Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional Infrastructure and Convergence: Growth Implications in a Spatial Framework

  • Published:
Transition Studies Review

Abstract

In this paper we contribute to the debate on convergence, by presenting an overview of the catch up process of the European regions between 1995 and 2006, focusing on both absolute and conditional β convergence. Our focus is on the role of infrastructure stocks in shaping the growth and convergence process between EU regions and to what extent the spatial dimension of the data affects results. We also explicitly examine the link between infrastructure evolution and regional economic growth with a spatial panel data approach. Our results confirm an ongoing convergence process at the EU regional level, and assess the important role of transport and telecommunication infrastructure, with traditional and spatial estimation techniques. We also confirm, in a panel setting, the strong positive correlation between transport and TLC indicators and GDP growth at the regional level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Slight differences with respect to figures provided by national statistical offices might be due to different definitions of the level of government to which motorways refer to.

  2. Subscript i for the regional dimension is omitted for clarity of exposition.

  3. A list of the NUTS2 used in the empirical analysis is presented in the Appendix.

  4. Considering a standard Cobb–Douglas production function, the implied rate of annual convergence is derived by: \( \gamma = - {\frac{{1 - e^{\beta T} }}{T}}, \) while the half life is derived from τ = −ln (2)/ ln (1 + β).

  5. A recent criticism to the definition of Objective 1 regions in the UK is put forth by Gripaios and Bishop (2006), who conclude that the qualifying regions may not have been optimally selected, possibly providing an explanation to the small difference we find between the two groups in Table 3.

  6. In order to rule out the possibility that the initial level of mobile phones may be capturing convergence effects, we added an interaction between the initial level of GDP and mobile phones. The coefficient associated to the initial level of mobile phones is largely still significant, therefore ruling out the convergence critique.

  7. In our initial period of 1995, mobile phones were still not very widespread and were a significant new technology.

  8. We report results for the geographical distance-based matrix W. In order to verify robustness to alternative specifications, we used a geographical distance based spatial weight matrix and a rook second order contiguity matrix, and results were stable to both specifications.

  9. We have omitted estimated coefficients for the spatially lagged variables due to space limitations. Few are statistically significant. Detailed results available upon request.

  10. We used a rook second order contiguity matrix, and verified robustness to alternative specifications.

References

  • Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L (2001) Spatial econometrics. In: Baltagi B (ed) A companion to theoretical econometrics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 310–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L, Florax R (eds) (1995) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbia G, Le Gallo J, Piras G (2008) Does evidence on regional economic convergence depend on the estimation strategy? Outcomes from analysis of a set of NUTS2 EU regions. Spatial Econ Anal 3(2):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschauer DA (1990) Why is infrastructure important? In: Munnell AH (ed) Is there a shortfall in public capital investment? Conference series 34. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Badinger H, Muller W, Tondl G (2004) Regional convergence in the European Union 1985–1999: a spatial dynamic panel analysis. Reg Stud 38(3):241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Polit Econ 100(2):223–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (2004) Economic growth, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Basile R (2008) Regional economic growth in Europe: a semiparametric spatial dependence approach. Pap Reg Sci 87(4):527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biehl D (1986) The contribution of infrastructure to regional development. Commission of the European Communities, Study group, Brussels

  • Bond S, Hoeffler A, Temple J (2001) GMM estimation of empirical growth models. CEPR Discussion Paper N. 3048, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London

  • Burridge P (1981) Testing for a common factor in a spatial autoregression model. Environ Plan A 13(7):795–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button K (1998) Infrastructure investment, endogenous growth and economic convergence. Ann Reg Sci 32:145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón C, Chong A (2004) Volume and quality of infrastructure and the distribution of income: an empirical investigation. Rev Income Wealth 50(1):87–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni R, Capello R (2005) ICTs and territorial competitiveness in the era of internet. Ann Reg Sci 39(3):421–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canaleta C, Arzoz P, Garate M (2002) Structural change, infrastructure and convergence in the regions of the European Union. Eur Urban Reg Stud 9(2):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen A, Castellacci F, Fagerberg J, Verspagen B (2003) Regional support, growth and convergence in the EU. J Common Mark Stud 41:621–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington A (2006) Regional convergence in the European Union: a stochastic dominance approach. Int Regional Sci Rev 29(1):64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta A, Agarwal S (2004) Telecommunications and economic growth: a panel data approach. Appl Econ 36:1649–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Fuente A (2002) On the sources of convergence: a look at the Spanish regions. Eur Econ Rev 46(3):569–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debarsy N, Ertur C (2006) The European enlargement process and regional convergence revisited: spatial effects still matter. ERSA conference papers ersa06p198. European Regional Science Association

  • Ding L, Haynes K, Liu Y (2008) Telecommunications infrastructure and regional income convergence in China: panel data approaches. Ann Regional Sci 42(4):843–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf SN, Johnson PA (1995) Multiple regimes and cross country growth behaviour. J Appl Econ 10:365–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckey H, Kosfeld R, Turck M (2007) Regional convergence in Germany: a geographically weighted regression approach. Spatial Econ Anal 2(1):45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int Regional Sci Rev 26(3):244–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst JP (2009) Spatial panel data models. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis, chap C.2. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertur C, Koch W (2006) Regional disparities in the European Union and the enlargement process: an exploratory spatial economic analysis. Ann Regional Sci 40:723–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P, Korras G (1996) Convergence revisited. J Monetary Econ 37:225–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Stirbock C (2006) Pan-European regional income and club-convergence. Ann Regional Sci 40:693–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gripaios P, Bishop P (2006) Objective One Funding in the UK: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 40(8):937–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque M, Kim D (2003) Public investment in transportation and communication and growth: a dynamic panel approach. The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 0324, Economics, The University of Manchester

  • Kelejian HH, Robinson DP (1997) Infrastructure productivity estimation and its underlying econometric specifications: a sensitivity analysis. Pap Reg Sci 76(1):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gallo J, Dall’Erba S (2006) Evaluating the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of the European Convergence process, 1980–1999. J Regional Sci 46(2):269–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gallo J, Ertur C (2003) Exploratory spatial data analysis of the distribution of regional per capita GDP in Europe, 1980–1995. J Econ 82(2):175–201

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSage J, Pace R (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press Inc., Boca Roton

  • Levine R, Renel D (1992) A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. Am Econ Rev 82(4):942–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Bano A, Vayà E, Artis M (2004) Regional externalities and growth: evidence from European Regions. J Regional Sci 44(1):43–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrini S (2004) Regional convergence. In: Henderson V, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics. North-Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2741–2796

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas M, Maudos J, Pérez F, Uriel E (1996) Infrastructures and productivity in the Spanish regions. Reg Stud 30(7):641–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morana C (2004) Regional convergence in Italy: 1951–2000. Giorn Econ Ann Econ 63(2):139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1996) Regional convergence clusters across Europe. Eur Econ Rev 40(3–5):951–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rioja F (2005) Roads versus schooling: growth effects of government choices. Top Macroecon 5(1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Romp W, De Haan J (2007) Public capital and economic growth: a critical survey. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 8:6–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothengatter W, Schaffer A (2004) The impact of transport infrastructure and other immobile production factors on regional competitiveness. Working Paper, Institute for Economic Policy Research, University of Karlsruhe

  • Unwin DJ (1996) GIS, spatial analysis and spatial statistics. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4):540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yudong Y, Weeks M (2000) Provincial income convergence in China, 1953–1997: a panel data approach. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0010, University of Cambridge

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank A. Caragliu, and participants at the VIII Milan European Economic Workshop, June 2009, for helpful suggestions and discussions on an earlier version, and J.P. LeSage and J.P. Elhorst for making their Matlab routines publicly available. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Del Bo.

Appendix: List of regions in the sample

Appendix: List of regions in the sample

See Table 7.

Table 7 List of EU regions

About this article

Cite this article

Del Bo, C., Florio, M. & Manzi, G. Regional Infrastructure and Convergence: Growth Implications in a Spatial Framework. Transit Stud Rev 17, 475–493 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-010-0160-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-010-0160-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation