Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Enhanced bioremediation of BTEX contaminated groundwater in pot-scale wetlands

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pot-scale wetlands were used to investigate the role of plants in enhancing the performance of engineered bioremediation techniques like biostimulation, bioaugmentation, and phytoremediation collectively. Canna generalis plants were grown hydroponically in BTEX contaminated groundwater supplied in wetland mesocosms. To quantify the contaminant uptake by the plants, wetlands with and without shoot biomass along with unplanted gravel bed were used under controlled conditions. The residual concentration of the selected BTEX compound, toluene, in the rhizosphere water was measured over the entire period of the experiment along with the water lost by evapotranspiration. The rate of biodegradation in all wetland mesocosms fitted best with the first-order kinetics. The total removal time of the BTEX compound was found to be highest in the unplanted gravel bed mesocosm followed by wetlands without and with shoot biomass. The cumulative uptake of toluene in shoot biomass of the wetland plants initially increased rapidly and started to decrease subsequently till it reached a peak value. Continuity equations integrated with biodegradation and plant uptake sink terms were developed to simulate residual concentration of toluene in rhizospheric water for comparison with the measured data for entire period of the experiments. The results of this research can be used to frame in situ plant-assisted bioremediation techniques for hydrocarbon-contaminated soil-water resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez PJJ, Illman WA (2006) Bioremediation and natural attenuation, process fundamentals and mathematical models. Wiley-Interscience, ISBN-10 0-471-65043-9

  • Boonsaner M, Borrirukwisitsak S, Boonsaner A (2011) Phytoremediation of BTEX contaminated soil by Canna generalis. Ecotoxicol. Environ Saf 74(6):1700–7

  • Brennan MA, Shelley ML (1999) A model of the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of lead (Pb) by maize for the purpose of phytoextraction. Ecol Eng 12:271–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs GG, Bromilow RH, Evans AA (1982) Relationships between lipophilicity and root uptake and translocation of non-ionized chemicals by barley. Pestic Sci 13:495–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bromilow RH, Chamberlain K (1995) Principles governing uptake and chemicals in plant contamination: Modelling and simulation of organic chemical processes Trapp S McFarlane JC (Eds), Lewis Publishers: 37–68

  • Carlson RW, Bazzaz FA (1977) Growth reduction in American sycamore (Plantanus occidentalis L.) caused by Pb-Cd interaction.”. Environ Pollut 12:243–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y, Corapcioglu MY (1998) Plant-enhanced subsurface bioremediation of non-volatile hydrocarbons. J Environ Eng 112:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claassen N, Barber SA (1976) Simulation model for nutrient uptake from soil by agrowing plant system. Agro J 68:961–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins C, Laturnus F, Nepovim A (2002) Remediation of BTEX and trichloroethene: current knowledge with special emphasis on phytoremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 9:86–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SD, Berti WR (1993) Remediation of contaminated soils with green plants: an overview in vitro cell. Dev Biol Plant 29P:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman JH (1979) An analytical solution to solute transport near root surfaces for low initial concentration I. Equation's development. Soil Sc Soc Am J 43:1087–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dakora FD, Phillips DA (2002) Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low-nutrient environments. Plant Soil 245:35–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis LC, Erickson LE, Lee E, Shimp JF, Tracy JC (1993) Modeling the effect of plants on the bioremediation of contaminated soil and ground water.". Environ Prog 12(1):67–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dzantor EK (2007) Phytoremediation:  the state of rhizosphere “engineering” for accelerated rhizodegradation of xenobiotic contaminants; 232:228–232

  • Farhadian M, Vachelard C, Duchez D, Larroche C (2008) In situ bioremediation of monoaromatic pollutants in groundwater: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:5296–5308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gessner TP, Kadlec R, Reaves RP (2005) Wetland remediation of cyanide and hydrocarbons. Ecol Eng 25:457–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji GD, Sun T, Zhou QX, Sui X, Chang SJ, Li PJ (2002) Constructed subsurface flow wetland for treating heavy oil-produced water of the Liaohe Oilfield in China. Ecol Eng 18:459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang QQ, Singh BR (1994) Effect of different forms and sources of arsenic on crop yield and arsenic concentration. Water Air Soil Pollut 74:321–343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langwaldt JH, Puhakka JA (2000) On-site biological remediation of contaminated groundwater: a review”. Environ Pollut 107:187–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mascolo G, Ciannarella R, Balest L, Lopez A (2007) Effectiveness of UV-based advanced oxidation processes for the remediation of hydrocarbon pollution in the groundwater: a laboratory investigation. J Hazard Mater 152(3):1138–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur S (2004) Modeling phytoremediation of soils. Pract. Period. Hazardous, toxic, radioact. Waste Manag 8(4):286–297

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur S, Yadav BK (2009) Phytoextraction modeling of heavy metal (Lead) contaminated site using maize (Zea mays). Pract Period Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste Manage 13(4):229–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer K, Trevors JT (2011) Remediation of oil spills in temperate and tropical coastal marine environments. Environmentalist 31(3):338–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan M, Tracy JC, Davis LC, Erickson LE (1998a) Modeling the fate of toluene in a chamber with alfalfa plants 1. Theory and modeling concepts. J Hazard Subs Res 1(5a):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan M, Davis LC, Tracy JC, Erickson LE (1998b) Modeling the fate of toluene in a chamber with alfalfa plants 2. Numerical results and comparison study. J Hazard Subs Res 1(5b):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell CJ, Acree SD, Ross RR, HulingSG (1995) Light non-aqueous phase liquids. US Environmental Protection Agency Ground water issue EPA/540/S-95/500

  • Omari K, Revitt M, Shutes B, Garelick H (2003) Hydrocarbon removal in an experimental gravel bed constructed wetland. Water Sci Technol 48(5):275–281

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson S, Mackay D, Tam D, Shiu WY (1990) Uptake of organic chemicals by plants: a review of processes, correlations and models. Chemosphere 21:297–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell CL, Goltz MN, Agrawal A (2014) Degradation kinetics of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons by methane oxidizers naturally-associated with wetland plant roots. J Contam Hydrol 170:68–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao S, Mathur S (1994) Modeling heavy metal (cadmium) uptake by soil-plant root system. J Irrig and Drainage Eng 125(1):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z (1993) Mechanistic simulations models of nutrient uptake: a review. Plant Soil 152:161–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ross GJS (1981) The use of non-linear regression methods in crop modeling. In: Rose DA, Charles-Edwards DA (eds) Mathematics and plant physiology. Academic, London, pp 269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan JA, Bell RM, Davidson JM, O’Connor GA (1988) Plant uptake of non-ionic organic chemicals from spills. Chemosphere 17:2299–2323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon C, Crabos JL, Sambuco JP, Bessiere JM, Basseres A, Caumette P, Baccou JC (1998) Artificial wetland performances in the purification efficiency of hydrocarbon wastewater. Water, Air and Soil Pollut 104:313–329

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnoor JL (1997) Phytoremediation. technology evaluation report TE-98-01. Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp JF, Tracy JC, Davis LC, Lee E, Huang W, Erickson LE, Schnoor JF (1993) Beneficial effects of plants in the remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic materials. Crit Rev Environ Sci Tech 23(1):41–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simonich SL, Hites RA (1995) Organic pollutant accumulation in vegetation Environ. Sci Technol 29:2905–2914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Susarla S, Medina VF, McCutcheon SC (2002) Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic chemical contamination. Ecol Eng 18(5):647–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting YP, Lawson F, Prince IG (1989) Uptake of cadmium and zinc by the alga chlorella vulgaris: part 1. Individual ion species. Biotechnol Bioeng 34(7):990–999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trevors JT, Stratton GW, Gadd GM (1986) Cadmium transport, resistance, and toxicity in bacteria, algae, and fungi. Can J Microbiol 32(6):447–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDE (1998) Empirical models for the uptake of inorganic chemicals from soil by plants, DE-AC05-98OR22700. US Department of Energy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment, risk assessment forum, Washington, DC, EPA/630/R095/002F

  • Vogeler I, Green SR, Clothier BE, Kirkham MB, Robinson BH (2000) Contaminant transport in the root zone: 171–193. In: Iskander IK, Kirkham MB (eds) ‘Trace elements in soil: bioavailability, fluxes and transfer of trace elements in soils and soil components’. CRC press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace S, Kadlec R (2005) BTEX degradation in a cold-climate wetland system. Water Sci Technol 51:165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe ME (1997) Phytoremediation on the brink of commercialization Environ. Sci Technol 31:182A–186A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wemple C, Hendricks L (2000) Documenting the recovery of hydrocarbon-impacted wetlands: a multi-disciplinary approach. Battelle Press: Columbus, Ohio, pp 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild SR, Jones KC (1992) Organic chemicals entering agricultural soils in sewage sludges: screening for their potential to transfer to crop plants and livestock. Sci Total Environ 119:85–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav BK, Hassanizadeh SM (2011) An overview of biodegradation of LNAPLs in coastal (semi)-arid Environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 220(1–4):225–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav B K, and Junaid S (2014) “Groundwater vulnerability assessment to contamination using soil moisture flow and solute transport modelling” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

  • Yadav BK, Siebel MA, Van Bruggen JJA (2011) Rhizofiltration of a heavy metal (Lead). Cont Waste Wet Plant Carex Pendula 39(5):467–474

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav BK, Ansari FA, Basu S, Mathur A (2013) Remediation of LNAPL contaminated groundwater using plant-assisted biostimulation and bioaugmentation Methods. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SZ, Jin HJ, Wei Z, He RX, Ji YJ, Li XM (2009) Bioremediation of oil spills in cold environments: a review. Pedosphere 19:371–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yerokun OA, Christenson DR (1990) Relating high soil test phosphorus concentrations to plant phosphorus uptake. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:796–799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X., Venosa A. D., Suidan M. T. (2004). Literature review on the use of commercial bioremediation agents for clean-up of oil-contaminated estuarine environments. USEPA

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology (DST) and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for their financial support to this research as Ramanujan Award and Senior Research Fellowship to the authors. We are also thankful to Mr. Jahangeer from IIT Roorkee and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable contribution and suggestion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Shreejita Basu & Shashi Mathur

  2. Department of Hydrology, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, 247667, Uttarakhand, India

    Brijesh Kumar Yadav

Authors
  1. Shreejita Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brijesh Kumar Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shashi Mathur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shreejita Basu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basu, S., Yadav, B.K. & Mathur, S. Enhanced bioremediation of BTEX contaminated groundwater in pot-scale wetlands. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 20041–20049 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5240-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5240-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation