Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Testing environmental Kuznets curve for the USA under a regime shift: the role of renewable energy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goals of this paper are to examine whether the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) holds and to investigate whether renewable energy consumption can decrease CO2 emissions in the USA using monthly data spanning the period 2000:M01–2018:M07. For these purposes, the paper employs a cointegration test with a regime shift and observes the long-run coefficients before and after the regime shift. The findings support the presence of the EKC. The findings also indicate that renewable energy consumption has negative effects on CO2 emissions, while these effects are greater when the share of renewable energy consumption in total energy consumption is higher in the USA. Theoretical and practical implications for these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apergis N, Payne JE, Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ 69:2255–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apergis N, Christou C, Gupta R (2017) Are there environmental Kuznets curves for US state-level CO2 emissions? Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:551–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atasoy BS (2017) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across the US: evidence from panel mean group estimators. Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:731–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek J (2015) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: the case of Arctic countries. Energy Econ 50:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili F, Kocak E, Bulut U (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:838–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2003) Trade and the environment: theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49:1057–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du G, Liu S, Lei N, Huang Y (2018) A test of environmental Kuznets curve for haze pollution in China: evidence from the penal data of 27 capital cities. J Clean Prod 205:821–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2013) Sunny uplands. http://www.economist.com/news/21566414-alternative-energy-will-no-longer-be-alternative-sunny-uplands. Accessed 24 Nov 2018

  • Energy Information Administration (2018) October 2018 monthly energy review. https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/. Accessed 11 Nov 2018

  • Engle RF, Granger CW (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteve V, Requeana FA (2006) Cointegration analysis of car advertising and sales data in the presence of structural change. Int J Econ Bus 13:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2018) Industrial production index. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/INDPRO. Accessed 11 Nov 2018

  • Flores CA, Flores-Lagunes A, Kapetanakis D (2014) Lessons from quantile panel estimation of the environmental Kuznets curve. Econ Rev 33:815–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory AW, Hansen BE (1996) Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. J Econ 70:99–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110:353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guris B (2016) CO2 emissions and energy consumption in the US: results from a threshold error correction model. Energ Source Part B 11:314–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxford B Econ Stat 52:169–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantz E, Hand M, Wiser R (2012) The past and future cost of wind energy. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/54526.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2018

  • Menyah K, Wolde-Rufael Y (2010) CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy 38:2911–2915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2018) How climate is changing? https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/. Accessed 1 July 2018

  • Ozbugday FC, Erbas BC (2015) How effective are energy efficiency and renewable energy in curbing CO2 emissions in the long run? A heterogeneous panel data analysis. Energy 82:734–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2018) The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy 160:1115–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1361–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC (1987) Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica 55:277–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018a) A review on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 649:128–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018b) Empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. J Clean Prod 201:98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Sinha A (2018) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: a literature survey. J Econ Stud 46:106–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32:1419–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Watson M (1993) A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61:783–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su ECY, Chen YT (2018) Policy or income to affect the generation of medical wastes: an application of environmental Kuznets curve by using Taiwan as an example. J Clean Prod 188:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Fang C (2018) Water use trend analysis: a non-parametric method for the environmental Kuznets curve detection. J Clean Prod 172:497–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li G, Fang C (2018) Urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:2144–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz NC (2014) CO2 emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energ Source Part B 9:229–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zivot E, Andrews DWK (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. J Bus Econ Stat 10:251–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoundi Z (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the environmental Kuznets curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1067–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University, Kirsehir, Turkey

    Umit Bulut

Authors
  1. Umit Bulut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umit Bulut.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bulut, U. Testing environmental Kuznets curve for the USA under a regime shift: the role of renewable energy. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 14562–14569 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04835-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04835-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation