Abstract
The management and remediation of abandoned hydrocarbon-contaminated sites require detailed information on the distribution of contaminant plumes. In areas where groundwater is active, the formation of contaminant plumes is associated with hydrodynamics, the nature of the sedimentary layers, and the nature of the pollutants and the degradation process. A comprehensive survey is needed to determine this information. An abandoned hydrocarbon disposal site is located in an area where groundwater is very active. In the investigation of contaminant plumes, we combined the geophysical method with accurate geochemical analysis of subsoil and groundwater samples. Ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography images of the electrical anomalies potentially originating from hydrocarbon pollution were used to select sites for subsurface sampling. Total petroleum hydrocarbons, total dissolved solids, and groundwater pH were measured. The results showed that the source zone had undergone long-term natural attenuation, and it was unable to continuously output organic matter to support the expansion of contaminant plumes. Low-resistivity anomalies and enhanced attenuation in the study area were caused by hydrocarbon degradation products and enhanced mineral weathering. Delineating the distribution of contaminant plumes in areas where the resistivity was below 15 Ω m. The distribution of the plume in the vertical direction was related to the hydrocarbon release history (release rate and volume) and was affected by fluctuations in the groundwater level. The contaminant plume moved very slowly along the direction of the hydraulic gradient and was in a basically stable state. The results showed that the combined application of the geoelectrical method and the geochemical method can effectively describe the distribution of underground contaminant plumes in an aged pollution site.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aal GZA, Atekwana EA, Slater LD, Atekwana EA (2004) Effects of microbial processes on electrolytic and interfacial electrical properties of unconsolidated sediments. Geophys Res Lett 31:179–206. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl020030
Abdul, Abdul S (2010) A new pumping strategy for petroleum product recovery from contaminated hydrogeologic systems: laboratory and field evaluations. Ground Water Monit Remediat 12:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.1992.tb00415.x
Al-Sarawi M, Massoud MS, Al-Abdali F (1998) Preliminary assessment of oil contamination levels in soils contaminated with oil lakes in the Greater Burgan Oil Fields, Kuwait. Water Air Soil Pollut 106:493–504. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005073031798
Atekwana EA, Atekwana EA (2010) Geophysical signatures of microbial activity at hydrocarbon contaminated sites: a review. Surv Geophys 31:247–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-009-9089-8
Atekwana EA, Atekwana EA, Rowe RS, Werkema DD Jr, Legall FD (2004a) The relationship of total dissolved solids measurements to bulk electrical conductivity in an aquifer contaminated with hydrocarbon. J Appl Geophys 56:281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2004.08.003
Atekwana EA, Werkema DD Jr, Duris JW, Rossbach S, Atekwana EA, Sauck WA, Cassidy DP, Means J, Legall FD (2004b) In-situ apparent conductivity measurements and microbial population distribution at a hydrocarbon-contaminated site. Geophysics 69:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/1.1649375
Bellin CA, Rao PSC (1993) Impact of bacterial biomass on contaminant sorption and transport in a subsurface soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:1813–1820. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260420120
Bertolla L, Porsani JL, Soldovieri F, Catapano I (2014) GPR-4D monitoring a controlled LNAPL spill in a masonry tank at USP, Brazil. J Appl Geophys 103:237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2004.02.006
Bradford JH (2007) Frequency-dependent attenuation analysis of ground-penetrating radar data. Geophysics 72:J7–J16. https://doi.org/10.1190/gpysa7.72.y3_1
Buselli G, Lu K (2001) Groundwater contamination monitoring with multichannel electrical and electromagnetic methods. J Appl Geophys 48:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-9851(01)00055-6
Cassidy DP, Hudak AJ, Werkema DD, Atekwana EA, Rossbach S, Duris JW, Atekwana EA, Sauck WA (2002) In situ rhamnolipid production at an abandoned petroleum refinery. J Soil Contam 11:769–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/20025891107087
Castro DLD (2003) 4-D ground penetrating radar monitoring of a hydrocarbon leakage site in Fortaleza (Brazil) during its remediation process: a case history. J Appl Geophys 54:127–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.08.021
Caterina D, Flores-Orozco A, Nguyen F (2017) Long-term ERT monitoring of biogeochemical changes of an aged hydrocarbon contamination. J Contam Hydrol 201:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2017.04.003
Chang L (2004) Remediation of petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated groundwater by natural attenuation Environmental Engineering
Che-Alota V, Atekwana EA, Atekwana EA, Sauck WA, Werkema DD (2015) Temporal geophysical signatures from contaminant-mass remediation. Geophysics 74:B113–B123. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3139769
Chu M, Kitanidis PK, Mccarty PL (2005) Modeling microbial reactions at the plume fringe subject to transverse mixing in porous media: when can the rates of microbial reaction be assumed to be instantaneous? Water Resour Res 41:294–311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003495
Essaid HI, Bekins BA, Cozzarelli IM (2015) Organic contaminant transport and fate in the subsurface: evolution of knowledge and understanding. Water Resour Res 51:4861–4902. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015wr017121
Golebiowski T, Tomecka-Suchon S, Marcak H, Zogala B (2010) Aiding of the GPR method by other measurement techniques for liquid contamination detection. In: International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1190/icgpr.2010.5550160
Gomez-Lahoz C, ., Garcia-Delgado RA, Wilson DJ (1994) A model with mass transport limitations for pump and treat remediation of soils polluted with NAPL Environ Monit Assess 32:161–186 doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00547134
Griffin TW, Watson KW (2010) A comparison of field techniques for confirming dense nonaqueous phase liquids ground. Water Monit Remediat 22:48–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2002.tb00312.x
Ham PAS, Schotting RJ, Prommer H, Davis GB (2004) Effects of hydrodynamic dispersion on plume lengths for instantaneous bimolecular reactions. Adv Water Resour 27:803–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.05.008
Jie Z, Gui-Rui Y (2002) Effects of surface coatings on electrochemical properties and contaminant sorption of clay minerals. Chemosphere 49:619–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00332-6
Weber WJ, Huang W (1996) A distributed reactivity model for sorption by soils and sediments. 4. Intraparticle heterogeneity and phase distribution relationships under nonequilibrium conditions. Environ Sci Technol 30:881–888. https://doi.org/10.1021/es950329y
Werkema DD Jr, Atekwana EA, Endres AL, Sauck WA, Cassidy DP (2003) Investigating the geoelectrical response of hydrocarbon contamination undergoing biodegradation. Geophys Res Lett 30:87–104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl017346
Kanli AI, Neducz B (2015) Electromagnetic measurements for monitoring molybdenum contamination in near-surface survey. Earth Sci Res J 19:107–111. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v19n2.44897
Lago AL, Elis VR, Borges WR, Penner GC (2009) Geophysical investigation using resistivity and GPR methods: a case study of a lubricant oil waste disposal area in the city of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. Environ Geol 58:407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1511-x
Liedl R, Yadav PK, Dietrich P (2011) Length of 3-D mixing-controlled plumes for a fully penetrating contaminant source with finite width. Water Resour Res 47:427–438. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009710
Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. In 44:131–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.x
Marcak H, Gołębiowski T (2008) Changes of GPR spectra due to the presence of hydrocarbon contamination in the ground. Acta Geophys 56:485–504. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-008-0003-4
Mercer JW, Cohen RM (1990) A review of immiscible fluids in the subsurface: properties, models, characterization and remediation. J Contam Hydrol 6:107–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7722(90)90043-g
Nyári Z, Kanlı A, Stickel J, Tillmann A (2010) The use of non-conventional CPTe data in determination of 3-D electrical resistivity distribution. J Appl Geophys 70:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.01.008
Orlando L, Renzi B (2015) Electrical permittivity and resistivity time-lapses of multi-phase DNAPLs in a lab test. Water Resour Res 51:377–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr015291
Pérez-Corona M, García JA, Taller G, Polgár D, Bustos E, Plank Z (2016) The cone penetration test and 2D imaging resistivity as tools to simulate the distribution of hydrocarbons in soil. Phys Chem Earth 91:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.09.006
Peter A, Miles B, Teutsch G (2008) Estimation of emission from an LNAPL contaminated zone considering groundwater recharge. Environ Geol 55:321–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0978-1
Plank Z, Szűcs P, Madarász T, Neducza B (2011) Interdisciplinary characterization of subsurface hydrocarbon contamination on a test site in Hungary. Acta Geod Geophys Hu 46:457–470. https://doi.org/10.1556/ageod.46.2011.4.7
Power C, Gerhard JI, Tsourlos P, Soupios P, Simyrdanis K, Karaoulis M (2015) Improved time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of dense non-aqueous phase liquids with surface-to-horizontal borehole arrays. J Appl Geophys 112:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.10.022
Ravi N, Subhas N, Mallavarapu M, Kumar RP, Sreenivasulu C, Zuliang C, Mark B (2012) Monitored natural attenuation of a long-term petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated sites: a case study. Biodegradation 23:881–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-012-9580-7
Revil A, Skold M, Karaoulis M, Schmutz M, Hubbard SS, Mehlhorn TL, Watson DB (2013) Hydrogeophysical investigations of the former S-3 ponds contaminant plumes, Oak Ridge Integrated Field Research Challenge site, Tennessee. Geophysics 78:EN29–EN41. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0177.1
Rosales RM, Martínez-Pagán P, Faz A, Bech J (2014) Study of subsoil in former petrol stations in SE of Spain: physicochemical characterization and hydrocarbon contamination assessment. J Geochem Explor 147:306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.10.006
Rucker DF, Levitt MT, Greenwood WJ (2009) Three-dimensional electrical resistivity model of a nuclear waste disposal site. J Appl Geophys 69:150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.09.001
Sauck WA (2000) A model for the resistivity structure of LNAPL plumes and their environs in sandy sediments. J Appl Geophys 44:151–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-9851(99)00021-x
Seyedabbasi M, Pirestani K, Holland SB (2005) Imhoff PT investigation of processes controlling elution of solutes from nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) pools into groundwater. In: AGU fall meeting, vol 18, pp 130–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1910.tb15685.x
Shao S, Guo X, Chang G (2019a) Fresh underground light non-aqueous liquid (LNAPL) pollution source zone monitoring in an outdoor experiment using cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:18316–18328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05039-8
Shao S, Guo X, Ding H (2019b) Temporal ground penetrating radar (GPR) imaging of an oil release within a porous medium: a description of anomalous GPR characteristics during the degradation process and a contaminated area determination method: towards a sustainable geoenvironment. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, vol 1, pp 850–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2221-1_97
Shen L, Jaffé R (2000) Interactions between dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons and pure and humic acid-coated mineral surfaces in artificial seawater. Mar Environ Res 49:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-1136(99)00066-5
Simyrdanis K, Papadopoulos N, Soupios P, Kirkou S, Tsourlos P (2018) Characterization and monitoring of subsurface contamination from olive oil Mills’ waste waters using electrical resistivity. Tomography Sci Total Environ 637(638):991–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.348
Tillmann A, Englert A, Nyari Z, Fejes I, Vanderborght J, Vereecken H (2008) Characterization of subsoil heterogeneity, estimation of grain size distribution and hydraulic conductivity at the Krauthausen test site using cone penetration test. J Contam Hydrol 95:57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.07.013
Triantafilis J, Lesch SM (2005) Mapping clay content variation using electromagnetic induction techniques. Comput Electron Agric 46:203–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.006
Vaudelet P, Schmutz M, Pessel M, Franceschi M, Guérin R, Atteia O, Blondel A, Ngomseu C, Galaup S, Rejiba F, Bégassat P (2011) Mapping of contaminant plumes with geoelectrical methods. A case study in urban context. J Appl Geophys 75:738–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.09.023
Acknowledgments
We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Funding
This research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for development project of major scientific research instrument (Grant No. 41427803), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41772307), and National Key Research and Development Projects (Grant No. 2017YFC0307701).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shao, S., Gao, C., Guo, X. et al. Mapping the contaminant plume of an abandoned hydrocarbon disposal site with geophysical and geochemical methods, Jiangsu, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 24645–24657 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05780-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05780-0