Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fingerprinting sub-basin spatial suspended sediment sources by combining geochemical tracers and weathering indices

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transport and deposition of fine-grained sediment, a pervasive nonpoint source pollutant, cause deleterious off-site impacts for water quality and aquatic ecosystems. Sediment fingerprinting provides one means of identifying the spatial sources of mobilised sediment delivered to fluvial systems in order to help target sediment control strategies and uptake of such source tracing procedures has been steadily increasing. Nonetheless, there remains a need to continue testing and comparing different composite signatures for source discrimination including the incorporation of physically grounded information relevant to erosion patterns. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to compare the discrimination and apportionment of sub-basin spatial suspended sediment sources in a mountainous basin in northern Tehran, Iran, using composite signatures comprising conventional geochemical tracers combined with lithological weathering indices or only the former. The list of conventional geochemical properties comprised Al, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, Sr, Ti, and Zn whilst three weathering indices were included: the chemical index of alteration (CIA), the weathering index of Parker (WIP), and the indicator of recycling (IR) which were all calculated based on elemental oxides. Using a composite signature combining conventional geochemical tracers and one weathering index (IR), the relative contributions from the sub-basin spatial sources were estimated at 1 (Imamzadeh Davood; 1.4%), 2 (Taloon; 13.4%), 3 (Soleghan; 35.9%), and 4 (Keshar; 48.4%) compared with corresponding respective estimates of 0.7%, 45.5%, 40.2%, and 13.3% using conventional geochemical tracers alone. Wald-Wolfowitz Runs test pairwise comparisons of the posterior distributions of predicted source proportions generated using the two different composite signatures confirmed statistically significant differences. These differing proportions demonstrated the sensitivity of predicted source apportionment to the inclusion or exclusion of a weathering index providing information reflecting the relative coverage of more erodible lithological formations in each of the sub-basins (32.7% sub-basin 1, 53.6% sub-basin 2, 58.5% sub-basin 3, and 63.2% sub-basin 4). The outputs of this study will be used to target sediment mitigation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amini X, Emami N (1992) Geological map of the Tehran sheet: scale 1: 100,000. Geol Surv Iran. Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilotta GS et al (2008) Rethinking the contribution of drained and undrained grasslands to sediment-related water quality problems. J Environ Qual 37:906–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins AL, Walling DE (2004) Documenting catchment suspended sediment sources: problems, approaches and prospects. Prog Phys Geogr 28:159–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A, Walling D, Leeks G (1997) Sediment sources in the Upper Severn catchment: a fingerprinting approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 1:509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A, Zhang Y, McChesney D, Walling D, Haley S, Smith P (2012) Sediment source tracing in a lowland agricultural catchment in southern England using a modified procedure combining statistical analysis and numerical modelling. Sci Total Environ 414:301–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins A, Pulley S, Foster ID, Gellis A, Porto P, Horowitz A (2017) Sediment source fingerprinting as an aid to catchment management: a review of the current state of knowledge and a methodological decision-tree for end-users. J Environ Manag 194:86–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Haen K, Verstraeten G, Degryse P (2012) Fingerprinting historical fluvial sediment fluxes. Prog Phys Geogr 36:154–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies J, Olley J, Hawker D, McBroom J (2018) Application of the Bayesian approach to sediment fingerprinting and source attribution. Hydrol Process 0. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13306

  • Davis R, Gregory K (1994) A new distinct mechanism of river bank erosion in a forested catchment. J Hydrol 157:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux OH, Prestegaard KL, Needelman BA, Gellis AC (2010) Suspended-sediment sources in an urban watershed, Northeast Branch Anacostia River, Maryland. Hydrol Process 24:1391–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedo C, Wayne Nesbitt H, Young G (1995) Unraveling the effects of potassium metasomatism in sedimentary rocks and paleosols, with implications for paleoweathering conditions and provenance. Geology 23. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0921:UTEOPM>2.3.CO;2

  • Foster ID, Lees JA (2000) Tracers in geomorphology: theory and applications in tracing fine particulate sediments. In: Foster IID (ed) Tracers in Gemorphology. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster ID, Boardman J, Keay-Bright J (2007) Sediment tracing and environmental history for two small catchments, Karoo Uplands. South Afr Geomorphol 90:126–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garzanti E, Wang J-G, Vezzoli G, Limonta M (2016) Tracing provenance and sediment fluxes in the Irrawaddy River basin (Myanmar). Chem Geol 440:73–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gruszowski K, Foster ID, Lees J, Charlesworth S (2003) Sediment sources and transport pathways in a rural catchment, Herefordshire, UK. Hydrol Process 17:2665–2681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habibi S, Gholami H, Fathabadi A, Jansen JD (2019) Fingerprinting sources of reservoir sediment via two modelling approaches. Sci Total Environ 663:78–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haddadchi A, Olley J, Laceby P (2014) Accuracy of mixing models in predicting sediment source contributions. Sci Total Environ 497:139–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haddadchi A, Olley J, Pietsch T (2016) Variable source contributions to river bed sediments across three size fractions. Hydrol Process 30:1609–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnois L (1988) The CIW index: a new chemical index of weathering. Sediment Geol 55:319–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(88)90137-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison C (1994) Rates of continental erosion and mountain building. In: Active continental margins—present and past. Springer, pp 431-447

  • Honda M, Yabuki S, Shimizu H (2004) Geochemical and isotopic studies of aeolian sediments in China. Sedimentology 51:211–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • House W et al (1997) Micro-organic compounds in the Humber rivers. Sci Total Environ 194:357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Du P, Walling DE, Ning D, Wei X, Liu B, Wang J (2019a) Using reservoir deposits to reconstruct the impact of recent changes in land management on sediment yield and sediment sources for a small catchment in the Black Soil region of Northeast China. Geoderma 343:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang D, Du P, Wang J, Wei X, Liu B, Xu J (2019b) Using reservoir deposits to quantify the source contributions to the sediment yield in the Black Soil Region, Northeast China, based on the fingerprinting technique. Geomorphology 339:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Yang S (2010) Is chemical index of alteration (CIA) a reliable proxy for chemical weathering in global drainage basins? Am J Sci 310:111–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran RJ, Campbell BL (1995) The identification of catchment sediment sources. In: Foster IDL, Gurnell AM, Webb BW (eds) Sediment and water quality in river catchments. Wiley, Chichester, pp 189–205

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan SM (1993) Weathering and global denudation. J Geol 101:295–303. https://doi.org/10.1086/648222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Mackin G, Miller SMO (2015) Application of geochemical tracers to fluvial sediment. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mizugaki S, Onda Y, Fukuyama T, Koga S, Asai H, Hiramatsu S (2008) Estimation of suspended sediment sources using 137Cs and 210Pbex in unmanaged Japanese cypress plantation watersheds in southern Japan. Hydrol Process 22:4519–4531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JW, Semmens BX (2008) Incorporating uncertainty and prior information into stable isotope mixing models. Ecol Lett 11:470–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motha J, Wallbrink P, Hairsine P, Grayson R (2003) Determining the sources of suspended sediment in a forested catchment in southeastern Australia. Water Resour Res:39

  • Mukundan R, Walling DE, Gellis AC, Slattery MC, Radcliffe DE (2012) Sediment source fingerprinting: transforming from a research tool to a management tool. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 48:1241–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Négrel P, Sadeghi M, Ladenberger A, Reimann C, Birke M (2015) Geochemical fingerprinting and source discrimination of agricultural soils at continental scale. Chem Geol 396:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt HW (1979) Mobility and fractionation of rare earth elements during weathering of a granodiorite. Nature 279:206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt HW, Young GM (1982) Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites. Nature 299:715–717. https://doi.org/10.1038/299715a0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niu B, Qu J, Zhang XJ, Liu B, Tan L, An Z (2019) Quantifying provenance of reservoir sediment using multiple composite fingerprints in an arid region experiencing both wind and water erosion. Geomorphology 332:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosrati K, Feiznia S, Van Den Eeckhaut M, Duiker SW (2011a) Assessment of soil erodibility in Taleghan Drainage Basin, Iran, using multivariate statistics. Physical Geography 32:78–96. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.32.1.78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosrati K, Govers G, Ahmadi H, Sharifi F, Amoozegar MA, Merckx R, Vanmaercke M (2011b) An exploratory study on the use of enzyme activities as sediment tracers: biochemical fingerprints? Int J Sediment Res 26:136–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(11)60082-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosrati K, Govers G, Semmens BX, Ward EJ (2014) A mixing model to incorporate uncertainty in sediment fingerprinting. Geoderma 217:173–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nosrati K, Collins AL, Madankan M (2018a) Fingerprinting sub-basin spatial sediment sources using different multivariate statistical techniques and the Modified MixSIR model. Catena 164:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosrati K, Haddadchi A, Collins AL, Jalali S, Zare MR (2018b) Tracing sediment sources in a mountainous forest catchment under road construction in northern Iran: comparison of Bayesian and frequentist approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:30979–30997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3097-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owens P et al (2005) Fine-grained sediment in river systems: environmental significance and management issues. River Res Appl 21:693–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens P et al (2016) Fingerprinting and tracing the sources of soils and sediments: Earth and ocean science, geoarchaeological, forensic, and human health applications. Earth Sci Rev 162:1–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palazón L, Navas A (2017) Variability in source sediment contributions by applying different statistic test for a Pyrenean catchment. J Environ Manag 194:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazón L, Gaspar L, Latorre B, Blake WH, Navas A (2015) Identifying sediment sources by applying a fingerprinting mixing model in a Pyrenean drainage catchment. J Soils Sediments 15:2067–2085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker A (1970) An index of weathering for silicate rocks. 107:504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756800058581

  • Patault E, Alary C, Franke C, Abriak N-E (2019) Quantification of tributaries contributions using a confluence-based sediment fingerprinting approach in the Canche river watershed (France). Sci Total Environ 668:457–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peart M, Walling D (1986) Fingerprinting sediment source: the example of a drainage basin in Devon, UK. In: Drainage basin sediment delivery: proceedings of a symposium held in Albuquerque, NM., pp 4–8 August 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Price JR, Velbel MA (2003) Chemical weathering indices applied to weathering profiles developed on heterogeneous felsic metamorphic parent rocks. Chem Geol 202:397–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2002.11.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulley S, Foster I, Antunes P (2015) The uncertainties associated with sediment fingerprinting suspended and recently deposited fluvial sediment in the Nene river basin. Geomorphology 228:303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Karam DS, Lennard AT (2018) Evaluating tracer selection for catchment sediment fingerprinting. J Soils Sediments 18:3005–3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft (2008) STATISTICA: [data analysis software system], Version 8.0 for Windows update. StatSoft, Inc., 8.0 for Windows update edn.,

  • Tang Q, Fu B, Wen A, Zhang X, He X, Collins AL (2019) Fingerprinting the sources of water-mobilized sediment threatening agricultural and water resource sustainability: progress, challenges and prospects in China. Science China Earth Sciences:1-14

  • Taylor SR, McLennan SM (1985) The continental crust: its composition and evolution. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiecher T, Ramon R, Laceby JP, Evrard O, Minella JPG (2019) Potential of phosphorus fractions to trace sediment sources in a rural catchment of Southern Brazil: comparison with the conventional approach based on elemental geochemistry. Geoderma 337:1067–1076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vale SS, Fuller IC, Procter JN, Basher LR, Smith IE (2016) Application of a confluence-based sediment-fingerprinting approach to a dynamic sedimentary catchment, New Zealand. Hydrol Processes 30:812–829. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wakatsuki T, Furukawa H, Kyuma K (1977) Geochemical study of the redistribution of elements in soil—I. Evaluation of degree of weathering of transported soil materials by distribution of major elements among the particle size fractions and soil extract. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 41:891–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walling D (2005) Tracing suspended sediment sources in catchments and river systems. Sci Total Environ 344:159–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walling D (2013) The evolution of sediment source fingerprinting investigations in fluvial systems. J Soils Sediments 13:1658–1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0767-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling D, Collins A (2008) The catchment sediment budget as a management tool. Environ Sci Pol 11:136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE, Collins AL (2016) Fine sediment transport and management. In: Gilvear DJ, Greenwood MT, Thoms MC, Wood PJ (eds) River science: research and management for the 21st century. Wiley, London, pp 37–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walling D, Foster ID (2016) Using environmental radionuclides and sediment geochemistry for tracing and dating fine fluvial sediment. In: Kondolf GM, Piégay H (eds) Tools in fluvial geomorphology, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 183–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE, Owens PN, Leeks GJ (1999) Fingerprinting suspended sediment sources in the catchment of the River Ouse, Yorkshire, UK. Hydrological Processes 13:955–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werritty A, Ferguson R (1980) Pattern changes in a Scottish braided river over 1, 30 and 200 years Timescales in geomorphology:53-68

  • Wilkinson SN, Hancock GJ, Bartley R, Hawdon AA, Keen RJ (2013) Using sediment tracing to assess processes and spatial patterns of erosion in grazed rangelands, Burdekin River basin, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project was funded by grant number 600.1197 from the research council of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. ALC was supported by strategic funding from the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC grant BBS/E/C/000I0330).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Geography, School of Earth Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, 1983969411, Iran

    Kazem Nosrati & Zeynab Fathi

  2. Sustainable Agriculture Sciences Department, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, EX20 2SB, UK

    Adrian L. Collins

Authors
  1. Kazem Nosrati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zeynab Fathi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adrian L. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazem Nosrati.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nosrati, K., Fathi, Z. & Collins, A.L. Fingerprinting sub-basin spatial suspended sediment sources by combining geochemical tracers and weathering indices. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 28401–28414 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06024-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06024-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation