Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of higher insect taxa as bioindicators for different logging-disturbance regimes in lowland tropical rain forest in Sabah, Malaysia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

One of the serious environmental problems since the 1980s has been the conflict between the high rate of deforestation and maintenance of healthy ecosystem services and biological values in tropical forests. There is an urgent demand for setting up an appropriate environmental assessment to keep healthy ecosystem functions and biodiversity along with sustainable forest use based on ecology. In this study, we tried to assess logging-disturbance effects on the abundances of several flying insect groups (higher-taxon approach) in lowland tropical rain forest (Deramakot Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia), while considering seasonal changes and vertical forest stratification. The season was the most important factor affecting the abundances of all the insect groups. Effects of logging disturbance were prominent in the understorey but obscure in the canopy. Changes in physical conditions caused by logging—possibly an increased evaporation due to solar radiation—may have decreased the abundance of desiccation-sensitive insects, especially in the understorey. There are also two probable reasons for the difference between events in the understorey and those in the canopy: (1) noise effects of various physical, environmental factors may have obscured insect responses to logging disturbance in the canopy; (2) higher spatio-temporal variation in quality and quantity of living food resources—such as leaves, flowers and fruits—provided in the canopy may have affected the abundance of their consumer insects independently of logging disturbance. Thus, this study suggests that the abundance of some insect groups at higher-taxon level, especially in the understorey, can be used as bioindicators for assessing effects of logging disturbance on the forest ecosystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Proceedings in second international symposium on information theory. Budapest, Hungary, pp 267–281

  • Aussenac G (2000) Interactions between forest stands and microclimate: ecophysiological aspects and consequences for silviculture. Ann For Sci 57:287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldi A (2003) Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera, Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves. Basic Appl Ecol 4:589–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS, Kress WJ, Nadkarni NM, Lele S (2004) Beyond paradise—meeting the challenges in tropical biology in the 21st century. Biotropica 36:437–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles IA, Rice RE, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB (1998) Logging and tropical forest conservation. Science 280:1899–1900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H, Byron Y (1990) Deforestation and timber extraction in Borneo and the Malay Peninsula—the Record since 1965. Glob Environ Change 1:42–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chey VK, Holloway JD, Speight MR (1997) Diversity of moths in forest plantations and natural forests in Sabah. Bull Entomol Res 87:371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chey VK (2002) Comparison of moth diversity between lightly and heavily logged sites in a tropical rain forest. Malay Nat J 56:23–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung AYC, Eggleton P, Speight MR, Hammond PM, Chey VK (2000) The diversity of beetle assemblages in different habitat types in Sabah, Malaysia. Bull Entomol Res 90:475–496

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol Monogr 53:209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Barone JA (1996) Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 27:305–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deans AM, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Bellocq MI (2005) Edge effects and the responses of aerial insect assemblages to structural-retention harvesting in Canadian boreal peatland forests. For Ecol Manage 204:249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department SF (1998) RIL operation guide book, Specifically For Tracked Skidder Use, Sandakan, Malaysia

  • Ekschmitt K, Stierhof T, Dauber J, Kreimes K, Wolters V (2003) On the quality of soil biodiversity indicators: abiotic and biotic parameters as predictors of soil faunal richness at different spatial scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eltz T, Bruhl CA, van der Kaars S, Linsenmair KE (2002) Determinants of stingless bee nest density in lowland dipterocarp forests of Sabah, Malaysia. Oecologia 131:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eltz T, Bruhl CA, Imiyabir Z, Linsenmair KE (2003) Nesting and nest trees of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) in lowland dipterocarp forests in Sabah, Malaysia, with implications for forest management. For Ecol Manag 172:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J (1999) Use of soil dwelling Diptera (Insecta, Diptera) as bioindicators: a review of ecological requirements and response to disturbance. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Hamer KC, Dawood MM, Tangah J, Chey VK (2003) Rainfall but not selective logging affect changes in abundance of tropical forest butterfly in Sabah, Borneo. J Trop Ecol 19:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental monitoring, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems. Environ Manag 35:649–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway JD, Kirkspriggs AH, Khen CV (1992) The response of some rain-forest insect groups to logging and conversion to plantation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 335:425–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato M, Inoue T, Hamid AA, Nagamitsu T, Merdek MB, Nona AR, Itino T, Yamane S, Yumoto T (1995) Seasonality and vertical structure of light-attracted insect communities in a Dipterocarp forest in Sarawak. Res Popul Ecol 37:59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith S Summerville LMR, Thomas OC (2004) Forest moth taxa as indicators of lepidopteran richness and habitat disturbance: a preliminary assessment. Biol Conserv 116:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleine M, Heuveldop J (1993) A management planning concept for sustained yield of tropical forests in Sabah, Malaysia. For Ecol Manag 61:277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF (1998) A crisis in the making: responses of Amazonian forests to land use and climate change. Trends Ecol Evol 13:411–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF (1999) Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biol Conserv 91:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R (1978) Forest microclimatology. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OT (2001) Effect of experimental selective logging on tropical butterflies. Conserv Biol 15:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R, Horn H (1969) Foliage profile by vertical measurements. Ecology 50:802–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcgeoch MA (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol Rev 73:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecol Appl 6:594–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjuni H (ed) (1990) ITTO guidelines for the sustainable management of natural tropical forests. Organisation ITT, ITTO, Kuala Lumpur

  • Parker GG (1995) Structure and microclimate of forest canopies. In: Lowman MDN (eds) Forest canopies. Academic, San Diego, pp 73–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GG, Harding DJ, Berger ML (2004) A portable LIDAR system for rapid determination of forest canopy structure. J Appl Ecol 41:755–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2004) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna Austria.)

  • Rosenberg DM, Danks HV, Lehmkuhl DM (1986) Importance of insects in environmental-impact assessment. Environ Manag 10:773–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samejima H, Marzuki M, Nagamitsu T, Nakasizuka T (2004) The effects of human disturbance on a stingless bee community in a tropical rainforest. Biol Conserv 120:577–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer M, Schauermann J (1990) The fauna of beech forests: comparison between mull and moder soil. Pedobiologia 34:299–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe S (2002) Between-forest variation in vertical stratification of drosophilid populations. Ecol Entomol 27:720–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda MJ (1977) Two new ‘retainer’ bait traps. Drosoph Inf Serv 52:180

    Google Scholar 

  • van Jaarsveld AS, Freitag S, Chown SL, Muller C, Koch S, Hull H, Bellamy C, Kruger M, Endrody-Younga S, Mansell MW, Scholtz CH (1998) Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies. Science 279:2106–2108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt W, Perner J, Davis AJ, Eggers T, Schumacher J, Bahrmann R, Fabian B, Heinrich W, Kohler G, Lichter D, Marstaller R, Sander FW (2003) Trophic levels are differentially sensitive to climate. Ecology 84:2444–2453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie DS, Sidle JG, Boundzanga GC (1992) Mechanized logging, market hunting, and a bank loan in Congo. Conserv Biol 6:570–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willott SJ (1999) The effects of selective logging on the distribution of moths in a Bornean rainforest. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 354:1783–1790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willott SJ, Lim DC, Compton SG, Sutton SL (2000) Effects of selective logging on the butterflies of a Bornean rainforest. Conserv Biol 14:1055–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H (1980) Seasonality of tropical insects.1. Leafhoppers (Homoptera) in Las-Cumbres, Panama. J Anim Ecol 49:277–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H (1988) Insect seasonality—why. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 19:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock BA, Watt AD, Leather SR (2003) Influence of management type on Diptera communities of coniferous plantations and deciduous woodlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study would not have been possible without kind support from a lot of people including K. Kitayama, T. Seino, S. Aiba, M. Takyu, H. Matsubayashi, S. Tanabe, and staff of Deramakot Forest Office, especially Peter Lagan, Azny Ahmad, Mike and Joel. Finally, K.A. must acknowledge the research partner, Erwin. This study was funded by the Project (P-2) of the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Kita 19 Nishi 8, Kitaku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0819, Japan

    Kosuke Akutsu & Masanori J. Toda

  2. Forestry Research Centre, P. O. Box 1407, Sandakan, Sabah, Malysia

    Chey Vun Khen

Authors
  1. Kosuke Akutsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chey Vun Khen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masanori J. Toda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kosuke Akutsu.

About this article

Cite this article

Akutsu, K., Khen, C.V. & Toda, M.J. Assessment of higher insect taxa as bioindicators for different logging-disturbance regimes in lowland tropical rain forest in Sabah, Malaysia. Ecol Res 22, 542–550 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0052-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0052-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation