Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A systematic literature review on competitor analysis: status quo and start-up specifics

  • Published:
Management Review Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine the status quo of research on competitor analysis (CA), which constitutes a cornerstone of strategic management. Of special interest are potential specifications for start-ups which act in an environment of high uncertainty, where CA is supposed to provide meaningful information to determine the right course of action. This study is performed as a conceptually organized systematic literature review with representative coverage and focus on research outcomes. The findings of 78 identified relevant studies out of 43 different journals are analyzed. Results are presented with regard to research contribution, mentioned purposes for conducting CA, CA processes and methods, and elements for ensuring quality of CA. To provide a cohesive understanding of the CA theme, as well as a foundation and guidance for researchers and practitioners, a conceptual framework is derived, which synthesizes the facets of the CA theme in a novel manner. Start-up related research contributions and avenues for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker D (2013) Competitor Analysis. Strategic market management, 10th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 40–58

  • Achleitner A-K, Bassen A (2002) Controllingsysteme in jungen Wachstumsunternehmen - terra incognita. Betriebs-Berater 57(23):1192–1198

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilar FJ (1967) Scanning the business environment. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Debei MM, Avison D (2010) Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. Eur J Inf Syst 19(3):359–376

    Google Scholar 

  • American Marketing Association (AMA) (2018) Marketing management. https://www.ama.org/resources/Pages/Marketing-Dictionary.aspx. Accessed 2 August 2018

  • Anand G, Kodali R (2008) Benchmarking the benchmarking models. Benchmarking Int J 15(3):257–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulet B (2013) Disciplined entrepreneurship. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbar S, Rai A (1993) Competitive intelligence for international business. Long Range Plan 26(3):103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacigalupo M, Kampylis P, Punie Y, Van den Brande G (2016) EntreComp: the entrepreneurship competence framework JRC science for policy report. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball R (1987) Assessing your competitor’s people and organization. Long Range Plan 20(2):32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger I (1989) Developing competitive advantage in small and medium-size firms. Long Range Plan 22(5):80–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R, Baiyere A, Gergor S, Hevner A, Rossi M (2018) Design science research contributions: finding a balance between artifact and theory. J Assoc Inf Syst 19(5):358–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett R (2003) Competitor analysis practices of British charities. Market Intell Plan 21(6):335–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen M, Peteraf MA (2002) Competitor identification and competitor analysis: a broad-based managerial approach. Manag Decis Econ 23(4–5):157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt DC (1994) “I want it fast, factual, actionable”: tailoring competitive intelligence to executives’ needs. Long Range Plan 27(1):12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank S, Dorf B (2012) The startup owner’s manual: the step-by-step guide for building a great company, 10th edn. K & S Ranch Inc., Pescadero

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton P, Kitchenham BA, Budgen D, Turner M, Khalil M (2007) Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J Syst Softw 80(4):571–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinckmann J, Grichnik D, Kapsa D (2010) Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. J Bus Ventur 25(1):24–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush CG (1992) Marketplace information scanning activities of new manufacturing ventures. J Small Bus Manage 30(4):41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers TH, Dorf RC, Nelson AJ (2015) Technology ventures, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan TJ, Cassar MD (1995) Small business owners’ assessments of their abilities to perform and interpret formal market studies. J Small Bus Manag 33(4):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter GS, Lehmann DR (1985) a model of marketing mix, brand switching, and competition. J Mark Res 22(3):318–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright DL, Boghton PD, Miller SW (1995) Competitive intelligence systems: relationships to strategic orientation and perceived usefulness. J Manag Issues 7(4):420–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler GN, DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Mumford TV (2011) Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study. J Bus Ventur 26(3):375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M-J (1996) Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: toward a theoretical integration. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):100–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M-J, MacMillan IC (2017) Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: the roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility. Acad Manag J 35(3):539–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M-J, Miller D (2012) Competitive dynamics: themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Acad Manag Ann 6(1):135–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark BH, Montgomery DB (1999) Managerial identification of competitors. J Market 63(3):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur 20(1):37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper HM (1988) Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowl Soc 1(1):104–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley KG, Gioia DA (2011) Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution. Acad Manag Rev 36(1):12–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dattakumar R, Jagadesh R (2003) A review of literature on benchmarking. Benchmarking Int J 10(3):176–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Day GS (1981) Strategic market analysis and definition: an integrated approach. Strateg Manag J 2(3):281–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Day GS, Wensley R (1988) Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. J Market 52(2):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Derfus PJ, Maggitti PG, Grimm CM, Smith KG (2008) The red queen effect: competitive actions and firm performance. Acad Manag J 51(1):61–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpandé R, Gatignon H (1994) Competitive analysis. Market Lett 5(3):271–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon WR, Madden TJ, Kirmani A, Mukherjee S (2001) Understanding what’s in a brand rating: a model for assessing brand and attribute effects and their relationship to brand equity. J Mark Res 38(4):415–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimov D (2016) Toward a design science of entrepreneurship. In: Katz JA, Corbett AC (eds) Models of start-up thinking and action: theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches, vol 18. Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth. Emerald Insight, Bingley, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishman PL, Calof JL (2008) Competitive intelligence: a multiphasic precedent to marketing strategy. Eur J Mark 42(7/8):766–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring N, Bortz J (2016) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman LF, Manolova TS, Brush CG (2008) Entrepreneurship education: correspondence between practices of nascent entrepreneurs and textbook prescriptions for success. Acad Manag Learn Edu 7(1):56–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans AG, Varaiya NP (2003) Anne evans: assessment of a biotechnology market opportunity. Entrep Theory Pract 28(1):87–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey L, King WR, Narayanan VK (1981) Environmental scanning and forecasting in strategic planning:the state of the art. Long Range Plan 14(1):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Fann GL, Smeltzer LR (1989) The use of information from and about competitors in small business management. Entrep Theory Pract 13(4):35

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer D (1984) Competitive analysis: its role in purchasing. Long Range Plan 17(3):72–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisch C, Block J (2018) Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research. Manag Rev Q 68(2):103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong SW, Cheng EWL, Ho DCK (1998) Benchmarking: a general reading for management practitioners. Manag Decis 36(6):407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis G, Holloway J (2007) What have we learned? Themes from the literature on best-practice benchmarking. Int J Manag Rev 9(3):171–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen DL, Brem A (2017) How do entrepreneurs think they create value? A scientific reflection of Eric Ries’ lean startup approach. Int Entrep Manag J 13(1):169–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Frehe V, Teuteberg F (2017) Information and communication technology in green logistics: status quo and research gaps. Manag Rev Q 67:65–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb BD, Saxton MJ, Zinkhan GM, Albers ND (1991) Competitive intelligence: insights from executives. Bus Horiz 34(1):43

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghazinoory S, Abdi M, Azadegan-Mehr M (2011) SWOT methodology: a state-of-the art review for the past, a framework for the future. J Bus Econ Manag 12(1):24–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardino C, Bajwa SS, Wang X, Abrahamsson P (2015) Key challenges in early-stage software startups. In: Lassenius C, Dingsøyr T, Paasivaara M (eds) XP 2015, vol 212. Springer, Cham, pp 52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilad B, Gordon G, Sudit E (1993) Identifying gaps and blind spots in competitive intelligence. Long Range Plan 26(6):107–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman P, Howard T (1997) The theory and practice of competence-based competition. Long Range Plan 30(4):615–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshal S, Kim SK (1986) Building effective intelligence systems for competitive advantage. Sloan Manag Rev 28(1):49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshal S, Westney DE (1991) Organizing competitor analysis systems. Strateg Manag J 12(1):17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q 37(2):337–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber M (2004) Marketing in new ventures: theory and empirical evidence. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 56:164–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilding C (1999) Competitor-focused accounting: an exploratory note. Acc Organ Soc 24:583–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR, Chatterjee S (2010) Design research in information systems: theory and practice, vol 22. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg C (2017) Marketingmanagement: Strategie, Instrumente, Umsetzung, Unternehmensführung, 6th edn. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Insights CB (2016) Top 20 reasons why startups fail. CB Insights, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SC (1984) Environmental scanning in US Corporations. Long Range Plan 17(2):117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski BJ, Macinnis DJ, Kohli AK (2002) Generating competitive intelligence in organizations. Journal of Market-Focused Management 5(4):279–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings D, Jones A (1999) Environmental scanning in an emerging industry. Strateg Change 8(3):153–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson P, Perjons E (2014) An introduction to design science. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian RK, Drazin R (1989) An empirical test of a stage of growth progression model. Manage Sci 35(12):1489–1503

    Google Scholar 

  • King WR (1978) Information for strategic planning: an analysis. Inf Manag 1(2):59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • King WR, Cleland DI (1974) Environmental information systems for strategic marketing planning. J Market 38(4):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • King WR, Dutta BK, Rodriguez JT (1978) Strategic competitive information systems. Omega 6(2):123–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham B, Charters S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report, EBSE-2007-01, Version 2.3. Available online at https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/35830450/2_143465389588742151.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1550653485&Signature=iezIibtZktfm0iKw1MMfu%2FAQFxQ%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%Bfilename%3DSystematic_Literature_Reviews_SLR.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2017

  • Kitchenham B, Pearl Brereton O, Budgen D, Turner M, Bailey J, Linkman S (2009) Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol 51(1):7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackéus M (2015) Entrepreneurship in education: what, why, when, how. Entrepreneurship in education: what, why, when, how. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Lema NM, Price ADF (1995) Benchmarking: performance Improvement Toward Competitive Advantage. J Manag Eng 11(1):28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemos ÂD, Porto AC (1998) Technological forecasting techniques and competitive intelligence: tools for improving the innovation process. Ind Manag Data Syst 98(7):330–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz RT, Engledow JL (1986) Environmental analysis: the applicability of current theory. Strateg Manag J 7(4):329–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmer M, Herrmann BL, Dogrultan E, Berman R (2011) Startup genome report: a new framework for understanding why startups succeed. Technical Report, University and Stanford University, Berkley. Available online at https://media.rusbase.com/reports/StartupGenomeReport1_Why_Startups_Succeed_v2.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2015

  • McEwen T (2008) Environmental scanning and organizational learning in entrepreneurial ventures. Entrep. Execut 13:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath RG, MacMillan IC (1995) Discovery-driven planning. Harvard Bus Rev 73(4):44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee P (1984) Competitive analysis using matrix displays. Long Range Plan 17(3):98–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed I, Guillet BD, Law R (2014) Competitor set identification in the hotel industry: a case study of a full-service hotel in Hong Kong. Int J Hosp Manag 39:29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan-Neill I (1995) The influence of firm’s age and size on its environmental scanning activities. J Small Bus Manag 33(4):10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer R (1982) Strategic planning for the small firm. J Small Bus Manag 20(3):8–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nag R, Hambrick DC, Chen MJ (2007) What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strateg Manag J 28:935–955

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojala A (2016) Business models and opportunity creation: how IT entrepreneurs create and develop business models under uncertainty. Inf Syst J 26(5):451–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojala A, Tyrväinen P (2006) Business models and market entry mode choice of small software firms. J Int Entrep 4(2–3):69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons J, Wand Y (2008) Using cognitive principles to guide classification in information systems modeling. MIS Q 32(4):839–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson LT, McCullough CD (1980) A market study methodology for small businesses. J Small Bus Manag 18(3):30–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf MA, Bergen ME (2003) Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market-based and resource-based framework. Strateg Manag J 24(10):1027–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen K, Feldt R, Mujtaba S, Mattsson M (2008) Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering

  • Peyrot M, Doren D Van, Allen K, Childs N (1996) Competitor intelligence among industrial wholesalers: an exploratory study. J Market Manag 5(1):46–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips P, Appiah-adu K (1998) Benchmarking to improve the strategic planning process in the hotel sector benchmarking to improve the strategic planning process in the hotel sector. Serv Ind J 18(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirttilä A (1998) Organising competitive intelligence activities in a corporate organisation. Aslib Proc 50(4):79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of scottish Knitwear producers. Adm Sci Q 40(2):203–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1979) How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Bus Rev 57:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prašnikar J, Debeljak Ž, Ahčan A (2005) Benchmarking as a tool of strategic management. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 16(2):257–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott JE, Grant JH (1988) A manager’s guide for evaluating competitive analysis techniques. Interfaces 18(3):10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott JE, Smith DC (1987) A project-based approach to competitive analysis. Strateg Manag J 8(5):411–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott JE, Smith DC (1989) The largest survey of “leading-edge” competitor intelligence managers. Plan Rev 17(3):6–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Press G (1990) Assessing competitors’ business philosophies. Long Range Plan 23(5):71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Radder L, Louw L (1998) The SPACE matrix: a tool for calibrating competition. Long Range Plan 31(4):549–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries E (2011) The lean startup: how constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. Portfolio/Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripsas S, Zumholz H (2011) Die Bedeutung von Business Plänen in der Nachgründungsphase. Corp Finance Biz 7:435–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Pomeda J, Morcillo Ortega P, Fernández De Navarrete FC, Rodríguez Antón JM (2001) Technological competencies and competitive advantage in the spanish electricity industry: new challenges, new tools. Int J Innov Manag 5(4):457–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme G (2016) The quest for professionalism: the case of management and entrepreneurship. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Romme G, Reymen I (2018) Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: toward an inclusive framework. J Bus Ventur Insights 10:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman F (1964) Intensive competitive marketing. J Market 28(3):10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman AM, Oh CH, Lim DSK (2012) The regional and global competitiveness of multinational firms. J Acad Mark Sci 40(2):218–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD (2001a) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev 26(2):243–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD (2001b) Effectual Reasoning in Entrepreneurial Decision Making: existence and Bounds. Acad Manag Proc 1:D1–D6

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD (2008) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoss J (2013) Was etablierte Unternehmen von Start-ups lernen können. In: Grichnik D, Gassmann O (eds) Das unternehmerische Unternehmen. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahid Bajwa S, Wang X, Duc AN, Abrahamsson P (2016) How do software startups pivot? Empirical results from a multiple case study. In: 7th international conference on software business (ICSOB 2016) (pp. 169–176)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shay JP, Rothaermel FT (1999) Dynamic competitive strategy: towards a multi-perspective conceptual framework. Long Range Plan 32(6):559–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan NT (2005) Why old tools won’t work in the “new” knowledge economy. J Bus Strategy 26(4):53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetty YK (1993) Aiming high: competitive benchmarking for superior performance. Long Range Plan 26(1):39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Shocker AD, Stewart DW, Zahorik AJ (1990) Determining the competitive structure of product-markets: practices, issues, and suggestions. J Manag Issues 2(2):127–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer AE, Brodie RJ (1990) Forecasting competitors’ actions. An evaluation of alternative ways of analyzing business competition. Int J Forecast 6(1):75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeltzer LR, Fann GL, Nikolaisen VN (1988) Environmental scanning practices in small business. J Small Bus Manag 26(3):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohel SM, Rahman AMA, Uddin A (2014) Competitive profile matrix (CPM) as a competitors’ analysis tool: a theoretical perspective. Int J Hum Potential Dev 3(1):40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabell CB, Fjeldstad ØD (1998) Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strateg Manag J 19(5):413–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson HH, Jarillo JC (1990) A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strateg Manag J 11:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian R, Ishak ST (1998) Competitor analysis practices of US companies: an empirical investigation. Manag Int Rev 38(1):7–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton SM (2000) The role of process in software start-up. IEEE Softw 17(4):33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarraf P, Molz R (2006) Competitive intelligence at small enterprises. SAM Adv Manag J 71(4):24–34

    Google Scholar 

  • The Startups Team (2017) Analyzing business competitors is like a high-stakes game of battleship. https://www.startups.co/articles/analyzing-startup-business-competitors. Accessed 9 October 2018

  • Thomas PS (1974) Environmental analysis for corporate planning. Bus Horiz 17(5):27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson A, Strickland A (2001) Strategic management: concepts and cases. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W, Su K-H, Chen M (2011) Seeing through the eyes of a rival: rival-centric perceptions. Acad Manag J 54(4):761–778

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aken JE (2005) Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. Br J Manag 16(1):19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aken JE, Romme G (2009) Reinventing the future: adding design science to the repertoire of organization and management studies. Organ Manag J 6(1):5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aken JE, Romme G (2012) A design science approach to evidence-based management. In: Rousseau D (ed) The oxford handbook of evidence-based management. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Burg E, Romme AGL (2014) Creating the future together: toward a framework for research synthesis in entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 38(2):369–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan PR (1985) A two-factor classification of competitive strategy variables. Strateg Manag J 6(4):357–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Vella CM, McGonagle JJ (1988) Improved business planning using competitive intelligence. Quorum Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall JL (1974) What competition is doing: your need to know. Harvard Bus Rev 52(6):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA (1992) Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf Syst Res 3(1):36–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihrich H (1982) The TOWS Matrix: a tool for situational analysis. Long Range Plan 15(2):54–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh JA, White JF (1981) A small business is not a little big business. Harvard Bus Rev 59(4):18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten DA (1989) What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad Manag Rev 14(4):490–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickham P (2006) Strategic entrepreneurship, 4th edn. Pearson Education, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz BW (2018) Business Model Management: Design - Instrumente - Erfolgsfaktoren von Geschäftsmodellen, 4th edn. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S, Pickton DW, Callow J (2002) Competitive intelligence in UK firms: a typology. Market Intell Plan 20(6):349–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasai-Ardekani AM, Nystrom PC (1996) Designs for environmental scanning systems: tests of a contingency theory. Manag Sci 42(2):187–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasin MM (2002) The theory and practice of benchmarking: then and now. Benchmarking Int J 9(3):217–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoskovitz B (2011) Competitive research 101 for startups. http://www.instigatorblog.com/competitive-research-101-for-startups/2011/08/30/. Accessed 9 October 2018

  • Zahra SA, Bogner WC (2000) Technology strategy and software new ventures’ performance. J Bus Ventur 15(2):135–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Chaples SS (1993) Blind spots in competitive analysis. Acad Manag Exec 7(3):7–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, El-Hagrassey GM (2002) Competitive analysis and new venture performance: understanding the impact of strategic uncertainty and venture origin. Entrep Theory Pract 27(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Entrepreneurship, Hasso-Plattner-Institute, Prof.-Dr.-Helmert-Str. 2-3, 14482, Potsdam, Germany

    Nadja Hatzijordanou & Nicolai Bohn

  2. Institute of Entrepreneurship, Technology Management and Innovation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Fritz-Erler-Str. 1-3, 76133, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Orestis Terzidis

Authors
  1. Nadja Hatzijordanou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolai Bohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Orestis Terzidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadja Hatzijordanou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12.

Table 8 Research contribution: CA practices
Full size table
Table 9 Research contribution: CA as part of an organizational system
Full size table
Table 10 Research contribution: review
Full size table
Table 11 Research contribution: competitor information requirements
Full size table
Table 12 Research contribution: application
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatzijordanou, N., Bohn, N. & Terzidis, O. A systematic literature review on competitor analysis: status quo and start-up specifics. Manag Rev Q 69, 415–458 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00158-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00158-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation