Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revealing the environmental pollution in nexus of aviation transportation in SAARC region

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental degradation has put serious concern among the nations at global level, yet contented measures are still lagged behind the prospective outcomes. This study is aimed at analyzing the existence of “aviation transportation Kuznets curve” together with “environmental Kuznets curve” in perspective of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the SAARC region during 1980 to 2018. The panel unit root test summary applied to panel data indicates the first difference order while panel fisher cointegration shows long-run association among the considered variables. The econometric results by fully modified least square (FMOLS) validate the existence of “inverted U-shaped” Kuznets curve for environment as (EKC) and aviation transported carriage (ATC) while “U shaped” aviation transported passenger (ATP) is observed in context to greenhouse gas (GHG). In addition, the dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) exhibits “inverted U shaped” for aviation transportation while GDP has an increasing trend of “U-shaped” curve. The pairwise Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality shows unidirectional association from economic growth, trade openness, and aviation sector to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Therefore, it is an urgent need of the hour for the SAARC region to consider the sustainability of the environment by key sector. This analysis suggests that SAARC nations must focus on exploiting renewable energy means along with implementing fuel-saving traveler and merchandise expertise that thoroughly cuts the diesel fuel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdouli M, Kamoun O, Hamdi B (2018) The impact of economic growth, population density, and FDI inflows on emissions in BRICTS countries: does the Kuznets curve exist? Empir Econ 54(4):1717–1742

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad N, Du L, Lu J, Wang J, Li HZ, Hashmi MZ (2017) Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: is there any environmental Kuznets curve? Energy 123:164–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Akomolafe KJ, Danladi JD, Oseni YR (2015) Trade openness, economic growth, and environmental concern in Nigeria. International Journal of African and Asian Studies 13:163–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Alege PO, Ogundipe AA (2015) Environmental quality and economic growth in Nigeria: a fractional cointegration analysis. Int J Dev Sustain 2(2)

  • Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35(10):4772–4778

    Google Scholar 

  • Azam M, Khan AQ (2016) Urbanization and environmental degradation: evidence from four SAARC countries—Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 35(3):823–832

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman W (1992) Economic growth and the environment: whose growth? Whose environment? World Dev 20(4):481–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavides M, Ovalle K, Torres C, Vinces T (2017) Economic growth, renewable energy and methane emissions: is there an enviromental Kuznets curve in Austria? Int J Energy Econ Policy 7(1):259–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Boopen S, Vinesh S (2011) On the relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth: the Mauritian experience. In: University of Mauritius, Mauritius Environment Outlook Report, http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/conferences/2011-EDiA/papers/776-Seetanah.pdf. Vol. 14, p 2015

  • Bozkurt C, Akan Y (2014) Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: the Turkish case. Int J Energy Econ Policy 4(3):484–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillol S (2011) Fighting global warming: the potential of photocatalysis against CO2, CH4, N2O, CFCs, tropospheric O3, BC and other major contributors to climate change. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 12(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristea A, Hummels D, Puzzello L, Avetisyan M (2013) Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport. J Environ Econ Manag 65(1):153–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Google Scholar 

  • Etuonovbe AK (2009) The devastating effects of environmental degradation-a case study of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria

  • Farhani S, Ben Rejeb J (2012) Link between economic growth and energy consumption in over 90 countries. University of Sousse, Tunisia

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhani S, Mrizak S, Chaibi A, Rault C (2014) The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainability: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 71:189–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CW (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society:424–438

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3):1156–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE, Phillips PC (1990) Estimation and inference in models of cointegration: a simulation study. Adv Econ 8(1989):225–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan SA, Nosheen M (2018) The impact of air transportation on carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL modelling approach. Int J Innov Econ Dev 3(6):7–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan SA, Nosheen M (2019) Estimating the railways Kuznets curve for high income nations—a GMM approach for three pollution indicators. Energy Rep 5:170–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill N, Brannigan C, Wynn D, Milnes R, van Essen H, den Boer E et al (2011) The role of GHG emissions from infrastructure construction, vehicle manufacturing, and ELVs in overall transport sector emissions. Task 2 paper produced as part of a contract between European Commission Directorate-general climate action and AEA technology plc

  • Hossain MS (2011) Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy 39(11):6991–6999

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes W, Wang S (2012) Green growth and developing countries: a summary for policymakers. Document DCD/DAC (2012), 27

  • Ilham MI (2018) Economic development and environmental degradation in ASEAN. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi 7(1):103–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115: 53–74.

  • Jamel L, Maktouf S (2017) The nexus between economic growth, financial development, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in European countries. Cogent Economics & Finance 5(1):1341456

    Google Scholar 

  • Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Zhou Z, Liu C (2018) The impact of public transportation on carbon emissions: a panel quantile analysis based on Chinese provincial data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:4000–4012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3921-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik G, Chel A, Patil S, Chaturvedi S (2018) Status of particulate matter pollution in India: a review. Handbook of Environmental Materials Management:1–28

  • Khan HH, Khan O (2018) Income-FDI-environmental degradation nexus for developing countries: a panel analysis of America continent

  • Khwaja MA, Umer F, Shaheen N, Sherazi A, Shaheen FH (2012) Air pollution reduction and control in South Asia–need for a regional agreement. Sci Technol Dev 31(1):51–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin C-F, Chu C-SJ (1992) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Magazzino C (2016) The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Italy. Int J Sustainable Energy 35(9):844–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallick L, Tandi SM (2015) Energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in SAARC countries: does environmental Kuznets curve exist. The Empirical Econometrics and Quantitative Economics Letters, 4:57–69

  • Mao C, Zhai N, Yang J, Feng Y, Cao Y, Han X, Ren G, Yang G, Meng QX (2013) Environmental Kuznets curve analysis of the economic development and nonpoint source pollution in the Ningxia Yellow River irrigation districts in China. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzanti M, Musolesi A, Zoboli R (2006) A Bayesian approach to the estimation of environmental Kuznets curves for CO2 emissions. (October 2006). FEEM Working Paper No. 121.06. Available at SSRN:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.936903

  • Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Econ 32(6):1374–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikayilov JI Galeotti M, Hasanov FJ (2018) The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan (No. 102). IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita’Bocconi, Milano, Italy

  • Mitic P, Munitlak Ivanović O, Zdravković A (2017) A cointegration analysis of real GDP and CO2 emissions in transitional countries. Sustainability 9(4):568

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohiuddin O, Asumadu-Sarkodie S, Obaidullah M (2016) The relationship between carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, and GDP: a recent evidence from Pakistan. Cogent Engineering 3(1):1210491

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad A, Ishfaq A (2011) Industrial development, agricultural growth, urbanization and environmental Kuznets curve in PakistanMPRA Working Paper, Paper No. 33469

  • Nassani AA, Aldakhil AM, Abro MMQ, Zaman K (2017) Environmental Kuznets curve among BRICS countries: spot lightening finance, transport, energy and growth factors. J Clean Prod 154:474–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh KY, Bhuyan MI (2018) Trade openness and CO2 emissions: evidence of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment (AJAE) 12(1)

  • Oktavilia S, Firmansyah F (2016) The relationships of environmental degradation and trade openness in Indonesia. Int J Econ Financ Issues 6(6S):125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Opoku EEO (2013) Effects of trade openness and economic growth on carbon dioxide (Co2) Emissions in Ghana (doctoral dissertation, Department of Economics, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology)

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(9):3220–3225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pablo-Romero MP, Cruz L, Barata E (2017) Testing the transport energy-environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the EU27 countries. Energy Econ 62:257–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey B, Gautam M, Agrawal M (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions from coal mining activities and their possible mitigation strategies. In: Environmental carbon footprints, pp 259–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran H (2003) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence, Cambridge working papers in economics 0346. Faculty of Economics (DAE), University of Cambridge

  • Phillips PC (1995) Fully modified least squares and vector autoregression. Econometrica-Evanston ill 63:1023–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan V, Feng Y (2009) Air pollution, greenhouse gases and climate change: global and regional perspectives. Atmos Environ 43(1):37–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saboori B, Sulaiman J (2013) Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy 60:892–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Gow J (2014) Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Energy 73:44–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleem H, Jiandong W, Zaman K, Elashkar EE, Shoukry AM (2018) The impact of air-railways transportation, energy demand, bilateral aid flows, and population density on environmental degradation: evidence from a panel of next-11 countries. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 62:152–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Jemaa MMB (2015) On the causal nexus of road transport CO2 emissions and macroeconomic variables in Tunisia: evidence from combined cointegration tests. Renew Sust Energ Rev 51:89–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad SJH, Kumar RR, Zakaria M, Hurr M (2017) Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikkonen P (1991) Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegration regressions. Econom Theory 7(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SS (2011) Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy 88(1):376–382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sim S, Barry M, Clift R, Cowell SJ (2007) The relative importance of transport in determining an appropriate sustainability strategy for food sourcing. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(6):422

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Sengupta T (2018) Renewable energy policies and contradictions in causality: a case of Next 11 Countries. J Clean Prod 197:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KR, Samet JM, Romieu I, Bruce N (2000) Indoor air pollution in developing countries and acute lower respiratory infections in children. Thorax 55(6):518–532

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soytas U, Sari R, Ewing BT (2007) Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 62(3–4):482–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayebi SK, Younespour S (2012) The effect of trade openness on environmental quality: evidence from Iran’s trade relations with the selected countries of the different blocks. Iranian Economic Review 16(32):19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin MMM, Wadud MA (2014) CARBON emission and economic growth of SAARC countries: a vector autoregressive (VAR) analysis. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research

  • WDI (2019) Online available at: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Syeda Anam Hassan: Data source and methodology, estimations and results discussion, conclusion and manuscript writing (sections 3, 4, and 5)

Nazish Rafaz: Introduction, literature review, recommendations, references correction, and manuscript editing (sections 1, 2, and 6).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syeda Anam Hassan.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Pairwise Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality tests

Sample: 1980 2018

Lags: 2

Null hypothesis:

W-Stat.

Zbar-Stat.

Prob.

  GDP does not homogeneously cause GHG

4.00442

1.83453

0.0666

  GHG does not homogeneously cause GDP

1.77319

−0.35310

0.7240

  ATC does not homogeneously cause GHG

4.76854

2.58371

0.0098

  GHG does not homogeneously cause ATC

4.29886

2.12321

0.0337

  ATP does not homogeneously cause GHG

2.26996

0.13396

0.8934

  GHG does not homogeneously cause ATP

4.68746

2.50422

0.0023

  EU does not homogeneously cause GHG

4.62940

2.44730

0.0144

  GHG does not homogeneously cause EU

6.44502

4.22744

2.E-05

  TOP does not homogeneously cause GHG

2.59628

0.45390

0.0499

  GHG does not homogeneously cause TOP

3.49109

1.33123

0.1831

  ATC does not homogeneously cause GDP

1.44867

−0.67129

0.0020

  GDP does not homogeneously cause ATC

6.27799

4.06367

5.E-05

  ATP does not homogeneously cause GDP

1.92809

− 0.20124

0.0405

  GDP does not homogeneously cause ATP

8.72427

6.46216

1.E-10

  EU does not homogeneously cause GDP

2.38703

0.24874

0.0036

  GDP does not homogeneously cause EU

2.19673

0.06216

0.9504

  TOP does not homogeneously cause GDP

2.79140

0.64521

0.5188

  GDP does not homogeneously cause TOP

5.40790

3.21059

0.0013

  ATP does not homogeneously cause ATC

5.45177

3.25359

0.0011

  ATC does not homogeneously cause ATP

6.02646

3.81705

0.0001

  EU does not homogeneously cause ATC

3.77653

1.61109

0.1072

  ATC does not homogeneously cause EU

4.08193

1.91052

0.0561

  TOP does not homogeneously cause ATC

3.46486

1.30551

0.0917

  ATC does not homogeneously cause TOP

3.46422

1.30489

0.1919

  EU does not homogeneously cause ATP

3.11180

0.95935

0.0374

  ATP does not homogeneously cause EU

3.13370

0.98082

0.3267

  TOP does not homogeneously cause ATP

3.36815

1.21069

0.2260

  ATP does not homogeneously cause TOP

4.71968

2.53581

0.0012

  TOP does not homogeneously cause EU

3.30766

1.15138

0.0496

  EU does not homogeneously cause TOP

1.53332

− 0.58829

0.5563

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, S.A., Nosheen, M. & Rafaz, N. Revealing the environmental pollution in nexus of aviation transportation in SAARC region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 25092–25106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05648-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05648-3

Keywords

Navigation