Skip to main content
Log in

Joint Overlay-Underlay Optimal Power Allocation in Cognitive Radio

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper a novel cognitive radio system model is proposed in which secondary user transmitter (SU-Tx) operates under two modes underlay and overlay, based on the channel sensing information it receives. This is an effort to maximize transmission data rate based on the threshold which decides the mode of operation. In this paper, the resources are utilized efficiently by making them operate in both the modes. It provides the optimal power allocation to the CR user in a way that it should not provide interference to its neighbouring users, specifically the most prioritized primary/licensed users. The performance of each mode is analyzed with attainable ergodic and outage capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Federal Communications Commission. (2002). Spectrum policy task force. Rep. ET Docket no. 02-135.

  2. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 23(2), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akyildiz, G., Lee, W. Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006). Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 50, 2127–2159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma, J., Li, G. Y., & Juang, B. H. (2009). Signal processing in cognitive radio. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(5), 805–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Axell, E., Leus, G., Larsson, E. G., & Poor, H. V. (2012). Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio: State of the art and recent advances. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(3), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moessner, K., Harada, H., et al. (2011). Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio systems: Technical aspects and standardization activities of the IEEE P1900.6 working group. IEEE Wireless Communications, 18, 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yucek, T., & Arslan, H. (2009). A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 11(1), 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghasemi, A., & Sousa, E. S. (2008). Spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: Requirements, challenges and design trade-offs. IEEE Communications Magazine, 46(4), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghasemi, A., & Sousa, E. S. (2007). Fundamental limits of spectrum-sharing in fading environments. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(2), 649–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun, C., Alemseged, Y. D., & Tran, H. N. (2010). Transmit power control for cognitive radio over a Rayleigh fading channel. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(4), 1847–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bansal, G., Hossain, M. J., & Bhargava, V. K. (2011). Adaptive power loading for OFDM-based cognitive radio systems with statistical interference constraint. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(9), 2786–2791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bansal, G., Hossain, M. J., & Bhargava, V. K. (2008). Optimal and suboptimal power allocation schemes for OFDM-based cognitive radio systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(11), 4710–4718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stotas, S., & Nallanathan, A. (2011). Enhancing the capacity of spectrum sharing cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(8), 3768–3779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldsmith, A. (2005). Wireless communications. Stanford University, Cambridge University Press.

  15. Wang, Y., Ren, P., Gao, F., & Su, Z. (2014). A hybrid underlay/overlay transmission mode for cognitive radio networks with statistical quality-of-service provisioning. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 13(3), 1482–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Musavian, L., & Äıssa, S. (2007). Ergodic and outage capacities of spectrum-sharing systems in fading channels. In Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM. (pp. 3327–3331). IEEE.

  17. Musavian, L., & Lambotharan, S. (2011). Power allocation under service-outage constraints for spectrum-sharing cognitive radio networks. In First UK-India international workshop on cognitive wireless systems (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

  18. Palomar, D. P., & Chiang, M. (2006). A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(8), 1439–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Boyd, S., Xiao, L., & Mutapcic, A. (2003). Subgradient methods. Notes for EE392o, Stanford University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juhi Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, J., Karwal, V. & Dwivedi, V.K. Joint Overlay-Underlay Optimal Power Allocation in Cognitive Radio. Wireless Pers Commun 83, 2267–2278 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2516-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2516-x

Keywords

Navigation