Abstract:
Spatial aggregation and self-similarity are two important properties in species spatial distribution analysis and modeling. The aggregation parameter k in the negative binomial distribution model and fractal dimension are two widely used measures of spatial aggregation and self-similarity, respectively. In this paper, we attempt to describe spatial aggregation and self-similarity using nearest neighbor methods. Specifically, nearest neighbor methods are used to calculate k and box-counting fractal dimension of species spatial distribution. First, five scaling patterns of k are identified for tree species in a tropical rainforest on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama. Based on the scaling patterns and the means of the nth nearest neighbor distance (NND), the mean NND of higher ranks can be accurately predicted. Second, we describe how to use the theoretical probability distribution model of the nth NND for a homogeneous Poisson process on regular fractals to estimate the fractal dimension. The results indicate that the fractal dimensions estimated using the nearest neighbor method are consistent with those estimated using the scale–area method for 85 tree species on BCI (abundance ≥ 100 individuals and ≤ 5000 individuals). For other tree species, the breakdown of self-similarity in estimates of fractal dimension causes these two methods to be inconsistent. The applicability of the nearest neighbor method is also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL (1993) Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Chapman and Hall, London
Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453
Conlisk E, Conlisk J, Harte J (2007) The impossibility of estimating a negative binomial clustering parameter from presence absence data: a comment on He and Gaston. Am Nat 170:651–654
Diggle PJ (1983) Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. Academic Press Inc., New York
Dungan JL, Perry JN, Dale MRT, Legendre P, Citron-Pousty S, Fortin MJ, Jakomulska A, Miriti M, Rosenberg MS (2002) A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25:626–640
Falconer K (1990) Fractal geometry: mathematical foundations and applications. Wiley, Chichester
Fortin MJ, Dale M (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gao M (2013) Detecting spatial aggregation from distance sampling: a probability distribution model of nearest neighbor distance. Ecol Res 28:397–405
Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London
Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (2000) Patterns and processes in macroecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford
Gatrell AC, Bailey TC, Diggle PJ, Rowlingson BS (1996) Spatial point pattern analysis and its application in geographical epidemiology. Trans Inst Brit Geogr 21:256–274
Halley JM, Hartley S, Kallimanis AS, Kunin WE, Lennon JJ, Sgardelis SP (2004) Uses and abuses of fractal methodology in ecology. Ecol Lett 7:254
Harte J, Kinzig A, Green JL (1999) Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species. Science 284:334–336
Harte J, Blackburn T, Ostling A (2001) Self-similarity and the relationship between abundance and range size. Am Nat 157:374–386
He F, Gaston KJ (2000) Estimating species abundance from occurrence. Am Nat 156:553–559
He F, Gaston KJ (2007) Estimating abundance from occurrence: an underdetermined problem. Am Nat 170:655–659
He F, Hubbell SP (2003) Percolation theory for the distribution and abundance of species. Phys Rev Lett 91:198103
Hubbell SP, He F, Condit R, Borda-de-Água L, Kellner J, ter Steege H (2008) How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them go extinct? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11498–11504
Hui C (2009) On the scaling patterns of species spatial distribution and association. J Theor Biol 261:481–487
Hui C, McGeoch MA (2007a) A self-similarity model for the occupancy frequency distribution. Theor Popul Biol 71:61–70
Hui C, McGeoch MA (2007b) Modeling species distributions by breaking the assumption of self-similarity. Oikos 116:2097–2107
Hui C, McGeoch MA (2008) Does the self-similarity species distribution model lead to unrealistic prediction. Ecology 89:2946–2952
Hui C, McGeoch MA, Warren M (2006) A spatially explicit approach to estimating species occupancy and spatial correlation. J Anim Ecol 75:140–147
Hui C, McGeoch MA, Beyers B, Le Roux PC, Greve M, Chown SL (2009) Extrapolating population size from the occupancy–abundance relationship and the scaling pattern of occupancy. Ecol Appl 19:2038–2048
Hui C, Veldtman R, McGeoch MA (2010) Measures, perceptions and scaling patterns of aggregated species distributions. Ecography 33:95–102
Kunin WE (1998) Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales. Science 281:1513–1515
Legendre P, Fortin MJ (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107–138
Mladenoff DJ, White MA, Pastor J, Crow TR (1993) Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecol Appl 3:294–306
Ostling A, Harte J, Green J (2000) Self-similarity and clustering in the spatial distribution of species. Science 290:671
Perry JN, Liebhold AM, Rosenberg MS et al (2002) Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial patterns in ecological data. Ecography 25:578–600
Perry GLW, Miller BP, Enright NJ (2006) A comparison of methods for the statistical analysis of spatial point patterns in plant ecology. Plant Ecol 187:59–82
Pielou EC (1960) A single mechanism to account for regular, random and aggregated populations. J Ecol 48:575–584
Plotkin JB, Muller-Landau HC (2002) Sampling the species composition of a landscape. Ecology 83:3344–3356
Sakhr J, Nieminen JM (2006) Spacing distributions for point processes on a regular fractal. Phys Rev E 73:036201
Stoyan D, Penttinen A (2000) Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Stat Sci 15:61–78
Thompson HR (1956) Distribution of distance to n-th nearest neighbor in a population of randomly distributed individuals. Ecology 37:391–394
Tilman D, Kareiva P (1997) Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wiegand T, Moloney KA (2004) Rings, circles, and null models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos 104:209–229
Zillio T, He F (2010) Modeling spatial aggregation of finite populations. Ecology 91:3698–3706
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31000197, 41001360) and the Knowledge Innovation Project of the China Academy of Sciences (No. KZCX2-EW-QN209). The authors are grateful to the Center for Tropical Forest Science for providing the BCI data set and to Dr. Guochun Shen for preparing the data. Help from the editors and all anonymous reviewers of the original manuscript is also acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, M., Wang, X. & Wang, D. Species spatial distribution analysis using nearest neighbor methods: aggregation and self-similarity. Ecol Res 29, 341–349 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1131-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1131-8