chenggang, Y., Bano, S. et al. The empirical relationship between environmental degradation, economic growth, and social well-being in Belt and Road Initiative countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 30800–30814 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09058-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09058-8