Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental assessment on electrokinetic remediation of multimetal-contaminated site: a case study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an environmental assessment on an electrokinetic (EK) system for the remediation of a multimetal-contaminated real site was conducted using a green and sustainable remediation (GSR) tool. The entire EK process was classified into major four phases consisting of remedial investigations (RIs), remedial action construction (RAC), remedial action operation (RAO), and long-term monitoring (LTM) for environmental assessment. The environmental footprints, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, total energy used, air emissions of criteria pollutants, such as NOx, SOx, and PM10, and water consumption, were calculated, and the relative contribution in each phase was analyzed in the environmental assessment. In the RAC phase, the relative contribution of the GHG emissions, total energy used, and PM10 emissions were 77.3, 67.6, and 70.4 %, respectively, which were higher than those of the other phases because the material consumption and equipment used for system construction were high. In the RAO phase, the relative contributions of water consumption and NOx and SOx emissions were 94.7, 85.2, and 91.0 %, respectively, which were higher than those of the other phases, because the water and electricity consumption required for system operation was high. In the RIs and LTM phases, the environmental footprints were negligible because the material and energy consumption was less. In conclusion, the consumable materials and electrical energy consumption might be very important for GSR in the EK remediation process, because the production of consumable materials and electrical energy consumption highly affects the GHG emissions, total energy used, and air emissions such as NOx and SOx.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acar YB, Gale RJ, Alshawabkeh AN, Marks RE, Puppala S, Bricka M, Parker R (1995) Electrokinetic remediation: basics and technology status. J Hazard Mater 40:117–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amrate S, Akretche DE, Innocent C, Seta P (2005) Removal of Pb from a calcareous soil during EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction. Sci Total Environ 349:56–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer P, Finkel M (2006) Life cycle assessment of active and passive groundwater remediation technologies. J Contam Hydrol 83:171–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte M, Deschênes L, Samson R (2007) Selection of a remediation scenario for a diesel-contaminated site using LCA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 12:239–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho JM, Kim KJ, Chung KY, Hyun S, Baek K (2009) Restoration of saline soil in cultivated land using electrokinetic process. Sep Sci Technol 44:2371–2384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho JM, Park SY, Baek K (2010) Electrokinetic restoration of saline agricultural lands. J Appl Electrochem 40:1085–1093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gent DB, Bricka RM, Alshawabkeh AN, Larson SL, Fabian G, Granade S (2004) Bench- and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. J Hazard Mater 110:53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harbottle MJ, Al-Tabbaa A, Evans CW (2007) A comparison of the technical sustainability of in situ stabilisation/solidification with disposal to landfill. J Hazard Mater 141:430–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins MR, Olson TM (2009) Life-cycle case study comparison of permeable reactive barrier versus pump-and-treat remediation. Environ Sci Technol 43:9432–9438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu X, Zhu J, Ding Q (2011) Environmental life-cycle comparisons of two polychlorinated biphenyl remediation technologies: incineration and base catalyzed decomposition. J Hazard Mater 191:258–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Institute BM (2011). SiteWise version 2 user guide

  • ITRC (2011) Green and sustainable remediation: state of the science and practice, The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Green and Sustainable Remediation Team

  • Kim BK, Park GY, Jeon EK, Jung JM, Jung HB, Ko SH, Baek K (2013a) Field application of in situ electrokinetic remediation for As-, Cu-, and Pb-contaminated paddy soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Jeon CS, Baek K, Ko SH, Yang JS (2009) Electrokinetic remediation of fluorine-contaminated soil: conditioning of anolyte. J Hazard Mater 161:565–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Cho JM, Baek K (2011) Pilot-scale ex situ electrokinetic restoration of saline greenhouse soil. J Soils Sediments 11:947–958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Jo SU, Choi JH, Yang JS, Baek K (2012) Hexagonal two dimensional electrokinetic systems for restoration of saline agricultural lands: a pilot study. Chem Eng J 198–199:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Hwang BR, Moon DH, Kim YS, Baek K (2013b) Environmental assessment on a soil washing process of a Pb-contaminated shooting range site: a case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:8417–8424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Jo SU, Yoo JC, Baek K (2013c) Ex situ pilot scale electrokinetic restoration of saline soil using pulsed current. Sep Purif Technol 120:282–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YJ, Choi JH, Lee HG, Ha TH, Bae JH (2011) Pilot-scale study on in situ electrokinetic removal of nitrate from greenhouse soil. Sep Purif Technol 79:254–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemming G (2010) Environmental assessment of contaminated site remediation in a life cycle perspective, Technical University of Denmark

  • Lemming G, Hauschild M, Bjerg P (2010a) Life cycle assessment of soil and groundwater remediation technologies: literature review. Int J Life Cycle Ass 15:115–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemming G, Hauschild MZ, Chambon J, Binning PJ, Bulle CC, Margni M, Bjerg PL (2010b) Environmental impacts of remediation of a Trichloroethene-contaminated site: life cycle assessment of remediation alternatives. Environ Sci Technol 44:9163–9169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MOE (1995). Soil Environment Conservation Act

  • MOE (2007). Guideline for contaminated soil remediation methods

  • MOE (2008). Clean Air Conservation Act

  • MOE (2012). National LCI DB. In: http://www.edp.or.kr/lcidb/lcidb/lcidb_intro.asp (Hrsg.)

  • Morais SA, Delerue-Matos C (2010) A perspective on LCA application in site remediation services: critical review of challenges. J Hazard Mater 175:12–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Page CA, Diamond ML, Campbell M, McKenna S (1999) Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: case study. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:801–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu BG, Yang JS, Kim DH, Baek K (2010) Pulsed electrokinetic removal of Cd and Zn from fine-grained soil. J Appl Electrochem 40:1039–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanscartier D, Margni M, Reimer K, Zeeb B (2010) Comparison of the secondary environmental impacts of three remediation alternatives for a diesel-contaminated site in Northern Canada. Soil Sediment Contam 19:338–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suèr P, Nilsson-Påledal S, Norrman J (2004) LCA for site remediation: a literature review. Soil Sediment Contam 13:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suer P, Andersson-Sköld Y (2011) Biofuel or excavation?—life cycle assessment (LCA) of soil remediation options. Biomass Bioenerg 35:969–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toffoletto L, Deschênes L, Samson R (2005) LCA of ex-situ bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil (11 pp). Int J Life Cycle Ass 10:406–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2008a) Incorporating sustainable practices into site remediation, EPA 542/F/08/002

  • USEPA (2008b) Green remediation: incorporating sustainable environmental practices into remediation of contaminated site, EPA 542/R/08/002

  • Volkwein S, Hurtig HW, Klöpffer W (1999) Life cycle assessment of contaminated sites remediation. Int J Life Cycle Ass 4:263–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou DM, Cang L, Alshawabkeh AN, Wang YJ, Hao XZ (2006) Pilot-scale electrokinetic treatment of a Cu contaminated red soil. Chemosphere 63:964–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Research Foundation (NRF) (grant number 2012R1A1A2007941)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kitae Baek.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, DH., Yoo, JC., Hwang, BR. et al. Environmental assessment on electrokinetic remediation of multimetal-contaminated site: a case study. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21, 6751–6758 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2597-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2597-1

Keywords

Navigation