Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Positron Emission Tomography for Pretreatment Staging and Posttreatment Evaluation in Cancer of the Anal Canal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Imaging and Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In recent years, combined modality therapy (CMT) with chemotherapy and radiation has replaced surgery as the preferred treatment for cancer of the anal canal. Clinical staging with computed tomography (CT) scan alone may underestimate the extent of disease. We investigated the utility of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-deoxy-2[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) in the staging and determination of response to CMT.

Patients and Methods

From September 1999 to August 2002, 21 patients with cancer of the anal canal were studied prospectively. All patients underwent pretreatment PET, in addition to standard clinical evaluation that included CT scanning. Follow-up PET studies were ordered one month after completion of CMT.

Results

Sites of metastases not observed on CT scan were identified in five of 21 patients (24%). These sites included pelvic lymph nodes (four patients) and distant omental metastasis (one patient). In another patient, PET confirmed the presence of suspected M1 disease in the liver. Posttreatment PET imaging was less useful. Nine patients had minimal residual PET activity at the primary site on the one-month follow-up PET study, but only three of these subsequently developed local recurrence. In addition, recurrences occurred in three patients (two local, one distant) of the six who had negative posttreatment PET studies.

Conclusions

FDG-PET, in conjunction with CT scanning, provides additional staging information in cancer of the anal canal. This information may have implications for prognosis and radiotherapy planning. Posttreatment PET scans appear to be of little value in predicting durability of response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Coverage Issues Manual; Program Memorandum Intermediaries/Carriers Transmittal AB-03-092, June 20, 2003

  2. Bastiaannet E, Groen H, Jager PL, et al. (2004) The value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 30:83–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rose PG, Adler LP, Rodriguez M, et al. (1999) Positron emission tomography for evaluating para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: A surgicopathologic study. J Clin Oncol 17:41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hain SF, O'Doherty MJ, Timothy AR, et al. (2000) Fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the initial staging of germ cell tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 27:590–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DeSantis M, Becherer A, Bokemeyer C, et al. (2004) 2-[18]Fluorodeoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is a reliable predictor for viable tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma: An update of the prospective multicentric SEMPET trial. J Clin Oncol 22:1034–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Haustermans KM, Vrieze O, DeWever W, et al. (2002) The role of FDG-PET in the design of the radiation fields for patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 54(2s):249 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Majhail NS, Urbain J, Albani JM, et al. (2003) F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of distant metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3995–4000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nigro ND, Vaitkevicius VK, Considine B (1974) Combined therapy for cancer of the anal canal: A preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum 17:354–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flam M, John M, Pajak TF, et al. (1996) Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: Results of a phase III randomized intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 14:2527–2539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cummings BJ, Keane TJ, O'Sullivan B, et al. (1991) Epidermoid anal cancer: Treatment by radiation alone or by 5-fluorouracil with and without mitomycin-C. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 21:1115–1125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (2001) Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp 1337–1338

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ogunbiyi OA, Flanagan FL, Dehdashti F, et al. (1997) Detection of recurrent and metastatic colorectal cancer: Comparison of positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Ann Surg Oncol 4:613–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, et al. (1992) Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo—high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med 33:1972–1980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hu K, Minsky BD, Cohen AM, et al. (1999) 30 Gy may be an adequate dose in patients with anal cancer treated with excisional biopsy followed by combined-modality therapy. J Surg Oncol 70:71–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ciernik IF, Dizendorf E, Baumert BG, et al. (2003) Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): A feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:853–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group (2001) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:880–914

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas G. Trautmann MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trautmann, T.G., Zuger, J.H. Positron Emission Tomography for Pretreatment Staging and Posttreatment Evaluation in Cancer of the Anal Canal. Mol Imaging Biol 7, 309–313 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-005-0003-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-005-0003-6

Key words

Navigation