Skip to main content
Log in

Dry season diets of sympatric ungulates in lowland Nepal: competition and facilitation in alluvial tall grasslands

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Based on microhistological analyses of faecal material, we compared the early dry season diets of greater one-horned rhinoceros Rhinoceros unicornis, swamp deer Cervus duvauceli and hog deer Axis porcinus, which inhabit the same alluvial grassland habitat complex in lowland Nepal. Their diets were quite similar, both at the forage category level and within subcategories of graminoids and woody plants. Early successional tall grasses, especially Saccharum spontaneum, were the dominant food of all three species, underlining the key role of the threatened alluvial floodplains in large mammal conservation in South Asia. The two deer species ate significantly more graminoids (>66.5%) than did rhino (45.5%), and although they did not differ in proportions of graminoids, swamp deer ate significantly more late successional tall grasses (Narenga porphyrocoma and Themeda spp.) and short grasses (mainly Imperata cylindrica) than hog deer. The two deer consumed almost equal proportions of woody browse (ca. 10%), significantly less than that of rhino (33.0%). The prediction of the Jarman–Bell hypothesis, that large-bodied herbivores are less selective and subsist on lower quality graminoids than smaller ruminants, was not supported by the data. Based on this and previous studies in the same area we propose a conceptual model where the larger megaherbivores (rhino and elephant Elephas maximus) facilitate the smaller swamp deer and hog deer during the monsoonal growing season, while the smaller and more selective deer species outcompete the larger during the dry season when food is more limited. Owing to the all-year sprouting ability of S. spontaneum, facilitation may occur also in the dry season with low numbers of megaherbivores, thus accentuating competitive exclusion at higher deer densities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA (1980) Some comments on measuring niche overlap. Ecology 61:44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1998) High competition with low similarity and low competition with high similarity: exploitative and apparent competition in consumer–resource systems. Am Nat 152:114–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alipayo D, Valdez R, Holechek JL, Cardenas M (1992) Evaluation of microhistological analysis for determining ruminant diet botanical composition. J Range Manage 45:148–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenault R, Owen-Smith N (2002) Facilitation versus competition in grazing herbivore assemblages. Oikos 97:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi S, Gopal SP, Sankar K (2003) Niche relationships of an ungulate assemblage in a dry tropical forest. J Mammal 84:981–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell RHV (1970) The use of the herb layer by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. In: Watson A (ed) Animal populations in relation to their food resources. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 111–124

  • Bell RHV (1971) A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti. Sci Am 225:86–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas T (1999) Habitat utilization by hog deer (Axis porcinus) in relation to other sympatric species at Jaldapara Wildlife Sanctuary, West Bengal, India. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun

    Google Scholar 

  • Butet A (1985) Methode d’etude du regime alimentaire d’unrongeur polyphage (Apodemus sylvaticus L., 1758) par l’analyse microscopique des feces. Mammalia 49:455–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers CR, Steinhorst RK, Krausman PR (1984) Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization–availability data. J Wildlife Manage 48:1050–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G, Sinclair ARE (1994) Wildlife ecology and management. Blackwell, Oxford

  • Dawson TJ, Ellis BA (1979) Comparison of the diets of yellow-footed rock wallabies and sympatric herbivores in Western New South Wales. Aust Wildlife Res 6:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden BL, Pegau RE, Hansen RM (1975) Precision of microhistological estimate of ruminant food habits. J Wildlife Manage 39:402–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demment MW, Van Soest PJ (1985) A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. Am Nat 125:641–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhungel SK, O’Gara BD (1991) Ecology of the hog deer in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Wildlife Monogr 119:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E (1979a) An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali–Bardia Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Part I: vegetation, modifying factors, and successional relationships. Biol Conserv 15:127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E (1979b) An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali–Bardia Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Part II: habitat/animal interactions. Biol Conserv 16:265–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E (1980) An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali–Bardia Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Part III: ungulate populations. Biol Conserv 18:5–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E (2003) The return of the unicorns: the natural history and conservation of the greater one-horned rhinoceros. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E, Price L (1991) Demography and habitat use by a greater one horned rhinoceros in Nepal. J Wildlife Manage 55:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinerstein E, Wemmer CM (1988) Fruits Rhinoceros eat: dispersal of Trewia nudiflora (Euphorbiaceae) in lowland Nepal. Ecology 69:1768–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DNPWC (2003) Royal Bardia National Park Management Plan 2001–2005. Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation, Babar Mahal, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG (1973) The relationship between sample similarity and ecological distances. Ecology 54:618–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayot M, Henry O, Dubost G, Sabatier D (2004) Comparative diets of two forest cervids of the genus Mazama in French Guiana. J Trop Ecol 20:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire JN (1996) Status of swamp deer (Cervus duvauceli) in Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Tiger Paper 24:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IJ, Illius AW (1988) Incisor arcade structure and diet selection in ruminants. Funct Ecol 2:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IJ, Illius AW (1989) Resource partitioning by ungulates in the Isle of Rhum. Oecologia 79:383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon IJ, Illius AW (1996) The nutritional ecology of African ruminants: a reinterpretation. J Anim Ecol 65:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne MO, Bell RNV (1968) Selection of vegetation components by grazing ungulates in the Serengeti National Park. Nature 220:390–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris RB, Miller DJ (1995) Overlap in summer habitats and diets of Tibetan Plateau ungulates. Mammalia 59:197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR, Stewart DRM (1972) Grazer or browser: a classification based on the stomach-structure and feeding habits of East African ruminants. Mammalia 36:226–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Holechek JL, Vavra M, Pieper RD (1982) Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review. J Range Manage 35:309–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ (1974) The social organization of antelopes in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ, Sinclair ARE (1979) Feeding strategy and the pattern of resource partitioning in ungulates. In: Sinclair ARE, Norton-Griffiths M (eds) Serengeti: dynamics of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 130–163

  • Jenkins KJ, Wright RG (1988) Resource partitioning and competition among cervids in Northern Rocky Mountains. J Appl Ecol 25:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jnawali SR (1995) Population ecology of greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) with particular emphasis on habitat preference, food ecology and ranging behavior of a reintroduced population in Royal Bardia National Park in lowland Nepal. PhD Thesis, Agricultural University of Norway

  • Jnawali SR, Wegge P (1993) Space and habitat use by a small re-introduced population of greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) in Royal Bardia National Park in Nepal—a preliminary report. In: Ryder AO (ed) Rhinoceros biology and conservation. Proceedings of an international conference. Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, CA, pp 208–217

  • Johnsingh AJT, Sankar K (1991) Food plants of chital, sambar and cattle on Mundanthurai plateau, South India. Mammalia 55:57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BK, Kern JW, Wisdom ML, Findholt SL, Kie JG (2000) Resource selection and spatial separation of mule deer and elk during spring. J Wildlife Manage 64:685–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones ME, Barmuta LA (1998) Diet overlap and relative abundance of sympatric dasyurid carnivores: a hypothesis of competition. J Anim Ecol 67:410–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurie WA (1978) The ecology and behavior of the greater one-horned rhinoceros. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge

  • Lehmkuhl JF (1989) The ecology of a south Asian tall grass community. PhD Thesis, University of Washington

  • Martin C (1982) Interspecific relationship between barasingha and axis deer in Kanha MP, India and relevance to management. In: Wemmer CW (ed) Biology and management of the Cervidae. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 299–306

  • McNaughton SJ (1976) Serengeti migratory wildebeest: facilitation of energy flow by grazing. Science 191:92–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1979) Grazing as an optimization process: grass–ungulate relationships in the Serengeti. Am Nat 113:691–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe SR (1994) The importance of aquatic vegetation for the management of the barashinga Cervus duvauceli in Nepal. Biol Conserv 70:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG, Illius AW (2000) Vegetation modification and resource competition in ungulates. Oikos 89:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A (2000) Diet overlap among ruminants in Fennoscandia. Oecologia 124:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odden M, Wegge P, Storaas T (2005) Hog deer (Axis porcinus) need threatened tallgrass floodplains: a study of habitat selection in lowland Nepal. Anim Conserv 8:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith RN (1988) Megaherbivores: the influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet NB, Watkinson AR, Bell DJ, Sharma UR (1997) The management of tall grasslands for the conservation of biodiversity and sustainable utilization. A scientific and management report prepared for Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, HMG, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet NB, Watkinson AR, Bell DJ, Kattel BJ (1999) Plant diversity in the threatened sub-tropical grasslands of Nepal. Biol Conserv 88:193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pokharel CP (1996) Food habit and habitat utilization of swamp deer (Cervus duvauceli) in the Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. MSc thesis, Tribhuvan University

  • Prins HHT, Olff H (1998) Species richness of African grazer assemblages: towards a functional explanation. In: Newbury DM, Prins HHT, Brown ND (eds) Dynamics of tropical communities. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 449–490

  • Putman RJ (1996) Competition and resource partitioning in temperate ungulate assemblies. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins CT (1983) Wildlife feeding and nutrition. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaaf CD (1978) Population size and structure and habitat relations of the Barasingha (Cervus D. duvauceli) in Sukla Phanta Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. PhD Thesis, Michigan State University

  • Schoener TJ (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seidensticker JC (1976) Ungulate populations in Chitwan Valley, Nepal. Biol Conserv 10:183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha R, Wegge P, Koirala RA (2005) Summer diets of wild and domestic ungulates in Nepal Himalaya. J Zool Lond 266:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DR, Malechek JC (1968) Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscopic technique. J Range Manage 21:264–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinheim G, Wegge P, Fjellstad JI, Jnawali SR, Weladji RB (2005) Dry season diets and habitat use of sympatric Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) and greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis) in Nepal. J Zool Lond 265:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Kie JG, Dick BL, Ben-David M (2003) Niche partitioning among mule deer, elk, and cattle: do stable isotopes reflect dietary niche? Ecoscience 10:297–302

    Google Scholar 

  • du Toit JT (2003) Large herbivores and savanna heterogeneity. In: du Toit JT, Rogers KH, Biggs HC (eds) The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 291–309

  • Vavra M, Holechek JL (1980) Factors influencing microhistological analyses of herbivore diets. J Wildlife Manage 33:371–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesey-Fitzgerald DF (1960) Grazing succession among East African game animals. J Mammal 41:161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voeten MM, Prins HHT (1999) Resource partitioning between sympatric wild and domestic herbivores in the Tarangire region of Tanzania. Oecologia 120:287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wangchuk TR (1999) Diet selection by Bhutan Takin Budorcas taxicolor whitei on summer range in Jigme Dorji National Park, Bhutan. MSc Thesis, Agricultural University of Norway

  • Westoby M, Rost GR, Weis JA (1976) Problems with estimating herbivore diets by microscopically identifying plant fragments from stomachs. J Mammal 57:167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White T (1978) The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecology. Oecologia 33:71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AC (2002) Elephants (Elephas maximus), their habitats in Rajaji-Corbett National Parks. PhD Thesis, Saurashtra University, India

  • Woolnough AP, du Toit JT (2001) Vertical zonation of browse quality in tree canopies exposed to size-structured guild of African browsing ungulates. Oecologia 129:585–590

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC, HMG/Nepal) for permission to carry out the study and the Royal Bardia National Park staff for assistance during fieldwork. Dr S.R. Jnawali, Director of the King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation’s (KMTNC) field station in Bardia, provided logistic support and technical advice for the microhistological analyses. The project was part of a long-term collaborative research programme between the DNPWC, KMTNC and the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, funded by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Wegge.

About this article

Cite this article

Wegge, P., Shrestha, A.K. & Moe, S.R. Dry season diets of sympatric ungulates in lowland Nepal: competition and facilitation in alluvial tall grasslands. Ecol Res 21, 698–706 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0177-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0177-7

Keywords

Navigation