Skip to main content
Log in

Species spatial distribution analysis using nearest neighbor methods: aggregation and self-similarity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract:

Spatial aggregation and self-similarity are two important properties in species spatial distribution analysis and modeling. The aggregation parameter k in the negative binomial distribution model and fractal dimension are two widely used measures of spatial aggregation and self-similarity, respectively. In this paper, we attempt to describe spatial aggregation and self-similarity using nearest neighbor methods. Specifically, nearest neighbor methods are used to calculate k and box-counting fractal dimension of species spatial distribution. First, five scaling patterns of k are identified for tree species in a tropical rainforest on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama. Based on the scaling patterns and the means of the nth nearest neighbor distance (NND), the mean NND of higher ranks can be accurately predicted. Second, we describe how to use the theoretical probability distribution model of the nth NND for a homogeneous Poisson process on regular fractals to estimate the fractal dimension. The results indicate that the fractal dimensions estimated using the nearest neighbor method are consistent with those estimated using the scale–area method for 85 tree species on BCI (abundance ≥ 100 individuals and ≤ 5000 individuals). For other tree species, the breakdown of self-similarity in estimates of fractal dimension causes these two methods to be inconsistent. The applicability of the nearest neighbor method is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL (1993) Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk E, Conlisk J, Harte J (2007) The impossibility of estimating a negative binomial clustering parameter from presence absence data: a comment on He and Gaston. Am Nat 170:651–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ (1983) Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. Academic Press Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dungan JL, Perry JN, Dale MRT, Legendre P, Citron-Pousty S, Fortin MJ, Jakomulska A, Miriti M, Rosenberg MS (2002) A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25:626–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer K (1990) Fractal geometry: mathematical foundations and applications. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin MJ, Dale M (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao M (2013) Detecting spatial aggregation from distance sampling: a probability distribution model of nearest neighbor distance. Ecol Res 28:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (2000) Patterns and processes in macroecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford

  • Gatrell AC, Bailey TC, Diggle PJ, Rowlingson BS (1996) Spatial point pattern analysis and its application in geographical epidemiology. Trans Inst Brit Geogr 21:256–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halley JM, Hartley S, Kallimanis AS, Kunin WE, Lennon JJ, Sgardelis SP (2004) Uses and abuses of fractal methodology in ecology. Ecol Lett 7:254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harte J, Kinzig A, Green JL (1999) Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species. Science 284:334–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harte J, Blackburn T, Ostling A (2001) Self-similarity and the relationship between abundance and range size. Am Nat 157:374–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He F, Gaston KJ (2000) Estimating species abundance from occurrence. Am Nat 156:553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He F, Gaston KJ (2007) Estimating abundance from occurrence: an underdetermined problem. Am Nat 170:655–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He F, Hubbell SP (2003) Percolation theory for the distribution and abundance of species. Phys Rev Lett 91:198103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP, He F, Condit R, Borda-de-Água L, Kellner J, ter Steege H (2008) How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them go extinct? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11498–11504

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C (2009) On the scaling patterns of species spatial distribution and association. J Theor Biol 261:481–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, McGeoch MA (2007a) A self-similarity model for the occupancy frequency distribution. Theor Popul Biol 71:61–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, McGeoch MA (2007b) Modeling species distributions by breaking the assumption of self-similarity. Oikos 116:2097–2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, McGeoch MA (2008) Does the self-similarity species distribution model lead to unrealistic prediction. Ecology 89:2946–2952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, McGeoch MA, Warren M (2006) A spatially explicit approach to estimating species occupancy and spatial correlation. J Anim Ecol 75:140–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, McGeoch MA, Beyers B, Le Roux PC, Greve M, Chown SL (2009) Extrapolating population size from the occupancy–abundance relationship and the scaling pattern of occupancy. Ecol Appl 19:2038–2048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hui C, Veldtman R, McGeoch MA (2010) Measures, perceptions and scaling patterns of aggregated species distributions. Ecography 33:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE (1998) Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales. Science 281:1513–1515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Fortin MJ (1989) Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mladenoff DJ, White MA, Pastor J, Crow TR (1993) Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecol Appl 3:294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostling A, Harte J, Green J (2000) Self-similarity and clustering in the spatial distribution of species. Science 290:671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry JN, Liebhold AM, Rosenberg MS et al (2002) Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial patterns in ecological data. Ecography 25:578–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry GLW, Miller BP, Enright NJ (2006) A comparison of methods for the statistical analysis of spatial point patterns in plant ecology. Plant Ecol 187:59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1960) A single mechanism to account for regular, random and aggregated populations. J Ecol 48:575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin JB, Muller-Landau HC (2002) Sampling the species composition of a landscape. Ecology 83:3344–3356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakhr J, Nieminen JM (2006) Spacing distributions for point processes on a regular fractal. Phys Rev E 73:036201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoyan D, Penttinen A (2000) Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Stat Sci 15:61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson HR (1956) Distribution of distance to n-th nearest neighbor in a population of randomly distributed individuals. Ecology 37:391–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Kareiva P (1997) Spatial ecology: the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand T, Moloney KA (2004) Rings, circles, and null models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos 104:209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillio T, He F (2010) Modeling spatial aggregation of finite populations. Ecology 91:3698–3706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31000197, 41001360) and the Knowledge Innovation Project of the China Academy of Sciences (No. KZCX2-EW-QN209). The authors are grateful to the Center for Tropical Forest Science for providing the BCI data set and to Dr. Guochun Shen for preparing the data. Help from the editors and all anonymous reviewers of the original manuscript is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Gao.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 171 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, M., Wang, X. & Wang, D. Species spatial distribution analysis using nearest neighbor methods: aggregation and self-similarity. Ecol Res 29, 341–349 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1131-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1131-8

Keywords

Navigation