Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of 11C-Methionine PET and 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been used as a promising tool to diagnose primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma because the tumor shows very high FDG accumulation. Although 11C-methionine (MET) PET has been reported to be useful for evaluating various brain tumors, the role of MET PET in CNS lymphoma is unclear. We compared the uptake of MET and FDG in patients with CNS lymphoma.

Procedures

Thirteen immunocompetent patients with CNS lymphoma were examined. All patients underwent PET with MET (15 min p.i.) and FDG (60 min p.i.). PET results were evaluated by visual and semi-quantitative analysis. For semi-quantitative analysis, the standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumor to contralateral normal brain tissue (T/N) ratio were determined by region-of-interest analysis.

Results

For detection of CNS lymphoma, sensitivity of PET using both MET and FDG was 100%. The mean (±SD) value of SUV in the contralateral normal brain tissue using MET (1.43 ± 0.21) was significantly lower than that using FDG (5.58 ± 1.79; p < 0.002). The mean (±SD) value of SUV in the CNS lymphoma using MET (4.27 ± 1.91) was significantly lower than that of FDG (13.94 ± 5.65; p < 0.002). There were no significant differences between mean (±SD) T/N ratios using MET PET (3.00 ± 1.26) and FDG PET (2.74 ± 1.25).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference between T/N ratios using MET PET and FDG PET, although uptake of MET in CNS lymphoma was significantly lower than that of FDG. MET PET showed as high a sensitivity as FDG PET for the detection of primary lesions in patients with CNS lymphoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Corn BW, Marcus SM, Tophan A, Hauck W, Curran WJ Jr (1997) Will primary central nervous system lymphoma be the most frequent brain tumor diagnosed in the year 2000? Cancer 79:2409–2413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Behin A, Hoang-Xuan K, Caroentier AF, Delattre J-Y (2003) Primary brain tumours in adults. Lancet 361:323–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Basso U, Brandes AA (2002) Diagnostic advances and new trends for treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma. Eur J Cancer 38:1298–1312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abrey LE, Yahalom J, DeAngelis LM (2000) Treatment for primary CNS lymphoma: the next step. J Clin Oncol 18:3144–3150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenfeld SS, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE, Glantz MJ, Hanson MW, Schold SC (1992) Studies of primary central nervous system lymphoma with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med 33:532–536

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Chiro G, DeLaPaz RL, Brooks RA et al (1982) Glucose utilization of cerebral gliomas measured by [18]F fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography. Neurology 32:1323–1329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alavi JB, Alavi A, Chawluk J et al (1988) Positron emission tomography in patients with glioma. A predictor of prognosis. Cancer 62:1074–1078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman JM, Waskin HA, Schifter T et al (1993) FDG-PET in differentiating lymphoma from nonmalignant central nervous system lesions in patients with AIDS. J Nucl Med 34:567–575

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roelcke U, Leenders KL (1999) Positron emission tomography in patients with primary CNS lymphomas. J Neuro Oncol 43:231–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmedo H, Urbach H, Bender H et al (2006) FDG-PET in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: correlation with MRI and clinical follow-up. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:164–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Monden T et al (2007) Diagnostic value of kinetic analysis using dynamic FDG PET in immunocompetent patients with primary CNS lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:78–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura N, Yamamoto Y, Kameyama R, Hatakeyama T, Kawai N, Nishiyama Y (2009) Diagnostic value of kinetic analysis using dynamic FDG PET in patients with malignant primary brain tumor. Nucl Med Commun 30:602–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogawa T, Shishido F, Kanno I et al (1993) Cerebral glioma: evaluation with methionine PET. Radiology 186:45–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sasaki M, Kuwabara Y, Yoshida T et al (1998) A comparative study of thallium-201 SPET. Carbon-11 methionine PET and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET for the differentiation of astrocytic tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 25:1261–1269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto Y, Nishiyama Y, Kimura N et al (2008) 11C-Acetate PET in the evaluation of brain glioma: comparison with 11C-methionine and 18F-FDG-PET. Mol Imaging Biol 10:281–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogawa T, Kanno I, Hatazawa J et al (1994) Methionine PET for follow-up of radiation therapy of primary lymphoma of the brain. RadioGraphics 14:101–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishiwata K, Ido T, Vaalburg W (1988) Increased amounts of D-enantiomer dependent on alkaline concentration in the synthesis of L-[methyl-11C] methionine. Appl Radiat Isot 39:311–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Toorongian SA, Mulholland GK, Jewett DM, Bachelor MA, Kilbourn MR (1990) Routine production of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose by direct nucleophilic exchange on a quaternary 4-aminopyridinium resin. Nucl Med Biol 17:273–279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu RS, Chang CP, Chu LS et al (2006) PET imaging of brain astrocytoma with 1-11C-acetate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:420–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoskin PJ (2003) PET in lymphoma: what are the oncologist’s needs? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:S37–S41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka Y, Nariai T, Momose T et al (2009) Glioma surgery using a multimodality navigation system with integrated metabolic images. J Neurosurg 110:163–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiro Kawase.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawase, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Kameyama, R. et al. Comparison of 11C-Methionine PET and 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma. Mol Imaging Biol 13, 1284–1289 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0447-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-010-0447-1

Key words

Navigation