Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

End-to-End Delay and Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Providing better communication and maximising the communication performance in a Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSN) is always challenging due to the volatile characteristics of the underwater environment. Radio signals cannot properly propagate underwater, so there is a need for acoustic technology that can support better data rates and reliable underwater wireless communications. Node mobility, 3-D spaces and horizontal communication links are some critical challenges to the researcher in designing new routing protocols for UWSNs. In this paper, we have proposed a novel routing protocol called Layer by layer Angle-Based Flooding (L2-ABF) to address the issues of continuous node movements, end-to-end delays and energy consumption. In L2-ABF, every node can calculate its flooding angle to forward data packets toward the sinks without using any explicit configuration or location information. The simulation results show that L2-ABF has some advantages over some existing flooding-based techniques and also can easily manage quick routing changes where node movements are frequent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wahid, A., Sungwon, L., & Dongkyun, K. (2011). An energy-efficient routing protocol for UWSNs using physical distance and residual energy. In OCEANS, 2011 IEEE—Spain

  2. Ayaz, M., et al. (2012). An efficient dynamic addressing based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 35(4), 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yan, H., Shi, Z.J., & Cui, J.-H. (2008). DBR: Depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th international IFIP-TC6 networking conference on AdHoc and sensor networks, wireless networks, next generation internet (pp. 72–86). Springer: Singapore.

  4. Basagni, S., et al. (2010). Optimizing network performance through packet fragmentation in multi-hop underwater communications. In OCEANS 2010 IEEE—Sydney.

  5. Xie, P., Cui, J.-H., & Lao, L. (2006). VBF: Vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks. In Networking 2006. Networking technologies, services, and protocols; performance of computer and communication networks; mobile and wireless communications systems (pp. 1216–1221). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

  6. Daeyoup, H., & Dongkyun, K. (2008). DFR: Directional flooding-based routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. In OCEANS 2008.

  7. Nicolaou, N., et al. (2007). Improving the robustness of location-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In OCEANS 2007—Europe.

  8. Ayaz, M., et al. (2011). A survey on routing techniques in underwater wireless sensor networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(6), 1908–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yunus, F., Ariffin, S.H.S., & Zahedi, Y. (2010). A survey of existing medium access control (mac) for underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN). In Fourth Asia international conference on mathematical/analytical modelling and computer simulation (AMS).

  10. Chirdchoo, N., Soh, S. W., & Chaing, K. C. (2009). Sector-based routing with destination location prediction for underwater mobile networks. In International conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops, 2009. WAINA’09.

  11. Ayaz, M., & Abdullah, A., (2009). Hop-by-hop dynamic addressing based (H2-DAB) routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on information and multimedia technology (pp. 436–441). IEEE Computer, Society.

  12. Partan, J., Kurose, J., Levine, B. N. (2006) A survey of practical issues in underwater networks, In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Underwater networks, ACM: Los Angeles, CA.

  13. Shang, G.-Y., Feng, Z.-P., & Lian, L. (2011). A low-cost testbed of underwater mobile sensing network. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 16(4), 502–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chitre, M., et al. (2008). Underwater acoustic communications and networking: Recent advances and future challenges. In OCEANS 2008.

  15. Jiang, Z. (2008). Underwater acoustic networks—issues and solutions. International Journal of Intelligent control and systems, 13, 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chun-Hao, Y., & Kuo-Feng, S. (2008). An energy-efficient routing protocol in underwater sensor networks. In 3rd international conference on sensing technology, 2008. ICST 2008.

  17. Glenn Elert, H. L. (2006). Depth of the Ocean. http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2006/HelenLi.shtml.

  18. Anupama, K. R., Sasidharan, A., & Vadlamani, S. (2008). A location-based clustering algorithm for data gathering in 3D underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In International symposium on telecommunications, 2008. IST 2008.

  19. Jornet, J. M., Stojanovic, M., & Zorzi, M. (2008) Focused beam routing protocol for underwater acoustic networks. In Proceedings of the third ACM international workshop on underwater networks. 2008 (p. 75–82). ACM: San Francisco, CA.

  20. Jornet, J. M. & Stojanovic, M. (2008). Distributed power control for underwater acoustic networks. In OCEANS.

  21. Chen, K., Zhou, Y., & He, J. (2009). A localization scheme for underwater wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 4.

  22. Caruso, A., et al. (2008). The meandering current mobility model and its impact on underwater mobile sensor networks. In The 27th conference on computer communications. INFOCOM 2008 IEEE 2008.

  23. Younis, O., & Fahmy, S. (2004). HEED: A hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(4), 366–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, Y., et al. (2012). A simple distributed networking protocol for underwater acoustic networks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(4), 3487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mahajan, A., & Walworth, M. (2001). 3D position sensing using the differences in the time-of-flights from a wave source to various receivers. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 17(1), 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ali, T. & Jung, L. T. (2012). Flooding control by using Angle Based Cone for UWSNs. In 2012 international symposium on telecommunication technologies (ISTT).

  27. Ethem, M. Sozer, M. S., & Proakis, J. G. (2000, Janaury). Underwater Acoustic Networks. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 25(1), 72–83.

Download references

Acknowledgments

we would like thanks Universti Teknologi PETRONAS for support to complete this research project and also would like to thanks Dr. Muhammad Ayaz Arshad for his technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, T., Jung, L.T. & Faye, I. End-to-End Delay and Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 79, 339–361 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1859-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1859-z

Keywords

Navigation