Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation in basic density and modulus of elasticity of coastal Douglas-fir

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tree Genetics & Genomes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Douglas-fir trees from 39 open-pollinated families at four test locations were assessed to estimate heritability of modulus of elasticity (MOE) and basic density. After trees were felled, sound velocity was measured on 4-m logs with the Director HM200. Disks were taken to estimate dry and green wood density; dynamic MOE was estimated as green density × (sound velocity)2. Heritability estimates of MOE (across-site h 2=0.55) were larger than those for total height (0.15) and diameter at breast height (DBH; 0.29), and similar to those for density (0.59). Negative genetic correlations were found for MOE with height (r A=−0.30) and DBH (r A=−0.51), and were similar to those found for density with height (r A=−0.52) and DBH (r A=−0.57). The partial correlations of height with MOE and density, while holding DBH constant, were positive, implying that the observed negative correlations between height and the wood properties were a function of the high positive correlation between height and DBH and the strong negative correlations between DBH and the wood properties. Taper [DBH/(height−1.4)] was found to be negatively associated with MOE. Selection for MOE may produce greater gains than selection for density because MOE had a larger coefficient of additive variation (9.6%) than density (5.1%). Conversely, selection for growth may have a more negative impact on MOE than density because of the greater genetic variation associated with MOE. Family mean correlations of the wood quality traits with stem form and crown health were mostly nonsignificant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alden HA (1997) Softwoods of North America. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-102. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, p 151

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews M (2002) Wood quality measurement-son et lumière. N Z J For 47(3):19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastien JCh, Roman-Amat B, Vonnet G (1985) Natural variation of some wood quality traits of coastal Douglas-fir in a French progeny test: implications on breeding strategy. IUFRO S2.02.05 Working Party, Vienna, June 1985

  • Becker WA (1984) Manual of quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Academic, Pullman, p 190

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon RD (1977) Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype–environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet 26:168–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon RD, Low CB (1992) Genetic survey of Pinus radiata. 6. Wood properties: variation, heritabilities, and interrelationships with other traits. N Z J For Sci 22(2/3):145–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell RK (1979) Genecology of Douglas-fir in a watershed in the Oregon Cascades. Ecology 60(5):1036–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave ID, Walker JCF (1994) Stiffness of wood in fast-grown plantation softwoods: the influence of microfibril angle. For Prod J 44:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest Products Laboratory (1999) Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-113. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, p 463

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GR (1997) Site-to-site genetic correlations and their implications on breeding zone size and optimum number of progeny test sites for coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet 46:280–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GR (2002) Genetic variation in tolerance of Douglas-fir to Swiss needle cast as assessed by symptom expression. Silvae Genet 51:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R, Jayawickrama K (2002) Genetics of wood specific gravity in coastal Douglas-fir. In: Jayawickrama K (ed) Proceedings of the Workshop Genetic Improvement of Wood Quality in Coastal Douglas-fir and Western Hemlock, Corvallis, 27 June 2002, pp 43–49. http://www.fsl.orst.edu/pnwtirc/publications/Electronic version of some pubs/Jayawickrama, Bracher & Howe (2002) (WQ).pdf

  • Johnson GR, Gartner BL, Maguire D, Kanaskie A (2003) Influence of Bravo fungicide applications on wood density and moisture content of Swiss needle cast affected Douglas-fir trees. For Ecol Manag 186:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GR, Grotta AT, Gartner BL, Downes G (2005) Impact of the foliar pathogen Swiss needle cast on wood quality of Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 35:331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jozsa LA, Middleton GR (1994) A discussion of wood quality attributes and their practical implications. Special Pub. No. SP-34. Forintek Canda Corp, Vancouver, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  • King JN, Yeh FC, Heaman JCH (1988) Selection of wood density and diameter in controlled crosses of coastal Douglas-fir. Silvae Genet 37:152–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles L, Hansen, Downes G, Kimberley M, Gaunt D, Lee J, Roper J (2003) Modelling within-tree and between-tree variation in Douglas-fir wood and lumber properties. In: Proceedings of IUFRO All Division 5 Conference, Rotorua, 11–15 March 2003, pp 87–100

  • Kumar S (2004) Genetic parameter estimates for wood stiffness, strength, internal checking, and resin bleeding for radiata pine. Can J For Res 34:2601–2610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Jayawickrama KJS, Lee J, Lausberg M (2002) Direct and indirect measures of stiffness and strength show high heritability in a wind-pollinated radiata pine progeny test in New Zealand. Silvae Genet 51:256–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell R, Miliken G, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Loo-Dinkins JA, Gonzalez JS (1991) Genetic control of wood density profile in young Douglas-fir. Can J For Res 21:935–939

    Google Scholar 

  • Megraw RA (1986) Douglas-fir wood properties. In: Oliver CD, Hanley DP, Johnson JA (eds) Proceedings of the Douglas fir: stand management for the future conference, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, 18–20 June 1985, pp 81–96

  • Pellerin RF, Ross RJ (2002) Nondestructive evaluation of wood. Forest Products Society, Madison, p 210

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle SR (1961) Phenotypic, genetic and environmental correlations. Biometrics 17:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. WH Freeman, New York, pp 643–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Squillace AE (1974) Average genetic correlation among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genet 223:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • St Clair JB (1994) Genetic variation in tree structure and its relation to size in Douglas-fir. I. Biomass partitioning, foliage efficiency, stem form and wood density. Can J For Res 24:1226–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonecypher RW, Piesch RF, Helland GG, Chapman JG, Reno HJ (1996) Results from genetic tests of selected parents of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) in an applied tree improvement program. For Sci Monogr 32:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargas-Hernandez J, Adams WT (1991) Genetic variation of wood density components in young coastal Douglas-fir: implications for tree breeding. Can J For Res 21:1801–1807

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods JH (1993) Breeding programs and strategies for Douglas-fir in North America. In: Park YS, Adams GW (eds) Breeding strategies of important tree species in Canada. N.B. Inform. Rep. no. M-X-186E. Natural Resources Canada, Fredericton, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada Y (1962) Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlation of the same trait under different environments. Japan J Genet 37:498–509

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowldegements

This research was supported by the Sustainable Forestry component of Agenda 2020 (a joint effort of the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Research and Development and the American Forest and Paper Association), a special grant from the USDA to Oregon State University for wood utilization research, the Swiss Needle Cast Cooperative, and the Oregon Department of Forestry. Data and analyses were also provided by the Northwest Tree Improvement Cooperative. Field assistance was provided by Steve Skinner and Joe Travers of the Oregon Department of Forestry and the chainsaw crew from the Oregon Department of Corrections. Nicole Suty helped with some of the measurements. Helpful reviews were provided by Rowland Burdon, Marilyn Cherry, Keith Jayawickrama, Leith Knowles, Satish Kumar, Nancy Mandel, Charles Sorensson, Michael Stoehr, and three anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. R. Johnson.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Aitken

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, G.R., Gartner, B.L. Genetic variation in basic density and modulus of elasticity of coastal Douglas-fir. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3, 25–33 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-006-0054-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-006-0054-0

Keywords

Navigation