Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A time series of land cover maps of South Asia from 2001 to 2015 generated using AVHRR GIMMS NDVI3g data

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In South Asia, key differences in annual land use and land cover (LULC) take place due to climate change, global warming, human activity, biodiversity, and hydrology. So, it is very important to get accurate land cover information for this region. An annual LULC map that covers a comprehensive period is a major dataset for climatologically study. While yearly worldwide maps of LULC are produced from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) dataset, in 2001, the first LULC map of MODIS is generated which restrictions the perspective climatologically analysis. This research work generated a time series of yearly LULC maps of South Asia from 2001 to 2015 by using random forest classification from AVHRR GIMMS NDVI3g data. The MODIS land cover product such as (MCD12Q1) was used as a reference data for the trained classifier. The result was validated by using time series of annual LULC maps, and the spatiotemporal dynamic of LULC maps was illustrated in the last 15 years from 2001 to 2015. The simplified sixteen class versions of our 15-year overall accuracy of a land cover map are 86.70%, and 1.23% higher than that of MODIS maps. The change detection indicated that, for the last 15 years, the class of closed shrublands, savannas, croplands, urban and built-up land, barren, and cropland per natural vegetation mosaics increase notably during the 2001 to 2015, and in contrast, the class of woody savannas, evergreen needleleaf forests, open shrublands, grasslands, mixed forests, permanent wetlands, permanent snow and ice, evergreen broadleaf forests, and water bodies decrease notably during 2001 to 2015. These yearly land cover maps will be an essential dataset for the upcoming climate study, where time series of LULC maps accessibility is restricted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andres L, Salas WA, Skole D (1994) Fourier analysis of multi-temporal AVHRR data applied to a land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 15:1115–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff S (1985) The minimum accuracy value as an index of classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 51:99–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudron P, Alonso-Sarría F, García-Aróstegui JL, Cánovas-García F, Martínez-Vicente D, Moreno-Brotóns J (2013) Identifying the origin of groundwater samples in a multi-layer aquifer system with random forest classification. J Hydrol 499:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom DE, Rosenberg L (2011) The future of South Asia: population dynamics, economic prospects, and regional coherence J. Pgda Working Papers. WDA-Forum, University of St. Gallen. http://www.cepf.net

  • Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channan S, Collins K, Emanuel W (2014) Global mosaics of the standard MODIS land cover type data. University of Maryland and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, College Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG, Green K (2009) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Lewis Publishers

  • Czaplewski RL (1992) Misclassification bias in areal estimates. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 58:189–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahinden C (2011) An improved random forest approach with application to the performance prediction challenge datasets. Hands-on Pattern Recognition, Challenges in Machine Learning 1:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Dappen P (2003) Using satellite imagery to estimate irrigated land: a case study in Scotts bluff and Kearney counties. Center of Advanced Land Management Information Techonologies. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE, USA

  • Di Gregorio A (2005) Land cover classification system (LCCS), classification concepts and user manual, software version 2. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • El Saleous N (2005) An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int J Remote Sens 26:4485–4498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 80:185e201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley A, Huang X (2010) MODIS collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens Environ 114:168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Lee E, Timothy AW (2017) A time series of annual land use and land cover maps of China from1982 to 2013 generated using AVHRR GIMMS NDVI3g data. Remote Sens Environ 199:201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold D, Mayaux P, Woodcock CE, Baccini A, Schmullius C (2008) Some challenges in global land cover mapping: an assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sens Environ 112:2538e2556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holben BN (1986) Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sens 7:1417–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrakhimov M, Khamzina A, Forkutsa I, Paluasheva G, Lamers JPA, Tischbein B et al (2007) Groundwater table and salinity: spatial and temporal distribution and influence on soil salinization in Khorezm region (Uzbekistan, Aral sea basin). Irrig Drain Syst 21:219e236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature (2010) The Kazakh Steppe e Conserving the world’s largest dry steppe region. http://www.iucn.org/about/union/secretariat/offices/europe/resources/?5640/Kazakh-Action-Plan-for-Grasslands. Accessed 10.02.12

  • James M, Kalluri SN (1994) The pathfinder AVHRR land data set: an improved coarse resolution data set for terrestrial monitoring. Int J Remote Sens 15:3347–3363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein I, Ursula G, Claudia K (2012) Regional land cover mapping and change detection in Central Asia using MODIS time-series. Appl Geogr 35:219e234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsiantis SB (2007) Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica 31:249e268

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Albernaz AK, Schroth G, Fearnside PM, Bergen S, Venticinque EM, Da Costa C (2002) Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Biogeogr 29:737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence PJ, Chase TN (2007) Representing a new MODIS consistent land surface in the Community Land Model (CLM 3.0). J Geophys Res Biogeosci 112:G01023

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaw A, Wiener M, Breiman L, Cutler A (2009) Package “Randomforest”. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/randomForest/randomForest.pdf. Accessed 16. 04. 12

  • Linke J, McDermid GJ, Laskin DN, McLane AJ, Pape A, Cranston J, Hall-Beyer M, Franklin SE (2009) A disturbance-inventory framework for flexible and reliable landscape monitoring. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 75:981–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Heiskanen J, Aynekulu E, Maeda EE, Pellikka PK (2016) Land cover characterization inWest Sudanian Savannas using seasonal features from annual Landsat time series. Remote Sens 8:365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta RS, Knight JF, Ediriwickrema J, Lyon JG, Worthy LD (2006) Land-cover change detection using multi-temporal MODIS NDVI data. Remote Sens Environ 105:142–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens B, Lambin E (2000) Land-cover-change trajectories in southern Cameroon. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(3):467–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer WB, Turner BL II (1992) Human population growth and global land use/land cover change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:39e61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad S, Niu Z, Wang L, Aablikim A, Hao P, Wang C (2015) Crop classification based on time series MODIS EVI and ground observation for three adjoining years in Xinjiang. Spectrosc Spectr Anal 35:1345–1350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson P, Foody GM, Herold M, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE, Wulder MA (2014) Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sens Environ 148:42–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GN, Underwood MC et al (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience 51:933e938

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinzon JE, Tucker CJ (2014) A non-stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g time series. Remote Sens 6:6929–6960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper SE (1983) The evaluation of the spatial accuracy of computer classification. In: Proceedings of the 1983 Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data Symposium. Purdue University, West Lafayette, pp 303–310

  • Pontius RG, Millones M (2011) Death to kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment. Int J Remote Sens 32:4407–4429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Propastin PA, Kappas M, Muratova NR (2008a) Inter-annual changes in vegetation activities and their relationship to temperature and precipitation in Central Asia from 1982 to 2003. J Environ Inf 12(2):75e87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Propastin PA, Kappas M, Muratova NR (2008b) A remote sensing based monitoring system for discrimination between climate and human-induced vegetation change in Central Asia. Manag Environ Qual: Int J 19(5):579e596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy CS, Pasha SV, Satish KV, Saranya KRL, Jha CS, Krishna Murthy YVN (2017) Quantifying nationwide land cover and historical changes in forests of Nepal (1930–2014): implications on forest fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1423-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Galiano VF, Ghimire B, Rogan J, Chica-Olmo M, Rigol-Sanchez JP (2012) An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 67:93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield GH, Fitzpatrick-Lins K (1986) A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52:223–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse JW Jr, Haas R, Schell J, Deering D (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Proceedings of the Thrid ERTS Symposium. NASA, Washington, pp 309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Running SW, Loveland TR, Pierce LL (1994) A vegetation classification logic based on remote sensing for use in global biogeochemical models. Ambio 23:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabins J, Lulla K (2007) Remote sensing: principles and interpretation, 3rd edn. Waveland, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Friedl MA, Potere D (2009) A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data. Environ Res Lett 4:044003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz JJ, Cayuela L, Echeverria C, Salas J, Benayas JMR (2010) Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of Central Chile (1975–2008). Appl Geogr 30(3):436–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia-Armijos MF, Homeier J, Espinosa CI, Leuschner C, de la Cruz M (2015) Deforestation and forest fragmentation in South Ecuador since the 1970s—losing a hotspot of biodiversity. PLoS One 10(9):e0133701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Townshend J, Justice C, Li W, Gurney C, McManus J (1991) Global land cover classification by remote sensing: present capabilities and future possibilities. Remote Sens Environ 35:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2009) World population prospects: the 2008 revision population database. http://esa.un.org/wup2009/unup/index.asp. Accessed 3 Oct 2015

  • Warrens MJ (2015) Properties of the quantity disagreement and the allocation disagreement. Int J Remote Sens 36:1439–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulder MA, White JC, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE, Belward AS, Cohen WB, Fosnight G, Shaw J, Masek JG, Roy DP (2016) The global Landsat archive: status, consolidation, and direction. Remote Sens Environ

  • Yin X (2008) Analysis on the change of land use by remote sensing technology in Manas county. J Shihezi Univ (Nat Sci) 26:402–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan F, Sawaya KE, Loeffelholz BC, Bauer ME (2005) Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 98:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the key basic research project of Shandong Natural Science Foundation of China (ZR2017ZB0422), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project Funding (2018M642614), and “Taishan Scholar” project of Shandong Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiahua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, S., Henchiri, M., Sha, Z. et al. A time series of land cover maps of South Asia from 2001 to 2015 generated using AVHRR GIMMS NDVI3g data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 20309–20320 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08433-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08433-9

Keywords

Navigation