Skip to main content
Log in

An Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Fracture of Nacre–Mother of Pearl

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nacre, also known as mother-of-pearl, is a hard biological composite found in the inside layer of many shells such as oyster or abalone. It is composed of microscopic ceramic tablets arranged in layers and tightly stacked to form a three-dimensional brick wall structure, where the mortar is a thin layer of biopolymers (20–30 nm). Although mostly made of a brittle ceramic, the structure of nacre is so well designed that its toughness is several order of magnitudes larger that the ceramic it is made of. How the microstructure of nacre controls its mechanical performance has been the focus of numerous studies over the past two decades, because such understanding may inspire novel composite designs though biomimetics. This paper presents in detail uniaxial tension experiment performed on miniature nacre specimens. Large inelastic deformations were observed in hydrated condition, which were explained by sliding of the tablets on one another and progressive locking generated by their microscopic waviness. Fracture experiments were also performed, and for the first time the full crack resistance curve was established for nacre. A rising resistance curve is an indication of the robustness and damage tolerance of that material. These measurements are then discussed and correlated with toughening extrinsic mechanisms operating at the microscale. Moreover, specific features of the microstructure and their relevance to associated toughening mechanisms were identified. These features and mechanisms, critical to the robustness of the shell, were finely tuned over millions of years of evolution. Hence, they are expected to serve as a basis to establish guidelines for the design of novel man-made composites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Currey, JD (1999) The design of mineralised hard tissues for their mechanical functions. J Exp Biol 202:3285–3294.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lawn BR (1993) Fracture of brittle solids. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang RZ, Suo Z, Evans AG, Yao N, Aksay IA (2001) Deformation mechanisms in nacre. J Mater Res 16:2485–2493.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Currey JD, Taylor JD (1974) The mechanical behavior of some molluscan hard tissues. J Zool (London) 173:395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sarikaya M, Aksay IA (eds) (1995) Biomimetics, design and processing of materials. Woodbury, NY.

  6. Currey JD (1977) Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension. Proc R Soc Lond 196:443–463.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson AP, Vincent JFV, Turner RM (1988) The mechanical design of nacre. Proc R Soc Lond 234:415–440.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Menig R, Meyers MH, Meyers MA, Vecchio KS (2000) Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical response of haliotis rufescens (abalone) shells. Acta Mater 48: 2383–2398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barthelat F, Tang H, Zavattieri PD, Li CM, Espinosa HD (2007) On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: a key feature in the material hierarchical structure. J Mech Phys Solids 55:225–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barthelat F, Li CM, Comi C, Espinosa HD (2006) Mechanical properties of nacre constituents and their impact on mechanical performance. J Mater Res 21:1977–1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang RZ, Wen HB, Cui FZ, Zhang HB, Li HD (1995) Observations of damage morphologies in nacre during deformation and fracture. J Mater Sci 30:2299–2304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barthelat F, Espinosa HD (2005). In: MRS 2004 fall meeting. Boston.

  13. Li XD, Chang WC, Chao YJ, Wang RZ, Chang M (2004) Nanoscale structural and mechanical characterization of a natural nanocomposite material: the shell of red abalone. Nano Lett 4:613–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruet BJF, et al. (2005) Nanoscale morphology and indentation of individual nacre tablets from the gastropod mollusc Trochus niloticus. J Mater Res 20:2400–2419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schaeffer TE, et al. (1997) Does abalone nacre form by heteroepitaxial nucleation or by growth through mineral bridges? Chem Mater 9:1731–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith BL, et al. (1999) Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites. Nature (London) 399:761–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans AG, et al. (2001) Model for the robust mechanical behavior of nacre. J Mater Res 16:2475–2484.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Song F, Bai YL (2003) Effects of nanostructures on the fracture strength of the interfaces in nacre. J Mater Res 18:1741–1744.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li XD, Xu ZH, Wang RZ (2006) In situ observation of nanograin rotation and deformation in nacre. Nano Lett 6:2301–2304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kotha SP, Li Y, Guzelsu N (2001) Micromechanical model of nacre tested in tension. J Mater Sci 36:2001–2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katti K, Katti DR, Tang J, Pradhan S, Sarikaya M (2005) Modeling mechanical responses in a laminated biocomposite. Part II. Nonlinear responses and nuances of nanostructure. J Mater Sci 40:1749–1755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Okumura K, de Gennes PG (2001) Why is nacre strong? Elastic theory and fracture mechanics for biocomposites with stratified structures. Eur Phys J, E Soft Matter 4:121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao HJ (2006) Application of fracture mechanics concepts to hierarchical biomechanics of bone and bone-like materials. Int J Fract 138:101–137.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Katti DR, Katti KS (2001) Modeling microarchitecture and mechanical behavior of nacre using 3D finite element techniques. Part 1. Elastic properties. J Mater Sci 36:1411–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peters WH, Ranson WF (1982) Digital imaging techniques in experimental stress-analysis. Opt Eng 21:427–431.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1985) Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Exp Mech 25:232–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Evans AG, et al. (2001) A model for the robust mechanical behavior of nacre. J Mater Res 16:2475–2484.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manne S, et al. (1994) Atomic-force microscopy of the nacreous layer in mollusk shells. Proc R Soc Lond, B Biol Sci 256:17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Feng QL, Cui FZ, Pu G, Wang RZ, Li HD (2000) Crystal orientation, toughening mechanisms and a mimic of nacre. Mater Sci Eng, C Biomim Mater, Sens Syst 11:19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Song F, Bai Y (2002) Nanostructure of nacre and its mechanical effects. Int J of Nonlinear Sci & Numer Simul 3(3):257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blank S, et al. (2003) The nacre protein perlucin nucleates growth of calcium carbonate crystals. J Microsc-Oxford 212:280–291.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. McNulty JC, Zok FW, Genin GM, Evans AG (1999) Notch-sensitivity of fiber-reinforced ceramic-matrix composites: effects of inelastic straining and volume-dependent strength. J Am Ceram Soc 82:1217–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McMeeking RM, Evans AG (1982) Mechanics of transformation-toughening in brittle materials. J Am Ceram Soc 65:242–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Evans AG (1990) Perspective on the development of high-toughness ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 73:187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saxena A (1998) Nonlinear fracture mechanics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. ASTM (2005) Standard E399-05: standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness KIc of metallic materials.

  37. McMeeking RM, Parks DM (1979) In: Elastic-plastic fracture, vol 668, pp 175–194. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM-STP), Philadelphia.

  38. ASTM (2004) ASTM standard E 1820-01: Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness.

  39. Barker DB, Sanford RJ, Chona R (1985) Determining K and related stress-field parameters from displacement-fields. Exp Mech 25:399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McNeill SR, Peters WH, Sutton MA (1987) Estimation of stress intensity factor by digital image correlation. Eng Fract Mech 28:101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sih GC, Paris PC, Irwin GR (1965) On cracks in rectilinearly anisotropic bodies. Int J Fract Mech 1:189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kamat S, Su X, Ballarini R, Heuer A (2000) H. Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas. Nature 405:1036–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Barthelat F, Tang H, Li C, Espinosa H (2007) On the microscopic origins of the toughness of nacre (submitted).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through award No. CMS-0301416. We would like to thank Dr. Ken Chong for his encouragement and support during this investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. D. Espinosa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barthelat, F., Espinosa, H.D. An Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Fracture of Nacre–Mother of Pearl. Exp Mech 47, 311–324 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9040-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-007-9040-1

Keywords

Navigation