Skip to main content
Log in

The dioxin/POPs legacy of pesticide production in Hamburg: Part 2—waste deposits and remediation of Georgswerder landfill

  • SI: HCH and Pesticide Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

α-HCH, β-HCH, and γ-HCH (lindane) were listed as persistent organic pollutants in the Stockholm Convention. Therefore, they need to be globally addressed including the wastes remaining from historic use and production. While at most lindane production sites the unintentionally produced 85 % HCH waste isomers have been deposited, at a former pesticide factory in Hamburg-Moorfleet HCH waste isomers have been recycled from 1953 to 1984 by thermal decomposition to chlorobenzenes and resulted in high polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin/polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDD/PCDF)-contaminated residues. The management of the PCDD/PCDF-contaminated waste from the former pesticide factory in Hamburg has been assessed and quantified. Based on past accredited PCDD/PCDF measurements, the registered 3,700 tonnes of disposed thermal HCH decomposition residue contained 333 to 854 kg of PCDD/PCDF toxicity equivalent (I-TEQ) in 53–102 tonnes total sum of PCDD/PCDF. The wastes have been deposited together with other wastes in landfills in Hamburg and other parts of Germany. For the Georgswerder landfill (Hamburg), where approximately 50 % of the PCDD/PCDF is disposed, current and previous situation and remediation activities are described. While PCDD/PCDF leaching from the landfill is controlled and incinerated, more water soluble organochlorines (vinyl chloride, cis-1,2-dichlorethene, chlorobenzenes) and benzene remain as a challenge for groundwater management. A comprehensive aftercare program has been established and will need to be operated by future generations including renewal of containment systems. Former lindane/HCH productions need—in addition to HCH deposits—to be assessed for possible recycling practice of HCH and related PCDD/PCDF-containing deposits. This could systematically be addressed within the Stockholm Convention implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 2010, a symposium on 25 years of remediation of the Georgswerder landfill has been held. Some key findings are summarized in this paper: http://www.hamburg.de/energieberg-georgswerder/2344370/25-jahre-deponie-georgswerder-fachtagung.html

  2. This HCH waste contained PCDD/PCDF at lower levels and a wider range from 0.08 to 295 μg I-TEQ/kg (in parts per billion) (Scholz and Engler 1987). The delta-paste contained approximately 5 μg/kg 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Universität Bayreuth, Tritschler and Partner GmbH 1995a).

  3. Germany submitted PCDD/PCDF releases to air (for 2004).

  4. See footnote 1.

References

  • Bodenstein G (1972) Disposal of wastes from lindane manufacture. In: Uhlmann E, Verlag K (eds) Lindane monograph of an insecticide. Schillinger, Freiburg im Breisgau, pp 23–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürgerschaft Hamburg. (1985): Bürgerschaft der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg, 11. Wahlperiode. Drucksache 11/3774, 26.02.1985

  • Degler H-D, Uentzelmann D (Ed.) (1984) In supergift dioxin. Spiegel Buch, Rudolf Augstein GmbH Co. KG Hamburg, Germany

  • Fiedler H, Hub M, Hutzinger O (1993) Stoffbericht Hexachlorcyclohexan (HCH); HCH in Altlasten Text und Berichte zur Altlastenbearbeitung , Band 9/93, Landesanstalt für Umweltschutz Baden-Württemberg

  • Gillbricht C, Effenberger M, Sokollek V (2012) Gesicherte Altlasten in der Nachsorge – Erfahrungen aus Standorten in Hamburg. ITVA – Altlastensymposium, 22.-23.03.2012, Hamburg, Proceedings 51-57

  • BWS GmbH (2004) Untersuchung und Bewertung der Stauwasserbeschaffenheit der Deponie Georgswerder. Bericht im Auftrag der Behörde für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Fachamt Altlastensanierung (unpublished)

  • Götz R (1984) Untersuchungen an Sickerwässern der Mülldeponie Georgswerder in Hamburg. Müll und Abfall 12:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz R (1985) Polychlorierte Dibenzodioxine (PCDD), polychlorierte dibenzofurane (PCDF) und andere toxische organische Substanzen in Sickerfluessigkeiten der Muelldeponie Georgswerder/Hamburg. Vom Wasser 65:215–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz R (1986a) Chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans in leachate and sediments of the sanitary landfill in Hamburg-Georgswerder. Chemosphere 15:1981–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Götz R (1986b) Chemismus der dioxinhaltigen Sickeröle der Deponie Georgswerder/Hamburg. Müll und Abfall 1(86):2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstedt B (1981) Prolegomena to Seveso. Arch Toxicol 44:211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jit S, Dadhwal M, Kumari H, Jindal S, Kaur J, Lata P, Niharika N, Lal D, Garg N, Gupta SK, Sharma P, Bala K, Singh A, Vijgen J, Weber R, Lal R (2010) Evaluation of hexachlorocyclohexane contamination from the last lindane production plant operating in India. Env Sci Pollut Res 18(4):586–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens H-J, Roth R (1989) Case study and proposed decontamination steps of the soil and groundwater beneath a closed herbicide plant in Germany. Chemosphere 18:1163–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilger R, Haupt T, Weisleder S (2010) Deponie Georgswerder – Umgestaltung zum Energieberg. Altlastenspektrum 19(04/10):165–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnittger P (2001) Sanierung der Deponie Georgswerder in Hamburg in Handbuch der Altlastensanierung, RdNr. 7, C. F. Müller Verlag, Hüthig GmbH & Co. KG Heidelberg, Germany. http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/141902/data/veroeff-georgswerder-sanierung.pdf

  • Scholz B, Engler M (1987) Determination of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in wastes of technical hexachlorocyclohexane. Chemosphere 16:1829–1834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher E (1985) Dioxine in der Deponie Georgswerder – Bekanntwerden, Untersuchungen, Gefährdungsabschätzung. Abfallwirtschaft in Forschung und Praxis, Band 14:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher E (1987) Untersuchungsergebnisse von PCDD/PCDF-Messungen auf Deponien. VDI-Bericht Nr 634:219–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sievers S, Friesel P (1989) Soil contamination patterns of chlorinated organic compounds: looking for the source. Chemosphere 19:691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokollek V (2010a) Nachsorge der Deponie Georgswerder - Erfahrungen aus der Eigenkontrolle. – 25 Jahre Sanierung der Deponie Georgswerder, Proceedings, ed. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Behörde für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt:23-45. http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/2356970/data/tagungsband-25-jahre-dgw.pdf

  • Sokollek V (2010b) Nachsorge der Deponie Georgswerder: Zwei Jahrzehnte Erfahrungen aus der Eigenkontrolle. Altlastenspektrum 19(04/10):172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokollek V, Steinert B, Melchior S, Moosmann L (2003) Results from thirteen years of monitoring the encapsulated Georgswerder landfill (Hamburg) In: ConSoil 2003, 8th International FZK/TNO conference on contaminated Soil, conference proceedings. C 2582, 10 pp

  • Sokollek V, Melchior S, Berger K, Steinert B, (2008) Zwanzig Jahre Überwachung und Nachsorge der gesicherten Deponie Georgswerder/Hamburg. – Skládkový Workshop (Deponieworkshop) Liberec – Zittau 2008, 27. – 28. 11. 2008, Technická Univerzita v Liberci, Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz, sborník konference, 131-148. http://www.hamburg.de/altlastensanierung/141886/gorgswerder-veroeffentlichungen.html

  • UBA (2008) Nationaler Durchführungsplan unter dem Stockholmer Abkommen zu persistenten organischen Schadstoffen (POPs). Forschungsbericht 205 67 444 UBA-FB 001094

  • Umweltbehörde Hamburg (1988) Sanierung der Deponie Georgswerder

  • Umweltbehörde Hamburg (1995) Deponie Georgswerder Sanierung 1984-95

  • UNEP (2009) Report of the conference of the parties of the Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants on the work of its fourth meeting. UNEP/POPS/COP.4/38. 8. May 2009; http://chm.pops.int/Programmes/NewPOPs/DecisionsRecommendations/tabid/671/language/en-US/Default.aspx

  • UNEP (2011) Assessment of PCDD/PCDF release inventories—status 2011. PCDD/PCDF Release Inventories – Toolkit Update 2. Draft report 12/2011

  • Universität Bayreuth, Tritschler & Partner GmbH (1995a) Dioxin-Bilanz für Hamburg, Abschlussbericht, Im Auftrag von: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Umweltbehörde, Kapitel 3. http://www.hamburg.de/contentblob/112354/data/dioxinbilanz.pdf

  • Universität Bayreuth, Tritschler & Partner GmbH (1995b) Dioxin-Bilanz für Hamburg, Zusammenfassender Endbericht. Hamburger Umweltberichte 51/95, Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg, Umweltbehörde

  • Vijgen J (2006a) The legacy of lindane HCH isomer production. http://ew.eea.europa.eu/Agriculture/Agreports/obsolete_pesticides/lindane_production.pdf/. Accessed 10 Feb.2012

  • Vijgen J (2006b) The legacy of indane HCH isomer production. Annexes. IHPA, January 2006 http://ew.eea.europa.eu/Agriculture/Agreports/obsolete_pesticides/lindane_annexes.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2012

  • Vijgen J, Abhilash PC, Li Y-F, Lal R, Forter M, Torres J, Singh N, Yunus M, Tian C, Schäffer A, Weber R (2011) HCH as new Stockholm Convention POPs—a global perspective on the management of lindane and its waste isomers. Env Sci Pollut Res. 18: 152-162. http://www.springerlink.com/content/g62g810418512421/fulltext.pdf

  • Weber R, Varbelow G (2012) The dioxin/POPs legacy of pesticide production in Hamburg: part 1—remediation of production site. Env Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-012-1011-0

  • Weber R, Behnisch PA, Brouwer A, van Bavel B, Lindstroem G, Zennegg M, Schilling B, Paepke O (2006) Contemporary relevance of dioxin and dioxin-like compound contaminations in residues from recycling of HCH waste. Organohalogen Compd 68:905–910

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R, Gaus C, Tysklind M, Johnston P, Forter M, Hollert H, Heinisch H, Holoubek I, Lloyd-Smith M, Masunaga S, Moccarelli P, Santillo D, Seike N, Symons R, Torres JPM, Verta M, Varbelow G, Vijgen J, Watson A, Costner P, Woelz J, Wycisk P, Zennegg M (2008a) Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites—contemporary and future relevance and challenges. Env Sci Pollut Res 15:363–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R, Tysklind M, Gaus C (2008b) Dioxin—Contemporary and future challenges of historical legacies (editorial, dedicated to Otto Hutzinger). Env Sci Pollut Res 15:96–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber R, Watson A, Forter M, Oliaei F (2011) Persistent organic pollutants and landfills—a review of past experiences and future challenges. Waste Manag Res 29(1):107–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wycisk P, Stollberg R, Neumann C, Gossel W, Weiss H, Weber R (2012) Integrated methodology for assessing the HCH groundwater pollution at the multi-source contaminated mega-site bitterfeld/wolfen. Env Sci Pollut Res. doi:10.1007/s11356-012-0963-4

  • Wolf K (1986) The Hamburg-Georgswerder dumping ground. Situation, problems and administrative arrangements for production a rehabilitation plan. In: Assink JW, van den Brink WJ (eds) Contaminated soil. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 723–728

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Lothar Moosmann of the Geologisches Landesamt in Hamburg, Germany for providing Figs. 2, 3, and 5 and to Tim Newfield for the native correction of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Weber.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Leif Kronberg

This article belongs also to the series “dioxin and POP contaminated sites” edited by Roland Weber, Mats Tysklind, and Caroline Gaus (Weber et al. 2008a,b).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(XLS 38 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Götz, R., Sokollek, V. & Weber, R. The dioxin/POPs legacy of pesticide production in Hamburg: Part 2—waste deposits and remediation of Georgswerder landfill. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 1925–1936 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0986-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0986-x

Keywords

Navigation