Abstract
As the largest emitter of CO2 emissions, the installed capacity of thermal power generation in China is facing more and more strict restrictions, since the Chinese government proposed to dissolve overcapacity and intends to solve the problem of continuous reduction in utilization rate of electricity sector. Regretfully, the impact of power-generating capacity and its utilization on carbon emissions in the power sector has not yet been addressed. In this study, we incorporate the interaction between capacity and utilization of power sector into the dynamic spatial Durbin model, and estimate the specific impact on carbon dioxide emissions from the power sector based on the panel data set of China’s provinces during 1991–2015. The results show that both installed capacity and utilization rate have positive effects on CO2 emissions. Interestingly, the estimation coefficient of their interaction term is negative, implying that the carbon emission reduction effect derives from the conflicting performance of capacity governance and utilization efficiency. Besides, the advantage of the emerging econometric method, the dynamic spatial Durbin model (SDM) with provinces and time-period fixed effects, is that it can estimate spatial interaction effects among the provinces and neighboring provinces and decompose those effects into two parts: long-term and short-term. However, the estimates indicate that only capacity has roughly significant spatial spillovers. As a result, dissolving overcapacity of thermal power generation and a necessary interprovincial coordination will promote carbon emission reduction rather than investing in coal-fired power plants, and the power authority should turn to alternative investment in cleaner power generation technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albu LL (2007) Spatial econometrics: applications to investigate distribution of CO2 emission in Europe. Rom J Econ Forecast 4(1):45–56
Asane-Otoo E (2016) Competition policies and environmental quality: empirical analysis of the electricity sector in OECD countries. Energ Policy 95:212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.001
Barros CP, Wanke P (2017) Efficiency in Angolan thermal power plants: evidence from cost structure and pollutant emissions. Energy 130:129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.114
Bazilian M, Chattopadhyay D (2016) Considering power system planning in fragile and conflict states. Energy Sustain Dev 32:110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.02.011
China Electricity Council (CEC). 2017. http://www.cec.org.cn/guihuayutongji/tongjxinxi/niandushuju/2017-01-20/164007.html. Accessed 3/11/2018
Duan N, Guo JP, Xie BC (2016) Is there a difference between the energy and CO2 emission performance for China’s thermal power industry? A bootstrapped directional distance function approach. Appl Energ 162:1552–1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.066
Elhorst JP (2010) Spatial panel data models. Springer, Berlin
Elhorst, JP 2014. Spatial econometrics. From cross-sectional data to spatial panels. James P Lesage
Gu Y, Xu J, Chen D, Wang Z, Li Q (2016) Overall review of peak shaving for coal-fired power units in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.052
Huang J, Liu C, Chen S, Huang X, Hao Y (2019) The convergence characteristics of China’s carbon intensity: evidence from a dynamic spatial panel approach. Sci Total Environ 668:685–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.413
IEA, 2017. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 2017
International Monetary Fund (2012) People’s Republic of China: 2012 Article IV Consultation. IMF Country Report, 12/195. International Monetary Fund Publication Services, Washington DC
Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.002
Jiang S, Chen Z, Li S, Chen X, Wang H (2017) Committed CO2 emissions of China’s coal-fired power generators from 1993 to 2013. Energ Policy 104:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.002
Karmellos M, Kopidou D, Diakoulaki D (2016) A decomposition analysis of the driving factors of CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions from the power sector in the European Union countries. Energy 94(9):680–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.145
Lee L, Yu J (2010) A spatial dynamic panel data model with both time and individual fixed effects. Economet Theor 26:564–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.12.001
LeSage JP (2014) Spatial econometric panel data model specification: a Bayesian approach. Spat Stat 9:122–145. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2339124
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
LeSage JP, Sheng Y (2014) A spatial econometric panel data examination of endogenous versus exogenous interaction in Chinese province-level patenting. J Geogr Syst 16:233–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-014-0198-7
Liu L, Zong H, Zhao E, Chen C, Wang J (2014) Can China realize its carbon emission reduction goal in 2020? From the perspective of thermal power development. Appl Energ 124(3):199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.001
Mahlia TMI, Lim JY, Aditya L, Riayatsyah TMI, Pg Abas AE, Nasruddin (2018) Methodology for implementing power plant efficiency standards for power generation: potential emission reduction. Clean Technol Envir 20(2):309–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1473-3
Mahmoudi R, Emrouznejad A, Khosroshahi H, Khashei M, Rajabi P (2019) Performance evaluation of thermal power plants considering CO2 emission: a multistage PCA, clustering, game theory and data envelopment analysis. J Clean Prod 223:641–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.047
Nabavieh A, Gholamiangonabadi D, Ahangaran AA (2015) Dynamic changes in CO2 emission performance of different types of Iranian fossil-fuel power plants. Energ Econ 52:142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.10.006
Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energ Policy 2010(38):661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005
Narayan PK, Saboori B, Soleymani A (2016) Economic growth and carbon emissions. Econ Model 53:388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.027
Özokcu S, Özlem Ö (2017) Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.059
Pablo-Romero MDP, Jesús JD (2016) Economic growth and energy consumption: the energy-environmental Kuznets curve for Latin America and the Caribbean. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:1343–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.029
Peng J, Yu BY, Liao H, Wei YM, Peng J, Yu BY et al (2017) Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emissions in the thermal power sector: a regional empirical analysis from China. J Clean Prod 171:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.242
Sanchez-Moore CC, Kulay L (2019) Effect of the implementation of carbon capture systems on the environmental, energy and economic performance of the Brazilian electricity matrix. Energies 12:331. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020331
Shearer C, Fofrich R, Davis SJ (2017) Future CO2 emissions and electricity generation from proposed coal-fired power plants in India. Earth’s Future 5:408–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000542
Solarin SA, Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2017) Validating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in India and China: the role of hydroelectricity consumption. Renew Sust Energ Rev 80:1578–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.028
Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2015) Environmental assessment on coal-fired power plants in U.S. north-east region by DEA non-radial measurement. Energ Econ 50(8):125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.016
Sun Q, Li T, Wu F (2015) Enforcement of capacity-differentiated regulations in China: evidence from coal-fired power plants. Front Econ China 10(4):604–628. https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-004-015-0028-4
Wang Y, Zhang C, Lu A, Li L, He Y, Tojo J et al (2017) A disaggregated analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for industrial CO2 emissions in China. Appl Energ 190:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.109
Wang Y, Yan W, Komonpipat S (2019a) How does the capacity utilization of thermal power generation affect pollutant emissions? Evidence from the panel data of China’s provinces. Energ Policy 132:440–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.010
Wang S, Zhu X, Song D, Wen Z, Chen B, Feng K (2019b) Drivers of CO2 emissions from power generation in China based on modified structural decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod 220:1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.199
Wang Y, Zhao T, Wang J, Guo F, Kan X, Yuan R (2019c) Spatial analysis on carbon emission abatement capacity at provincial level in China from 1997 to 2014: an empirical study based on SDM model. Atmos Pollut Res 10(1):97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.06.003
Wei C, Löschel A, Liu B (2015) Energy-saving and emission-abatement potential of Chinese coal-fired power enterprise: a non-parametric analysis. Energ Econ 49:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.02.002
Yan Z, Lin Z (2016) Impact analysis of the implementation of cleaner production for achieving the low-carbon transition for SMEs in the Inner Mongolian coal industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 127:418–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.015
Yan Q, Wang Y, Baležentis T (2019) Analysis of China’s regional thermal electricity generation and CO2 emissions: decomposition based on the generalized Divisia index. Sci Total Environ 682:737–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.143
Yang L, Lin B (2016) Carbon dioxide-emission in China’s power industry: evidence and policy implications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 60:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.058
Yu J, de Jong R, Lee L (2008) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large. J Econ 146:118–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.08.002
Yuan J, Li P, Wang Y, Liu Q, Shen X, Zhang K, Dong L (2016a) Coal power overcapacity and investment bubble in China during 2015–2020. Energ Policy 97:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.009
Yuan J, Lei Q, Xiong M, Guo J, Hu Z (2016b) The prospective of coal power in China: will it reach a plateau in the coming decade? Energ Policy 98:495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.025
Yuan J, Wang Y, Zhang W, Zhao C, Liu Q, Shen X, Zhang K, Dong L (2017) Will recent boom in coal power lead to a bust in China? A micro-economic analysis. Energ Policy 108:645–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.035
Zambrano-Monserrate MA, Silva-Zambrano CA, Davalos-Penafiel JL, Zambrano-Monserrate A, Ruano MA (2018) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Peru: the role of renewable electricity, petroleum and dry natural gas. Renew Sus Energ Rev 82:4170–4178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.005
Zeng M, Zhang P, Yu S, Liu H (2017) Overall review of the overcapacity situation of China’s thermal power industry: status quo, policy analysis and suggestions. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:768–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.084
Zhang N, Zhou P, Choi Y (2013) Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance function analysis. Energ Policy 56(2):653–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.033
Zhang YJ, Hao JF, Song J (2016) The CO2 emission efficiency, reduction potential and spatial clustering in China’s industry: evidence from the regional level. Appl Energ 174:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.109
Zhao C, Zhang W, Wang Y, Liu Q, Guo J, Xiong M, Yuan J (2017a) The economics of coal power generation in China. Energ Policy 105:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.020
Zhao X, Cai Q, Zhang S, Luo K (2017b) The substitution of wind power for coal-fired power to realize China’s CO2, emissions reduction targets in 2020 and 2030. Energy 120:164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.109
Zhou N, Levine MD, Price L (2010) Overview of current energy-efficiency policies in China. Energ Policy 38(11):6439–6452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.015
Zhou G, Chung W, Zhang Y (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions and energy efficiency analysis of China’s regional thermal electricity generation. J Clean Prod 83:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.047. Accessed 11 Mar 2018
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge support from the Talent Introduction Program of Nanjing Audit University. We thank the editors and reviewers for their conscientious work and valuable and insightful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Chen, J. The environmental effect of capacity utilization in thermal power plants: evidence from interprovincial carbon emissions in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 30399–30412 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06251-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06251-2