Abstract
The growing use of restorative justice provides a major opportunity for experimental criminology and evidence-based policy. Face-to-face meetings led by police officers between crime victims and their offenders are predicted to reduce the harm to victims caused by the crime. This prediction is derived not only from the social movement for restorative justice, but also from the microsociology of interaction rituals (Collins, 2004). Four randomized, controlled trials of this hypothesis in London and Canberra, with point estimates disaggregated by gender, tested the prediction with measures of both successful interaction ritual (apologies received and their perceived sincerity) and the hypothesized benefits of the ritual (on forgiveness of, and reduced desire for violent revenge against, offenders, and victim self-blame for the crime). The meta-analyses of the eight point estimates suggest success (as victims define it) of restorative justice as an interaction ritual, and as a policy for reducing harm to victims.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angel, C. (2004). Crime Victims Meet Their Offenders: Testing the Impact of Restorative Justice Conferences on Victims’ Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms. Paper presented to the American Society of Criminology, Nashville, Tennessee, 17.
Black, D. (1982). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review 48, 34–45.
Braithwaite, J. B. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Braithwaite, J. B. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Foa, E. B. & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin 99, 20–35.
Foa, E. B. & Meadows, E. A. (1997). Psychosocial treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: A critical review. American Review of Psychology 48, 449–480.
Harris, N. (2002). Shaming and shame: Regulating drink-driving. In E. Ahmed, N. Harris, J. Braithwaite & V. Braithwaite (Eds.), Shame management through reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moher, D., Schulz K. F. & Altman, D. (2001). The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 285, 1987–1991.
Rothbaum, B. O. & Foa, E. B. (1999). Exposure Therapy for PTSD, PTSD Research Quarterly, The National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, White River Junction, Vt, vol 10, 2:1–8.
Ruth, H. & Reitz, K. R. (2003). The challenge of crime. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Scheff, T. J. (1990). Micro-sociology: Discourse, emotion and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Colledge, E., Dignan, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Pennant, R., Robinson, G. & Sorsby, A. (2004). Implementing restorative justice schemes (Crime Reduction Programme): A report on the first year. Home Office Online Report 32/04. London: Home Office (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr3204.pdf ).
Sherman, L. W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence and irrelevance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30, 445–473.
Sherman, L. W. (2006). Revenge may be sweet, but restorative justice can suppress the appetite. In S. Karstedt, H. Strang, & I. Loader (Eds.), Emotions, Crime and Justice: A Volume of the International Institute for the Sociology of Law, Onati, Spain. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Sherman, L. W. & Strang, H. (2004a) Verdicts or inventions? Interpreting results from randomized controlled experiments in criminology. American Behavioral Scientist 47, 575–607.
Sherman, L. W. & Strang, H., in collaboration with Daniel J. Woods, Caroline M. Angel, Geoffrey C. Barnes, Nova Inkpen, Dorothy Newbury-Birch and Sarah Bennett (2004b). Restorative Justice: What we know and how we know it. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, http://www.sas.upenn.edu/jerrylee/rjWorkingPaper1.pdf.
Strang, H. (2002). Repair or revenge: Victims and restorative justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strang, H. & Sherman, L. W. (2006). Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice experiences: A quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues.
Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9006-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sherman, L.W., Strang, H., Angel, C. et al. Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials. J Exp Criminol 1, 367–395 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-8126-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-8126-y