Abstract
Introduction
There is still interest in a unified methodology to quantify the mass of particulate material emitted into the atmosphere by activities inherent to open-pit mining. For the case of total suspended particles (TSP), the current practice is to estimate such emissions by developing inventories based on the emission factors recommended by the USEPA for this purpose. However, there are disputes over the specific emission factors that must be used for each activity and the applicability of such factors to cases quite different to the ones under which they were obtained. There is also a need for particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 10 μm (PM10) emission inventories and for metrics to evaluate the emission control programs implemented by open-pit mines.
Standardized emission inventory methodology
To address these needs, work was carried out to establish a standardized TSP and PM10 emission inventory methodology for open-pit mining areas. The proposed methodology was applied to seven of the eight mining companies operating in the northern part of Colombia, home to the one of the world’s largest open-pit coal mining operations (∼70 Mt/year).
Results
The results obtained show that transport on unpaved roads is the mining activity that generates most of the emissions and that the total emissions may be reduced up to 72% by spraying water on the unpaved roads. Performance metrics were defined for the emission control programs implemented by mining companies. It was found that coal open-pit mines are emitting 0.726 and 0.180 kg of TSP and PM10, respectively, per ton of coal produced. It was also found that these mines are using on average 1.148 m2 of land per ton of coal produced per year.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Government. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2011) National pollutant inventory emission estimation technique manual for mining V3.0. ISBN: 0 642 54700 9
Axetell K (1978) Survey of fugitive dust from coal mines. EPA-908/1-78-003. USEPA
Axetell K, Cowherd C (1981) Improved emission factors for fugitive dust from western surface coal mining sources. 2 Volumes, EPA Contract No. 68-0302924. USEPA
BP (2009) BP statistical review of world energy. www.bp.com/statisticalreview. Accessed 30 June 2010
Chaulya SK (2004) Assessment and management of air quality for an opencast coal mining area. J Environ 70(1):1–14
Chaulya SK (2005) Air quality status of an open pit mining area in India. Environ Monit Assess 105(1–3):369–89
Cowherd CE (1982) Fugitive dust emission factor update for AP-42 final report. USEPA
Cowherd CE (1988) Control of open fugitive dust sources, EPA-450/3-88-008. USEPA
Devore JL (2008) Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences. 7th Ed. Thomson Learning Inc
Energy Watch Group (2007) Coal: resources and future production. EWG-Paper No. 1/07
Ghose MK (1989) Pollution due to air borne dust particles in coal mining, its monitoring and abatement measures. Mine Technol 10:91–95
Ghose MK (2004) Emission factors for the quantification of dust in India coal mines. J Sci Ind Res 63:763–768
Ghose MK (2007) Generation and quantification of hazardous dusts from coal mining in the Indian context. Environ Monit Assess 130(1–3):35–45
Ghose MK, Majee SR (2000) Assessment of dust generation due to opencast coal mining—an Indian case study. Environ Monit Assess 67:255–256
Ghose MK, Majee SR (2001) Air pollution caused by opencast mining and its abatement measures in India. J Environ Manage 63(2):193–202
Huertas JI, Vilchis E (2011) Modeling TSP and PM10 dispersion in an open pit mine by CFD. Master thesis, Tecnológico de Monterrey (in Spanish)
Huertas JI, Huertas ME, Diaz J (2012a) Assessing precision and accuracy of atmospheric emission inventories. Int J Environ Sci Tech (in press)
Huertas JI, Izquierdo S, Gonzalez D, Camacho D (2012b) Air quality impact assessment of multiple open pit coal mines in Northern Colombia. J Environ Manage 93:121–129
Huertas JI, Huertas ME, Solis C (2012c) Characterization of airborne particles in an open pit mining region. Sci Total Envi (in press)
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (2009) EIQ form 2.8 storage pile worksheet instructions for form 780-1446. www.dnr.mo.gov/forms/. Accessed 21 October 2010
Muleski GE (1990) Update of AP-42 emission factors for western surface coal mines and related sections. USEPA
Muleski GE (1994) Surface coal mine emission factor field study. EPA-454/R-95-010, USEPA
NIOSH-National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2005) Significant dust dispersion models for mining operations IC 9478. USA
Shearer DL, Dougherty RA, Easterbrook CC (1981) Coal mining emission factor development and modeling study. TRC Environmental Consultants, Englewood, CO
Silvester SA, Lowndes IS, Hargreaves DM (2009) A computational study of particulate emissions from an open pit quarry under neutral atmospheric conditions. Atmos Environ 43:6415–6424
Thompson RJ, Visser AT (2003) Mine haul road fugitive dust emission and exposure characterization. Environmental Health Risk II. WIT Press
US Department of Energy (1980) Bituminous coal and lignite production and mine operation. DOE/EIA-0118(78)
USEPA (1998) Revision of emission factors for AP-42. Chapter 11: mineral products industry. Section 11.9: Western Surface Coal Mining. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index.html. Accessed 5 September 2009
USEPA (2006a) Revision of emission factors for AP-42. Chapter 13: miscellaneous source. Section 13.2.2: Unpaved Roads (Fugitive Dust Sources). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index.html. Accessed 16 May 2009
USEPA (2006b) Revision of emission factors for AP-42. Chapter 13: Miscellaneous Source. Section 13.2.4: Aggregate Handling and Storage Piles (Fugitive Dust Sources). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index.html. Accessed 2 June 2009
USEPA (2008) Revision of emission factors for AP-42. Chapter 11: mineral products industry. Section 11.9: Western Surface Coal Mining. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/index.html. Accessed 1 April 2009
USEPA (2009) Emission factors & AP 42. http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/. Accessed 13 July 2009
Wheeler AJ, Williams I, Beaumont RA, Manitol RS (2000) Characterization of particulate matter sampled during a study of children's personal exposure to airbone particulate matter in a UK urban environment. Environ Monit Assess 65:69–77
Zeller KF, Fox GF, Marlatt WE (1979) Estimating dust production from surface mining. Report No. EPA -600/7-79-182. USEPA
Zhang R, Khalizov AF, Pagels J, Zhang D, Xue H, McMurry PH (2008) Variability in morphology, hydroscopicity, and optical properties of soot aerosols during atmospheric processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5295
Zheng J, Hu M, Zhang R, Yue D, Wang Z, Guo S, Li X, Bohn B, Shao M, He L, Huang X, Wiedensohler A, Zhu T (2011) Measurements of gaseous H2So4 by AP-ID-CIMS during CAREBeijing 2008 campaign. Atmos Chem Phys 11:5019–5042
Acknowledgments
This work was financed by the Colombian Ministry of the Environment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Appendix A
Appendix A
List of symbols
- A :
-
Blasting horizontal area with a dept <21 m (square meter)
- A i :
-
Intensity of activity i
- b :
-
Days of stocking or exposition (days)
- c:
-
Dry days during the year (days)
- d :
-
Average high where the material is released (meter)
- e :
-
Percentage of wind speed >5.33 m/s (percent)
- E i :
-
Estimate the mass of TSP or PM10 that is released into the atmosphere by activity i (kilograms per year)
- E f,l :
-
Emission factor for aggregate handling and storage in piles of granulated material (kilograms of TSP/ton)
- E f,i :
-
Emission factor for activity i (kilogram per intensity of activity i)
- k :
-
Intensity of the applications (liters per square meter)
- m :
-
Number of days in the period (days)
- M::
-
Moisture content of the handled material (percent)
- M p :
-
Material's properties
- M c :
-
Meteorological conditions
- p :
-
Average daytime evaporation rate (millimeter per hour)
- n :
-
Number of rainy days in the period with precipitation levels exceeding 0.254 mm (days)
- r :
-
Average daily traffic (vehicles per hour)
- R 2 :
-
Coefficient of determination
- S a :
-
Emitting activity
- S :
-
Average vehicle speed (kilometers per hour)
- s :
-
Silt content (mesh 200) of the handled material or on the surface of the road (percent)
- t :
-
Average time between spray applications (hour)
- U :
-
Wind speed (meters per second)
- U*:
-
Average train speed (meters per second)
- VKT:
-
Kilometers traveled per vehicle (kilometers per vehicle)
- W::
-
Truck average weight (tons)
- i, j :
-
Indexes
- α, β, γ, ζ :
-
Experimental constants.
- η j :
-
Efficiency of the emission control measure j (percent)
- η s :
-
Efficiency of emission controls for spraying water (percent)
- * :
-
Constant values area applied whenever equations are not applicable
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huertas, J.I., Camacho, D.A. & Huertas, M.E. Standardized emissions inventory methodology for open-pit mining areas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19, 2784–2794 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0778-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0778-3