Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the performance and intellectual structure of construction and demolition waste research during 2000–2016

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction and demolition (C&D) waste diminishes scarce land resources and endangers human health and the surrounding environment. Quantitative and visualized analysis was conducted to evaluate worldwide scientific research output on C&D waste from 2000 to 2016. The related information of 857 publications was collected from SCI-Expanded database and statistically analyzed. The number of documents about C&D waste presented a general growth during the last 17 years. Construction and Building Materials publication ranked first in the most productive journals. China and Spain acted as dominated roles comparing to other countries, and Hong Kong Polytechnic University was the institution with the largest amount of C&D waste research. Recycled aggregates, sustainable C&D waste management, and the rewarding program and commerce system were the hottest topics during 2000–2016 and in the near future according to the intellectual structure analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamuthu P (2008) Challenges in sustainable management of construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag Res 491–492

  • Báez AG, Sáez PV, Merino MR, Navarro JG (2012) Methodology for quantification of waste generated in Spanish railway construction works. Waste Manag 32:920–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbudo A, Agrela F, Ayuso J, Jiménez JR, Poon CS (2012) Statistical analysis of recycled aggregates derived from different sources for sub-base applications. Constr Build Mater 28:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovea MD, Powell JC (2016) Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes. Waste Manag 50:151–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2006) CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 57:359–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Li H, Wong CTC (2002) An application of bar-code system for reducing. Autom Constr 11:521–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Li H, Kong SCW, Hong J, Xu Q (2006) E-commerce system simulation for construction and demolition waste exchange. Autom Constr 15:706–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Hu Z, Liu S, Tseng H (2012) Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opin Biol Ther 12:593–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Yang Y, Yang Y, Jiang W, Zhou J (2014) A bibliometric investigation of life cycle assessment research in the Web of Science databases. Int J Life Cycle Ass 19:1674–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Liu Z, Luo Z, Webber M, Chen J (2016) Bibliometric and visualized analysis of energy research. Ecol Eng 90:285–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan H, Wang J, Huang Q (2015) Encouraging the environmentally sound management of C&D waste in China: an integrative review and research agenda. Renew Sust Energ Rev 43:611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etxeberria M, Vázquez E, Marí A, Barra M (2007) Influence of amount of recycled coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Cem Concr Res 37:735–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista L, de Brito J (2007) Mechanical behaviour of concrete made with fine recycled concrete aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 29:397–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Zhang L, Du U, Wang W (2015) Visualization and quantitative study in bibliographic databases: a case in the field of university–industry cooperation. J Informetrics 9:118–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu H-Z, Ho Y-S (2012) Comparison of independent research of China’s top universities using bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics

  • Fu H-Z, Ho Y-S, Sui Y-M, Li Z-S (2010) A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993–2008. Waste Manag 30:2410–2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvín AP, Ayuso J, Jiménez JR, Agrela F (2012) Comparison of batch leaching tests and influence of pH on the release of metals from construction and demolition wastes. Waste Manag 32:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Soberon JMV (2002) Porosity of recycled concrete with substitution of recycled concrete aggregate an experimental study. Cem Concr Res 32:1301–1311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiete M, Stengel J, Ludwig J, Schultmann F (2011) Matching construction and demolition waste supply to recycling demand: a regional management chain model. Build Res Inf 39:333–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W-L, Lin D-H, Chang N-B, Lin K-S (2002) Recycling of construction and demolition waste via a mechanical sorting process. Resour Conserv Recycl 37:23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Zhao X, Sun Y, Ma J, Gao X, Xie T, Xu D, Yue Y, Zhao Y (2016) Spatial distribution of organic pollutants in industrial construction and demolition waste and their mutual interaction on an abandoned pesticide manufacturing plant. Environ Sci Process Impacts 18:482–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez JR, Ayuso J, Agrela F, López M, Galvín AP (2012a) Utilisation of unbound recycled aggregates from selected CDW in unpaved rural roads. Resour Conserv Recycl 58:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez JR, Ayuso J, Galvín AP, López M, Agrela F (2012b) Use of mixed recycled aggregates with a low embodied energy from non-selected CDW in unpaved rural roads. Constr Build Mater 34:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofoworola OF, Gheewala SH (2009) Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand. Waste Manag 29:731–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Chen Z (2003) Barcode technology for an incentive reward program to reduce construction wastes. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 18:313–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Ding Z, Mi X, Wang J (2013) A model for estimating construction waste generation index for building project in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 74:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Zhang X, Ding G, Feng Z (2016) Developing a quantitative construction waste estimation model for building construction projects. Resour Conserv Recycl 106:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Chen C (2012) The proximity of co-citation. Scientometrics 91:495–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Yin Y, Liu W, Dunford M (2015) Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics

  • Llatas C (2011) A model for quantifying construction waste in projects according to the European waste list. Waste Manag 31:1261–1276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Yuan H (2010) Exploring critical success factors for waste management in construction projects of China. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao G, Zou H, Chen G, Du H, Zuo J (2015) Past, current and future of biomass energy research: a bibliometric analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1823–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon V, Garg A, Aldred D, Hobbs G, Smith R, Tothill IE (2008) Composting and bioremediation process evaluation of wood waste materials generated from the construction and demolition industry. Chemosphere 71:1617–1628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Ruiperez C, Rodríguez A, Gutiérrez-González S, Calderón V (2016) Lightweight masonry mortars made with expanded clay and recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 118:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie Z, Yang Z, Fang Y, Yang Y, Tang Z, Wang X, Die Q, Gao X, Zhang F, Wang Q, Huang Q (2015) Environmental risks of HBCDD from construction and demolition waste: a contemporary and future issue. Environ Sci Pollut R 22:17249–17252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osmani M, Glass J, Price ADF (2008) Architects’ perspectives on construction waste reduction by design. Waste Manag 28:1147–1158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poon CS, Chan D (2006) Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base. Constr Build Mater 20:578–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon CS, Yu ATW, Ng LH (2001) On-site sorting of construction and demolition waste in Hong Kong. Resour Conserv Recycl 32:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian G (2014) Scientometric sorting by importance for literatures on life cycle assessments and some related methodological discussions. Int J Life Cycle Ass 19:1462–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao A, Jha KN, Misra S (2007) Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 50:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sáez PV, del Rio Merino M, Porras-Amores C (2012) Estimation of construction and demolition waste volume generation in new residential buildings in Spain. Waste Manag Res 30:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen LY, Tam VWY (2002) Implementation of environmental management in the Hong Kong construction industry. Int J Proj Manag 20:535–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva RV, de Brito J, Dhir RK (2015) Prediction of the shrinkage behavior of recycled aggregate concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 77:327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solís-Guzmán J, Marrero M, Montes-Delgado MV, Ramírez-de-Arellano A (2009) A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste. Waste Manag:2542–2548

  • Tam VWY, Tam CM (2006) A review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 47:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam VWY, Tam CM, Le KN (2007) Removal of cement mortar remains from recycled aggregate using pre-soaking approaches. Resour Conserv Recycl 50:82–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam VW, Li J, Cai H (2014) System dynamic modeling on construction waste management in Shenzhen, China. Waste Manag Res 32:441–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trankler J, Walker I, David J, Dohman M (1996) Environmental impact of demolition waste—an overview on 10 years of research and experience. Waste Manag 16:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M-H, Yu T-C, Ho Y-S (2010) A bibliometric analysis of the performance of water research. Scientometrics 84:813–820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Li Z, Tam VWY (2014) Critical factors in effective construction waste minimization at the design stage: a Shenzhen case study, China. Resour Conserv Recycl 82:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu H, Duan H, Wang J, Wang T, Wang X (2015) Quantification of carbon emission of construction waste by using streamlined LCA: a case study of Shenzhen, China. J Mater Cycles Waste 17:637–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao J, Ma Z, Ding T (2016) Reclamation chain of waste concrete: a case study of Shanghai. Waste Manag 48:334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LY, Yue T, Ding JL, Han T (2012) A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC countries by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics Article in press

  • Yang L, Chen Z, Liu T, Gong Z, Yu Y, Wang J (2013) Global trends of solid waste research from 1997 to 2011 by using bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 96:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu R, Shui Z (2014) Efficient reuse of the recycled construction waste cementitious materials. J Clean Prod 78:202–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan H (2013) A SWOT analysis of successful construction waste management. J Clean Prod 39:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan H, Shen L (2011) Trend of the research on construction and demolition waste management. Waste Manag 31:670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan H, Lu W, Hao J (2013) The evolution of construction waste sorting on-site. Renew Sust Energ Rev 20:483–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Chen C, Li J (2009) Visualizing the intellectual structure with paper-reference matrices. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 15:1153–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Xie S, Ho Y-S (2010) A bibliometric analysis of world volatile organic compounds research trends. Scientometrics 83:477–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R, Wang J (2011) Visualizing the research on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. Scientometrics 86:593–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zong L, Fei Z, Zhang S (2014) Permeability of recycled aggregate concrete containing fly ash and clay brick waste. J Clean Prod 70:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51508430) and the Open Research fund from Hubei Key Laboratory of Mine Environmental Pollutional Control & Remediation (No. 2016101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lie Yang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Sun, T. & Yang, L. Evaluating the performance and intellectual structure of construction and demolition waste research during 2000–2016. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 19259–19266 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9598-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9598-9

Keywords

Navigation