Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are Online Samples Credible? Evidence from Risk Elicitation Tests

  • Anthology
  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Finance University of Texas El Paso, Texas, TX, 79902, USA

    John Gibson

  2. Department of Economics and Finance, University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, MO, 64093, USA

    David Johnson

Authors
  1. John Gibson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Johnson.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 43 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gibson, J., Johnson, D. Are Online Samples Credible? Evidence from Risk Elicitation Tests. Atl Econ J 47, 377–379 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-019-09625-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-019-09625-6

JEL

Search

Navigation