Skip to main content
Log in

Smart Learning Environment for Enhancing Digital Literacy of Thai Youth: A Case Study of Ethnic Minority Group

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Digital literacy is needed for digital transformation. It is challenging to provide an appropriate digital literacy lesson for all people to satisfy their different goals. Therefore, the proper way of teaching and learning digital literacy requires personalized learning. Nowadays, the ethnic minority group can have equal access to a vast opportunity from the Internet through the smartphone. However, the Internet can also be harmful to them without proper protection. Therefore, it is necessary to promote digital literacy for them. This study proposes a smart learning environment for enhancing digital literacy of Thai youths from the ethnic minority group. The proposed smart environment modifies the objective distance, which is the distance between the satisfied and the current competency of each learner, for providing a personal learning path. There are 5 learning objects included. The experiment is conducted with 103 students who are the ethnic minority group in Chiang Rai province, Thailand. The comparison of post-test and pre-test reveals that the students can enhance their digital literacy after learning with the developed learning environment. Overall, the students agree on the provided personalized support. More specifically, they strongly agree that the provided content is suitable for their performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture and Society, 33(2), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eshet-Alkalai, Yoram. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meneses, J., & Mominó, J. M. (2010). Putting digital literacy in practice: How schools contribute to digital inclusion in the network society. The Information Society, 26(3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit—a European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2(2), 130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research libraries, 72(1), 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, M., Graf, S., & Yang, G. (2010). Adaptivity and personalization in mobile learning. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 8(2), 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Intayoad, W., Becker, T., & Temdee, P. (2017). Social context-aware recommendation for personalized online learning. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(1), 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2011). E-learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & Education, 56(3), 885–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Temdee, P. (2014). Ubiquitous learning environment: Smart learning platform with multi-agent architecture. Wireless Personal Communications, 76(3), 627–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Temdee, P., & Prasad, R. (2018). Context-aware communication and computing: Applications for smart environment. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaichumpa, S., & Temdee, P. (2018). Assessment of student competency for personalised online learning using objective distance. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 23(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Green, H., Facer, K., Rudd, T., Dillon, P., & Humphreys, P. (2005). Futurelab: Personalisation and Digital Technologies: Research report. hal-00190337.

  13. Nijhavan, H., & Brusilovsky, P. (2002). A framework for adaptive e-learning based on distributed re-usable learning activities. In E-learn: World conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 154–161). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  14. Kabassi, K., & Virvou, M. (2004). Personalised adult e-training on computer use based on multiple attribute decision making. Interacting with Computers, 16(1), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Simon, B., Miklós, Z., Nejdl, W., Sintek, M., & Salvachua, J. (2003, May). Smart space for learning: A mediation infrastructure for learning services. In Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on world wide web (pp. 20–24).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has the financial support by Thailand Research Fund and Mae Fah Luang University (Project ID: TRF-MFU01, Contract: 2/2559).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Punnarumol Temdee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Temdee, P. Smart Learning Environment for Enhancing Digital Literacy of Thai Youth: A Case Study of Ethnic Minority Group. Wireless Pers Commun 118, 1841–1852 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06637-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06637-y

Keywords

Navigation