Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contribution of milk production to global greenhouse gas emissions

An estimation based on typical farms

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, aim and scope

Studies on the contribution of milk production to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are rare (FAO 2010) and often based on crude data which do not appropriately reflect the heterogeneity of farming systems. This article estimates GHG emissions from milk production in different dairy regions of the world based on a harmonised farm data and assesses the contribution of milk production to global GHG emissions.

Materials, methods and results

The methodology comprises three elements: (1) the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN) concept of typical farms and the related globally standardised dairy model farms representing 45 dairy regions in 38 countries; (2) a partial life cycle assessment model for estimating GHG emissions of the typical dairy farms; and (3) standard regression analysis to estimate GHG emissions from milk production in countries for which no typical farms are available in the IFCN database. Across the 117 typical farms in the 38 countries analysed, the average emission rate is 1.50 kg CO2 equivalents (CO2-eq.)/kg milk. The contribution of milk production to the global anthropogenic emissions is estimated at 1.3 Gt CO2-eq./year, accounting for 2.65% of total global anthropogenic emissions (49 Gt; IPCC, Synthesis Report for Policy Maker, Valencia, Spain, 2007).

Discussion and conclusion

We emphasise that our estimates of the contribution of milk production to global GHG emissions are subject to uncertainty. Part of the uncertainty stems from the choice of the appropriate methods for estimating emissions at the level of the individual animal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ECM = energy-corrected milk with 4% fat and 3.3% protein; \( {\text{ECM}} = \left( {{\text{milk}}\;{\text{production}} \times \left( {0.{383} \times \% \;{\text{fat}} + 0.{242} \times \% \;{\text{protein}} + 0.{7832}} \right)/{3}.{1138}} \right) \) (GFE 2001)

  2. 1 livestock unit (LU) = 650 kg live weight (Kirchgessner et al. 1991).

  3. The regression output for this cubical model is shown in Appendix 3.

References

  • AFPC (2010) The Agricultural & Food Policy Center, Bryan, TX, USA. http://afpc.tamu.edu/. Accessed 11 November 2010

  • Audsley E, Alber S, Clift R, Cowell S, Crettaz P, Gaillard G, Hausheer JL, Jolliet O, Kleijn R, Mortensen B, Pearce D, Roger E, Teulon H, Weidema B, Van Zeijts H (2003) Harmonisation of environmental life cycle assessment for agriculture. Final Report. Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-2028, European Commission DG VI Agriculture, Brussels, Belgium

  • Bellabary J, Foereid B, Hastings A, Smith P (2008) Cool Farming. Climate impacts of agriculture and mitigation potential. Greenpeace International, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederberg C, Flysjö A (2004) Life cycle inventory of 23 dairy farms in south-western Sweden, SIK-Rapport. Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Gothenburg, Sweden

  • Cederberg C, Stadig M (2003) System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis JL, Kebreab E, Odongo NE, McBride BW, Okine EK, France J (2007) Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. J Dairy Sci 90:3456–3467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: livestock’s long shadow. Environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Greenhouse gas emissions from the dairy sector: a life cycle assessment. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • GFE (2001) Feeding recommendations on energy and nutrient supply for lactating and heifers ‘[in German]’. German Society for Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinèe JB, Gorrèe M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn H, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ, Lindeijer E, Roorda AAH, van der Ven BL, Weidema BP (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: Operational guide to the ISO standards. Centrum voor Milieukunde–Universiteit Leiden (CML). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch TC, Gustafson C, Baum K, Harrington D (1982) A typical farm series: development and application to a Mississippi Delta farm. Southern J Agric Econ 14:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemme T (2000) A concept for international analysis of the policy and technology impacts in agriculture [in German]. International Farm Comparison Network, IFCN Dairy Research Center, Kiel, Germany

  • Hemme T (2007) IFCN Dairy Report 2007, International Farm Comparison Network, IFCN Dairy Research Center, Kiel, Germany

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Synthesis Report. Summary for Policymakers, Valencia, Spain

  • IPCC (1996) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Revised IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual. ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gl/invs1.html

  • ISO (2006) International Organization for Standardization, Environmental Management, The ISO 14,000 family of international standards, Genève, Switzerland. http://iso.org/iso/theiso14000family_2009.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2010

  • Kebreab E, Clark K, Wagner-Riddle C, France J (2006) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian animal agriculture: a review. Can J Anim Sci 86:135–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelm M, Wachendorf M, Trott H, Volkers K, Taube F (2004) Performance and environmental effects of forage production on sandy soils: III. Energy efficiency in forage production from grassland and maize for silage. Grass Forage Sci 59:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgessner M, Windisch W, Müller HL, Kreuzer M (1991) Release of methane and of carbon dioxide by dairy cattle. Agribiol Res 44:91–102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy C (1999) Energy coefficients for agriculture inputs in Western Canada. Canadian Agricultural Energy End-Use Data Analysis Centre, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. http://csale.usask.ca/PDFDocuments/energyCoefficientsAg.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2010

  • Sevenster M, de Jong F (2008) A sustainable dairy sector. Global, regional and life cycle facts and figures on greenhouse-gas emissions, Delft, The Netherlands

  • Simon K-H (1998) Reviewing the parameters used in the study. “The impact of agriculture and food on climate change” [in German]. Center for Environmental Systems Research at University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany

  • Taylor C (2000) Environmental assessment of different nutrition using selected indicators [in German]. Justus-Liebig Universität, Gießen

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Agriculture (2010) The UK’s top agriculture, food and farming resource. http://ukagriculture.com/. Accessed 18 July 2010

  • Umweltbundesamt (2010) Process oriented basic data for environmental management tools. Berlin, Germany. http://probas.umweltbundesamt.de Accessed 11 July 2010. Original source: German Institute for Applied Ecology (Öko-Institute), Berlin

  • UNSTAT (2010) United Nations Statistics Division. New York, USA. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/ENVIRONMENT/air_greenhouse_emissions%20by%20sector.htm. Accessed 11 November 2010

  • Van Eerdt MM, Fong PKN (1998) The monitoring of nitrogen surpluses from agriculture. Environ Pollut 102:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woitowitz A (2007) Impact of a reduction in consumption of food of animal origin on selected sustainability indicators—examples of conventional and organic farming [in German]. Technische Universität München, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood S, Cowie A (2004) A review of greenhouse gas emission factors for fertiliser production. New South Wales, Australia

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hagemann.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Euripides Stephanou

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Enteric and total emissions by different methods (kg CO2-eq./100 kg ECM)
Table 7 Description of the analysed typical farms
Table 8 Coefficients and statistics of the regression model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hagemann, M., Ndambi, A., Hemme, T. et al. Contribution of milk production to global greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19, 390–402 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0571-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0571-8

Keywords

Navigation