Abstract
The pore structure of biochar determines many biochar-induced environmental serves. In order to predict quantitatively, the environmental serves of biochar, it is very important to characterize the porosity and pore size distribution of biochar and to understand how biochar pore structure relates to the environmental serves. In this study, pore characteristics of biochars derived from different feedstocks were determined using nitrogen adsorption and the mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) methods. A great variation of pore characteristics in biochar was found, depending on feedstock material. The specific surface area (SSA) of biochars varied greatly, ranging from 1.06 to 70.22 m2/g. Total pore volume and porosity of biochars determined by the MIP method ranged from 1.28 to 3.68 cm3/g and from 57.8 to 79.7%, respectively. The pore size distribution of biochars had bimodal peaks in the range of 5–15 and 1.5–5 μm for the herbaceous plant and broad-leaf forest biochars, while coniferous forest biochar had two peaks at the pore sizes of 6–25 and 1.5–3 μm, respectively. Biochars had substantial storage pores (0.5–50 μm), accounting for about 85% of total pore volume, and small transmission and residual pores. The herbaceous plant biochars had larger volume of transmission pores (> 50 μm) than broad-leaf and coniferous forest biochar. Effects of pyrolysis conditions (temperature and residence time) on pore characteristics largely depended on feedstocks types. The difference in feedstocks would greatly affect pore characteristics of biochar, while the effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar pore characteristics varied with biomass type. The detailed characterization of pore structure in biochars could effectively predict the potential impacts of biochars as soil amendment and pollutant sorbent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G (2013) Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma 202-203:183–191
ASTM D4284 (1994) Standard test method for determining pore volume distribution of catalysts by mercury intrusion porosimetry, vol 05.03. ASTM Committee D-32 on Catalysts, Conshohocken
Biederman LA, Harpole WS (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenerg 5:202–214
Brewer CE, Chuang VJ, Masiello CA, Gonnermann H, Gao X, Dugan B, Driver EL, Panzacchi P, Zygourakis K, Davies CA (2014) New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenergy 66:176–185
Burrell LD, Zehetner F, Rampazzo N, Wimmer B, Soja G (2016) Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties. Geoderma 282:96–102
Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 107:419–428
Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy 61:196–205
Gregg SJ, Sing SW (1982) Adsorption, surface area, and porosity. Academic Press, London
Hardie M, Clothier B, Bound S, Oliver G, Close D (2014) Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant Soil 376:347–361
Hillel D (1980) Fundamentals of soil physics. Academic Press, New York
Hyvaluoma J, Kulju S, Hannula M, Wikberg H, Kalli A, Rasa K (2018) Quantitative characterization of pore structure of several biochars with 3D imaging. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8823-x
Illingworth J, Williams PT, Rand B (2013) Characterization of biochar porosity from pyrolysis of biomass flax fibre. J Energy Inst 86:63–70
Jaafar NM, Clode PL, Abbott LK (2014) Microscopy observations of habitable space in biochar for colonization by fungal hyphae from soil. J Integr Agric 13:483–490
Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187
Jimenez-Cordero D, Heras F, Alonso-Morales N, Gilarranz MA, Rodriguez JJ (2013) Porous structure and morphology of granular chars from flash and conventional pyrolysis of grape seeds. Biomass Bioenergy 54:123–132
Jones K, Ramakrishnan G, Uchimiya M, Orlov A (2015) New applications of X-ray tomography in pyrolysis of biomass: biochar imaging. Energy Fuel 29:1628–1634
Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT (2012) Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenergy 41:34–43
Krzesinska M, Pilawa B, Pusz S, Ng J (2006) Physical characteristics of carbon materials derived from pyrolysed vascular plants. Biomass Bioenergy 30:166–176
Laine J, Yunes S (1992) Effect of the preparation method on the pore size distribution of activated carbon from coconut shell. Carbon 30:601–604
Lal R, Shukla MK (2004) Principles of soil physics. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York
Lou L, Luo L, Cheng G, Wei Y, Mei R, Xun B, Xu X, Hu B, Chen Y (2012) The sorption of pentachlorophenol by aged sediment supplemented with black carbon produced from rice straw and fly ash. Bioresour Technol 112:61–66
Mimmo T, Panzacchi P, Baratieri M, Davies CA, Tonon G (2014) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on miscanthus (Miscanthus xgiganteus) biochar physical, chemical and functional properties. Biomass Bioenergy 62:149–157
Quilliam RS, Glanville HC, Wade SC, Jones DL (2013) Life in the “charosphere” - does biochar in agricultural soil provide a significant habitat for microorganisms? Soil Biol Biochem 65:287–293
Quin PR, Cowie AL, Flavel RJ, Keen BP, Macdonald LM, Morris SG, Singh BP, Young IM, Van Zwieten L (2014) Oil mallee biochar improves soil structural properties–a study with x-ray micro-CT. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:142–149
Schnee LS, Knauth S, Hapca S, Otten W, Eickhorst T (2016) Analysis of physical pore space characteristics of two pyrolytic biochars and potential as microhabitat. Plant Soil 408:357–368
Shinogi Y, Kanri Y (2003) Pyrolysis of plant, animal and human waste: physical and chemical characterization of the pyrolytic products. Bioresour Technol 90:241–247
Singh B, Singh BP, Cowie AL (2010) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Soil Res 48:516–525
Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass Bioenergy 84:37–48
Sun FF, Lu SG (2014) Biochars improve aggregate stability, water retention, and pore-space properties of clayey soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:26–33
Uzoma KC, Inoue M, Andry H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. J Food Agric Environ 9:1137–1143
Wang Y, Hu Y, Zhao X, Wang S, Xing G (2013) Comparisons of biochar properties from wood material and crop residues at different temperatures and residence times. Energy Fuel 27:5890–5899
Wang SS, Gao B, Zimmerman AR, Li YC, Ma LN, Harris WG, Migliaccio KW (2015) Physicochemical and sorptive properties of biochars derived from woody and herbaceous biomass. Chemosphere 134:257–262
Washburn EW (1921) Note on a method of determing the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. PNAS 7:115–116
Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, Spokas K (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag 36:256–268
Zhu XM, Chen BL, Zhu LZ, Xing BS (2017) Effects and mechanisms of biochar-microbe interactions in soil improvement and pollution remediation: a review. Environ Pollut 227:98–115
Funding
This research was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China (2016YFD0200302).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, S., Zong, Y. Pore structure and environmental serves of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 30401–30409 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3018-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3018-7