Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mandibular advancement splint titration in obstructive sleep apnoea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Breathing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Mandibular advancement splints (MAS) allowing self-adjustment may be better tolerated, but the optimum titration protocol needs systematic study.

Aim

The aims of the study are to assess the effectiveness of a titratable MAS device in consecutive patients with body mass index (BMI) < 35 kg/m2 and obstructive sleep apnoea [OSA, apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) 10–40/h] and compare two methods of adjustment [self-adjustment or adjustment after polysomnographic (PSG) feedback].

Materials and methods

Twenty-eight patients (24 M, mean age 49 years, mean BMI 27.6 kg/m2) with symptomatic (Epworth Sleepiness score > 8/24, snoring, choking or poor sleep quality) OSA (mean AHI 25.7/h, range 10–46/h) had a MAS set at 70% maximal protrusion and were randomised to subjective self-adjustment for 6 weeks (n = 16) or objective adjustment (n = 12; fixed position for 3 weeks, then PSG based feedback at 3 weeks with self-adjustment instructions). Primary outcome variable (AHI) and OSA symptoms were compared by t tests and chi-squared tests at baseline and after 6 weeks. Resolution of apnoea was defined as AHI < 5/h; improvement was defined as AHI decreased by >50% but still >5/h.

Results

The groups had similar baseline demographics, OSA severity and occlusal type. MAS therapy improved or resolved OSA in 20 out of 28 (71%) and was reportedly used nightly by 91% of the objective group and 63% of the subjective group (p = 0.04). MAS were used all night by 75% of the objective group and 69% of the subjective group (p > 0.05). MAS adjustment following PSG feedback did not lower AHI further from 3 weeks (baseline 26.5 ± 12.0/h, 3 weeks 15.3 ± 13.5/h p = 0.01, 6 weeks 11.7 ± 10.0/h, p = 0.11). The overall improvement was similar to that achieved with subjective adjustment (baseline AHI 25.4 ± 7.4/h, 6 weeks 14.3 ± 10.7/h, p = 0.0002). Symptomatic benefit was reported by both groups.

Conclusion

In selected patients, titratable MAS improved or resolved OSA in the majority of patients and was well tolerated. PSG-based feedback at 3 weeks allowed objective confirmation of efficacy and increased device use but did not result in greater improvement in AHI or symptoms. Neither titration method was significantly superior for us to provide firm endorsement. However, we recommend a follow-up sleep study to confirm MAS efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S (1993) The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med 328:1230–1235 doi:10.1056/NEJM199304293281704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lavie P (1983) Incidence of sleep apnea in a presumably healthy working population: a significant relationship with excessive daytime sleepiness. Sleep (4):312–318

    Google Scholar 

  3. Young T, Peppard P, Palta M, Hla KM (1997) Population-based study of sleep-disordered breathing as a risk factor for hypertension. Arch Intern Med 157:1746–1752 doi:10.1001/archinte.157.15.1746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss JW, Launois SH, Anand A, Garpestad E (1996) Cardiovascular morbidity in obstructive sleep apnoea. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 41(5):367–376 doi:10.1053/pcad.1999.0410367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Findley L, Unverzagt M, Suratt P (1988) Automobile accidents involving patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 138:337–340

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sullivan CE, Issa FG, Berthon-Jones M, Eves L (1981) Reversal of obstructive sleep apnoea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares. Lancet 1(8225):862–865 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(81)92140-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kribbs N, Pack A, Kline L, Smith P, Schwartz A, Schubert N et al (1993) Objective measurement of patterns of nasal CPAP use by patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 147:887–895

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Engleman H, Martin S, Douglas N (1994) Compliance with CPAP therapy in patients with the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. Thorax 49:263–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan CF, Love LL, Peat D et al (1999) Mandibular advancement oral appliance therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea: effect on awake calibre of the velopharynx. Thorax 54:972–977

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng AT, Gotsopoulos H, Qian J, Cistulli PA (2003) Effect of oral appliance therapy on upper airway collapsibility in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:238–241 doi:10.1164/rccm.200211-1275OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neill A, Whyman R, Bannan S, Jeffery O, Campbell A (2002) Mandibular advancement splint improves indices of obstructive sleep apnoea and snoring but side effects are common. N Z Med J 115:298–292

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt-Nowara WW, Meade T, Hays MB (1991) Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with a dental orthosis. Chest 99(6):1378–1385 doi:10.1378/chest.99.6.1378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Sullivan RA, Hillman DR, Mateljan R, Pantin C, Finucane KE (1995) Mandibular advancement splint: an appliance to treat snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151:194–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marklund M, Franklin KA, Sahlin C, Lundgren R (1998) The effect of a mandibular advancement device on apneas and sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 113(3):707–713 doi:10.1378/chest.113.3.707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehta A, Qian J, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA (2001) A randomized, controlled study of a mandibular advancement splint for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163(6):1457–1461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cistulli PA, Gotsopoulos H, Marklund M, Lowe AA (2004) Treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea with mandibular repositioning appliances. Sleep Med Rev 8(6):443–457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gotsopoulos H, Kelly J, Cistulli P (2004) Oral appliance therapy reduces blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Sleep 27(5):934–941

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johns MW (1991) A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep 14:540–545

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. George P (1992) A new instrument for functional appliance bite registration. J Clin Orthod 26:721–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force (1999) Sleep related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. Sleep 22(5):667–689

    Google Scholar 

  21. American Sleep Disorders Association (1992) EEG arousals: scoring rules and examples. Sleep 15:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chan AS, Lee RW, Cistulli PA (2007) Dental appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Chest 132(2):693–699 doi:10.1378/chest.06-2038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferguson KA, Cartwright R, Rogers R, Schmidt-Nowara W (2006) Oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep 29(2):244–262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chervin R, Theut S, Bassetti C, Aldrich M (1997) Compliance with nasal CPAP can be improved by simple interventions. Sleep 20(4):284–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fletcher EC, Luckett RA (1991) The effect of positive reinforcement on hourly compliance in nasal continuous positive airway pressure users with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 143(5 pt 1):936–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Walker-Engstrom ML, Ringqvist I, Vestling O, Wilhelmsson B, Tegelberg A (2003) A prospective randomized study comparing two different degrees of mandibular advancement with a dental appliance in treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 7:119–130 doi:10.1007/s11325-003-0119-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ferguson A, Ono T, Lowe A, Al-Majid S, Love L, Fleetham J (1997) A short term controlled trial of an adjustable oral appliance for the treatment of mild to moderate OSA. Thorax 52:362–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tegelberg A, Walker-Engstrom ML, Vestling O, Wilhelmsson B (2003) Two different degrees of mandibular advancement with a dental appliance in treatment of patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. Acta Odontol Scand 61(6):356–362 doi:10.1080/00016350310007130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by an Otago University Research Grant and the Wellington Medical Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Neill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, A.J., Reynolds, G., Trengrove, H. et al. Mandibular advancement splint titration in obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep Breath 13, 157–162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-008-0230-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-008-0230-6

Keywords

Navigation