Skip to main content
Log in

A Measure for the Reliability of a Rating Scale Based on Longitudinal Clinical Trial Data

  • Theory and Methods
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new measure for reliability of a rating scale is introduced, based on the classical definition of reliability, as the ratio of the true score variance and the total variance. Clinical trial data can be employed to estimate the reliability of the scale in use, whenever repeated measurements are taken. The reliability is estimated from the covariance parameters obtained from a linear mixed model. The method provides a single number to express the reliability of the scale, but allows for the study of the reliability’s time evolution. The method is illustrated using a case study in schizophrenia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso, A., Geys, H., Molenberghs, G., & Vangeneugden, T. (2002). Investigating the criterion validity of psychiatric symptom scales using surrogate marker validation methodology. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 12, 161–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R.D. (1966). Contributions of multivariate experimental designs to educational research. In R.B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R.D. (1983). The discrete Bayesian. In H. Wainer & S. Messick (Eds.), Principals of modern psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Diggle, P.J., Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S.L. (1994). Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford Science Publications. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

  • Laird, N.M., & Ware, J.H. (1982). Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38, 963–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M., & Novick, M.R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Vangeneugden, T., Laenen, A., Geys, H., Renard, D., & Molenberghs, G. (2004). Applying linear mixed models to estimate reliability in clinical trial data with repeated measurements. Controlled Clinical Trials, 25(1), 13–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annouschka Laenen.

Additional information

The authors are grateful to J&J PRD for kind permission to use their data. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Belgian IUAP/PAI network “Statistical Techniques and Modeling for Complex Substantive Questions with Complex Data.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laenen, A., Alonso, A. & Molenberghs, G. A Measure for the Reliability of a Rating Scale Based on Longitudinal Clinical Trial Data. Psychometrika 72, 443–448 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-007-9002-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-007-9002-7

Keywords

Navigation