Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of installed capacity size on environmental efficiency across 528 thermal power stations in North China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermal power plants are the main source of carbon dioxide emissions in China. Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and their neighborhood provinces are the most polluted regions in China. Environmental efficiencies of 528 thermal power plants were evaluated through metafrontier epsilon-based measure, which aimed to overcome the invalid inferences of radial or non-radial model. We also analyzed the heterogeneity of environmental efficiency across different regions by considering environmental technology differences. Bootstrap regression was used in order to testify three different hypotheses to address the disadvantages of conventional regression. We found that environmental efficiency in Beijing and Tianjin is higher than the other regions and is becoming divergent. In addition, coal consumption intensity negatively affects environmental efficiency. Large-scale power stations are more environmental efficient than smaller ones. Longer equipment utilization hour can enhance energy performance of power stations, which can decrease carbon emissions and increase environmental efficiency. It is better to promote technology transfer from regions with higher environmental efficiency to regions with lower environmental efficiency. Low-carbon technologies should be promoted to decrease carbon emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://dq.gongcheng365.cn/yunxingweihu/jishuyuguanli/10121.html

References

  • Andrés JP, Prior D (2009) Environmental externalities and efficiency measurement. J Environ Manag 90:3332–3339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrés JP, Ernest R, Francesc H (2005) Directional distance functions and environmental regulation. Resour Energy Econ 27(2):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, Zhang N, Danao D, Zhang N (2013) Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: a non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy 58:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SY, Golley J (2014) Green’ productivity growth in China’s industrial economy. Energy Econ 44:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Jin GZ, Kumar N, Shi G (2013) The promise of Beijing: evaluating the impact of the 2008 Olympic Games on air quality. J Environ Econ Manag 66(3):424–443

  • China Electricity Council (2011) A study on emission reduction of power industry in China, China market press, Beijing

  • Choi Y, Zhang N, Zhou P (2012) Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Appl Energy 98:198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51(3):229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications. References and DEA-Solver Software, Springer

  • Du LM, Mao J (2015) Estimating the environmental efficiency and marginal CO2 abatement cost of coal-fired power stations in China. Energy Policy 85:347–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du KR, Lu H, Yu K (2014) Source of the potential CO2 emission reduction in China: a nonparametric metafrontier approach. Appl Energy 115:491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Hernandez-Sancho F (2004) Environmental performance: an index number approach. Resour Energy Econ 26:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Noh DW, Weber W (2005) Characteristics of a polluting technology: theory and practice. J Econ 126:469–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrel MJ (1957) The measurement of productivity efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama H, William LW (2009) A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio Econ Plan Sci 43(4):274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao JM, Wang LT (2005) Improving urban air quality in China: Beijing case study. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 55(9):1298–1305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami Y (1969) Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. Am J Agric Econ 51:564–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami Y, Ruttan VW (1970) Agricultural productivity differences among countries. Am Econ Rev 60(5):895–911

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2014) Energy, climate change and environment: 2014 insights

  • Kumar S (2006) Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: a global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index. Ecol Econ 56:280–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Park J, Kim T (2002) Estimation of the shadow prices for pollutants with production /environment inefficiency taken into account: a nonparametric directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 64:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li KQ (2015) www. bj new.net /yl/228237.html

  • Li Z, Ouyang XL, Du KR, Zhao Y (2017) Does government transparency contribute to improved eco-efficiency performance? An empirical study of 262 cities in China. Energy Policy 110:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BQ, Du KR (2013) Technology gap and China’s regional energy efficiency: a parametric metafrontier approach. Energy Econ 40:529–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BQ, Du KR (2015) Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China’s regional economies: Do market-oriented reforms matter? Energy Policy 78:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BQ, Wu Y, Zhang L (2012) Electricity saving potential of the power generation industry in China. Energy 40:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner S, Zhu L, Guan DB, Geng Y, Li X (2013) CO2 emissions from China’s power sector at the provincial level: consumption versus production perspectives. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19:164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long XL, Oh KY, Cheng G (2013) Are stronger environmental regulations effective in practice? The case of China’s accession to the WTO. J Clean Prod 39:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long XL, Zhao XC, Cheng FX (2015) The comparison analysis of total factor productivity and eco-efficiency in China’s cement manufactures. Energy Policy 81:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo L, Tang QL (2014) Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? J Contemp Account Econ 10(3):191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (2013) Detailed implementation of the air pollution prevention and control action plan for the beijing-tianjin-hebei region and surrounding areas, 2013

  • Munisamy S, Arabi B (2015) Eco-efficiency change in power stations: using a slacks-based measure for the meta-frontier Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. J Clean Prod 105:218–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (2014) China statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, 2014

  • National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) (2014) National greenhouse gas inventory of the People’s Republic of China. Chinese Environmental Science Press

  • O’Donnell CJ, Rao DSP, Battese GE (2008) Metafrontier Frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and the technology ratios. Empir Econ 34:231–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher N, Norra S, Chen Y, Chai F, Wang S (2012) Efficiency of mitigation measures to reduce particulate air pollution—a case study during the Olympic Summer Games 2008 in Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ 427:146–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econ 136(1):31–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streets DG, Fu JS, Jang CJ, Hao J, He K, Tang XY, Zhang YH, Wang ZF, Li ZP, Zhang Q, Wang LT, Wang BY, Yu C (2007) Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games. Atmos Environ 41:480–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi T, Goto M (2015) Environmental assessment on coal-fired power stations in U.S. north-east region by DEA non-radial measurement. Energy Econ 50:125–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K, Tsutsui M (2010) An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA – a third pole of technical efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 207(3):1554–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyteca D (1997) Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms-concepts and empirical results. J Prod Anal 8:183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZH, Zeng HL, Wei YM, Zhang YX (2012) Regional total factor energy efficiency: an empirical analysis of industrial sector in China. Appl Energy 97:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SL, Gao J, Zhang YC, Zhang JQ, Cha FH, Wang T, Ren C, Wang WX (2014) Impact of emission control on regional air quality: an observational study of air pollutants before, during and after the Beijing Olympic Games. J Environ Sci 26:175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang QW, Su B, Sun J, Zhou P, Zhou D (2015) Measurement and decomposition of energy-saving and emissions reduction performance in Chinese cities. Appl Energy 151:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y, Liao H, Fan Y (2007) An empirical analysis of energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel sector. Energy 32(12):2262–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei C, Löschel A, Liu B (2013) An empirical analysis of the CO2 shadow price in Chinese thermal power enterprises. Energy Econ 40:22–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xue YF, Tian HZ, Yan J, Zhou Z, Wang JL et al (2016) Temporal trends and spatial variation characteristics of primary air pollutants emissions from coal-fired industrial boilers in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 213:717–726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Han OY, Fang KN, Ye LL, Zhang J (2014) Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecol Indic 51:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Huang RT, Du KR (2019) The impacts of market power on power grid efficiency: evidence from China. China Econ Rev 55:99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZX (2000) Decoupling China’s carbon emissions increase from economic growth: an economic analysis and policy implications. World Dev 28:739–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Choi Y (2013) A comparative study of dynamic changes in CO2 emission performance of fossil fuel power stations in China and Korea. Energy Policy 62:324–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Kong FB, Choi Y, Zhou P (2014) The effect of size-control policy on unified energy and carbon efficiency for Chinese fossil fuel power stations. Energy Policy 70:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XL, Ma Q, Yang R (2013) Factors influencing CO2 emissions in China’s power industry: co-integration analysis. Energy Policy 57:89–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XL, Yin HT, Zhao Y (2015) Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency and CO2 emissions of power stations in China. Appl Energy 149:238–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou BS (2013) http://news.china.com/domestic/945/20150302/19333992_all.html

  • Zhou P, Poh KL, Ang BW (2007) A non-radial approach to measuring environmental performance. Eur J Oper Res 178:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Ang BW, Han JY (2010) Total factor carbon emission performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Econ 32(1):194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou KL, Yang SL, Shen C, Ding S, Sun CP (2015) Energy conservation and emission reduction of China’s electric power industry. Renew Sust Energ Rev 45:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71803068, 71603105, 71911540483), the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A5A2A03036952), the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2014K2A2A2000766), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu, China (No. SBK2016042936), the Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 16YJC790067), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M610051, 2018T110054).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Keunyeob Oh or Xingle Long.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, C., Oh, K., Long, X. et al. Effect of installed capacity size on environmental efficiency across 528 thermal power stations in North China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 29822–29833 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05981-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05981-7

Keywords

Navigation