Skip to main content
Log in

Detritivory: stoichiometry of a neglected trophic level

  • Special Feature
  • Stoichiometry in Ecology
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Previous syntheses have identified the key roles that phylogeny, body size, and trophic level play in determining arthropod stoichiometry. To date, however, detritivores have been largely omitted from such syntheses, despite their importance in nutrient cycling, biodiversity, and food web interactions. Here, we report on a compiled database of the allometry and nutritional stoichiometry (N and P) of detritivorous arthropods. Overall, both N and P content for detritivores varied among major phylogenetic lineages. Detritivore N content was similar to the N content of herbivores, but below that of predators. By contrast, detritivore P content was independent of trophic level. Contrary to previous reports, neither nutrient varied with body size. This analysis places detritivores in the context of related herbivores and predators, and as such, sets the stage for future investigations into the causes and consequences of elemental (mis)matches between detritivores and their detrital resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson TR, Hessen DO, Elser JJ, Urabe J (2005) Metabolic stoichiometry and the fate of excess carbon and nutrients in consumers. Am Nat 165:1–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boersma M, Kreutzer C (2002) Life at the edge: is food quality really of minor importance at low quantities? Ecology 83:2552–2561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárcamo HA, Abe TA, Prescott CE, Holl FB, Chanway CP (2000) Influence of millipedes on litter decomposition, N mineralization, and microbial communities in a coastal forest in British Columbia, Canada. Can J For Res 30:817–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caterino MS, Shull VS, Hammond PM, Vogler AP (2002) Basal relationships of Coleoptera inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Zool Scr 31:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebrian J (1999) Patterns in the fate of production in plant communities. Am Nat 154:449–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross WF, Benstead JP, Rosemond AD, Wallace JB (2003) Consumer–resource stoichiometry in detritus-based streams. Ecol Lett 6:721–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (2005) Ecological stoichiometry of ants in a New World rain forest. Oecologia 142:221–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, Fagan WF (2003) Might nitrogen limitation promote omnivory among carnivorous arthropods? Ecology 84:2522–2531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Denno RF, Dobberfuhl DR, Folarin A, Huberty A, Interlandi S, Kilham SS, McCauley E, Schulz KL, Siemann EH, Sterner RW (2000) Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature 408:578–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner J, Makino W, Markow T, Watts T, Hobbie S, Fagan W, Schade J, Hood J, Sterner RW (2003) Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol Lett 6:936–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE, Gruner DS, Harpole WS, Hillebrand H, Ngai JT, Seabloom EW, Shurin JB, Smith JE (2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 10:1135–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF, Denno RF (2004) Stoichiometry of actual vs. potential predator-prey interactions: insights into nitrogen limitation for arthropod predators. Ecol Lett 7:876–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF, Siemann E, Mitter C, Denno RF, Huberty AF, Woods HA, Elser JJ (2002) Nitrogen in insects: implications for trophic complexity and species diversification. Am Nat 160:784–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland T Jr, Harvey PH, Ives AR (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst Biol 41:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1989) The phylogenetic regression. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 326:119–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen TF, Martins EP (1996) Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionray patterns: a general model of the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404–1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt T, Bergsten J, Levkanicova Z et al (2007). A comprehensive phylogeny of beetles reveals the evolutionary origins of a superradiation. Science 318:1913–1916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Killingbeck KT (1996) Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77:1716–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klowden MJ (2002) Physiological systems in insects. Elsevier Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen NP (1991) Phylogeny of extant Hexapods. In: CSIRO (ed) The insects of Australia. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 1137

  • Liermann M, Steel A, Rosing M, Guttorp P (2004) Random denominators and the analysis of ratio data. Environ Ecol Stat 11:55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison DR, Schulz K-S (eds) (2007) The tree of life Web project. http://tolweb.org

  • Markow TA, Raphael B, Dobberfuhl D, Breitmeyer CM, Elser JJ, Pfeiler E (1999) Elemental stoichiometry of Drosophila and their hosts. Funct Ecol 13:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins EP, Hansen TF (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 149:646–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson WJ (1980) Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen-content. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:119–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill S, Southwood TRE (1978) The role of nitrogen in the development of insect/plant relationships. In: Halborne JS (ed) Aspects of plant and animal coevolution. Academic Press, London, pp 77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe SJ, Stelzer RS, Forman MR, Harpole WS, Daufresne T, Yoshida T (2005) Recent advances in ecological stoichiometry: insights for population and community ecology. Oikos 109:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JC, Berlow EL, Coleman DC, Ruiter PC, Dong Q, Hastings A, Johnson NC, McCann KS, Melville K, Morin PJ, Nadelhoffer K, Rosemond AD, Post DM, Sabo JL, Scow KM, Vanni MJ, Wall DH (2004) Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:584–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooden LD, Guiamet JJ, John I (1997) Senescence mechanisms. Physiol Plant 101:746–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290 (package available freely under the GNU General Public License at: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/packages.html#ape)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull VL, Vogler AP, Baker MD, Maddison DR, Hammond P (2001) Sequence alignment of 18S ribosomal RNA and the basal relationships of Adephagan beetles: evidence for monophyly of aquatic families and the placement of Trachypachidae. Syst Biol 50:945–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shurin JB, Gruner DS, Hillebrand H (2006) All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (2002) Communities and ecosystems: linking the aboveground and belowground components. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler WC, Whiting M, Wheeler QD, Carpenter JM (2001) The phylogeny of the extant hexapod orders. Cladistics 17:113–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White TCR (1993) The inadequate environment: nitrogen and the abundance of animals. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods HA, Fagan WF, Elser JJ, Harrison JF (2004) Allometric and phylogenetic variation in insect phosphorus content. Funct Ecol 18:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates D, Meier R, Wiegmann B (2006) FlyTree: phylogenetic supertree of Diptera. http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu/research/FLYTREE/supertree.html. Accessed 13 April 2006

Download references

Acknowledgments

WFF wishes to thank A. Satake and the other members of the Program Committee for inviting him to speak at the 2007 meeting of the Japanese Ecological Society where these results were first presented. This paper reflects, in part, the efforts of the ‘Spatial Stoichiometry’ working group at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a center funded by the National Science Foundation, the University of California, and the State of California. This paper is also, in part, a product of NSF Award DBI 0548366.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William F. Fagan.

Additional information

Holly M. Martinson and Katie Schneider are co-first author.

About this article

Cite this article

Martinson, H.M., Schneider, K., Gilbert, J. et al. Detritivory: stoichiometry of a neglected trophic level. Ecol Res 23, 487–491 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0471-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0471-7

Keywords

Navigation