Skip to main content
Log in

Polymix breeding with paternity analysis in Populus: a test for differential reproductive success (DRS) among pollen donors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tree Genetics & Genomes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymix breeding with paternity analysis (PMX/WPA) has been proposed as an alternative to traditional full-sib breeding and testing schemes. To fully capture the benefits of PMX/WPA, differential reproductive success (DRS) of pollen parents used in the polymix must be modest. DRS was evaluated in an operational test of PMX/WPA for a hybrid poplar breeding program. A 16-parent pollen polymix (Populus nigra L.) was used to pollinate seven clones of Populus deltoides (Bartr. ex. Marshall) under greenhouse breeding conditions. Progeny were grown out briefly and randomly sampled (357) prior to out-planting in field trials. Twenty-eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci were evaluated and 15 were selected for genetic characterization in small populations of three Populus spp (P. nigra, P. deltoides, and P. balsamifera spp trichocarpa Torr. & Gray). Seven loci were ultimately selected for paternity analysis of progeny. The average exclusion probability of the seven loci in P. nigra was 0.604; combined, the theoretical exclusion probability was 0.9999. However, only 95% of sampled progeny were unambiguously assigned a single paternal parent. Missing data likely accounted for most of the ambiguity. DRS was statistically significant though not prohibitive for practical utility of PMX/WPA as a breeding system. Of the 112 potential crosses in this study, 92 were represented. Eight of the 16 pollen parents contributed 83% of the progeny. Good pollen vigor, as measured by germination percent, did not ensure paternal success, but poor vigor was associated with lack of paternal success. PMX/WPA appears to be logistically and economically attractive for hybrid poplar breeding and testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brewbaker JL, Kwack BH (1963) The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am J Bot 50:859–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunner AM, Rottmann WH, Sheppard LA, Krutovskii K, DiFazio SP, Leonardi S, Strauss SH (2000) Structure and expression of duplicate AGAMOUS orthologues in poplar. Plant Mol Biol 44:619–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickmann DI, Stuart KW (1983) The culture of poplars in Eastern North America. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lambeth C, Lee B-C, O’Malley D, Wheeler NC (2001) Polymix breeding with parental analysis of progeny: an alternative to full-sib breeding and testing. Theor Appl Genet 103:930–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk L, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7(5):639–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Melchior GH, Seitz FW (1968) Interspezifische kreuzungssterilitat innerhalb der pappelsektion Aigeriros. [Interspecific cross sterility within the poplar section Aigerios], translated from German. Silvae Genet 17:88–93

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mulcahy D (1983) Models of pollen-tube competition in Geranium maculatum. In: Real L (ed) Pollination Biology, Academic, New York, pp 151–161

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura RR, Wheeler NC (1992) Pollen competition and paternal success in Douglas-fir. Evolution 46:846–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nikkanen T, Aronen T, Haggman H, Venäläinen M (2000) Variation in pollen viability among Picea abies genotypes—potential for unequal paternal success. Theor Appl Genet 101:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quesada M, Winsor JA, Sephenson AG (1993) Effects of pollen competition on progeny performance in a heterozygous cucurbit. Am Nat 142:694–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smouse PE, Meagher TR (1994) Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L) Gray (Liliacease). Genetics 136:313–332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smulders MJM, Van Der Schoot J, Arens P, Vosman B (2001) Trinucleotide repeat microsatellite markers for black poplar (Populus nigra L.). Molec Ecol Notes 1(3):188–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stanton BJ, Villar M (1996) Controlled reproduction of Populus. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD Jr, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM (eds) Biology of Populus and its implication for management and conservation. Ch 5. NRC Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, pp 113–138

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stettler RF (1968) Irradiated mentor pollen: its use in remote hybridization of black cottonwood. Nature 219:746–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tuskan GA, Gunter LE, Yang ZK, Yin TM, Sewell MM, DiFazio SP (2004) Characterization of microsatellites revealed by genomic sequencing of Populus trichocarpa. Can J For Res 34(1):85–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Schoot J, Pospiskova M, Vosman B, Smulders MJM (2000) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in black poplar (Populus nigra L.). Theor Appl Genet 101(1–2):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yin TM, DiFazio SP, Gunter LE, Riemenschneider D, Tuskan GA (2004) Large-scale heterospecific segregation distortion in Populus revealed by a dense genetic map. Theor Appl Genet 109:451–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Steve DiFazio from the Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Dr. Steven Strauss, Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University for providing aliquots of primers needed to amplify 28 SSR loci evaluated in this study. We are grateful to Chuck Wierman, Brian Stanton and Clem Lambeth for reviewing earlier versions of this manuscript, and to anonymous reviewers at the journal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Wheeler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wheeler, N., Payne, P., Hipkins, V. et al. Polymix breeding with paternity analysis in Populus: a test for differential reproductive success (DRS) among pollen donors. Tree Genetics & Genomes 2, 53–60 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-005-0033-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-005-0033-x

Keywords

Navigation