Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A review of oxygen removal from oxygen-bearing coal-mine methane

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, a comparison will be made concerning the advantages and disadvantages of five kinds of coal mine methane (CMM) deoxygenation method, including pressure swing adsorption, combustion, membrane separation, non-metallic reduction, and cryogenic distillation. Pressure swing adsorption has a wide range of application and strong production capacity. To achieve this goal, adsorbent must have high selectivity, adsorption capacity, and adequate adsorption/desorption kinetics, remain stable after several adsorption/desorption cycles, and possess good thermal and mechanical stabilities. Catalytic combustion deoxygenation is a high-temperature exothermic redox chemical reaction, which releases large amounts of thermal energy. So, the stable and accurate control of the temperature is not easy. Meanwhile partial methane is lost. The key of catalytic combustion deoxygenation lies in the development of high-efficiency catalyst. Membrane separation has advantages of high separation efficiency and low energy consumption. However, there are many obstacles, including higher costs. Membrane materials have the requirements of both high permeability and high selectivity. The development of new membrane materials is a key for membrane separation. Cryogenic distillation has many excellence advantages, such as high purity production and high recovery. However, the energy consumption increases with decreasing CH4 concentrations in feed gas. Moreover, there are many types of operational security problems. And that several kinds of deoxygenation techniques mentioned above have an economic value just for oxygen-bearing CMM with methane content above 30%. Moreover, all the above methods are not applicable to deoxygenation of low concentration CMM. Non-metallic reduction method cannot only realize cyclic utilization of deoxidizer but also have no impurity gases generation. It also has a relatively low cost and low loss rate of methane, and the oxygen is removed thoroughly. In particular, the non-metallic reduction method has good development prospects for low concentration oxygen-bearing CMM. This article also points out the direction of future development of coal mine methane deoxygenation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker RW, Lokhandwala KA, Wijmans JG, Da Costa, AR (2003) Nitrogen removal from natural gas using two types of membranes. US patent no. 6630011. Washington, DC: US Patent and Trademark Office.

  • Beck IE, Bukhtiyarov VI, Pakharukov IY, Zaikovsky VI, Kriventsov VV, Valentin N (2009) Parmon platinum nanoparticles on Al2O3: correlation between the particle size and activity in total methane oxidation. J Catal 268:60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burdyny T, Struchtrup H (2010) Hybrid membrane/cryogenic separation of oxygen from air for use in theoxy-fuel process. Energy 35(7):1884–1897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Z, Sun LX, Cao X, Li Y (2011) A new safety enrichment method for low concentration coal mine methane-proportion pressure swing adsorption. Adv Materi Res 233-235:2276–2280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavenati S, Grande CA, Rodrigues AE (2004) Adsorption equilibrium of methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen on zeolite 13X at high pressures. J Chem Eng Data 49:1095–1101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charcosset C (2009) A review of membrane processes and renewable energies for desalination. Desalina 245:214–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Wang L, Zhang X (2011) Environmental impact of coal mine methane emissions and responding strategies in China. Int J Greenh Gas Con 5(1):157–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Zeng J (2008) A preparation method and the application for sulfur-resistant deoxygenation catalyst: CN101301611A.

  • Coward HF, Jones GW (1952) Limits of flammability of gases and vapors. (no. BM-BULL-503). Bureau of Mines, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui G, Li ZL, Zhao YL (2015) Design and security analysis for the liquefaction and distillation process of oxygen-bearing coal-bed methane. RSC Adv 5:68218–68226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong W, Wang P (2009) Experimental study on the deoxygenation of coal mine methane by using coke combustion method. Coal Conv 32(4):74–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuertes AB (2001) Preparation and characterization of adsorption-selective carbon membranes for gas separation. Adsorp 7:117–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao T, Lin W, Gu A, Gu M (2010) Coal mine methane liquefaction adopting a nitrogen expansion process with propane pre-cooling. Appl Energy 87:2142–2147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gatnar K, Tor A (2003) Drainage and economic utilization of methane from coal seams in the Jastrzebie mining-field. Appl Energ 74:331–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes VG, Hassan MM (2001) Coal seam methane recovery by vacuum swing adsorption. Sep Pur Technol 24:189–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosiewskia K, Matros YS, Warmuzinski K (2008) Homogeneous vs. catalytic combustion of lean methane-air mixtures in reverse-flow reactors. Chem Eng Sci 63:5010–5019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorio M, Marta GC, Antonio BF (1996) Kinetics of oxidation of CaS particles in the regime of high SO2 release. Chem Eng Sci 54:495–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Ren J, Xie C, Lin J, Li Z (2015) A comparison study on the deoxygenation of coal mine methane over coal gangue and coke under microwave heating conditions. Energy Convers Manag 100:45–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jens H, Li Z, Xu S (2009) How polygeneration schemes may develop under an advanced clean fossil fuel strategy under a joint sino-European initiative. Appl Energ 86:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Z, Fan Q, Liu X (2010) Simulation and analysis of low-temperature liquefaction and distillation process of low-concentration CMM. Coal Technol 29(6):11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Karacan CÖ, Ruiz FA, Cotè M, Phipps S (2011) Coal mine methane: a review of capture and utilization practices with benefits to mining safety and to greenhouse gas reduction. Int J Coal Geol 86(2–3):121–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karakurt I, Aydın G, Aydıner K. (2009) Decreasing options of methane gas released from coal mines. In: Proceedings of 3rd mining and environmental symposium. pp 165–72.

  • Kędzior S (2009) Accumulation of coal-bed methane in the south-west part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (southern Poland). Int J Coal Geol 80:20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurnia JC, Xu P, Sasmito AP (2016) A novel concept of enhanced gas recovery strategy from ventilation air methane in underground coal mines—a computational investigation. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35:661–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lan Z, Liu Q (2011) Research and application of deoxidation and explosion suppression technology in the concentration processes of low-concentration CMM by PSA method. China Coal 37(3):93–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH, Trimm DL (1995) Catalytic combustion of methane. Fuel Proc Technol 42:339–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li QY, Wang L, Ju YL (2011a) Analysis of flammability limits for the liquefaction process of oxygen-bearing coal-bed methane. Appl Energy 88:2934–2939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Yun C, Qin H (2005) Preparation of sodium sulfide from reduction of sodium sulfate by coke oven coal gas. J Inner Mongolia Polytechnic Univ 24(2):109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Liu Y (2013) Impact of bed length on low-concentration coal mine methane enrichment by proportion pressure swing adsorption. Int J Coal Prep Util 33(2):72–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Liu Y, Yang X (2011b) Safety analysis on low concentration coal mine methane enrichment process by proportion pressure swing adsorption; 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE), 10–12 May, Wuhan, Hubei.

  • Li Y, Liu Y, Yang X (2013) Proportion pressure swing adsorption for low concentration coal mine methane enrichment. Sep Sci Technol 48(8):1201–1210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Lu H, Chen Y (2004) Low temperature and high activity catalysts in the reduction of sodium sulfate to anhydrous sodium sulfite by hydrogen. Chem React Eng Technol 20(4):376–379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Su Z, Zhang J (2010) Review on CMM desorption adsorption mechanism. Well Testing 19(6):37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokhandwala K (1997) Membrane-augmented cryogenic methane/nitrogen separation. US patent no. 5647227. Washington, DC: US Patent and Trademark Office

  • Lu Q, Li X, Xu C (2013) Progress of purification technology for low concentration coal-bed methane. Chem Ind Eng Prog 32(6):1267–1272

  • M2M Workshop – Russia (2005) Current state and prospective of CMM/CBM production and utilization in Russia, Methane-to-Markets Partnership Technical Workshop, Beijing, China, 2 December 2005

  • Ma X (2007) Exploration and practice of technologies to comprehensively utilize coal mine methane. Chin coal mine methane 4(3):28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Majhi S, ohanty P, Wang H, Pant KK (2013) Direct conversion of natural gas to higher hydrocarbons: a review. J Energ Chem 22:543–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miao S, Deng Y (2001) Au-Pt/Co3O4 catalyst for methane combustion. Appl Catal 31(3):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momose W, Zheng T, Nishiyama N (2004) Synthesis of partially carbonised polyimide membranes with high resistance to moisture. J Chem Eng Jpn 37(9):1092–1098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore TA (2012) Coal mine methane: a review. Int J Coal Geol 101:36–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama N, Momose W, Egashira Y (2003) Partially carbonized polyimide membranes with high permeability for air separation. J Chem Eng Jpn 36(5):603–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oh SH, Mitchell PJ, Siewert RM (1991) Methane oxidation over noble metal catalysts as related to controlling natural gas vehicle emissions. In: Summers SJE (ed) Catalytic control of air pollution: mobile and stationary sources, 1rd edn. ACS, New York, pp 12–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Olajossy A, Gawdzik A, Budner Z (2003) Methane separation from coal mine methane gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption. Chem Eng Res Des 81(4):474–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu K, Hayden ACS (2009) Increasing the efficiency of radiant burners by using polymer membranes. Appl Energ 86:349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu S, Dong W (2014) Research and application of the low concentration coal mine methane upgrading technique. J China Coal Soc 39(8):1539–1544

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravanchia MT, Kaghazchia T, Kargari A (2009) Application of membrane separation processes in petrochemical industry: a review. Desalin 235:199–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren J, Xie C, Lin JY, Li Z (2014) Co-utilization of two coal mine residues: non-catalytic deoxygenation of coal mine methane over coal gangue. Process Saf Environ 92:896–902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter D, Vinson D, Barnhart E (2015) Enhanced microbial coalbed methane generation: a review of research, commercial activity, and remaining challenges. Int J Coal Geol 146:28–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sander R, Connell LD (2012) Methodology for the economic assessment of enhanced coal mine methane drainage (ECMM) as a fugitive emissions reduction strategy. Int J Greenh Gas Con 8:34–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seki K, Masuda M, Ohtsuka H, Shito E, Hirao K (2014) US patent no. 8899968. Washington, DC: US Patent and Trademark Office.

  • Senthamaraikkannan G, Gates I, Prasad V (2016) Modeling, estimation and optimization in coreflooding experiments for coal mine methane production. Chem Eng Sci 141:75–85

  • Shen P (2012) Study on oxygen removal from coal mine methane by VPSA. Dalian University of Technology, Dalian

    Google Scholar 

  • Simplício LMT, Brandão ST, Domingos D, Bozon-Verduraz F, Sales EA (2009) Catalytic combustion of methane at high temperatures: cerium effect on PdO/Al2O3 catalysts. App Catal A: Gen 360(1):2–7 

  • Slinko MM, Korchak VN, Peskov NV (2006) Mathematical modelling of oscillatory behaviour during methane oxidation over Ni catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 303:258–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stasinska B, Machocki A, Antoniak K, Rotko M, Figueiredo JL, Goncalves F (2008) Importance of palladium dispersion in Pd/Al2O3 catalysts for complete oxidation of humid low-methane-air mixtures. Catal Today 137:329–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su S, Beath A, Guo H, Mallett C (2005) An assessment of mine methane mitigation and utilisation technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 31:123–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki RO (2005) Calciothermic reduction of TiO2 and in situ electrolysis of CaO in the molten CaCl2. J Phys Chem Solids 66:461–465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian F, Zhang T, Zhang Y (2011) Study on NaS deoxidation of coal mine methane in low gassy mine. Coal Sci Technol 39(7):124–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Schoor F, Verplaetsen F, Berghmans J (2008) Calculation of the upper flammability limit of methane/air mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures. J Hazard Mater 153:1301–1307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Fan S (2011) Research on oxygen-containing liquefaction technology for low-concentration coal-bed gas in coal mining area. Min SAF Environ Protection 38(4):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Tan Z, Ma L (2012) Deoxygenation experiment of oxygen coalbed methane with membrane method. Oil Gas Stor Transp 31(8):585–587

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Wang S, Yuan Z, Zhang C, Ni C (2010) Process for catalytic deoxygenation of coal mine methane. US Patent Application No. 12/737342.

  • Wu XJ, Gui JZ, Wang L, Wang K, Sun ZL, Song LJ (2008) Techniques and applications of gas deoxidation. Ind Catal 16(2):8–11

  • Yang K (2007) Separation and liquefaction of oxygen-bearing coal mine methane. China Coal bed Methane 4(4):20–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Liu Y (2011) Study on low concentration oxygen-bearing coal mine methane enrichment by pressure swing adsorption. J Chin coal soc 36(1):91–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Liu J, Zhang L (2014) Catalytic combustion of low-concentration coal mine methane over CuO/g-Al2O3 catalyst: effect of SO2. RSC Adv 4:39394–39399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Fan S, Hua B, Wang Y, Huang T, Xie Y (2013) Optimization strategy and procedure for coal bed methane separation. J Energ Chem 22:533–541

  • Zhang H, Pan H (2014) Progress deoxygenation for low concentration coal mine methane. Technol Develop Chem Ind 43(4):44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Li Y, Chai R, Zhao G, Liu Y, Lu Y (2016a) Low-temperature active, oscillation-free PdNi (alloy)/Ni-foam catalyst with enhanced heat transfer for coalbed methane deoxygenation via catalytic combustion. Appl Catal B Environ 187:238–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Wu X, Zhao G et al (2015) High-performance PdNi alloy structured in situ on monolithic metal foam for coal mine methane deoxygenation via catalytic combustion. Chem Commun 51:12613–12616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Wu XP, Li Y, Chai R (2016b) High-performance PdNi nanoalloy catalyst in situ structured on Ni foam for catalytic deoxygenation of coal bed methane: experimental and DFT studies. ACS Catal 6:6236–6245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Fan S, Zhang Z (2012) Analysis of oxygen concentration oxygenated CMM technology. Energy Conv Manag 83(8):28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang G (2009) Deoxygenation characteristic of sulfide oxidation in the process of oxygen-bearing coal mine methane. Coal Conv 32(1):68–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Zhao J, Zhang L, Wu Z (2013) Catalytic deoxygenation characteristic of oxygen-bearing coal mine methane in the fluidized bed reactor. J Fuel Chem Techno 41(5):523–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1610115, 21376003, and 21676174) and the Joint Fund of Shanxi Provincial Coal Seam Gas (2015012019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Coal Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Shanxi Province, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030024, China

    Peiyu Zhao, Guojie Zhang, Yinghui Sun & Ying Xu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Coal and Coalbed Methane Co-Extraction, Jincheng, Shanxi, 048012, China

    Guojie Zhang

Authors
  1. Peiyu Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guojie Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yinghui Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ying Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guojie Zhang.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, P., Zhang, G., Sun, Y. et al. A review of oxygen removal from oxygen-bearing coal-mine methane. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 15240–15253 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8916-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8916-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation