Abstract
Objectives
This research, using focal concerns perspective on sentencing, examines how and why psychiatric labels, and having diagnoses biologically “labeled,” affect sentencing beliefs. Dimensions of public stigma toward psychiatric illnesses are hypothesized to mediate sentencing views.
Methods
This is a 2 × 2 partially-crossed, between-subjects multifactorial experiment with a lay sample (n= 1213), presenting mediation analyses.
Results
Four psychiatric labels (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, behavioral-variant Frontotemporal Dementia, High Functioning Autism, Borderline Intellectual Disability) led to significant beneficial effects on sentencing (less prison/rehabilitation support) as mediated by decreased stigmatization regarding lack of treatability, social acceptance, and personal responsibility. One biological “label” (Pedophilic Disorder) was mediated by decreased stigmatization (dangerousness), resulting in less prison support.
Conclusions
Data support effects of psychiatric labeling on sentencing under focal concerns. As no psychiatric labels resulted in increased discriminatory sentencing and, instead, led to decreased discriminatory sentencing behavior, psychiatric labeling may reduce punitiveness and bolster non-punitive sentencing beliefs. Biological labeling, aside from Pedophilic Disorder, may not affect sentencing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
(1) ADHD (assault against an adult male), (2) FAS (assault against adult male), (3) Addictive Disorder (assault against adult male), (4) Pedophilic Disorder (sexual assault against female child), (5) HFA (sexual assault against adult female), (6) bvFTD (sexual assault against adult female), (7) OCD (assault against adult male), (8) PTSD (assault against adult male), (9) Borderline ID (assault against adult male), (10) APD (assault against adult male).
Results of main effects of demographic variables on sentencing views are available upon request.
References
Appelbaum, P. S., & Scurich, N. (2014). Impact of behavioral genetic evidence on the adjudication of criminal behavior. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42(1), 91–100.
Barnett, M. E., Brodsky, S. L., & Davis, C. M. (2004). When mitigation evidence makes a difference: Effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22(6), 751–770.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bieneck, S. (2009). How adequate is the vignette technique as a research tool for psycho-legal research. In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck, & J. Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.), Social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 255–271). Chichester: John Wiley.
Blume, J. H., & Leonard, P. B. (2000). Capital cases: Principles of developing and presenting mental health evidence in criminal cases. Champion, 24, 63–71.
Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Clark, J. W., & Cornell, D. G. (2008). Describing, diagnosing, and naming psychopathy: How do youth psychopathy labels influence jurors? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26(4), 487–510.
Burstin, K., Doughtie, E. B., & Raphaeli, A. (1980). Contrastive vignette technique: An indirect methodology designed to address reactive social attitude measurement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(2), 147–165.
Corrigan, P. W. (2000). Mental health stigma as social attribution: Implications for research methods and attitude change. Clinical Psychology, 7(1), 48–67.
Corrigan, P. W., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A., Rowan, D., & Kubiak, M. A. (2003). An attribution model of public discrimination toward persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44(2), 162–179.
Day, E. N., Edgren, K., & Eshleman, A. (2007). Measuring stigma toward mental illness: Development and application of the mental illness stigma scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(10), 2191–2219.
Edens, J. F., Desforges, D. M., Fernandez, K., & Palac, C. A. (2004). Effects of psychopathy and violence risk testimony on mock juror perceptions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(4), 393–412.
Edens, J. F., Colwell, L. H., Desforges, D. M., & Fernandez, K. (2005). The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: Are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(5), 603–625.
Fazel, S., & Danesh, J. (2002). Serious mental disorder in 23,000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet, 359(9306), 545–550.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Grattet, R. (2011). Societal reactions to deviance. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 185–204.
Greene, E., & Cahill, B. S. (2012). Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30(3), 280–296.
Griset, P. L. (1991). Determinate sentencing: The promise and the reality of retributive justice. New York: SUNY.
Heath, W. P., Stone, J., Darley, J. M., & Granneman, B. D. (2003). Yes, I did it, but don’t blame me: Perceptions of excuse defenses. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 31, 187–226.
Hinshaw, S. P., & Scheffler, R. M. (2014). The ADHD explosion: myths, medication, money, and today’s push for performance. New York: Oxford University Press,
Jahnke, S., & Hoyer, J. (2013). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: A blind spot in stigma research. International Journal of Sexual Health, 25(3), 169–184.
King, N. J., & Noble, R. L. (2005). Jury sentencing in noncapital cases: Comparing severity and variance with judicial sentences in two states. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2(2), 331–367.
Kvaale, E. P., Gottdiener, W. H., & Haslam, N. (2013). Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople. Social Science & Medicine, 96, 95–103.
Lebowitz, M. S., Rosenthal, J. E., & Ahn, W. K. (2012). Effects of biological versus psychosocial explanations on stigmatization of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20(3), 240–250.
Linden, D. (2011). Biology of psychological disorders. New York: Palgrave.
Payne, J. L., & Wood, C. (2016). College students’ perceptions of attributes associated with autism spectrum disorders. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(2), 77–87.
Penn, D. L., Kommana, S., Mansfield, M., & Link, B. G. (1999). Dispelling the stigma of schizophrenia: The impact of information on dangerousness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 25(3), 437–446.
Pescosolido, B. A., Martin, J. K., Long, J. S., Medina, T. R., Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2010). “A disease like any other”? A decade of change in public reactions to schizophrenia, depression, and alcohol dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(11), 1321–1330.
Phelan, J. C. (2005). Geneticization of deviant behavior and consequences for stigma: The case of mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 307–322.
Robinson, P. H. (2013). Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert. New York: Oxford UJniversity Press.
Robinson, P. H., Jackowitz, S., & Bartels, D. M. (2012). Extra-legal punishment factors: A study of forgiveness, hardship, good-deeds, apology, remorse, and other such discretionary factors in assessing criminal punishment. Vanderbilt Law Review, 65, 737–826.
Saks, M. J., Schweitzer, N. J., Aharoni, E., & Kiehl, K. A. (2014). The impact of neuroimages in the sentencing phase of capital trials. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11(1), 105–131.
Scheff, T. J. (1970). Being mentally ill: A sociological theory. London: Transaction.
Schweitzer, N. J., Saks, M. J., Murphy, E. R., Roskies, A. L., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Gaudet, L. M. (2011). Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: No impact. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(3), 357–393.
Scurich, N., Gongola, J., & Krauss, D. A. (2016). The biasing effect of the “sexually violent predator” label on legal decisions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 47, 109–114.
Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. New York: SUNY.
Von dem Knesebeck, O., Angermeyer, M. C., Lüdecke, D., & Kofahl, C. (2014). Emotional reactions toward people with dementia–results of a population survey from Germany. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(3), 435–441.
Weiner, B., Graham, S., & Reyna, C. (1997). An attributional examination of retributive versus utilitarian philosophies of punishment. Social Justice Research, 10(4), 431–452.
Willis, G. M., Levenson, J. S., & Ward, T. (2010). Desistance and attitudes toward sex offenders: Facilitation or hindrance? Journal of Family Violence, 25(6), 545–556.
Acknowledgements
Research supported by American Psychology-Law Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 68 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berryessa, C.M. The effects of psychiatric and “biological” labels on lay sentencing and punishment decisions. J Exp Criminol 14, 241–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9322-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9322-x