Abstract
Objectives
People are hesitant to fully support reintegration efforts (e.g., opportunities to receive psychological counseling, career counseling, job training, housing assistance, educational opportunities, financial compensation) to help exonerees wrongfully convicted of a crime. However, underlying reasons motivating people’s hesitancy remain unaddressed. This research examined the influence of being wrongfully convicted of a race stereotypic-consistent crime on people’s judgments of exonerees’ culpability and willingness to support reintegration programs.
Method
Using an experimental design, participants were randomly assigned to read a news story that depicted an African-American or White male who was exonerated after being wrongfully convicted of assault or embezzlement. Participants then offered their culpability judgments (i.e., their belief in the exoneree’s guilt and confidence in that belief) and willingness to support reintegration services.
Results
Participants were less confident of the exoneree’s innocence and less supportive of psychological counseling services when the exoneree was a White, compared to African-American, male wrongfully convicted of the race stereotypic-consistent crime of embezzlement. An exploratory conditional mediation analysis indicated that less confidence in the exoneree’s innocence after being wrongfully convicted of a race stereotypic-consistent crime was, in turn, associated with people’s hesitancy to support psychological counseling for the exoneree.
Conclusions
Basic and applied implications to overcome people’s hesitancy to support reintegration efforts for exonerees are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Change history
21 May 2018
This correction provides minor changes to some of the statistical values presented in the original article. None of the changes alter interpretations of results or message of the research.
References
Blandisi, I. M., Clow, K. A., & Ricciardelli, R. (2015). Public perceptions of the stigmatization of wrongly convicted individuals: Findings from semi-structured interviews. The Qualitative Report, 20, 1881–1904.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726–737.
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Richeson, J. A. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. In R. F. Baumeister & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Advanced social psychology: The state of the science (pp. 341–383). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bodenhausen, G. V., & Wyer, R. S. (1985). Effects of stereotypes in decision making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 48, 267–282.
Bullock, J. (2007). Experiments on partisanship and public opinion: Party cues, false beliefs, and Bayesian updating (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Clow, K. A., & Leach, A. M. (2013). After innocence: Perceptions of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20, 147–164.
Clow, K. A., & Leach, A. M. (2015). Stigma and wrongful conviction: All exonerees are not perceived equal. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 172–185.
Clow, K. A., Lant, J. M., & Cutler, B. C. (2013). Perceptions of defendant culpability in pretrial publicity: The effects of defendant ethnicity and participant gender. Race and Social Problems, 5, 250–261.
Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2011). No good deed goes unquestioned: Cynical reconstruals maintain belief in the power of self-interest. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1207–1213.
Franks, A. S., & Scherr, K. C. (2014). A sociofunctional approach to prejudice at the polls: Are atheists more politically disadvantaged than gays and blacks? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 681–691.
Garrett, B. L. (2011). Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gawronski, B., Peters, K. R., Brochu, P. M., & Strack, F. (2008). Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice: A cognitive consistency perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 648–665.
Gross, S, Possley, M., & Stephens, K. (2017). Race and wrongful convictions in the United States. Retrieved from National Registry of Exonerations website: https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/Race_and_Wrongful_Convictions.pdf
Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guillford Press.
Hurrwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1997). Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 375–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111769.
Jones, C. S., & Kaplan, M. F. (2003). The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1–13.
Loftus, E. F. (1981). Eyewitness testimony: Psychological research and legal thought. Crime and Justice, 3, 105–151.
Mancini, C., Mears, D. P., Stewart, E. A., Beaver, K. M., & Pickett, J. T. (2012). Whites’ perception about black criminality: A closer look at the contact hypothesis. Crime and Delinquency, 1–27.
National Registry of Exonerations (2017). Retrieved April, 2017 from https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/detaillist.aspx
Osborne, D., & Davies, P. G. (2013). Eyewitness identifications are affected by stereotypes about a suspect’s level of perceived stereotypicality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 488–504.
Owens, M. L., & Griffiths, E. (2012). Uneven reparations for wrongful convictions: Examining the state politics of statutory compensation legislation. Albany Law Review, 75, 1283–1327.
Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 880–892.
Shlosberg, A., Mandery, E., & West, V. (2012). The expungement myth. Albany Law Review, 75, 1229–1241.
Thompson, A. M., Molina, O. R., & Levett, L. M. (2012). After exoneration: An investigation of stigma and wrongfully convicted persons. Albany Law Review, 75, 1373–1413.
Walther, E., & Langer, T. (2010). For whom Pavlov’s bell tolls: Processes underlying evaluative conditioning? In J. P. Forgas, J. Cooper, & W. D. Crano (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes and attitude change: An introductory overview (pp. 59–75). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Westervelt, S., & Cook, K. (2012). Life after death row. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Wihbey, J., & Kille, L. (2015). Excessive or reasonable force by police? Research on law enforcement and racial conflict. Retrieved from http://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/criminal-justice/police-reasonable-force-brutality-race-research-review-statistics
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from from experiment.com (DOI: 10.18258/5182).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 20.8 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scherr, K.C., Normile, C.J. & Sarmiento, M.C. Reluctant to embrace innocence: an experimental test of persevering culpability judgments on people’s willingness to support reintegration services for exonerees. J Exp Criminol 14, 529–538 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9306-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9306-2