Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigating the development efficiency of the green economy in China’s equipment manufacturing industry

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The equipment manufacturing industry is the industrial base of China, which makes it imperative to coordinate the relationship between industrial development and environmental protection. Using panel data of the seven sub-industries in China’s equipment manufacturing industry from 2011 to 2015, this paper evaluates the static and dynamic aspects of green economic development efficiency by combining the super-efficiency slack-based measure model of unexpected output and the data envelopment analysis-Malmquist index model. The results show investments in research and development, and environmental regulations have yielded some positive results, but that regulations have also yielded some undesired output in terms of diminished economic benefits. Pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency have both declined, indicating that the scale and industrial structure need to be further optimized. The results of this study present an objective and comprehensive assessment of green economic development of China’s equipment manufacturing industry and provide valuable insights for improving green economic development efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arimura TH, Sugino M (2007) Does stringent environmental regulation stimulate environment-related technological innovation? Sophia Econ Rev 52:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman E, Bui LTM (2001) Environmental regulation and productivity:evidence from oil refineries. Rev Econ Stat 83:498–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos JWB, Economidou C, Sanders MWJL (2013) Innovation over the industry life-cycle: evidence from EU manufacturing. J Econ Behav Organ 86:78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brännlund R, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1995) Environmental regulation and profitability: an application to Swedish pulp and paper mills. Environ Resour Econ 6:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input and output,and productivity. Econometrica 50:1938–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang ZY (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency changes in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin HWM (2005) Spatial analysis of landscape:concepts and statistics. Ecology 86(8):1975–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman AM, Haveman RH, Kneese AV (1972) Economics of environmental policy. Nature 376(6539):444–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray WB, Shadbegian RJ (2003) Plant vintage, technology,and productivity, and environmental regulation. J Environ Econ Manag 46:384–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He BJ, Zhao DX, Zhu J, Darko A, Gou ZH (2018) Promoting and implementing urban sustainability in China: an integration of sustainable initiatives at different urban scales. Habitat Int 82:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79:610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerath M, Bhat M, Rivera-Monroy VH, Castañeda-Moya E, Simard M, Twilley RR (2016) The role of economic, policy, and ecological factors in estimating the value of carbon stocks in Everglades mangrove forests, South Florida, USA. Environ Sci Pol 66:160–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang YQ, Xie BC, Wang J, Wang YN (2018) Environmental assessment and investment strategy for China’s manufacturing industry: a non-radial DEA based analysis. J Clean Prod 175:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen T, Bijsterbosch N, Dellink R (2009) Environmental cost-benefit analysis of alternative timing strategies in greenhouse gas abatement: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecol Econ 68:1633–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanoie P, Patry M, Lajeunesse R (2008) Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the Porter hypothesis. J Prod Anal 30:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magat WA (1978) Pollution control and technological advance: a dynamics model of the firm. J Environ Econ Manag 5:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trab Estad 4(2):209–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RCO (1981) Accounting for slower economic growth: the United States in the 1970s. Econ J 91:1044–1046. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ​National Bureau of Statistics of China, Ministry of Ecology and Environment (2018) China Statistical Yearbook on Environment. China Statistical Press, Beijing

  • Porter ME, Claas VDL (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin G, Zhang P, Hou X, Wu S, Wang Y (2020) Risk assessment for oil leakage under the common threat of multiple natural hazards. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08184-7

  • Ramnathan R, Black A, Nath P, Muyldermans L (2010) Impact of environmental regulations on innovation and performance in the UK industrial sector. Manag Decis 48:1493–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen N, Liao H, Deng R, Wang Q (2019) Different types of environmental regulations and the heterogeneous influence on the environmental total factor productivity: empirical analysis of China’s industry. J Clean Prod 211:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens JK, Denison EF (1981) Accounting for slower economic growth: the United States in the 1970s. South Econ J 47:1191

  • Telle K, Larsson J (2007) Do environmental regulations hamper prodictivity growth? How accounting for improvenments of plants environmental performance can change the conclusion. Ecol Econ 61:438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa F, Iraldo F, Frey M (2011) The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: the case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions. J Environ Manage 92:2136–2144

  • Wang H, Xu J, Wang D, Zhang T, Liu Y (2015) Cleaner production based on sustainable development in Chinese power plants. Environ Eng Sci 32:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Yan W, Ma D, Zhang C (2018) Carbon emissions and optimal scale of China’s manufacturing agglomeration under heterogeneous environmental regulation. J Clean Prod 176:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Xu J, Sheng L (2020) Purification mechanism of sewage from constructed wetlands with zeolite substrates: a review. J Clean Prod 258:120760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang CH, Tseng YH, Chiang CP (2012) Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity; evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industries. Resour Energy Econ 34:514–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Xiang Q (2018) Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model. J Clean Prod 176:895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan B, Ren S, Chen X (2017) Can environmental regulation promote the coordinated development of economy and environment in China’s manufacturing industry? A panel data analysis of 28 sub-sectors. J Clean Prod 149:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M (2017) Valuing environmental amenities through inverse optimization: theory and case study. J Environ Econ Manag 83:217–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is supported by the following projects: the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2019QG011) and the Shandong Provincial Social Science Planning project (18CJJZ01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weijuan Li.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Ouyang, X. Investigating the development efficiency of the green economy in China’s equipment manufacturing industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 24070–24080 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08811-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08811-3

Keywords

Navigation