Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determination of Residual Stresses in High Speed Milled Aluminium Alloys Using a Method of Indent Pairs

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An improved method of indent pairs is utilised to determine residual stresses in high speed milling specimens of AA 6082-T6 and AA 7075-T6 aluminium alloys. To carry out the measurement procedure, this approach does not need specific equipment but only requires a universal measuring machine and an oven. An indentation device is incorporated to the measuring machine, which allows reducing the absolute error of measurement to just ±0.9 MPa. The geometry of the tool and cutting parameters are selected to evaluate the sensitivity of the method. The residual stress distributions generated by high speed milling are exhaustively evaluated taking into account orthogonal components of cutting speed and tangential force, which are parallel and perpendicular to feed direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

elongation (%)

d :

depth of cut (mm)

E :

longitudinal elastic modulus (GPa)

f :

feed rate (mm/rev)

\( {F_{t_x}} \) :

tangential force component at the x direction (N)

\( {F_{t_y}} \) :

tangential force component at the y direction (N)

HV0.5:

Vickers micro-hardness (test load: 500 gf)

k 1 , k 2 :

elastic constants

K :

thermal conductivity (w/( m·K ))

R t :

non-dimensional thermal number

S :

specific heat capacity (J/( kg·K ))

u :

displacement component at the x direction (μm)

v :

displacement component at the y direction (μm)

V :

cutting speed (m/min)

V x :

cutting speed component at the x direction (m/min)

V y :

cutting speed component at the y direction (m/min)

X b , X a :

distances between indents located at the x direction, before and after the stress-relieving, respectively (mm)

Y b , Y a :

distances between indents located at the y direction, before and after the stress-relieving, respectively (mm)

α :

clearance angle (deg)

β :

fraction of energy from primary cutting zone to specimen surface

γ :

rake angle (deg)

ε x :

deformation component at the x direction

ε y :

deformation component at the y direction

υ :

Poisson’s ratio

ρ :

density (kg/m³)

σ x :

residual stress component at the x direction (MPa)

σ y :

residual stress component at the y direction (MPa)

σ u :

ultimate tensile strength (UTS) (MPa)

\( {\sigma_{{y_{0.2}}}} \) :

yield strength (MPa)

φ :

shear angle (deg)

χ :

entrance angle (deg)

Δu :

absolute error inherent to the u component (μm)

Δv :

absolute error inherent to the v component (μm)

ΔX b X a :

absolute errors inherent to the distances X b and X a , respectively

ΔY b Y a :

absolute errors inherent to the distances Y b and Y a , respectively

Δε x :

absolute error inherent to the ε x component

Δε y :

absolute error inherent to the ε y component

Δσ x :

absolute error inherent to the σ x component (MPa)

Δσ y :

absolute error inherent to the σ y component (MPa)

\( \Delta \sigma_x^d \) :

variation in the σ x component due to an increase in the d parameter (MPa)

\( \Delta \sigma_y^d \) :

variation in the σ y component due to an increase in the d parameter (MPa)

\( \Delta \sigma_y^f \) :

variation in the σ y component due to an increase in the f parameter (MPa)

References

  1. Lu J (ed) (1996) Handbook of measurement of residual stresses, SEM. Fairmont, Lilburn

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rowlands RE (1987) Residual stresses. In: Kobayashi AS (ed) Handbook on experimental mechanics. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp 768–813

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schwach DW, Guo YB (2006) A fundamental study on the impact of surface integrity by hard turning on rolling contact fatigue. Int J Fatigue 28:1838–1844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Toribio J (1998) Residual stress effects in stress-corrosion cracking. J Mater Eng Perform 7:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HK (2001) Residual stress. Part 1—Measurement techniques. Mater Sci Technol 17:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo YB, Ammula SC, Barkey ME (2006) A wet etching method coupled with finite element analysis based compliance function to determine residual stress by high speed milling. J Manuf Sci Eng 128:792–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rendler NJ, Vigness I (1966) Hole-drilling strain-gage method of measuring residual stresses. Exp Mech 6:577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Furgiuele FM, Pagnotta L, Poggialini A (1991) Measuring residual stresses by hole drilling and coherent optics techniques: a numerical calibration. J Eng Mater Technol 113:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McDonach A, McKelvie J, MacKenzie PM et al (1983) Improved moire interferometry and applications in fracture mechanics, residual stress and damaged composites. Exp Tech 7:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicoletto G (1991) Moiré interferometry determination of residual stresses in the presence of gradients. Exp Mech 31:252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Antonov AA (1983) Inspecting the level of residual stresses in welded joints by laser interferometry. Weld Prod 30:29–31

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson DV, McCrickerd JT (1986) Residual stress determination through combined use of holographic interferometry and blind hole drilling. Exp Mech 26:371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang J (1998) Two-dimensional in-plane electronic speckle pattern interferometer and its application to residual stress determination. Opt Eng 37:2402–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Díaz FV, Kaufmann GH, Galizzi GE (2000) Determination of residual stresses by hole drilling and digital speckle pattern interferometry with data automatic analysis. Opt Lasers Eng 33:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Díaz FV, Kaufmann GH, Möller O (2001) Residual-stress determination using blind-hole drilling and digital speckle pattern interferometry with automated data processing. Exp Mech 41:319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Noyan IC, Cohen JB (1987) Residual stress measurement by diffraction and interpretation, Materials Research and Engineering. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prevéy PS (1987) X-ray diffraction residual stress techniques. In: Metals Handbook, American Society for Metals, pp 380–401

  18. Allen AJ, Hutchings MT, Windsor CG et al (1985) Neutron diffraction methods for the study of residual stress fields. Adv Phys 34:445–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suresh S, Giannakopoulos AE (1998) A new method for estimating residual stresses by instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater 46:5755–5767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swadener JG, Taljat B, Pharr GM (2001) Measurement of residual stress by load and depth sensing indentation with spherical indenters. J Mater Res 16:2091–2102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao M, Chen X, Yan J et al (2006) Determination of uniaxial residual stress and mechanical properties by instrumented indentation. Acta Mater 54:2823–2832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wyatt JE, Berry JT (2006) A new technique for the determination of superficial residual stresses associated with machining and other manufacturing processes. J Mater Proc Tech 171:132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trent EM (1991) Metal cutting. Butterworth/Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schulz H (1996) High speed machining. Carl Hanser, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mantle AL, Aspinwall DK (2001) Surface integrity of a high speed milled gamma titanium aluminide. J Mater Proc Tech 118:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Bevington PR, Robinson DK (2002) Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Özel T, Zeren E (2004) Determination of flow material stress and friction for FEA of machining using orthogonal cutting tests. J Mater Proc Tech 153:1019–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kamiya M, Yakou T (2008) Role of second-phase particles in chip breakability in aluminium alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:688–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to Eduardo Cravero and Silvio Acosta for their assistance during HSM test phase. This work was supported by the Departamento de Ingeniería Electromecánica and the Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Facultad Regional Rafaela, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. V. Díaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Díaz, F.V., Bolmaro, R.E., Guidobono, A.P.M. et al. Determination of Residual Stresses in High Speed Milled Aluminium Alloys Using a Method of Indent Pairs. Exp Mech 50, 205–215 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-009-9288-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-009-9288-8

Keywords

Navigation