Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simulated experiments and their potential role in criminology and criminal justice

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. These references are but a small sample of the work that has been done in related disciplines. The natural sciences have been utilizing simulation for even longer to understand climate, ocean currents, wild fires, etc. (for a recent collection see Maguire et al. (2005) or the proceedings of the 2000 GIS & Environmental Modeling conference at http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/).

  2. For an opposite view on the importance of space, see Elffers and van Baal (2008).

References

  • Berk, R. A., Bond, J., Lu, R., Turco, R., & Weiss, R. (2000). Computer simulations as experiments: using program evaluation tools to assess the validity of interventions in virtual worlds. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Donald Campbell’s legacy (volume II): contributions to research design (pp. 195–214). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., & Graddy, E. (1982). Prevalence and recidivism in index arrests: a feedback model. Law & Society Review, 16(2), 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA, National Academy of Sciences.

  • Brantingham, P. L. (1977). Dynamic modelling of the Felony Court System, Florida State University. PhD: 340.

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (2004). Computer simulation as a tool for environmental criminologists. Security Journal, 17(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. L., & Groff, E. R. (2004). The future of agent-based simulation in environmental criminology. Nashville, TN: American Society of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. G., Page, S. E., Riolo, R., & Rand, W. (2004). Agent-based and analytical modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts. Environmental Modelling and Software, 19, 1097–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. G., Riolo, R., et al. (2005). Spatial process and data models: toward integration of agent-based models and GIS. Journal of Geographic Systems, 7, 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattoe, E. (1996). Why are we simulating anyway? Some answers from economics. In K. G. Troitzsch, U. Mueller, G. N. Gilbert & J. E. Doran (Eds.), Social Science Microsimulation (pp. 78–104). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Chen, B., Cunningham, A., Ewing, R., Peralta, R., & Visser, E. (1994). Two-dimensional modeling of microscale transport and biotransformation in Porous Media. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 10(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, C. (2001). Theory in a complex world: GeoGraph Computational Laboratories. Department of Geography p. 165. Santa Barbara: University of California Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, D. (1999). Experimenting on theories. Science in Context, 12(2), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E. (2005). Using crime pattern simulations to elaborate theory. Toronto: American Society of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., & Liu, L. (2004). Routine activity theory in a RA/CA crime simulation. Nashville, TN: American Society of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. E., Liu, L. (Eds.) (2008). Artificial crime analysis systems: using computer simulations and geographic information systems. Hershey, PA, IGI Global.

  • Elffers, H., & van Baal, P. (2008). Realistic spatial backcloth is not that important in agent based simulation research: an illustration from simulating perceptual deterrence. In J. E. Eck, & L. Liu (Eds.), Artificial crime analysis systems: using computer simulations and geographic information systems. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M., Steinbruner, J. D., & Parker, M. T. (2001). Modeling civil violence: an agent-based computational approach (working paper). Washington DC: Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., Doran, J. (Eds.) (1994). Simulating societies: the computer simulation of social phenomena. London: University College London Press.

  • Gilbert, N., Terna, P. (1999). How to build and use agent-based models in social science. Retrieved 9-30-2003, 2003, from http://web.econ.unito.it/terna/deposito/gil_ter.pdf.

  • Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (1999). Simulation for the social scientist. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimblett, H. R. (2002). Integrating geographic information systems and agent-based technologies for modeling and simulating social and ecological phenomena. In H. R. Gimblett (Ed.), Integrating geographic information systems and agent-based modeling techniques for simulating social and ecological processes (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groff, E. R. (2007a). Simulation for theory testing and experimentation: an example using routine activity theory and street robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23(2), 75–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff, E. R. (2007b). ‘Situating’ simulation to model human spatio-temporal interactions: an example using crime events. Transactions in GIS, 11(4), 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L., & Brown, D. (2000). Using a multi-agent model to predict both physical and cyber crime. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 4, 2338–2343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Wang, X., et al. (2005). Simulating crime events and crime patterns in RA/CA model. In F. Wang (Ed.), Geographic Information Systems and Crime Analysis (pp. 197–213). Singapore: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. W., & Willer, R. (2002). From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 143–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, D. J., Batty, M., et al. (Eds.) (2005). GIS, spatial analysis, and modeling. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.

  • Moss, S., & Edmonds, B. (2005). Sociology and simulation: statistical and qualitative cross-validation. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1095–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D., & Haklay, M. (2000). Agent-based models and individualism: is the world agent-based? Environment and Planning A, 32(8), 1409–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. C., Berger, T., & Manson, S. M. (2001). Agent-based models of land-use/land-cover change in LUCC Report Series No. 6, LUCC Focus 1 Office Anthropological Center for Training and Research on Global Environmental Change, Indiana University.

  • Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M. A., Hoffmann, M. J., & Deadman, P. (2003). Mult-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2), 314–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, P., Dray, A. (2005). SimDrug: exploring the complexity of heroin use in Melbourne. Drug Policy Modelling Project Monograph Series, from http://www.turningpoint.org.au/research/dpmp_monographs/dpmp_monograph11.pdf.

  • Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, E. (1996). An integrated, dynamic approach to travel demand forecasting. Transportation, 23(3), 313–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, L. (2000). Structure, behavior, and market power in an evolutionary labor market with adaptive search. Iowa State University Economic Report No. 51.

  • Tesfatsion, L. (2001). Guest editorial: Agent-based modeling of evolutionary economic systems. Computation, 5(5), 437–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfatsion, L. (2002). Agent-based computational economics: growing economies from the bottom up. Iowa State University Economics Working Paper No. 1.

  • Wang, X. (2005). Spatial adaptive crime event simulation With RA/CA/ABM computational laboratory. Geography p. 173. Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, A. (2001). Protection and social order. Computational Economics and Finance Meeting, Yale University.

  • Xue, Y., & Brown, D. E. (2003). A decision model for spatial site selection by criminals: a foundation for law enforcement decision support. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 33(1), 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Elizabeth Groff

  2. Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Lorraine Mazerolle

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Groff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorraine Mazerolle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Groff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Groff, E., Mazerolle, L. Simulated experiments and their potential role in criminology and criminal justice. J Exp Criminol 4, 187–193 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-008-9058-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-008-9058-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation