Abstract
The recent claim made in this journal that nuclear bomb tests and the Chernobyl disaster caused distortions in the secondary sex ratio is shown to be a likely artifact of data mining, misused statistics, and misreading of the evidence. In particular, the concept of statistical “significance” and its limitations do not seem to be fully understood, and important confounding factors have not been accounted for.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jacobsen R, Moller H, Mouritsen A (1999) Natural variation in the human sex ratio. Hum Reprod 14:3120–3125
Krämer W (2011) The cult of statistical significance—what economists should and should not do to make their data talk. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 131:623–642
Krämer W, Arminger G (2011) True believers or numerical terrorism at the nuclear power plant. Journal of Economics and Statistics 213:608–620
Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE (2005) Trend analysis of the sex ratio at birth in the United States. Natl Vital Stat Rep 53(20):1–17
Scherb H, Voigt K (2011) The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities. Environ Sci Poll Res Int 18:697–707
Ziliak ST, McCloskey DN (2008) The cult of statistical significance: how the standard error costs us jobs, justice and lives. University of Michigan Press, Michigan.
UNSCEAR (2000) Report on sources and effects of ionizing radiation to the general assembly (2 volumes). United Nations, Vienna
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
I am grateful to an anonymous referee for helpful suggestions and comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krämer, W. The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities: comment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19, 1332–1334 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0644-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0644-8