Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic architecture of fruit quality traits in Malus x domestica (Borkh.) compared between own-rooted seedlings and vegetative propagules on ‘M. 9’ rootstock

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tree Genetics & Genomes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The comparative performance of vegetative propagules (VP) grafted on ‘M. 9’ rootstock and own-rooted (OR) seedlings of the same genotypes was investigated for apple [Malus x domestica (Borkh.)] fruit quality traits using offspring from 22 control-pollinated families. Fifteen fruit quality traits including fruit size and shape, skin colour, russet and sensory eating characteristics were evaluated for individual seedlings. Estimates of genetic variance–covariance matrices (G) were obtained and compared between the two treatments (OR versus VP) using Mantel’s test and regression approaches. Empirical estimates of correlations, at the individual-tree and family-mean levels, between the two treatments were compared with those obtained from deterministic simulations. Estimates of narrow-sense heritability (h 2) were higher in the VP population than in the OR population for 11 of the 15 traits. The estimated G matrices were significantly different between the two treatments. Simulation study showed that with an increase in the total genetic variance, the correspondence between the two treatments at the family-mean level improved dramatically for different family sizes. As the ratio of dominance/additive variance increased from 0 to 1, the family-mean correlations between the two treatments decreased for all family sizes. The average estimated correlations between the two treatments at the family-mean level were higher than at the individual-tree level (0.78 and 0.42, respectively). These observed correlations were very similar to our theoretical expectations. In the light of these results, caution is required when comparing apple seedlings tested on their own roots with those tested on ‘M. 9’ rootstock, as potential cultivar breeding parents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alspach PA, Oraguzie NC (2002) Estimation of genetic parameters of apple (Malus domestica) fruit quality from open-pollinated families. NZ J Crop Hort Sci 30:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ (1992) Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am Nat 140:S85–S107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banks BD, Mao IL, Walter JP (1985) Robustness of the restricted maximum likelihood estimator derived under normality as applied to data with skewed distributions. J Dairy Sci 68:1785–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer AM, Reetz TC, Léon J (2006) Estimation of breeding values of inbred lines using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and genetic similarities. Crop Sci 46:2685–2691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borralho NMG, Kanowski PJ (1995) Correspondence of performance between genetically related clones and seedlings. Can J For Res 25:500–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burak M, Büyükyilmaz M (1998) Effect of promalin on fruit shape and quality of Starking Delicious apple cultivar. Acta Hortic 463:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon RD (1977) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet 26:168–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahaner A, Hillel J (1980) Estimating heritability and genetic correlation between traits from generations F2 and F3 of self-fertilising species: a comparison of three methods. Theor Appl Genet 58:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr DE, Fenster CB (1994) Levels of genetic variation and covariation for Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) floral traits. Heredity 72:606–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner JK (2002) Genetic mechanisms of floral trait correlations in a natural population. Nature 420:407–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dieters MJ, Hodge GR, White TL (1996) Genetic parameter estimates to rust infection from full-sib tests of Pinus elliottii, modelled as functions of rust incidence. Silvae Genet 45:235–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Durel CE, Laurens F, Fouillet A, Lespinasse Y (1998) Utilization of pedigree information to estimate genetic parameters from large unbalanced data sets in apple. Theor Appl Genet 96:1077–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinformatics Online 1:47–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, Harlow, p 463

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ASReml User Guide Release 2.0 VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK

  • Henderson CR (1984) Application of linear models in animal breeding. University of Guelph, Guelph

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge GR, White TL (1992) Genetic parameter estimates for growth traits at different ages in slash pine and some implications for breeding. Silvae Genet 41:252–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenis K, Keulemans J (2007) Study of tree architecture of apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) by QTL analysis of growth traits. Mol Breed 19:193–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein TW, Defries IC, Finkbeiner CT (1973) Heritability and genetic correlation: standard error of estimates and sample size. Behav Genet 3:355–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn LA, Atchley WR (1988) How similar are genetic correlations structure? Data from mice and rats. Evolution 42:467–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouassi AB, Durel C-E, Costa F, Tartarini S, van de Weg E, Evans K, Fernandez-Fernandez F, Govan C, Boudichevskaja A, Dunemann F, Antofie A, Lateur M, Stankiewicz-Kosyl M, Soska A, Tomala K, Lewandowski M, Rutkovski K, Zurawicz E, Guerra W, Laurens F (2009) Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for apple fruit-quality traits using pedigreed plant material in Europe. Tree Genet Genomes 5:659–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (2006) Correlation between clonal means and open-pollinated seedling progeny means, and its implications for radiata pine breeding strategy. Can J For Res 36:1968–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SK, Burdon RD, Stovold GT (2008) Wood properties of stem diameter of Pinus radiata in New Zealand: genetic parameter estimates of clonal and seedling material. N Z J For Sci 38:87–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar SK, Volz RK, Alspach PA, Bus VGM (2010) Development of a recurrent apple breeding programme in New Zealand: a synthesis of results, and a proposed revised breeding strategy. Euphytica 173:207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis RM, Emmans GC, Dingwall WS, Simm G (2002) A description of the growth of sheep and its genetic analysis. Anim Sci 74:51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebhard R, Kellerhals M, Pfammatter W, Jertmini M, Gessler C (2003) Mapping quantitative physiological traits in apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.). Plant Mol Biol 52:511–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalised regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Persson T, Andersson B (2004) Accuracy of single- and multiple-trait REML evaluation of data including non-random missing records. Silvae Genet 53:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP, Möhring J, Melchinger AE, Büchse A (2008) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA, Preziosi R (1994) The estimation of the genetic correlation: the use of the jackknife. Heredity 73:544–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods, 6th edn. The Iowa State University Press, Iowa, p 593

    Google Scholar 

  • Steppan SJ, Phillips PC, Houle D (2002) Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol Evol 17:320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Via S (1984) The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. II. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and among host plants. Evolution 38:896–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viana JMS, Sobreira FM, de Resende MDV, Faria VR (2010) Multi-trait BLUP in half-sib selection of annual crops. Plant Breed 129:599–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser T, Verhaegh JJ, De Vries P (1976) A comparison of apple and pear seedlings with reference to the juvenile period. I. Seedling growth and yield. Euphytica 25:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volz RK, White AG, Brookfield PL, Weskett R, Legg S, Koorey R, Tustin DS, Hughes J, White M (2004) Breeding and development of the new apple cultivar ‘Jazz™’. Acta Hortic 663:891–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster AD, Oehl VH, Jackson JE, Jones OP (1985) The orchard establishment, growth and precocity of four micropropagated apple scion cultivars. J Hortic Sci 60:169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim SJ (1998) Rootstock guide: apple, pear, cherry, European plum. Publication nr. 25. Fruit Research Station, Wilhelminadorp, p 144

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall PH (1987) A comparison of variance component estimates for arbitrary underlying distributions. J Amer Stat Assoc 82:866–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wünsche JN, Ferguson IB (2005) Crop load interactions in apple. Hortic Rev 31:231–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang B, Li B (2003) Best linear unbiased prediction of clonal breeding values and genetic values from full-sib mating design. Can J For Res 33:2036–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge orchard staff for technical assistance during the course of the project and helpful comments from Peter Alspach and Alastair Currie.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Private Bag 1401, Havelock North, 4157, New Zealand

    Satish Kumar, Richard Volz & Rosemary Weskett

Authors
  1. Satish Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Volz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rosemary Weskett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satish Kumar.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Dirlewanger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, S., Volz, R. & Weskett, R. Genetic architecture of fruit quality traits in Malus x domestica (Borkh.) compared between own-rooted seedlings and vegetative propagules on ‘M. 9’ rootstock. Tree Genetics & Genomes 7, 1079–1088 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0396-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0396-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation