Skip to main content
Log in

Edge Enhancement by Noise Suppression in HSI Color Model of UAV Video with Adaptive Thresholding

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 06 January 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

UAV video often suffers from noise, blurred edges, fewer details. Quality improvement is essential by noise suppression with an enhancement of edges. Edge detection algorithms for the correct classification of an object and identification have swiftly displayed a system toward processing moving images or whatsoever portion taken from UAVs or drones. To realize it in this paper, we propose a novel algorithm based on HSI transformed domain. Meanwhile, within the paper, we compile some significant analysis within the field of edge enhancement. Relying upon a laboratory evaluation regarding specific proposed techniques for noise suppression with detection of edges and its enhancement process on the UAV video dataset, we confirmed individual contributions, plus our methods’ achievement corresponded over the existent ones. Our proposed Edge Enhancement Algorithm with an HSI color model is the first with better results to the best of our research knowledge. The hybrid algorithm’s effectiveness in dealing with noise reduction working with different videos by finding the SSI, MSE, NRMSE, SNR, PSNR reference-based parameters, and with a reference-less based score, viz. BRISQUE. Our research typically provides a plan to assess the edge with image enhancement from the application’s perspective, encouraging the reformers’ awareness to be evaluated in a particular computer vision context. Results obtained the outcome of the experiment proving that assertion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

References

  1. Ilias, D., El Mezouar, M. C., Taleb, N., & Elbahri, M. (2017). An edge-based method for effective abandoned luggage detection in complex surveillance videos. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 158, 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennamoun, M. (1997). Edge detection: Problems and solutions. In: 1997 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. (Vol. 4, pp. 3164–3169). Computational cybernetics and simulation, IEEE.

  3. Gonzalez, R., & Faisal, Z. (2019). Digital Image Processing (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rao, B. T, Rao, K. V., Swathi, G. K., Shanthi, G. P., & Durga, J. S. (2009). A novel approach to image edge enhancement using smoothing filters. The Icfai University Journal of Computer Sciences, 3(2), 37–53.

  5. Srivastava, A., & Prakash, J. (2021). Future fanet with application and enabling techniques: Anatomization and sustainability issues. Computer Science Review, 39, 100359.

  6. Teng, S., Zhang, S., Huang, Q., & Sebe, N. (2020). Viewpoint and scale consistency reinforcement for uav vehicle re-identification. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1–17.

  7. Ibrahem, W. N. (2021). Drone flicker and noise. https://blog.neatvideo.com/post/drone-flicker-and-noise. Accessed 30 Mar 2021.

  8. Guttmann, M., Wolf, L., & Cohen-Or, D. (2011). Content aware video manipulation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 115(12), 1662–1678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao, J., Tian, H., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Lei, J. (2018). Blind video denoising via texture-aware noise estimation. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 169, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sendur, L., & Selesnick, I. W. (2002). Bivariate shrinkage functions for wavelet-based denoising exploiting interscale dependency. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 50(11), 2744–2756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mallat, S. (1999). A wavelet tour of signal processing. New York: Elsevier.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pizurica, A., Zlokolica, V., & Philips, W. (2004). Noise reduction in video sequences using wavelet-domain and temporal filtering. Wavelet Applications in Industrial Processing, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 5266, 48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kingsbury, N. (1999). Image processing with complex wavelets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 357(1760), 2543–2560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Payet, N., & Todorovic, S. (2013). Sledge: Sequential labeling of image edges for boundary detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 104(1), 15–37.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Brendel, W., & Todorovic, S. (2009). Video object segmentation by tracking regions. In: 2009 IEEE 12th international conference on computer vision (pp. 833–840). IEEE.

  16. Heric, D., & Zazula, D. (2007). Combined edge detection using wavelet transform and signal registration. Image and Vision Computing, 25(5), 652–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, S. M., & Brady, J. M. (1997). Susan-a new approach to low level image processing. International Journal of Computer Vision, 23(1), 45–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mikic, I., Krucinski, S., & Thomas, J. D. (1998). Segmentation and tracking in echocardiographic sequences: Active contours guided by optical flow estimates. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(2), 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O‘Callaghan, R. J., & Bull, D. R. (2004). Combined morphological-spectral unsupervised image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 14(1), 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meer, P., & Georgescu, B. (2001). Edge detection with embedded confidence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(12), 1351–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Canny, J. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence PAMI, 8(6), 679–698.

  22. Al-Amaren, A., Ahmad, M. O, & Swamy, M. (2021). A very fast edge map-based algorithm for accurate motion estimation. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 1–8.

  23. Hwang, W. (1992). Singularity detection and processing with wavelets. IEEE Transaction on Inform Theory, 38, 617–693.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Mallet, S., & Zhong, S. (1992). Characterization of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(7), 710–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Othman, Z., Haron, H., Kadir, M. R. A., & Rafiq, M. (2009). Comparison of canny and sobel edge detection in mri images. Computer Science, Biomechanics & Tissue Engineering Group, and Information System, 133–136.

  26. Sudarshan, M., Mohan, P. G., & Gangashetty, S. V. (2011). Optimized edge detection algorithm for face recognition. In Proceedings of the international conference on security and management (SAM) (p. 1). Citeseer.

  27. Dutta, S., & Chaudhuri, B. B. (2009). A color edge detection algorithm in rgb color space. In 2009 International conference on advances in recent technologies in communication and computing (pp. 337–340), IEEE.

  28. Anwar, S., & Rajamohan, G. (2020). Improved image enhancement algorithms based on the switching median filtering technique. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(12), 11103–11114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang, M. (2018). Edge enhancement and noise suppression for infrared image based on feature analysis. Infrared Physics and Technology, 91, 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Iqbal, M., Riaz, M. M., Ghafoor, A., & Ahmad, A. (2021). Illumination normalization of face images using layers extraction and histogram processing. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46(4), 3319–3328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tripathi, R. K., et al. (2020). Adaptive geometric filtering based on average brightness of the image and discrete cosine transform coefficient adjustment for gray and color image enhancement. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(3), 1655–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Burg, A. P., Keller, R., Wassner, J., Felber, N., & Fichtner, W. (2000) A 3D-DCT real-time video compression system for low complexity single-chip VLSI implementation. Proc. of the Mobile Multimedia Conference.

  33. Lee, M. C., Chan, R. K. W. & Adjeroh, D. A. (1997) Quantization of 3D-DCT coefficients and scan order for video compression. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 8(4), 405–422.

  34. Yan, F. & Chen, D.-F. (2013). Video reconstruction via online compressed sensing. Fifth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2013), 88780J. International Society for Optics and Photonics.

  35. Rong, W., Li, Z., Zhang, W. & Sun, L. (2014) An improved CANNY edge detection algorithm. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, 577–582.

  36. Mohan, S., & Ravishankar, M. (2012). Modified contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization based on local contrast enhancement for mammogram images. In International conference on advances in information technology and mobile communication (pp. 397–403). Springer.

  37. Dabov, K., Foi, A., Katkovnik, V., & Egiazarian, K. (2007). Image denoising by sparse 3-d transform-domain collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 16(8), 2080–2095.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2012). No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 21(12), 4695–4708.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Srivastava.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing conflicts of interest.

Code Availability

The code of the current study are not publicly available due to the ongoing research as a part of future work of this version but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: Four missing references were added: Burg, A. P., Keller, R., Wassner, J., Felber, N. & Fichtner, W. (2000) A 3D-DCT real-time video compression system for low complexity single-chip VLSI implementation. Proc. of the Mobile Multimedia Conference. Lee, M. C., Chan, R. K. W. & Adjeroh, D. A. (1997) Quantization of 3D-DCT coefficients and scan order for video compression. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 8(4), 405-422. Rong, W., Li, Z., Zhang, W. & Sun, L. (2014) An improved CANNY edge detection algorithm. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, 577-582. Yan, F. & Chen, D.-F. (2013) Video reconstruction via online compressed sensing. Fifth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP 2013), 88780J. International Society for Optics and Photonics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srivastava, A., Prakash, J. Edge Enhancement by Noise Suppression in HSI Color Model of UAV Video with Adaptive Thresholding. Wireless Pers Commun 124, 163–186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09334-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09334-x

Keywords

Navigation