Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The importance of individual differences for applicant attraction: a literature review and avenues for future research

  • State-of-the-Art
  • Published:
Management Review Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review of the research on individual differences on applicant attraction. After capturing the relevance of the research field, we analyze and operationalize different terms for applicant attraction. Our research shows that applicant attraction is a comprehensive term for (prospective) applicants’ perceptions, intentions, and behavior based on different stages of the recruitment process. We also analyze applied theories and frameworks on the basis of which we develop five broad categories that represent the applied theories and frameworks in research on individual differences on applicant attraction. To structure the broad variety of individual differences on applicant attraction, we develop a classification for individual differences. Based on the analysis we identified different avenues for future research. Beside theoretical and methodical research issues, gaps concerning applicant’s view of the recruitment process, a lack of research on specific individual differences as well as practice-oriented gaps are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acarlar G, Bilgiç R (2013) Factors influencing applicant willingness to apply for the advertised job opening: the mediational role of credibility, satisfaction and attraction. Int J Sel Assess 24:50–77. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.667427

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams G, Rau B (2004) Job seeking among retirees seeking bridge employment. Pers Psychol 57:719–744. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00005.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adkins CL, Russell CJ, Werber JD (1994) Judgments of fit in the selection process: the role of work value congruence. Pers Psychol 47:605–623. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01740.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiman-Smith L, Bauer TN, Cable DM (2001) Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. J Bus Psychol 16:219–237. doi:10.1023/A:1011157116322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen DG, Mahto RV, Otondo RF (2007) Web-based recruitment: effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a web site on applicant attraction. J Appl Psychol 92:1696–1708. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson N, Ahmed S, Costa AC et al (2008) Applicant reactions in Saudi Arabia: organizational attractiveness and core-self evaluation. Int J Sel Assess 20:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton MC (2013) Individual differences and personality. Academic Press, London

  • Atkinson KM, Koenka AC, Sanchez CE et al (2015) Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate. Res Synth Methods 6:87–95. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery DR (2003) Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising—Are differences black and white? J Appl Psychol 88:672–679. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery DR, McKay PF (2006) Target practice: an organizational impression management approach to attracting minority and female job applicants. Pers Psychol 59:157–187. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00807.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery DR, Volpone SD, Stewart RW et al (2013) Examining the draw of diversity: how diversity climate perceptions affect job-pursuit intentions. Hum Resour Manag 52:175–193. doi:10.1002/hrm

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus KB, Stone BA, Heiner K (2002) Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus Soc 41:292–318. doi:10.1080/02701367.2009.10599532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks GC, Kepes S, Joshi M, Seers A (2015) Social identity and applicant attraction: exploring the role of multiple levels of self. J Organ Behav 37:326–345. doi:10.1002/job.2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer TN, Aiman-Smith L (1996) Green career choices: the influence of ecological stance on recruiting. J Bus Psychol 10:445–458. doi:10.1007/BF02251780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer TN, Maertz CP, Dolen MR, Campion MA (1998) Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback. J Appl Psychol 83:892–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer TN, Truxillo D, Paronto ME et al (2004) Applicant reactions to different selection technology: face-to-face, interactive voice screening interviews. Int J Sel Assess 12:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer TN, Truxillo DM, Tucker JS et al (2006) Selection in the information age: the impact of privacy concerns and computer experience on applicant reactions. J Manag 32:601–621. doi:10.1177/0149206306289829

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum M, Kabst R (2013) Conjoint implications on job preferences: the moderating role of involvement. Int J Hum Resour Manag 24:1393–1417. doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.712542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum M, Kabst R (2014) The effectiveness of recruitment advertisements and recruitment websites: indirect and interactive effects on applicant attraction. Hum Resour Manag 53:353–378. doi:10.1002/hrm.21571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach LR (1993) Image theory: an alternative to normative decision theory. Adv Consum Res 40:235–238. doi:10.1057/jors.1991.87

    Google Scholar 

  • Behling O, Labovitz G, Gainer M (1968) College recruiting: a theoretical basis. Pers J 47:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell BS, Wiechmann D, Ryan AM (2006) Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system. J Appl Psychol 91:455–466. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthon P, Ewing M, Hah LL (2005) Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. Int J Advert 24:151–172. doi:10.1080/02650487.2005.11072912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau GJ (1994) Testing a two dimensional measure of job search behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 59:288–312. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume BD, Rubin RS, Baldwin TT (2013) Who is attracted to an organisation using a forced distribution performance management system? Hum Resour Manag J 23:360–378. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breaugh JA (2000) Research on employee recruitment: so many studies, so many remaining questions. J Manag 26:405–434. doi:10.1177/014920630002600303

    Google Scholar 

  • Breaugh JA (2009) Recruiting and attracting talent. SHRM Found 1–17

  • Breaugh JA (2013) Employee recruitment. Annu Rev Psychol 64:389–416. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz RD, Judge TA (1998) Realistic job previews?: A test of the adverse self-selection hypothesis. J Appl Psychol 83:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz RD, Ash RA, Dreher GF (1989) Do people make the place? An examination of the attraction–selection–attrition hypothesis. Pers Psychol 42:561–581. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00669.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz RD, Boudreau JW, Judge TA (1994) Job search behavior of employed managers. Pers Psychol 47:275–301. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01725.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesagentur für Arbeit (2015) Der Arbeitsmarkt in Deutschland - Fachkräfteengpassanalyse. Bundesagentur für Arbeit Stat 1–19: doi:10.1007/s00548-007-0040-2

  • Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung (2015) Unbesetzte Ausbildungsstellen und betriebliche Ausbildungsbeteiligung. https://www.bibb.de/de/35374.php. Accessed 1 Jul 2016

  • Byrne DE (1971) The attraction paradigm. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable DM, Judge TA (1994) Pay preferences and job search decisions: a person–organization fit perspective. Pers Psychol 47:317–348. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01727.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable DM, Judge TA (1996) Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 67:294–311. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable DM, Parsons CK (2001) Socialization tactics and person–organization fit. Pers Psychol 54:1–23. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00083.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless SA (2003) Information exchange article a longitudinal study of applicant reactions to multiple selection procedures and job and organizational characteristics. Int J Sel Assess 11:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless SA (2005) Person–job fit versus person–organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study. J Occup Organ Psychol 78:411–429. doi:10.1348/096317905X25995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless SA (2006) Applicant reactions to multiple selection procedures for the police force. Appl Psychol 55:145–167. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00235.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless SA, Hetherington K (2011) Understanding the applicant recruitment experience: Does timeliness matter? Int J Sel Assess 19:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless SA, Imber A (2007) The influence of perceived interviewer and job and organizational characteristics on applicant attraction and job choice intentions: The role of applicant anxiety. Int J Sel Assess 15:359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00395.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless SA, Wintle J (2007) Applicant attraction: the role of recruiter function, work–life balance policies and career salience. Int J Sel Assess 15:394–404. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00398.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper WJ, Buffardi LC (2004) Work–life benefits and job pursuit intentions: the role of anticipated organizational support. J Vocat Behav 65:391–410. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper WJ, Wayne JH, Manegold JG (2013) Who will we recruit? Targeting deep-and surface-level diversity with human resource policy advertising. Hum Resour Manag 52:311–332. doi:10.1002/hrm.21530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catanzaro D, Moore H, Marshall TR (2010) The impact of organizational culture on attraction and recruitment of job applicants. J Bus Psychol 25:649–662. doi:10.1007/S10869-010-9179-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman D, Webster J (2006) Toward an integrated model of applicant reactions and job choice toward an integrated model of applicant reactions and job choice. Int J Hum Resour Manag 17:1032–1057. doi:10.1080/09585190600696572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DS, Uggerslev KL, Webster J (2003) Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: a field investigation. J Appl Psychol 88:944–953. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman DS, Uggerslev KL, Carroll SA et al (2005) Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. J Appl Psychol 90:928–944. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen DJQ, Lim VKG (2012) Strength in adversity: the influence of psychological capital on job search. J Organ Behav 33:811–839. doi:10.1002/job.1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-C, Lin M-M, Chen C-M (2012) Exploring the mechanisms of the relationship between website characteristics and organizational attraction. Int J Sel Assess 23:867–885. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.579916

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Hsu C, Tsai P (2013) Positive moods and organizational attraction. Int J Sel Assess 21:376–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho J, Park DJ, Ordonez Z (2013) Communication-oriented person–organization fit as a key factor of job-seeking behaviors: millennials’ social media use and attitudes toward organizational social media policies. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 16:794–799. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cober RT, Brown DJ, Keeping LM, Levy PE (2004) Recruitment on the net: How do organizational web site characteristics influence applicant attraction? J Manag 30:623–646. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.03.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins CJ, Stevens CK (2002) The Relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labor–market entrants: a brand equity approach to recruitment. J Appl Psychol 87:1121–1133. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crant JM, Bateman TS (1990) An experimental test of the impact of drug-testing programs on potential job applicants’ attitudes and intentions. J Appl Psychol 75:127–131. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Goldman B, Folger R (2003) Deontic justice: the role of moral principles in workplace fairness. J Organ Behav 24:1019–1024. doi:10.1002/job.228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Slaughter JE, Bachiochi PD (2005) Organizational justice and black applicants’ reactions to affirmative action. J Appl Psychol 90:1168–1184. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Goede MEE, Van Vianen AEM, Klehe U-C (2011) Attracting applicants on the web: P–O fit, industry culture stereotypes, and website design. Int J Sel Assess 19:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeArmond S, Crawford EC (2011) Organization personality perceptions and attraction: the role of social identity consciousness. Int J Sel Assess 19:405–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devendorf SA, Highhouse S (2008) Applicant–employee similarity and attraction to an employer. J Occup Organ Psychol 81:607–617. doi:10.1348/096317907X248842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dineen BR, Ash SR, Noe RA (2002) A web of applicant attraction: person–organization fit in the context of web-based recruitment. J Appl Psychol 87:723–734. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly AH (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: a social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart KH, Ziegert JC (2005) Why are individuals attracted to organizations? J Manag 31:901–919. doi:10.1177/0149206305279759

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans RW, Davis WD (2011) An examination of perceived corporate citizenship, job applicant attraction, and CSR work role definition. Bus Soc 50:456–480. doi:10.1177/0007650308323517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1977) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Philos Rhetor 10:130–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Froese FJ, Vo A, Garrett TC (2010) Organizational attractiveness of foreign-based companies: a country of origin perspective. Int J Sel Assess 18:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg CB, Allen DG (2008) Black and white and read all over: race differences in reactions to recruitment web sites. Hum Resour Manag 47:217–236. doi:10.1002/hrm.20209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Pereira B, Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F (2010) A new approach to the metric of journals scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. J Informetr 4:379–391. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J (1987) A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad Manag Rev 12:9–22. doi:10.5465/AMR.1987.4306437

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus Soc 39:254–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griepentrog BK, Harold CM, Holtz BC et al (2012) Integrating social identity and the theory of planned behavior: predicting withdrawal from an organizational recruitment process. Pers Psychol 65:723–753. doi:10.1111/peps.12000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gully SM, Phillips JM, Castellano WG et al (2013) A mediated moderation model of recruiting socially and environmentally responsible job applicants. Pers Psychol 66:935–973. doi:10.1111/peps.12033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Han J (2009) Network-based recruiting and applicant attraction in China: insights from both organizational and individual perspectives. Int J Hum Resour Manag 20:2228–2249. doi:10.1080/09585190903239633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon JM (1996) Organizational attractiveness in Japan: a screening perspective. Int J Hum Resour Manag. doi:10.1080/09585199600000139

    Google Scholar 

  • Harn TJ, Thornton GC (1985) Recruiter counselling behaviours and applicant impressions. J Occup Psychol 58:57–65. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00180.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harold CM, Ployhart RE (2008) What do applicants want? Examining changes in attribute judgments over time. J Occup Organ Psychol 81:191–218. doi:10.1348/096317907X235774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harold CM, Holtz BC, Griepentrog BK et al (2015) Investigating the effects of applicant justice perceptions on job offer acceptance. Pers Psychol. doi:10.1111/peps.12101

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris MM, Fink LS (1987) A field study of employment opportunities: Does the recruiter make a difference? Pers Psychol 40:765–784. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00623.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse S, Stierwalt SL, Bachiochi P et al (1999) Effects of advertised human resource management practices on attraction of African American applicants. Pers Psychol 52:425–442. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00167.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse S, Lievens F, Sinar EF (2003) Measuring attraction to organizations. Educ Psychol Meas 63:986–1001. doi:10.1177/0013164403258403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse S, Thornbury EE, Little IS (2007) Social-identity functions of attraction to organizations. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 103:134–146. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck JR, Ilgen DR, Ostroff C, Vancouver JB (1987) Sex differences in occupational choice: a supply-side appraoch to understanding the male–female wage gap. Pers Psychol 40:715–744. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00621.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt TL, Rosen B (1997) Family friendly human resource policies, salary levels, and salient identity as predictors of organizational attraction. J Vocat Behav 50:271–290. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrelmann K (2006) Einführung in die Sozialisationstheorie, 9th edn. Beltz Studium, Weinheim, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaidi Y, Van Hooft EAJ, Arends LR (2011) Recruiting highly educated graduates: a study on the relationship between recruitment information sources, the theory of planned behavior, and actual job pursuit. Hum Perform 24:135–157. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.554468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge TA, Cable DM (1997) Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organization attraction. Pers Psychol 50:359–394. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00912.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashi K, Zheng C (2013) Extending technology acceptance model to the E-recruitment context in Iran. Int J Sel Assess 21:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kausel EE, Slaughter JE (2011) Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: evidence for the complementary hypothesis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 114:3–14. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konradt U, Warszta T, Ellwart T (2013) Fairness perceptions in web-based selection: impact on applicants’ pursuit intentions, recommendation intentions, and intentions to reapply. Int J Sel Assess 21:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konradt U, Garbers Y, Böge M et al (2015) Antecedents and consequences of fairness perceptions in personnel selection: a 3-year longitudinal study. Group Organ Manag 25:1682–1690. doi:10.1177/1059601115617665

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraichy D, Chapman DS (2014) Tailoring web-based recruiting messages: individual differences in the persuasiveness of affective and cognitive messages. J Bus Psychol 29:253–268. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9311-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof AL (1996) Person–organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Pers Psychol 49:1–49. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown AL (2000) Perceived applicant fit: distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person–job and person–organization fit. Pers Psychol 53:643–671. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00217.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Pers Psychol 58:281–342. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn KM (2009) Compensation as a signal of organizational culture: the effects of advertising individual or collective incentives. Int J Hum Resour Manag 20:1634–1648. doi:10.1080/09585190902985293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn KM, Nielsen ML (2008) Understanding applicant reactions to credit checks: uncertainty, information effects and individual differences. Int J Sel Assess 16:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen DA, Phillips JI (2002) Effect of recruiter on attraction to the firm: implications of the elaboration likelihood model. J Bus Psychol 16:347–364. doi:10.1023/A:1012816822546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden R, Parsons C (1986) A field study of job applicant interview perceptions, alternative opportunities, and demographic characteristics. Pers Psychol 39:109–122. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00577.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens F (2007) Employer branding in the Belgian army: the importance of instrumental and symbolic beliefs for potential applicants, actual applicants, and military employees. Hum Resour Manag 46:51–69. doi:10.1002/hrm.20145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens F, Highhouse S (2003) The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer. Pers Psychol 56:75–102. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00144.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens F, Decaesteker C, Coetsier P, Geirnaert J (2001) Organizational attractiveness for prospective applicants: a person–organisation fit perspective. Appl Psychol 50:30–51. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H-F (2010) Applicability of the extended theory of planned behavior in predicting job seeker intentions to use job-search websites. Int J Sel Assess 18:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce RA, Barber AE, Hillman AMYJ (2001) Good deeds and misdeeds: a mediated model of the effect of corporate social attractiveness. Bus Soc 40:397–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macan TH, Avedon MJ, Paese M, Smith DE (1994) The effects of applicants’ reactions to cognitive ability tests and an assessment center. Pers Psychol 47:715–739. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01573.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony DM, Klaas BS, Mcclendon JA, Varma A (2005) The effects of mandatory employment arbitration systems on applicants’ attraction to organizations. Hum Resour Manag 44:449–470. doi:10.1002/hrm.20084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins LL, Parsons CK (2007) Effects of gender diversity management on perceptions of organizational attractiveness: the role of individual differences in attitudes and beliefs. J Appl Psychol 92:865–875. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer SD, Howe V, Lee TW (2006) Organizational recruiting as marketing management: an interdisciplinary study of engineering graduates. Pers Psychol 45:807–833. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00969.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay PF, Avery DR (2006) What has race got to do with it? Unraveling the Role of racioethnicity in job seekers’ reactions to site visits. Pers Psychol 59:395–429. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00041.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meglino BM, Denisi AS, Ravlin EC (1993) Effects of previous job exposure and subsequent job status on the functioning of a realistic job preview. Pers Psychol 46:803–822. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01570.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels E, Handfield-Jones H, Axelrod B (2001) The war for talent. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Mick DG, Buhl C (1992) A meaning-based model of advertising experiences. J Consum Res 19:317–338. doi:10.1086/209305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng ESW, Burke RJ (2005) Person–organization fit and the war for talent: Does diversity management make a difference? Int J Hum Resour Manag 16:1195–1210. doi:10.1080/09585190500144038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng YL, Kulik CT, Bordia P (2015) The moderating role of intergroup contact in race composition, perceived similarity, and applicant attraction relationships. J Bus Psychol. doi:10.1007/s10869-015-9419-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou I (2011) Core processes and applicant reactions to the employment interview: an exploratory study in Greece. Int J Hum Resour Manag 22:2185–2201. doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.580187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan KP, Harold CM (2010) Fit with what? the influence of multiple self-concept images on organizational attraction. J Occup Organ Psychol 83:645–662. doi:10.1348/096317909X465452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunfowora B (2014) The impact of ethical leadership within the recruitment context: the roles of organizational reputation, applicant personality, and value congruence. Leadersh Q 25:528–543. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JE, Parsons CK, Martins LL, Ivanaj V (2015) Gender diversity programs, perceived potential for advancement, and organizational attractiveness: an empirical examination of women in the United States and France. Group Organ Manag. doi:10.1177/1059601115583579

    Google Scholar 

  • Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell Publishing, Malden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1984) The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and peripheral routes to persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 46:69–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfieffelmann B, Wagner SH, Libkuman T (2010) Recruiting on corporate web sites: perceptions of fit and attraction. Int J Sel Assess 18:40–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00487.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JM, Mccarthy JE, Castellano WG (2014) Recruiting global travelers: the role of global travel recruitment messages and individual differences in perceived fit, attraction, and job pursuit intentions. Pers Psychol 67:153–201. doi:10.1111/peps.12043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce CA, Karl KA, Brey ET (2012) Role of workplace romance policies and procedures on job pursuit intentions. J Manag Psychol 27:237–263. doi:10.1108/02683941211205808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau BL, Adams GA (2005) Attracting retirees to apply: desired organizational characteristics of bridge employment. J Organ Behav 26:649–660. doi:10.1002/job.330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau BL, Hyland MAM (2002) Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: the effects on applicant attraction. Pers Psychol 55:111–136. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00105.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve CL, Schultz L (2004) Job-seeker reactions to selection process information in job ads. Int J Sel Assess 12:343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle W, Wilt J, Condon DM (2013) Individual differences and differential psychology: a brief history and prospect. In: Chamorro-Premuzic T, Von Stumm S, Furnham A (eds) The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences, pp 1–38

  • Robbins SP, Judge TA, Campbell TT (2010) Organizational behavior. Pearson Education Limited, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson QM, Collins CJ, Oreg S (2005) The effects of recruitment message specificity on applicant attraction to organizations. J Bus Psychol 19:319–339. doi:10.1007/s10869-004-2231-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CR (1951) Client-centered therapy. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp DE, Shao R, Thornton MA, Skarlicki DP (2013) Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: the moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Pers Psychol 66:895–933. doi:10.1111/peps.12030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan AM, Sacco J, McFarland L, Kriska S (2000) Applicant self-selection: correlates of withdrawal from a multiple hurdle process. J Appl Psychol 85:163–179. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan AM, Horvath M, Kriska SD et al (2005) The role of recruiting source informativeness and organizational perceptions in decisions to apply. Int J Sel Assess 13:235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder NB (1965) The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. Am Sociol Rev 30:843–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rynes SL, Barber aE (1990) Applicant attraction strategies: an organizational perspective. Acad Manag Rev 15:286–310. doi:10.5465/AMR.1990.4308158

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes SL, Connerley ML (1993) Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures. J Bus Psychol 7:261–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks AM, McCarthy JM (2006) Effects of discriminatory interview questions and gender on applicant reactions. J Bus Psychol 21:175–191. doi:10.1007/sl0869-006-9024-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCImago SJR — SCImago Journal & Country Rank. http://www.scimagojr.com. Accessed 4 Mar 2016

  • Schinkel S, Van Vianen A, Van Dierendonck D (2013) Selection fairness and outcomes: a field study of interactive effects on applicant reactions. Int J Sel Assess 21:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JA, Chapman DS, Jones DA (2015) Does emphasizing different types of person–environment fit in online job ads influence application behavior and applicant quality? evidence from a field experiment. J Bus Psychol 30:267–282. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9353-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B (1987) The people make the place. Pers Psychol 40:437–453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs B, Derous E, De Witte K et al (2005) Attracting potential applicants to the military: the effects of initial face-to-face contacts. Hum Perform 18:105–122. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1802_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs B, Derous E, Van Hooft EAJ et al (2009a) Predicting applicants’ job pursuit behavior from their selection expectations: the mediating role of the theory of planned behavior. J Organ Behav 30:761–783. doi:10.1002/job570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs B, Druart C, Proost K, De Witte K (2009) Symbolic attributes and organizational attractiveness: the moderating effects of applicant personality. Int J Sel Assess 17:35–46. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00449.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs B, Derous E, Proost K, De Witte K (2010) The relation between selection expectations, perceptions and organizational attraction: a test of competing models. Int J Sel Assess 18:447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman E, Mathur A, Smith RBR (1997) Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychol Mark 14:361–378. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199707)14:4<361::AID-MAR4>3.0.CO;2-7

  • Slaughter JE, Greguras GJ (2009) Initial attraction to organizations: the influence of trait inferences. Int J Sel Assess 17:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter JE, Stanton JM, Mohr DC, Schoel WA (2005) The interaction of attraction and selection: implications for college recruitment and Schneider ’s ASA model. Appl Psychol 54:419–441. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00218.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith WJ, Wokutch RE, Dennis BS (2004) Organizational attractiveness and corporate social orientation: do our values influence our preference for affirmative action. Bus Soc 43:69–96. doi:10.1177/0007650304263047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smither JW, Reilly RR, Millsap RE et al (1993) Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Pers Psychol 46:49–76. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00867.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Q J Econ. doi:10.2307/1882010

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoughton JW, Thompson LF, Meade AW (2013) Examining applicant reactions to the use of social networking websites in pre-employment screening. J Bus Psychol 30:73–88. doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9333-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand R, Levine R, Montgomery D (1981) Organizational entry preferences based upon social and personnel policies: an information integration perspective. Organ Behav Hum Perform 27:50–68. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(81)90038-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hall, Chicago, pp 7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MS, Bergmann TJ (1987) Organizational recruitment activities and applicants’ reactions at different stages of the recruitment process. Pers Psychol 40:261–285. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00604.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas KM, Wise PG (1999) Organizational attractiveness and individual differences: Are diverse applicants attracted by different factors? J Bus Psychol 13:375–391. doi:10.1023/a:1022978400698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RJ, Payne SC, Taylor AB (2014) Applicant attraction to flexible work arrangements: separating the influence of flextime and flexplace. J Occup Organ Psychol. doi:10.1111/joop.12095

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorsteinson TJ, Palmer EM, Wulff C, Anderson A (2004) Too good to be true? Using realism to enhance applicant attraction. J Bus Psychol 19:125–137. doi:10.1023/B:JOBU.0000040276.75748.b9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tom VR (1971) The role of personality and organizational images in the recruiting process. Organ Behav Hum Perform 6:573–592. doi:10.1016/S0030-5073(71)80008-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trank CQ, Rynes SL, Bretz RD (2002) Attracting applicants in the war for talent: differences in work preferences among high achievers. J Bus Psychol 16:331–345. doi:10.1023/A:1012887605708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff G (1989) Sozialisation und Werthaltungen im Kulturvergleich. In: Trommsdorff G (ed) Sozialisation im Kulturvergleich. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 97–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Truxillo D, Bauer T (1999) Applicant reactions to test scores banding in entry-level and promotional contexts. J Appl Psychol 84:322–339. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truxillo DM, Bauer TN, Campion MA, Paronto ME (2002) Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study. J Appl Psychol 87:1020–1031. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W-C, Yang IW-F (2010) Does image matter to different job applicants? The influences of corporate image and applicant individual differences on organizational attractiveness. Int J Sel Assess 18:48–63. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00488.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban DB (2001) Organizational attractiveness as an employer on college campuses: an examination of the applicant population. J Vocat Behav 58:293–312. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban DB, Keon T (1993) Organizational attractiveness: an interactionist perspective. J Appl Psychol 78:184–193. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban DB, Lau C, Ngo H et al (2001) Organizational attractiveness of firms in the People’s Republic of China: a person–organization fit perspective. J Appl Psychol 86:194–206. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggerslev KL, Fassina NE, Kraichy D (2012) Recruiting through the stages: a meta-analytic test of predictors of applicant attraction at different stages of the recruiting process. Pers Psychol 65:597–660. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01254.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooft EAJ, De Jong M (2009) Predicting job seeking for temporary employment using the theory of planned behaviour: the moderating role of individualism and collectivism. J Occup Organ Psychol 82:295–316. doi:10.1348/096317908x325322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooft EAJ, Born MP, Taris TW et al (2004) Predictors of job search behavior among. Pers Psychol 57:25–59. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02483.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooft EAJ, Born MP, Taris TW, Van der Flier H (2006) Ethnic and gender differences in applicants’ decision-making processes: an application of the theory of reasoned action. Int J Sel Assess 14:156–166. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00341.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoye G (2014) Word of mouth as a recruitment source: an integrative model. In: Yu KYT, Cable DM (eds) The oxford handbook of recruitment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 251–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoye G, Saks AM (2011) The instrumental-symbolic framework: organisational image and attractiveness of potential applicants and their companions at a job fair. Appl Psychol 60:311–335. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00437.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoye G, Turban DB (2015) Applicant–employee fit in personality: testing predictions from similarity-attraction theory and trait activation theory. Int J Sel Assess 23:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoye G, Van Lievens F (2005) Recruitment-related information sources and organizational attractiveness: Can something be done about negative publicity? Int J Sel Assess 13:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoye G, Van Lievens F (2007) Investigating web-based recruitment sources: employee testimonials versus word-of-mouse. Int J Sel Assess 15:372–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoye G, Cromheecke S, Lievens F (2013) The instrumental and symbolic dimensions of organisations ’ image as an employer: a large-scale field study on employer branding in Turkey. Appl Psychol 62:543–557. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00495.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Walter B, Wentzel D, Tomczak T (2012) The effect of applicant–employee fit and temporal construal on employer attraction and pursuit intentions. J Occup Organ Psychol 85:116–135. doi:10.1348/2044-8325.002006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom VH (1964) Work and motivation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom VH (1966) Organizational choice: a study of pre- and postdecision processes. Organ Behav Hum Perform 1:212–225. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(66)90013-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker HJ, Feild HS, Giles WF et al (2007) An assessment of attraction toward affirmative action organizations: investigating the role of individual differences. J Organ Behav 28:485–507. doi:10.1002/job.434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker HJ, Feild HS, Giles WF, Bernerth JB (2008) The interactive effects of job advertisement characteristics and applicant experience on reactions to recruitment messages. J Occup Organ Psychol 81:619–638. doi:10.1348/096317907X252487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JH, Feild HS, Giles WF et al (2011) So what do you think of the organization? A contextual priming explanation for recruitment web site characteristics as antecedents of job seekers’ organizational image perceptions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 114:165–178. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanberg CR, Watt JD, Rumsey DJ (1996) Individuals without jobs: an empirical study of job-seeking behavior and reemployment. J Appl Psychol 81:76–87. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanberg CR, Kanfer R, Rotundo M (1999) Unemployed individuals: motives, job search competencies and job search constraints as predictors of job seeking and reemployment. J Appl Psychol 84:897–910. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q 26:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams ML, Bauer TN (1994) The effect of a managing diversity policy on organizational attractiveness. Group Organ Manag 19:295–308. doi:10.1177/1059601194193005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson IO, Lepak DP, King J (2003) The effect of company recruitment web site orientation on individuals’ perceptions of organizational attractiveness. J Vocat Behav 63:242–263. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00043-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson IO, Slay HS, Shapiro DL, Shivers-Blackwell SL (2008) The effect of explanations on prospective applicants reactions to firm diversity practices. Hum Resour Manag 47:311–330. doi:10.1002/hrm

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright PM, Smart DL, McMahan GC (1995) Matches between human resources and strategy among NCAA basketball teams. Acad Manag J 38:1052–1074. doi:10.2307/256620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu KYT (2014) Person–organization fit effects on organizational attraction: a test of an expectations-based model. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 124:75–94. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Gowan MA (2012) Corporate social responsibility, applicants’ individual traits, and organizational attraction: a person–organization fit perspective. J Bus Psychol 27:345–362. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9250-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für BWL, insb. Organisation und Personal, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Lena Evertz & Stefan Süß

Authors
  1. Lena Evertz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Süß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Süß.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evertz, L., Süß, S. The importance of individual differences for applicant attraction: a literature review and avenues for future research. Manag Rev Q 67, 141–174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0126-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0126-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation